Literature DB >> 21655899

Hounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength: a tool for osteoporosis management.

Joseph J Schreiber1, Paul A Anderson, Humberto G Rosas, Avery L Buchholz, Anthony G Au.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measurements obtained from clinical computed tomography examinations may yield information leading to the diagnosis of decreased bone mineral density, without added expense to the patient. The purpose of the present study was to determine if Hounsfield units, a standardized computed tomography attenuation coefficient, correlate with bone mineral density and compressive strength.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients (including eighteen female and seven male patients with a mean age of 71.3 years) undergoing both lumbar spine dual x-ray absorptiometry scans and computed tomography imaging were evaluated to determine if Hounsfield units correlated with bone mineral density and T-scores. Normative data were generated from lumbar spine computed tomography examinations for eighty consecutive trauma patients and were stratified by age and sex. Separately, polyurethane foam blocks of varying densities were imaged with computed tomography and were subjected to mechanical testing to determine compressive strength. Compressive strength values and Hounsfield units were analyzed for correlation.
RESULTS: Significant correlations were found between Hounsfield units and bone mineral density, age, and T-scores and between Hounsfield units and compressive strength (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Hounsfield units obtained from clinical computed tomography scans that are made for other purposes correlate with dual x-ray absorptiometry scores as well as compressive strengths based on osseous models and potentially provide an alternative method for determining regional bone mineral density at no additional cost to the patient. The information could conceivably be applied toward fracture risk assessment, diagnosis of osteoporosis, and early initiation of needed treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21655899     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  131 in total

1.  Supination External Rotational Ankle Fracture Injury Pattern Correlation With Regional Bone Density.

Authors:  Stephen J Warner; Elizabeth B Gausden; Ashley E Levack; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 2.827

2.  L1 vertebral density on CT is too variable with different scanning protocols to be a useful screening tool for osteoporosis in everyday practice.

Authors:  Emma-Louise Gerety; Philip Wp Bearcroft
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Use of internal references for assessing CT density measurements of the pelvis as replacement for use of an external phantom.

Authors:  Martijn F Boomsma; Inge Slouwerhof; Jorn A van Dalen; Mireille A Edens; Dirk Mueller; Julien Milles; Mario Maas
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Bone marrow-derived cell mobilization by G-CSF to enhance osseointegration of bone substitute in high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  A Marmotti; F Castoldi; R Rossi; S Marenco; A Risso; M Ruella; A Tron; A Borrè; D Blonna; C Tarella
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Proximal tibial bone density is preserved after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bradley I Richmond; Simon V Hadlow; Tim G Lynskey; Cameron G Walker; Jacob T Munro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  [Hounsfield units as a measure of bone density-applications in spine surgery].

Authors:  Max J Scheyerer; Bernhard Ullrich; Georg Osterhoff; Ulrich A Spiegl; Klaus J Schnake
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Bone loss and hematological malignancies in adults: a pilot study.

Authors:  Rosa Ruchlemer; Michal Amit-Kohn; Ariella Tvito; Irena Sindelovsky; Ari Zimran; David Raveh-Brawer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Alleged predisposing dietary factors fail to increase the incidence of osteochondrosis-like lesions in growing pigs at 14 and 24 wk of age.

Authors:  Mariola Grez-Capdeville; Nicole Gross; Joni C Baker; Jennifer A Shutter; Amanda R Haas; Mark E Wilson; Thomas D Crenshaw
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Radiologic changes in the aging nasal cavity.

Authors:  Kimia G Ganjaei; Zachary M Soler; Elliott D Mappus; Mitchell L Worley; Nicholas R Rowan; Guilherme J M Garcia; Lois J Matthews; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert; Rodney J Schlosser
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.681

10.  Dynamic evolution of osseous structure in osteonecrosis of the femoral head and dynamic collapse risks: a preliminary CT image study.

Authors:  Zeqing Huang; Biao Tan; Hengli Ye; Fanyu Fu; Rongtian Wang; Weiheng Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.