Literature DB >> 33480110

The effect of maternal position on venous return for pregnant women during MRI.

Emer J Hughes1, Anthony N Price2, Laura McCabe1, Suzanne Hiscocks1, Lara Waite1, Elaine Green1, Jana Hutter2, Kelly Pegoretti1, Lucilio Cordero-Grande2, Anthony David Edwards1, Joseph V Hajnal2, Mary A Rutherford1.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pregnancy is commonly undertaken in the left lateral tilt (LLT) position to prevent inferior vena cava (IVC) compression and supine hypotensive events, although this may be suboptimal for image quality. The supine position may also have an adverse effect on fetal well-being. The spinal venous plexus may provide an alternative pathway for venous return in the presence of IVC compression. This study assesses morphology and blood flow of the IVC and spinal venous plexus for pregnant women in LLT and supine positions to ascertain the effect of maternal position on venous return during MRI. Eighty-two pregnant women underwent phase contrast MRI (PC-MRI) of the IVC and spinal venous plexus in the supine position; 25 were also imaged in the LLT position. Differences in life monitoring, IVC, spinal venous plexus and total venous return between the two positions were assessed. A linear regression assessed the relationship between flow in the IVC and the spinal venous plexus in the supine position. Increasing gestational age and the right-sided position of the uterus on IVC and spinal venous plexus venous return were also evaluated. Hypotension symptoms were similar in supine (10%) and LLT (8%) positioning. Supine positioning decreased IVC height (p < 0.004) and flow (p = 0.045) but flow in the spinal venous plexus increased (p < 0.001) compared with the LLT position. Total venous return showed no difference (p = 0.989) between the two positions. Additional measurements of flow in the aorta also showed no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.866). Reduced IVC flow in the supine position was associated with increasing gestational age (p = 0.004) and degree of right-sided uterine position (p = 0.004). Women in the left lateral decubitus position who then rotated supine had greater flow in the IVC (p = 0.008) and spinal venous plexus (p = 0.029) than those who started supine. For the majority of women, the spinal venous plexus acts as a complementary venous return system for pregnant women in the supine position, maintaining vascular homeostasis. Further study is needed to assess the effects on the health of the fetus.
© 2021 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inferior vena cava; maternal position; pregnancy; spinal venous plexus; supine hypotension syndrome; venous return

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33480110     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  3 in total

1.  Visual assessment of the placenta in antenatal magnetic resonance imaging across gestation in normal and compromised pregnancies: Observations from a large cohort study.

Authors:  Alison Ho; Lucy C Chappell; Lisa Story; Mudher Al-Adnani; Alexia Egloff; Emma Routledge; Mary Rutherford; Jana Hutter
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 2.  Imaging of heart disease in women: review and case presentation.

Authors:  Nidaa Mikail; Alexia Rossi; Susan Bengs; Ahmed Haider; Barbara E Stähli; Angela Portmann; Alessio Imperiale; Valerie Treyer; Alexander Meisel; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Michael Messerli; Vera Regitz-Zagrosek; Philipp A Kaufmann; Ronny R Buechel; Cathérine Gebhard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Sinus Tachycardia: a Multidisciplinary Expert Focused Review.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mayuga; Artur Fedorowski; Fabrizio Ricci; Rakesh Gopinathannair; Jonathan Walter Dukes; Christopher Gibbons; Peter Hanna; Dan Sorajja; Mina Chung; David Benditt; Robert Sheldon; Mirna B Ayache; Hiba AbouAssi; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Blair P Grubb; Mohamed H Hamdan; Stavros Stavrakis; Tamanna Singh; Jeffrey J Goldberger; James A S Muldowney; Mark Belham; David C Kem; Cem Akin; Barbara K Bruce; Nicole E Zahka; Qi Fu; Erik H Van Iterson; Satish R Raj; Fetnat Fouad-Tarazi; David S Goldstein; Julian Stewart; Brian Olshansky
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-09-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.