Giampiero Proietti1, Julius Kuzmin1, Azamat Z Temerdashev2, Peter Dinér1. 1. Division of Organic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 30, 10044 Stockholm, Sweden. 2. Department of Analytical Chemistry, Kuban State University, Stavropolskaya St. 149, 350040 Krasnodar, Russia.
Abstract
Sulfonimidamides (SIAs) and sulfoximines (SOIs) have attracted attention due to their potential in agriculture and in medicinal chemistry as bioisosteres of biologically active compounds, and new synthetic methods are needed to access and explore these compounds. Herein, we present a light-promoted generation of perfluorinated aromatic nitrenes, from perfluorinated azides, that subsequently are allowed to react with sulfinamides and sulfoxides, generating achiral and chiral SIAs and SOIs. One of the enantiopure SIAs was evaluated as a novel chiral auxiliary in Grignard additions to the imines yielding the product in up to 96:4 diastereomeric ratio.
Sulfonimidamides (SIAs) and sulfoximines (SOIs) have attracted attention due to their potential in agriculture and in medicinal chemistry as bioisosteres of biologically active compounds, and new synthetic methods are needed to access and explore these compounds. Herein, we present a light-promoted generation of perfluorinated aromatic nitrenes, from perfluorinated azides, that subsequently are allowed to react with sulfinamides and sulfoxides, generating achiral and chiral SIAs and SOIs. One of the enantiopure SIAs was evaluated as a novel chiral auxiliary in Grignard additions to the imines yielding the product in up to 96:4 diastereomeric ratio.
During the last decades,
the utility of sulfonimidamides (SIAs)[1−5] and sulfoximines (SOIs)[6−12] has been demonstrated in synthesis, agrochemical applications, and
as bioisosteres in medicinal chemistry due to their notable properties,
such as basicity, nucleophilicity, and solubility in polar solvents.
The classical synthetic routes[13] to access
SIAs usually rely on the formation of sulfonimidoyl chloride as a
precursor, followed by an amidation reaction (Figure ).
Figure 1
(1) Routes to SIAs: (a) oxidative imidation,
(b) oxidative chlorination,
(c) deoxychlorination, (d) Grignard addition and chlorination, (e)
sulfur–fluorine exchange via sulfinimidoyl fluoride; (2) routes
to SOIs: (f) imidation, (g) oxidation, (h) desymmetrization of SOIs,
and (i) S-alkylation; and (3) this work: SIAs and
SOIs via photogenerated nitrenes.
(1) Routes to SIAs: (a) oxidative imidation,
(b) oxidative chlorination,
(c) deoxychlorination, (d) Grignard addition and chlorination, (e)
sulfur–fluorine exchange via sulfinimidoyl fluoride; (2) routes
to SOIs: (f) imidation, (g) oxidation, (h) desymmetrization of SOIs,
and (i) S-alkylation; and (3) this work: SIAs and
SOIs via photogenerated nitrenes.Sulfonimidoyl chloride can be generated in several different ways,
such as oxidative imidation (Figure a),[14] oxidative chlorination
(Figure b),[15] deoxychlorination[16] (Figure c), and
via Grignard addition to a sulfinylamine, followed by chlorination
(Figure d).[17] Similarly, sulfur–fluorine exchange reactions
(Figure e) with sulfonimidoyl
fluoride as the key intermediate have been used to yield SIAs.[18,19] Other approaches to form SIAs involve copper-catalyzed transamidation
of sulfinamides (SAs) or copper-catalyzed oxidation of methyl SOIs.[20,21] Furthermore, several metal-free approaches using N–H transfer
to SAs have been disclosed.[22]One
of the most convenient ways to synthesize chiral SOIs[23] involves the formation of a sulfur–nitrogen
bond between chiral SOs and nitrenes, either using metal-catalyzed
procedures (Fe, Rh, and Ag)[24−28] or hypervalent iodine or bromine reagents (Figure f).[29−32] Other approaches involve stereospecific oxidation
of enantioenriched sulfinimines (Figure g), desymmetrization of homochiral SOIs[33,34] (Figure h), and
