| Literature DB >> 34769003 |
Pia Michler1, Anne Schedel1, Martha Witschas1, Ulrike Anne Friedrich1, Rabea Wagener2, Juha Mehtonen3, Triantafyllia Brozou2, Maria Menzel1, Carolin Walter4, Dalileh Nabi5, Glen Pearce6, Miriam Erlacher7,8,9, Gudrun Göhring10, Martin Dugas11, Merja Heinäniemi3, Arndt Borkhardt2, Friedrich Stölzel12, Julia Hauer1,13, Franziska Auer13.
Abstract
While the shelterin complex guards and coordinates the mechanism of telomere regulation, deregulation of this process is tightly linked to malignant transformation and cancer. Here, we present the novel finding of a germline stop-gain variant (p.Q199*) in the shelterin complex gene POT1, which was identified in a child with acute myeloid leukemia. We show that the cells overexpressing the mutated POT1 display increased DNA damage and chromosomal instabilities compared to the wildtype counterpart. Protein and mRNA expression analyses in the primary patient cells further confirm that, physiologically, the variant leads to a nonfunctional POT1 allele in the patient. Subsequent telomere length measurements in the primary cells carrying heterozygous POT1 p.Q199* as well as POT1 knockdown AML cells revealed telomeric elongation as the main functional effect. These results show a connection between POT1 p.Q199* and telomeric dysregulation and highlight POT1 germline deficiency as a predisposition to myeloid malignancies in childhood.Entities:
Keywords: POT1; acute myeloid leukemia; germline cancer predisposition; pediatric; shelterin complex; trio sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34769003 PMCID: PMC8583981 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222111572
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1(A) Schematic drawing of the shelterin complex. POT1 (orange) is associated with the core complex via TPP1. (B) Two pediatric patient cohorts (TRIO-D, n = 158; TRIO-DD, n = 111) were analysed for germline variants within the shelterin complex genes. Only protein-altering variants with a MAF < 0.2% (healthy population) were included. (C) Tumor entities of the patients harboring the shelterin complex variants identified in (B). (D) Distribution of the protein-altering variants from (B) among the patients. (E) Family pedigree of the patient carrying the heterozygous germline POT1 variant p.Q199*. The index patient is marked with an arrow. Variant carrier is marked with “+”. Half-siblings were not included.
Figure 2(A) Top: POT1 protein structure displaying the interaction domains with single-stranded DNA (1–299) and TPP1 (320–634). Lollipops below depict the positions of variants found in adult AML with predicted loss-of-function variants being displayed in light-grey (adapted from Lim et al., 2021). The variant p.Q199* lies within the interaction domain with single-stranded DNA. Bottom: distribution of the adjusted variant frequencies (AF (%)) along POT1 based on germline variants in the gnomAD noncancer database with the respective constraint metrics (based on Ensembl canonical transcript ENST00000357628.3). (B) QRT-PCR analyses of the primary fibroblast samples carrying heterozygous POT1 p.Q199* compared to the POT1 WT fibroblasts from an unrelated child. TaqMan probe binds to POT1 exon 6–7 on chromosome 7. The assays were performed as three independent experiments, each with three technical replicates. (C) QRT-PCR analysis of PBMCs of the boy harboring heterozygous POT1 p.Q199* compared to his father (carrying WT POT1). The assays were performed as two independent experiments, each with three technical replicates. (D) Representative Western blot and quantitative POT1 protein level analysis of the patient’s fibroblasts harboring POT1 p.Q199* compared to a control fibroblast sample (WT POT1). Three independent Western blots from each genotype were performed. The data represent the means ± SEM. The two-tailed Student’s unpaired t-test was performed for the statistical analysis. ** = p ≤ 0.01, **** = p ≤ 0.0001.
Figure 3(A) Left: Quantification of the yH2AX foci per cell in the HEK293T POT1 WT and POT1 p.Q199* cells. Right: Representative images of the yH2AX (green) and 53BP1 (red) foci. DAPI (blue) was used for DNA labeling. Scale bar: 10 µm. (B) Left: quantification of yH2AX foci per cell in HEK293T POT1 WT and POT1 p.Q199* cells. The cells were exposed to 3 Gy ionising radiation. Right: Representative images analogous to (A). (C) Immunostaining analogous to (A) in the primary fibroblasts of the patient. (D) Immunostaining analogous to (A) in the primary fibroblasts of the patient with the cells exposed to 6 Gy ionising radiation. The experiments were performed as three biological replicates. The values are expressed in boxplots with whiskers from percentile 5–95. For the statistical analysis, two-tailed Student’s unpaired t-test was performed. ns = p > 0.05, **** = p ≤ 0.0001. ctr = control.
Figure 4(A) Relative telomere length (rTL) analysis by qRT-PCR (comparative ΔΔCt method) with DNA isolated from fibroblast samples (the cells were grown for 12–14 passages or 20 passages). Three biological replicates, each with three technical replicates, were performed. The values are expressed as the means ± SEM. (B) Left: Telomere fluorescence in situ hybridisation analysis on metaphase chromosomes of the stably transfected WT and p.Q199* POT1 HEK293T cells. Chromosomal aberrations are categorised in telomere fusion, fragility and loss. Right: Representative images of metaphase chromosomes. Red fluorescence shows telomere signals, and chromosomal DNA was stained with DAPI (blue). White arrows mark the respective chromosomal aberration. Scale bar: 10 µm. ns = p > 0.05, * p = ≤ 0.05, *** = p ≤ 0.001, **** = p ≤ 0.0001.
Figure 5(A) Principal component analyses of the single-cell RNA sequencing data displaying POT1 expression within the healthy human bone marrow. CLP: common lymphoid progenitor, DC: dendritic cell, HSC: hematopoietic stem cell, HSPC: hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell, NK: natural killer cell. (B) QRT-PCR analysis confirming downregulation of POT1 in the HL-60 cells carrying shRNA 1 and 2 compared to the nontargeting shRNA control. (C) Relative telomere length (rTL) analysis by qRT-PCR (comparative ΔΔCt method) with DNA isolated from the HL-60 samples; shRNA 2 showed significant telomere elongation compared to the nontargeting shRNA control (ctr). ns = p > 0.05, *** = p ≤ 0.001.