Alison Ho1, Lucy C Chappell2, Lisa Story2, Mudher Al-Adnani3, Alexia Egloff4, Emma Routledge4, Mary Rutherford4, Jana Hutter5. 1. Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: alison.ho@kcl.ac.uk. 2. Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 4. Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. 5. Centre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Biomedical Engineering Department, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Visual assessment of the placenta in antenatal magnetic resonance imaging is important to confirm healthy appearances or to identify pathology complicating fetal anomaly or maternal disease. METHODS: We assessed the placenta in a large cohort of 228 women with low and high risk pregnancies across gestation. All women gave written informed consent and were imaged using either a 3T Philips Achieva or 1.5T Philips Ingenia scanner. Images were acquired with a T2-weighted single shot turbo spin echo sequence of the whole uterus (thereby including placenta) for anatomical information. RESULTS: A structured approach to visual assessment of the placenta on T2-weighted imaging has been provided including determination of key anatomical landmarks to aid orientation, placental shape, signal intensity, lobularity and granularity. Transient factors affecting imaging are shown including the effect of fetal movement, gross fetal motion and contractions. Placental appearances across gestation in low risk pregnancies are shown and compared to pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia and chronic hypertension. The utility of other magnetic resonance techniques (T2* mapping as an indirect marker for quantifying oxygenation) and histological assessment alongside visual assessment of placental T2-weighted imaging are demonstrated. DISCUSSION: A systematic approach with qualitative descriptors for placental visual assessment using T2-weighted imaging allows confirmation of normal placental development and can detect placental abnormalities in pregnancy complications. T2-weighted imaging can be visually assessed alongside functional imaging (such as T2* maps) in order to further probe the visual characteristics seen.
INTRODUCTION: Visual assessment of the placenta in antenatal magnetic resonance imaging is important to confirm healthy appearances or to identify pathology complicating fetal anomaly or maternal disease. METHODS: We assessed the placenta in a large cohort of 228 women with low and high risk pregnancies across gestation. All women gave written informed consent and were imaged using either a 3T Philips Achieva or 1.5T Philips Ingenia scanner. Images were acquired with a T2-weighted single shot turbo spin echo sequence of the whole uterus (thereby including placenta) for anatomical information. RESULTS: A structured approach to visual assessment of the placenta on T2-weighted imaging has been provided including determination of key anatomical landmarks to aid orientation, placental shape, signal intensity, lobularity and granularity. Transient factors affecting imaging are shown including the effect of fetal movement, gross fetal motion and contractions. Placental appearances across gestation in low risk pregnancies are shown and compared to pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia and chronic hypertension. The utility of other magnetic resonance techniques (T2* mapping as an indirect marker for quantifying oxygenation) and histological assessment alongside visual assessment of placental T2-weighted imaging are demonstrated. DISCUSSION: A systematic approach with qualitative descriptors for placental visual assessment using T2-weighted imaging allows confirmation of normal placental development and can detect placental abnormalities in pregnancy complications. T2-weighted imaging can be visually assessed alongside functional imaging (such as T2* maps) in order to further probe the visual characteristics seen.
Authors: M Damodaram; L Story; E Eixarch; A Patel; A McGuinness; J Allsop; J Wyatt-Ashmead; S Kumar; M Rutherford Journal: Placenta Date: 2010-03-29 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Wibke Blaicher; Peter C Brugger; Christoph Mittermayer; Jens Schwindt; Josef Deutinger; Gerhard Bernaschek; Daniela Prayer Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2006-01-04 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Erm Jauniaux; Z Alfirevic; A G Bhide; M A Belfort; G J Burton; S L Collins; S Dornan; D Jurkovic; G Kayem; J Kingdom; R Silver; L Sentilhes Journal: BJOG Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: Marianne Sinding; David A Peters; Jens B Frøkjær; Ole B Christiansen; Niels Uldbjerg; Anne Sørensen Journal: Placenta Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Esra Abaci Turk; S Mazdak Abulnaga; Jie Luo; Jeffrey N Stout; Henry A Feldman; Ata Turk; Borjan Gagoski; Lawrence L Wald; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Drucilla J Roberts; Carolina Bibbo; Julian N Robinson; Polina Golland; P Ellen Grant; William H Barth Journal: Placenta Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Emer J Hughes; Anthony N Price; Laura McCabe; Suzanne Hiscocks; Lara Waite; Elaine Green; Jana Hutter; Kelly Pegoretti; Lucilio Cordero-Grande; Anthony David Edwards; Joseph V Hajnal; Mary A Rutherford Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Victoria J King; Laura Bennet; Peter R Stone; Alys Clark; Alistair J Gunn; Simerdeep K Dhillon Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-08-19 Impact factor: 4.755