stereospecific S—alkylation of chiral SOIs (Figure i).[35]The introduction of fluoro-substituents into drug-like molecules
and agrochemicals can tremendously affect their properties by, for
example, decreasing their basicity and improving their bioavailability,[36−38] and in this context, several different methods to synthesize fluorinated
SOIs were developed.[39−46] In addition, SOIs containing N–Caryl–F bonds
can be accessed either via copper-catalyzed direct sulfoximination
or via SNAr.[47,48] An alternative approach
is to incorporate aromatic fluorinated moieties via perfluorinated
aromatic azides (PFAAs). Phenyl azides can generate, either via photo-
or thermolysis, highly reactive nitrenes that rapidly rearrange via
ring-expansion to form ketenimines. These ketenimines will ultimately
lead to polymeric tar unless intercepted with a good nucleophile.[49] On the contrary, PFAAs are regarded as superior
phenylnitrene precursors, enabling higher yields of the C–H
and N–H insertion products.[50,51] The improved
selectivity is attributed to the “ortho-difluoro
effect” where fluorine atoms in the ortho-position to the azide
effectively retard the ring-expansion pathway and instead promote
a long-lived singlet nitrene that is responsible for the productive
bimolecular reaction.[52] The reaction between
dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and perfluorinated phenylnitrene, generated
via the thermolysis of 4-azido-2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine, was first
observed by Banks and Sparkes,[50] but no
attempts to expand the nitrene-promoted coupling between PFAAs and
SOs or related derivatives were undertaken. In this work, we investigated
a light-promoted approach to ortho-fluoro nitrenes
from PFAAs, leading to the stereospecific addition to SAs and SOs.
In addition, one of the chiral SIAs was evaluated as a chiral auxiliary
in the stereoselective addition of Grignard reagents to SIA-derived
imines, yielding the addition products in high stereoselectivity (up
to 96:4).
Results and Discussion
Upon the irradiation of PFAA
(1a) in DMSO with a 390
nm light-emitting diode (LED) light, we noticed the formation of an
SOI adduct between the in situ generated perfluoroaryl nitrene and
DMSO. In our group, we have previously developed procedures for the
catalytic formation of sulfinimines from chiral SAs and aldehydes,[53,54] and therefore, we became interested in investigating the reactivity
between perfluoroaryl nitrenes and optically active SAs or SO. Our
initial screening started with 1a and (S)-tert-butylsulfinamide in different solvents and
with an irradiation of 390 nm light for 1.5 h at room temperature.
In most of the solvents (Table , entries 1–9), SIA (S)-1 is formed together with varying amounts of the perfluorinated aniline.
Table 1
Optimization of Reaction Conditions
for the Synthesis of (S)-1a
entry
solvent
yield (S)-1 (%)b
aniline (%)b
1
THF
23
77
2
EtOH
21
59
3
toluene
52
21
4
acetone
51
9
5
CH2Cl2
47
4
6
CHCl3
57
6
7
MeCN
47
6
8
EtOAc
65
5
9
PhCF3
66
4
10
DMF
–b
–
11
H2O
0b
1
Reaction conditions: azide (0.075
mmol, 0.05 M), (S)-tert-butylsulfinamide
(0.15 mmol, 1.5 equiv), degassed solvent (1.5 mL), and 390 nm Kessil
LED light, 1.5 h.
Determined
by 1H NMR
with an internal standard.
Reaction conditions: azide (0.075
mmol, 0.05 M), (S)-tert-butylsulfinamide
(0.15 mmol, 1.5 equiv), degassed solvent (1.5 mL), and 390 nm Kessil
LED light, 1.5 h.Determined
by 1H NMR
with an internal standard.In tetrahydrofuran (THF) and ethanol, perfluorinated aniline was
the major product (Table , entries 1–2), while reactions in toluene, acetone,
dichloromethane, chloroform, and acetonitrile led to increased yields
of (S)-1 and with less formation of the aniline derivative
(Table , entries 3–7).
