| Literature DB >> 34771014 |
Mohammed Nadeem Bijle1, Mallikarjuna Rao Pichika2, Kit-Kay Mak2, Abhishek Parolia3, Muneer Gohar Babar4, Cynthia Yiu1, Umer Daood3.
Abstract
This study's objective was to examine L-arginine (L-arg) supplementation's effect on mono-species biofilm (Streptococcus mutans/Streptococcus sanguinis) growth and underlying enamel substrates. The experimental groups were 1%, 2%, and 4% arg, and 0.9% NaCl was used as the vehicle control. Sterilised enamel blocks were subjected to 7-day treatment with test solutions and S. mutans/S. sanguinis inoculum in BHI. Post-treatment, the treated biofilms stained for live/dead bacterial cells were analysed using confocal microscopy. The enamel specimens were analysed using X-ray diffraction crystallography (XRD), Raman spectroscopy (RS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The molecular interactions between arg and MMP-2/MMP-9 were determined by computational molecular docking and MMP assays. With increasing arg concentrations, bacterial survival significantly decreased (p < 0.05). The XRD peak intensity with 1%/2% arg was significantly higher than with 4% arg and the control (p < 0.05). The bands associated with the mineral phase by RS were significantly accentuated in the 1%/2% arg specimens compared to in other groups (p < 0.05). The TEM analysis revealed that 4% arg exhibited an ill-defined shape of enamel crystals. Docking of arg molecules to MMPs appears feasible, with arg inhibiting MMP-2/MMP-9 (p < 0.05). L-arginine supplementation has an antimicrobial effect on mono-species biofilm. L-arginine treatment at lower (1%/2%) concentrations exhibits enamel hydroxyapatite stability, while the molecule has the potential to inhibit MMP-2/MMP-9.Entities:
Keywords: Raman spectroscopy; arginine; biofilm; crystals; matrix metalloproteinase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34771014 PMCID: PMC8586951 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26216605
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Bacterial live/dead proportions in mono-species biofilms treated for 7-days.
| Groups | Live (%)–Mean (SD) | Dead (%)–Mean (SD) | Calculation of Percent Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Control | 97.1 (10.1) a | 2.9 (0.7) 1 | 0 |
| 1% arg | 34.4 (8.1) b | 65.6 (5.4) 2 | 0 |
| 2% arg | 10.8 (12.4) c | 89.2 (6.9) 3 | 1 |
| 4% arg | 5.9 (7.7) c | 94.1 (8.7) 3 | −1 |
|
| |||
| Control | 93.7 (9.1) A | 6.3 (1.4) α | 0 |
| 1% arg | 40.9 (7.9) B | 59.1 (11.1) β | 0 |
| 2% arg | 21.8 (5.5) C | 78.2 (6.1) γ | 0 |
| 4% arg | 14.3 (4.5) C | 85.7 (9.9) γ | 1 |
| Different superscript lowercase (a, b, c)/uppercase (A, B, C) English letters, numbers (1, 2, 3), and Greek letters (α, β, γ) represent significant differences between different treatment groups. | Mean 0.83 | ||
Figure 1Representative CLSM images of (A) S. mutans and (B) S. sanguinis grown on enamel discs for 7-days with 0.9% NaCl treatment. (C) 1% arg-treated enamel specimens with S. mutans. (D) 2% arg-treated enamel specimens with S. mutans. (E) 1% arg-treated specimens with S. sanguinis; and (F) 2% arg-treated specimens with S. sanguinis. (G) 4% arg-treated S. mutans; and (H) S. sanguinis specimens.
Figure 2(A) XRD patterns of the tested experimental groups. (B) Representative Raman spectra recorded in the region of different experimental specimens of the hydroxyapatite band at 960 cm−1. Representative TEM images of (C) control specimen; (D) 1% arg-treated specimen; and (E) 2% arg-treated specimen. (F) High-magnification TEM image taken from the more electron-dense regions of the 4% arg-treated specimens. The dark spots are artefacts.
Enamel Raman phosphate peaks and XRD analysis for crystallite size (in nm) with mono-species biofilms treated for 7 days.
| Groups | Raman Phosphate Peaks | Crystallite Size (nm) |
|---|---|---|
|
| XRD Analysis | |
| Control | 958 cm−1 | 24.31 |
| 1% arg | 960 cm−1 | 22.3 |
| 2% arg | 960 cm−1 | 21.7 |
| 4% arg | 964 cm−1 | 23.9 |
|
| ||
| Control | 956 cm−1 | |
| 1% arg | 960 cm−1 | |
| 2% arg | 960 cm−1 | |
| 4% arg | 963 cm−1 | |
Figure 3Binding of L-arg on the active site of MMPs protein as assessed by molecular docking. (A) Arginine–3AYU–SP docking-2D interaction diagram. The 2D surface view of docking of arg (blue) in the (B) catalytic cavity of MMP-9; it interacts with Zn as arg 149, forming hydrogen bonds extending in the S1′ pocket. (C) The docking of arginine in the MMP-2 protein shown in 3D form with the secondary structure of protein visible. (D) The surface view of docking of arg in the catalytic cavity of MMP-2 and the interaction of arg.
Detailed observations of docking poses of arg and its interactions with key residues of binding site in all the three docking protocols (SP, XP and Induced-Fit) with MMP-2 and MMP-9 and IFD docking scores.
| Interactions | Residues |
|---|---|
| Arginine–3AYU–SP Docking (MMP2) | |
| H-bond | Ala 83, Ala139 |
| Hydrophobic | Leu81, Leu82, Ala83, Leu116, Val117, Leu137, Ala139, PRO140, ILE141, TYR142 |
| Metallic | Zn415 |
| Salt bridge | Zn415 |
| Arginine–3AYU–XP Docking (MMP2) | |
| H-bond | Ala139, PRO140 |
| Hydrophobic | Leu82, Leu116, Val117, Leu137, Ala139, PRO140, ILE141, TYR142 |
| Metallic | Zn415 |
| Salt bridge | Zn415 |
| Arginine–4WZV–SP Docking (MMP9) | |
| H-bond | Ala189, Pro246 |
| Hydrophobic | Leu187, Leu188, Ala189, VAl223, Pro246, Met247 |
| Metallic | Zn302, Glu227 |
| Salt bridge | Zn302 |
Figure 4MMP assay to determine the interactions of arg with (A) MMP-2; and (B) MMP-9. The lowercase (a–c) and uppercase (A–C) letters identify significant differences between the experimental groups, immediately after the treatment and after 5 days, respectively.
Figure 5Experimental study design.