| Literature DB >> 34771108 |
Salwinder Singh Dhaliwal1, Vivek Sharma1, Arvind Kumar Shukla2, Vibha Verma1, Sanjib Kumar Behera2, Prabhjodh Singh Sandhu3, Kamaljit Kaur4, Ahmed Gaber5, Yusuf S Althobaiti6, Abdelhadi A Abdelhadi7, Akbar Hossain8.
Abstract
To achieve the nutritional target of human food, boron (B) has been described as an essential mineral in determining seed and theoretical oil yield of Sesamum indicum L. The research to increase its cultivation is garnering attention due to its high oil content, quality and its utilization for various purposes, which include human nutrition as well as its use in the food industry. For this, a two-year field experiment was performed at PAU, Punjab, India to determine the effect of different concentrations of foliar-applied B (20, 30 and 40 mg L-1) and different growth stages of crop, i.e., we measured the effects on agroeconomic indicators and certain quality parameters of sesame using different concentrations of B applied at the flowering and capsule formation stages as compared to using water spray and untreated plants. Water spray did not significantly affect the studied parameters. However, B application significantly increased the yield, uptake, antioxidant activity (AOA) and theoretical oil content (TOC) compared to those of untreated plants. The maximum increase in seed yield (26.75%), B seed and stover uptake (64.08% and 69.25%, respectively) as well as highest AOA (69.41%) and benefit to cost ratio (B:C ratio 2.63) was recorded when B was applied at 30 mg L-1 at the flowering and capsule formation stages. However, the maximum sesame yield and B uptake were recorded when B was applied at a rate of 30 mg L-1. A significant increase in TOC was also recorded with a B application rate of 30 mg L-1. For efficiency indices, the higher values of boron agronomic efficiency (BAE) and boron crop recovery efficiency (BCRE) were recorded when B was applied at 20 mg L-1 (5.25 and 30.56, respectively) and 30 mg L-1 (4.96 and 26.11, respectively) at the flowering and capsule formation stages. In conclusion, application of B @ 30 mg L-1 at the flowering and capsule formation stages seemed a viable technique to enhance yield, B uptake and economic returns of sesame.Entities:
Keywords: B uptake; acid value; agronomic efficiency indices; antioxidant activity; seed yield; sesame; theoretical oil content
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34771108 PMCID: PMC8587077 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26216699
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Basic physicochemical analysis of experimental soil before the start of the trial.
| Soil Properties | Values | Method |
|---|---|---|
| Soil texture | Sandy loam | [ |
| pH | 7.70 | |
| EC (dSm−1) | 0.35 | |
| Bulk density (g cm−3) | 1.42 | |
| Organic matter (%) | 0.83 | [ |
| Total N (%) | 0.39 | [ |
| Available P (kg ha−1) | 19.66 | [ |
| Available K (kg ha−1) | 128.85 | [ |
| DTPA-extractable Zn (mg kg−1) | 0.74 | [ |
| DTPA-extractable Fe (mg kg−1) | 20.7 | |
| DTPA-extractable Mn (mg kg−1) | 6.26 | |
| DTPA-extractable Cu (mg kg−1) | 0.56 | |
| Available B (mg kg−1) | 0.48 | [ |
Experimental treatment details (kharif season of 2019 and 2020).
| Treatments | Source | Boron Application Rate (mg L−1) | Crop Stages of B Application | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flowering Stage | Capsule Formation Stage | |||
| T1 | Control | - | − | |
| T2 | Water spray | - | + | − |
| T3 | Boron | 20 | + | − |
| T4 | Boron | 30 | + | − |
| T5 | Boron | 40 | + | − |
| T6 | Water spray | - | + | + |
| T7 | Boron | 20 | + | + |
| T8 | Boron | 30 | + | + |
| T9 | Boron | 40 | + | + |
Effect of level and stage of B application on B concentration of seed and stover of sesame.