The highest yields, together with the lowest formation of side products,
were obtained in ethyl acetate and α,α,α-trifluorotoluene
(PhCF3) (Table , entries 8 and 9), while DMF gave a complex mixture of fluorinated
products and the reaction in water led to the formation of the perfluorinated
azo-compound mainly (Table , entries 10–11). The reaction also proceeded using
blue light (440 nm), but the reaction times increased significantly
(about 10 times).Next, we explored the substrate scope of the
photopromoted coupling
between enantiopure tert-butylsulfinamides and different
PFAAs using PhCF3 as the solvent (Table ). Methyl 4-azidotetrafluorobenzoate reacted
with both (S)- and (R)-tert-butylsulfinamides to form SIAs (S)-1 and (R)-1 in good yields (66 and 65%,
respectively) and without the loss of enantiopurity, as determined
by chiral high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The cyano-substituted
PFAA derivative showed increased reactivity than the ester-containing
substrate and yielded product (S)-2 in
62% yield upon irradiation at 390 nm for merely 2 h in the presence
of (S)-tert-butylsulfinamide. The
pyridine-based PFAA gave similar yields toward the formation of products
(S)-3 and (R)-3 (64 and 65%, respectively) but required a considerably longer
irradiation time (16 h). Next, the reaction was extended to other
PFAA derivatives, such as pentafluoroazidobenzene and 4-azido-tetrafluorobenzoic
acid. However, this afforded lower yields of the target products (S)-4 and (S)-5 (32 and 34%, respectively) compared to the other derivatives (1–3). This highlights the importance of
the substituent in para-position in influencing the reactivity of
the photogenerated nitrene.
Table 2
Synthesis of SIAs
from PFAA and SAsa
Reaction
conditions: PFAA (0.3–0.9
mmol, 0.05 M), SA (0.45–1.35 mmol, 1.5 equiv), degassed PhCF3, 390 nm Kessil LED light, 2–16 h, r.t.
Average yield of two syntheses.
From the racemic starting material.
Reaction
conditions: PFAA (0.3–0.9
mmol, 0.05 M), SA (0.45–1.35 mmol, 1.5 equiv), degassed PhCF3, 390 nm Kessil LED light, 2–16 h, r.t.Average yield of two syntheses.From the racemic starting material.The photopromoted reaction
of PFAAs with p-toluenesulfinamide
was less satisfying, and (S)-6 was only
obtained in trace amounts together with other side products. Better
results were obtained for the more reactive cyano-substituted PFAA
yielding the product (S)-7 in 42% yield.
The poorer reactivity was ascribed to the scarce solubility of p-tolylsulfinamide compared to that of tert-butylsulfinamide. A secondary SA, racemic 1-(phenylsulfinyl)piperidine,
was made to react with methyl 4-azidotetrafluorobenzoate to yield
the target product rac-8 in 42% yield.In addition to the synthesis of perfluorinated SIAs, the generality
of the nitrene addition was expanded through reactions with SOs to
yield perfluorinated SOIs (Table ).
Table 3
Synthesis of SOIs from PFAA and SOsa
Reaction conditions:
PFAA (0.3 mmol,
0.05 M), SO (0.45 mmol, 1.5 equiv), degassed PhCF3, 390
nm Kessil LED light, 1–4 h, r.t.
EtOAc as the solvent.
Reaction conditions:
PFAA (0.3 mmol,
0.05 M), SO (0.45 mmol, 1.5 equiv), degassed PhCF3, 390
nm Kessil LED light, 1–4 h, r.t.EtOAc as the solvent.The photopromoted PFAA-nitrenes readily reacted with
SOs to form
SOIs and did not react further under prolonged light irradiation.
