Lauren K Truby1, Maryjane Farr2, Veli K Topkara3. 1. Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Due to the growing mismatch between donor supply and demand as well as unacceptably high transplant waitlist mortality, the heart organ allocation system was revised in October 2018. This review gives an overview of the changes in the new heart organ allocation system and its impact on heart transplant practice and outcomes in the United States. RECENT FINDINGS: The 2018 heart allocation system offers a 6-tiered policy and therefore prioritizes the sickest patients on the transplant waitlist. Patients supported with temporary mechanical circulatory support devices are prioritized as Status 1 or Status 2, resulting in increased utilization of this strategy. Patients supported with durable left ventricular assist devices have been prioritized as Status 3 or 4, which has resulted in decreased utilization of this strategy. Broader geographic sharing in the new heart allocation system has resulted in prolonged donor ischemic times. Overall, the new heart allocation system has resulted in significantly lower candidate waitlist mortality, shorter waitlist times, and higher incidence of transplantation. SUMMARY: The new United Network for Organ Sharing allocation policy confers significant advantages over the prior algorithm, allowing for decreased waitlist times and improved waitlist mortality without major impact on posttransplant survival.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Due to the growing mismatch between donor supply and demand as well as unacceptably high transplant waitlist mortality, the heart organ allocation system was revised in October 2018. This review gives an overview of the changes in the new heart organ allocation system and its impact on heart transplant practice and outcomes in the United States. RECENT FINDINGS: The 2018 heart allocation system offers a 6-tiered policy and therefore prioritizes the sickest patients on the transplant waitlist. Patients supported with temporary mechanical circulatory support devices are prioritized as Status 1 or Status 2, resulting in increased utilization of this strategy. Patients supported with durable left ventricular assist devices have been prioritized as Status 3 or 4, which has resulted in decreased utilization of this strategy. Broader geographic sharing in the new heart allocation system has resulted in prolonged donor ischemic times. Overall, the new heart allocation system has resulted in significantly lower candidate waitlist mortality, shorter waitlist times, and higher incidence of transplantation. SUMMARY: The new United Network for Organ Sharing allocation policy confers significant advantages over the prior algorithm, allowing for decreased waitlist times and improved waitlist mortality without major impact on posttransplant survival.
Authors: Lynne Warner Stevenson; Robert L Kormos; James B Young; James K Kirklin; Sharon A Hunt Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2016-04-16 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Rebecca Cogswell; Ranjit John; Jerry D Estep; Sue Duval; Ryan J Tedford; Francis D Pagani; Cindy M Martin; Mandeep R Mehra Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2019-11-20 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: D M Meyer; J G Rogers; L B Edwards; E R Callahan; S A Webber; M R Johnson; J D Vega; M J Zucker; J C Cleveland Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Javier Segovia; M Dolores G Cosío; Juan M Barceló; Manuel Gómez Bueno; Pablo García Pavía; Raúl Burgos; Santiago Serrano-Fiz; Carlos García-Montero; Evaristo Castedo; Juan Ugarte; Luis Alonso-Pulpón Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2011-04-05 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Oliver K Jawitz; Marat Fudim; Vignesh Raman; Benjamin S Bryner; Adam D DeVore; Robert J Mentz; Carmelo Milano; Chetan B Patel; Jacob N Schroder; Joseph G Rogers Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Thomas C Hanff; Michael O Harhay; Stephen E Kimmel; Maria Molina; Jeremy A Mazurek; Lee R Goldberg; Edo Y Birati Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Lauren V Huckaby; Laura M Seese; Michael A Mathier; Gavin W Hickey; Arman Kilic Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Fouad Chouairi; Clancy W Mullan; Sounok Sen; Makoto Mori; Michael Fuery; Robert W Elder; Joshua Lesse; Kelsey Norton; Katherine A Clark; P Elliott Miller; David Mulligan; Richard Formica; Joseph G Rogers; Daniel Jacoby; Christopher Maulion; Muhammad Anwer; Arnar Geirsson; Nihar R Desai; Tariq Ahmad Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 3.240