| Treatments | Seed B Concentration (mg kg−1) | Stover B Concentration (mg kg−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean | 1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean | |
| T1 | 22.59 d ± 1.22 | 22.37 d ± 0.69 | 22.48 f | 31.17 d ± 1.69 | 30.64 d ± 0.94 | 30.90 e |
| T2 | 22.63 d ± 0.98 | 22.49 d ± 0.29 | 22.56 f | 31.23 d ± 1.35 | 30.80 d ± 0.40 | 31.02 e |
| T3 | 25.66 c ± 1.08 | 24.55 c ± 0.86 | 25.11 e | 35.41 c ± 1.48 | 33.64 c ± 1.18 | 34.52 d |
| T4 | 28.69 b ± 1.27 | 28.14 b ± 0.07 | 28.41 c | 39.59 b ± 1.75 | 38.55 b ± 0.10 | 39.07 b |
| T5 | 30.36 a ± 0.23 | 28.60 b ± 0.66 | 29.48 b | 41.90 a ± 0.32 | 39.17 b ± 0.91 | 40.54 b |
| T6 | 22.91 d ± 0.80 | 22.58 d ± 0.21 | 22.75 f | 31.61 d ± 1.11 | 30.93 d ± 0.29 | 31.27 e |
| T7 | 27.06 c ± 0.46 | 25.01 c ± 0.83 | 26.03 d | 37.34 c ± 0.64 | 34.26 c ± 1.13 | 35.80 c |
| T8 | 30.09 ab ± 0.01 | 28.13 b ± 0.27 | 29.11 bc | 41.52 ab ± 0.02 | 38.53 b ± 0.37 | 40.03 b |
| T9 | 31.36 a ± 0.66 | 30.64 a ± 0.29 | 31.00 a | 43.28 a ± 0.91 | 41.97 a ± 0.39 | 42.63 a |
| LSD ≤ 0.05 | 1.50 | 0.96 | 0.88 | 2.07 | 1.32 | 1.21 |
The values with the same superscript letter do not differ significantly at the 5% level when using Duncan’s multiple range test.
Level and stage of B application on seed and stover yield of sesame.
| Treatments | Seed Yield (kg ha−1) | Stover Yield (kg ha−1) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean | % Increase | 1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean | % Increase | |
| T1 | 548.1 b ± 42.7 | 566.3 b± 7.0 | 557.2 b | - | 3065.4 b ± 168.7 | 3506.8 c ± 260.1 | 3286.6 c | - |
| T2 | 587.6 b ± 2.0 | 579.2 b ± 15.2 | 583.4 b | 4.67 | 3083.2 b ± 180.1 | 3761.6 bc ± 246.1 | 3422.4 bc | 4.14 |
| T3 | 533.3 b ± 39.2 | 643.1 ab ± 25.5 | 588.2 b | 5.57 | 3238.7 b ± 204.5 | 3976.3 bc ± 238.1 | 3607.5 bc | 9.77 |
| T4 | 700.2 ab ± 25.1 | 658.8 a ± 24.6 | 679.5 a | 21.90 | 4065.9 ab ± 288.8 | 4775.5 a ± 289.5 | 4420.7 a | 34.51 |
| T5 | 612.4 b ± 13.69 | 611.6 ab ± 16.0 | 612.5 b | 9.87 | 3230.1 b ± 163.6 | 4013.7 b ± 201.5 | 3621.4 bc | 10.19 |
| T6 | 576.5 b ± 11.3 | 598.3 b ± 17.3 | 587.4 b | 5.39 | 3113.5 b ± 140.7 | 4007.9 b ± 214.0 | 3560.7 bc | 8.34 |
| T7 | 663.1 ab ± 13.0 | 661.7 a ± 35.6 | 662.4 a | 18.85 | 4068.8 ab ± 552.4 | 4756.2 a ± 169.9 | 4412.5 a | 34.27 |
| T8 | 755.7 a ± 207 | 656.5 a ± 10.7 | 706.6 a | 26.75 | 4375.6 a ± 103.3 | 4212.4 b ± 109.1 | 4293.5 ab | 30.65 |
| T9 | 556.2 b ± 60.6 | 588.4 b ± 50.9 | 572.3 b | 2.69 | 3552.3 b ± 105.8 | 4048.1 b ± 245.1 | 3800.2 b | 15.64 |
| LSD ≤ 0.05 | 133.4 | 51.2 | 80.1 | - | 737.5 | 452.4 | 501.3 | - |
The treatments detailed are in Table 2. Values with the same superscript letter do not differ significantly at the 5% level using Duncan’s multiple range test.
