Karyn M Austin1, Mark E Alexander2, John K Triedman2. 1. Arrhythmia Service, Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: karyn.austin@cardio.chboston.org. 2. Arrhythmia Service, Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Altered ventricular depolarization due to manifest accessory pathway conduction (ie, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) leads to repolarization abnormalities that persist after pathway ablation. The term T-wave memory (TWM) has been applied to these changes, as the postablation T-wave vector "remembers" the pre-excited QRS vector. In adults, these abnormalities can be misinterpreted as ischemia leading to unnecessary interventions. To date, no comprehensive studies have evaluated this phenomenon in the pediatric population. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define TWM in the pediatric population, identify preablation risk factors, and delineate the timeline of recovery. METHODS: Pre- and postablation electrocardiograms (ECGs) in patients ≤25 years were analyzed over a 5-year period. Frontal plane QTc interval, T-wave axis, QRST angle, and T-wave inversions were used to identify patients with TWM. Univariate analysis was performed to determine the association of preablation ECG features with the outcome of TWM. RESULTS: TWM was present in 42% of pediatric patients, with resolution occurring within 3 months of ablation. Preablation QRS axis <0° was a strong predictor of TWM (odds ratio [OR] 15.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.7-40), followed by posteroseptal pathway location (right posteroseptal-OR 8.9; 95% CI 4.2-18.8; left posteroseptal-OR 6.1; 95% CI 1.7-22.3). The degree of pre-excitation had a modest association with the development of TWM. No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: TWM is less common in children compared to adults, and normalization occurred within 3 months postablation. The most predictive features for the development of TWM include a leftward pre-excited QRS axis and posteroseptal pathway location.
BACKGROUND: Altered ventricular depolarization due to manifest accessory pathway conduction (ie, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) leads to repolarization abnormalities that persist after pathway ablation. The term T-wave memory (TWM) has been applied to these changes, as the postablation T-wave vector "remembers" the pre-excited QRS vector. In adults, these abnormalities can be misinterpreted as ischemia leading to unnecessary interventions. To date, no comprehensive studies have evaluated this phenomenon in the pediatric population. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to define TWM in the pediatric population, identify preablation risk factors, and delineate the timeline of recovery. METHODS: Pre- and postablation electrocardiograms (ECGs) in patients ≤25 years were analyzed over a 5-year period. Frontal plane QTc interval, T-wave axis, QRST angle, and T-wave inversions were used to identify patients with TWM. Univariate analysis was performed to determine the association of preablation ECG features with the outcome of TWM. RESULTS: TWM was present in 42% of pediatric patients, with resolution occurring within 3 months of ablation. Preablation QRS axis <0° was a strong predictor of TWM (odds ratio [OR] 15.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.7-40), followed by posteroseptal pathway location (right posteroseptal-OR 8.9; 95% CI 4.2-18.8; left posteroseptal-OR 6.1; 95% CI 1.7-22.3). The degree of pre-excitation had a modest association with the development of TWM. No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: TWM is less common in children compared to adults, and normalization occurred within 3 months postablation. The most predictive features for the development of TWM include a leftward pre-excited QRS axis and posteroseptal pathway location.
Authors: Maria Aunes-Jansson; Liliane Wecke; Leon Lurje; Lennart Bergfeldt; Nils Edvardsson Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2006-01-04 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Vivian P Kamphuis; Nico A Blom; Erik W van Zwet; Sumche Man; Arend D J Ten Harkel; Arie C Maan; Cees A Swenne Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: Kurt C Roberts-Thomson; Daniel Steven; Jens Seiler; Keiichi Inada; Bruce A Koplan; Usha B Tedrow; Laurence M Epstein; William G Stevenson Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-09-28 Impact factor: 29.690