| Literature DB >> 34770914 |
Guichon Huang1, Weiwen Lin1, Hanpeng Li1, Qian Tang1, Zhiyu Hu1, Huiying Huang1, Xianming Deng1,2, Qingyan Xu1,2.
Abstract
Eight new cytochalasins 1-8 and ten known analogs 9-18 were isolated from the endophytic fungus Phomopsis sp. xz-18. The planar structures of the cytochalasins were determined by HR-ESI-MS and NMR analysis. Compounds 1, 2, 9 and 10 were 5/6/6/7/5-fused pentacyclic cytochalasins; compounds 3 and 4 had conjugated diene structures in the macrocycle; and compound 6 had a β,γ-unsaturated ketone. The absolute configuration of 6 was confirmed for the first time by the octant rule. The acid-free purification process proved that the pentacyclic system was a natural biosynthetic product and not an acid-mediated intramolecular cyclized artifact. The new compounds did not exhibit activities against human cancer cell lines in cytotoxicity bioassays or antipathogenic fungal activity, but compounds 1, 3 and 4 showed moderate antibacterial activity in disk diffusion assays.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial activity; cytochalasins; octant rule; pentacyclic system
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34770914 PMCID: PMC8587572 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26216505
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structures of new compounds 1–8.
NMR spectroscopic data (600 MHz, CDCl3) for phomopchalasin C1 (1) and phomopchalasin C2 (2).
| Position | Phomopchalasin C1 (1) | Phomopchalasin C2 (2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δC, Type | δH ( | HMBC (H→C) | δC, Type | δH ( | |
| 1 | 176.0, C | 176.5, C | |||
| 2 | 5.70, s | 4, 9 | 6.12, s | ||
| 3 | 58.5, CH | 3.46, dd (6.7, 7.7) | 1, 4, 7 | 59.3, CH | 3.44, dd (6.5,7.3) |
| 4 | 49.1, CH | 3.03, s | 1, 5, 9, 10 | 48.7, CH | 3.09, s |
| 5 | 126.9, C | 126.8, C | |||
| 6 | 135.0, C | 134.4, C | |||
| 7 | 77.2, CH | 4.07, d (10.7) | 76.3, CH | 3.96, dd (1.1,11.0) | |
| 8 | 47.1, CH | 2.03, m | 45.5, CH | 2.17, dd (9.8,14.4) | |
| 9 | 47.3, C | 47.6, C | |||
| 10 | 45.4, CH2 | 2.81, dd (8.1, 13.3) | 3, 2′ | 45.4, CH2 | 2.81, dd (7.7, 13.3) |
| 2.92, dd (6.1, 13.3) | 1′ | 2.88, dd (6.5, 13.3) | |||
| 11 | 16.9, CH3 | 1.50, s | 4, 5, 6 | 16.9, CH3 | 1.44, s |
| 12 | 13.5, CH3 | 1.78, s | 5, 6, 7 | 13.5, CH3 | 1.75, s |
| 13 | 45.3, CH | 2.14, t (9.7) | 42.9, CH | 2.01, m | |
| 14 | 87.9, CH | 3.66, ddd (2.9, 9.2, 12.0) | 89.3, CH | 3.63, ddd (3.3, 9.6, 11.8) | |
| 15 | 40.4, CH2 | 1.46, d (11.6) | 39.1, CH2 | 1.28, dd (3.0, 11.4) | |
| 2.01, m | 1.87, d (11.5) | ||||
| 16 | 30.5, CH | 2.15, dd (7.1, 9.7) | 29.5, CH | 2.07, m | |
| 17 | 133.7, CH | 5.29, s | 135.1, CH | 5.30, d (1.8) | |
| 18 | 137.5, C | 138.4, C | |||
| 19 | 34.6, CH | 2.32, dd (3.3, 11.7) | 40.8, CH | 2.30, t (10.8) | |
| 20 | 34.4, CH2 | 2.07, dt (3.3, 13.7) | 13 | 71.8, CH | 4.57, dd (3.2,10.2) |
| 2.38, td (2.3, 13.5) | |||||
| 21 | 70.3, CH | 3.96, d (2.7) | 73.8, CH | 3.81, d (3.3) | |
| 22 | 24.6, CH3 | 1.14, d (7.1) | 15, 16, 17 | 23.9, CH3 | 1.09, d (7.1) |
| 23 | 23.8, CH3 | 1.77, s | 17, 18, 19 | 22.8, CH3 | 2.00, s |
| 1′ | 137.0, C | 137.0, C | |||
| 2′, 6′ | 129.4, CH | 7.21, d (7.0) | 10, 3′, 4′ | 129.4, CH | 7.22, d (7.1) |
| 3′, 5′ | 128.8, CH | 7.36, t (7.2) | 1′ | 128.8, CH | 7.34, t (7.5) |
| 4′ | 127.1, CH | 7.29, d (7.2) | 127.1, CH | 7.28, t (7.5) | |
| OH (20) | 3.35, s | ||||
| OH (21) | 1.64, brs | 2.58, s | |||
Figure 22D correlations for compound 1.
Figure 3Structures of compounds 9–18.
Figure 4CD spectrum (a) and backfourregion of octant rule (b) for compound 6.
Figure 5HPLC-DAD (210 nm) chromatograms. (1) Phomopchalasin C1 (1), (2) phomopchalasin C2 (2), (3) phomopchalasin C3 (3), (4) cytochalasin J3 (9), (5) the fraction of MeOH/H2O (80/20, v/v) eluted from the crude extract.
Antimicrobial activities of compound 1, 3, and 4.
| Inhibition Zone Diameter (mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound |
|
|
|
|
|
| / | / | / | 8 |
|
| / | 9 | 10 | / |
|
| 7 | 8 | / | / |
| Gentamicin | 16 | 16 | / | / |
| Amphotericin B | / | / | 15 | 15 |
Note: ‘/’ stands for inactive.
Scheme 1Proposed biogenesis of 1–5 and 8 from 14.