Level and stage of B application on B uptake by seed and stover of sesame.
| Treatments | Seed B Uptake (g ha−1) | Stover B Uptake (g ha−1) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean | % Increase | 1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean | % Increase | |
| T1 | 123.67 c ± 11.47 | 126.67 c ± 2.94 | 125.18 c | - | 955.29 c ± 73.89 | 1074.26 d ± 66.32 | 1015.36 d | - |
| T2 | 132.85 c ± 5.38 | 130.12 c ± 1.95 | 131.49 c | 5.04 | 963.04 c ± 78.76 | 1158.65 d ± 61.64 | 1061.57 cd | 4.55 |
| T3 | 136.84 c ± 12.28 | 157.89 b ± 4.21 | 147.67 c | 17.97 | 1146.33 bc ± 109.78 | 1337.52 c ± 52.98 | 1245.19 c | 22.64 |
| T4 | 200.91 ab ± 7.61 | 185.09 a ± 6.67 | 192.94 ab | 54.13 | 1609.32 ab ± 118.80 | 1840.72 a ±116.11 | 1726.85 a | 70.07 |
| T5 | 185.94 b ± 11.58 | 174.63 a ± 8.57 | 180.28 b | 44.02 | 1353.40 b ± 76.39 | 1571.92 b ± 46.94 | 1468.01 b | 44.58 |
| T6 | 131.92 c ± 7.76 | 135.04 c ± 4.78 | 133.50 c | 6.65 | 984.23 c ± 42.66 | 1239.58 c ± 58.18 | 1113.43 cd | 9.66 |
| T7 | 179.40 b ± 17.75 | 165.29 b ± 14.31 | 172.33 b | 37.67 | 1518.98 ab ± 101.89 | 1629.09 b ± 6.30 | 1579.35 ab | 55.55 |
| T8 | 227.15 a ± 21.14 | 184.62 a ± 3.95 | 205.40 a | 64.08 | 1816.22 a ± 68.46 | 1623.10 b ± 143.79 | 1718.45 a | 69.25 |
| T9 | 174.22 bc ± 18.33 | 180.17 ab ± 17.42 | 177.25 b | 41.60 | 1537.11 ab ± 72.27 | 1699.15 b ± 113.55 | 1619.75 ab | 59.52 |
| LSD ≤ 0.05 | 39.54 | 16.25 | 23.75 | 301.25 | 146.74 | 199.10 | ||
The treatments detailed are in Table 2. The values with the same superscript letter do not differ significantly at the 5% level when using Duncan’s multiple range test.
Level and stage of B application on AOA, TOC and acid value in sesame grain.
| Treatments | AOA (%) * | TOC (%) ** | Acid Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 65.21 c ± 0.27 | 34.20 d ± 1.06 | 0.87 ± 0.06 |
| T2 | 65.59 c ± 0.32 | 34.72 d ± 0.71 | 0.87 ± 0.06 |
| T3 | 68.25 b ± 0.87 | 37.35 c ± 0.98 | 0.86 ± 0.05 |
| T4 | 68.45 b ± 0.69 | 42.15 b ± 0.18 | 0.88 ± 0.04 |
| T5 | 68.40 b ± 0.24 | 45.98 a ± 0.92 | 0.88 ± 0.03 |
| T6 | 65.63 c ± 0.20 | 34.83 d ± 0.67 | 0.89 ± 0.05 |
| T7 | 68.65 ab ± 0.74 | 39.57 c ± 3.77 | 0.90 ± 0.02 |
| T8 | 69.41 a ± 0.42 | 44.35 ab ± 0.77 | 0.89 ± 0.01 |
| T9 | 68.89 ab ± 0.36 | 45.92 a ± 0.38 | 0.89 ± 0.01 |
| LSD ≤ 0.05 | 0.87 | 2.38 | NS |
* AOA, antioxidant activities; ** TOC, total oil content. The values with the same superscript letter do not differ significantly at the 5% level when using Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 1Level and stage of B application on B use efficiency indices of sesame. Experimental treatment details (in the kharif seasons of 2019 and 2020) is available in Table 2. BAE and BCRE indicate boron agronomic efficiency and boron crop recovery efficiency.
Figure 2Economic analysis of sesame cultivation affected by different Zn treatments. Experimental treatment details (in the kharif season of 2019 and 2020) is available in Table 2.