| Literature DB >> 34768283 |
Carmelo Gurnari1,2, Simona Pagliuca1, Yihong Guan1, Vera Adema3, Courtney E Hershberger4, Ying Ni4, Hassan Awada1, Sunisa Kongkiatkamon1, Misam Zawit1, Diego F Coutinho5, Ilana R Zalcberg5, Jae-Sook Ahn6, Hyeoung-Joon Kim6, Dennis Dong Hwan Kim7, Mark D Minden7, Joop H Jansen8, Manja Meggendorfer9, Claudia Haferlach9, Babal K Jha1, Torsten Haferlach9, Jaroslaw P Maciejewski1, Valeria Visconte1.
Abstract
Decrease in DNA dioxygenase activity generated by TET2 gene family is crucial in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The general downregulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) argues for a role of DNA demethylation in MDS beyond TET2 mutations, which albeit frequent, do not convey any prognostic significance. We investigated TETs expression to identify factors which can modulate the impact of mutations and thus 5-hmC levels on clinical phenotypes and prognosis of MDS patients. DNA/RNA-sequencing and 5-hmC data were collected from 1665 patients with MDS and 91 controls. Irrespective of mutations, a significant fraction of MDS patients exhibited lower TET2 expression, whereas 5-hmC levels were not uniformly decreased. In searching for factors explaining compensatory mechanisms, we discovered that TET3 was upregulated in MDS and inversely correlated with TET2 expression in wild-type cases. Although TET2 was reduced across all age groups, TET3 levels were increased in a likely feedback mechanism induced by TET2 dysfunction. This inverse relationship of TET2 and TET3 expression also corresponded to the expression of L-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase, involved in agonist/antagonist substrate metabolism. Importantly, elevated TET3 levels influenced the clinical phenotype of TET2 deficiency whereby the lack of compensation by TET3 (low TET3 expression) was associated with poor outcomes of TET2 mutant carriers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34768283 PMCID: PMC8753204 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005418
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood Adv ISSN: 2473-9529
Figure 1.TET-family of gene dysfunction in myelodysplastic syndromes. (A) Bar plot showing 5-hmC levels (percent of 5-hmc/5-mC) in our internal cohort of patients (n = 81). Levels of statistical significance were assessed by Mann-Whitney U test. *P < .05, ***P < .0001. Pink quadrant indicates median level of expression in the WT cohort. On the right, pie charts representing percentage of patients with TET2 dysfunction (72%) and, among those, cases with TET2 mutations (60%). (B) Scatter plots of TET2 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels (log2_CPM). Left panel shows fractionated CD34+ cells of HC and MDS obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (accession number GSE63569) (P = .07). Middle panel shows a population of healthy controls (HC, n = 64) and our entire study cohort (MDS/MPN, n = 780). Right panel shows a breakdown of our study cohort (pure deletion4q24 = 13, TET2 mutant [MT] = 203, TET2, WT = 535, IDH MT = 29). Levels of statistical significance were assessed by Mann-Whitney U test. *P < .05, ***P < .0001. Pink quadrant indicates 25% lower percentile level of expression in the HC cohort. (C) Pie charts showing the percentages of patients in our cohort defined as low expressors and the breakdown of causes leading to TET2 dysfunction. (D) Scatter plot showing TET3 mRNA expression levels (log2_CPM) in a cohort of healthy controls (HC, n = 64), all cohort (MDS/MPN, n = 780), and TET2 WT (n = 577). Levels of statistical significance were assessed by Mann-Whitney U test. *P < .05, ***P < .0001. (E) TET3 vs TET2 mRNA expression (log2_CPM) in TET2 WT (n = 577). (F) Linear regression analyses of TET2 and TET3 mRNA expression (log2_CPM) vs TET2 variant allele frequency (n = 203). Variant allele frequency was expressed as percentage.
Figure 2.Compensatory mechanism by TET3 expression and correlation with clinical phenotypes. (A) Bar graphs representing TET2 and TET3 expression (log2_CPM) in TET2 WT (n = 577) MDS patients vs healthy controls (HC, n = 64), ***P < .0001. (B) Schematic representation of the role of L-2-hydroxyglutarate (L2HG) and L2HG dehydrogenase (L2HGDH) in cellular TETs function and global methylation status. (C) L2HGDH mRNA expression levels (log2_CPM) in HC (n = 64), TET2 MT (n = 203), IDH MT (n = 35), and TET2 (n = 577). (D-E) TET2 and TET3 vs L2HGDH mRNA expression (log2_CPM) in TET2 WT patients (n = 577). Kaplan-Meier curves estimate the probability of survival of patients stratified according to uncompensated and compensated TET3 (cutoff, median of expression in the entire cohort) in (F) TET2 MTs (right panel) and all cohort (left panel) and (G) WT cases with low TET2 expression (left panel) and all WT cases (right panel). P values and hazard ratios are depicted in the corresponding panels.