This differs from the reactivity in the work by Bolm and coworkers
where they observed the light-promoted formation of nitrenes from
SOIs.[55] For example, DMSO reacted with
the photogenerated nitrene to yield SOI 9 in high yield
(78%) after only 2 h. A fast reaction was also observed for racemic
methyl phenyl SO, yielding product 10 in good yield (61%).
Racemic phenylvinyl SO led to the formation of product 11 (56%) without affecting the double bond. The lower yield was accompanied
by an increased formation of the corresponding aniline derivative
(methyl 4-amino-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzoate), which was also observed
in the reaction with racemic methyl 2-phenylsulfinylacetate, affording rac-12 in 47% yield. An enantiomerically pure
SO was also converted to (R)-13 in a
stereospecific addition of the PFAA-nitrene in 66% yield. Furthermore,
the reaction was feasible with the racemic SO derived from the pesticide
chlorbensid, but due to poor solubility in PhCF3, ethyl
acetate was used as the solvent, yielding product rac-14 in moderate yield (53%) after 2 h. Finally, the
reaction was tested with methionine SO, derived from the oxidized
form of the amino acid l-methionine, which is associated
with aging when present in increased levels in tissues.[56,57] The Boc-protected SO yielded the target product 15 after
merely 1 h and was obtained in 49% yield again with an increased formation
of the aniline derivative as the side product.The use of enantiopure tert-butylsulfinamide is
an established strategy to access valuable chiral amines. In the standard
approach, the chiral auxiliary group is introduced via condensation
with aldehydes or ketones, followed by stereoselective nucleophilic
addition and chiral auxiliary removal to yield the enantioenriched
amine.[58,59] We hypothesized that the free NH2 group in enantiomerically pure SIAs could act as a chiral auxiliary
via the reaction with carbonyl compounds to yield imines, which could
subsequently be used in stereoselective addition reactions. Previously,
SIAs were used in asymmetric reactions as ligands,[60,61] organocatalysts,[62] or nitrene-transfer
agents,[63−71] but there are no reports of SIAs as chiral auxiliaries.Indeed,
the chiral pyridine-based (R)-3 formed
stable imines from pivaldehyde and aromatic benzaldehydes
using reaction conditions reported by Cid and coworkers.[72] The reactions proceeded to completion after
20–44 h at reflux in CH2Cl2, yielding
the target imines in high to excellent yields (78–90%, Scheme ).
Reaction conditions: (R)-3 (0.8 mmol, 0.1 M), aldehyde (2 equiv),
pyrrolidine (0.1 equiv), CH2Cl2 (8 mL, dry),
molecular sieves (4 Å), reflux, N2 atmosphere.Unfortunately, enolizable aldehydes, such as butyraldehyde,
led
to a complex reaction mixture with side products. The obtained imine
derivatives 16a–c were used to investigate the
ability of SIAs to function as chiral auxiliaries in stereoselective
carbonyl addition reactions with Grignard reagents.Initially,
the addition of phenylmagnesium bromide to imine (R)-16a was investigated in several different
solvents (Scheme ).
After 6 h of the reaction at −78 °C, the results revealed
that both CH2Cl2 and THF failed to give full
conversion, while toluene provided full conversion and high stereoselectivity
according to 1H NMR. Conducting the reaction in diethylether
and hexane also gave full conversion of the starting material but
with slightly lower diastereoselectivity.
Scheme 2
Solvent Screening
for Grignard Addition to SIA Imines
Solvent Screening
for Grignard Addition to SIA Imines
Reaction conditions:
phenylmagnesium
bromide (0.14 mmol, 2.5 equiv), imine (0.057 mmol, 1 equiv), solvent
(0.5 mL, dry), N2 atmosphere, −78 °C.With the optimal reaction conditions in hand, we
investigated the
scope of the Grignard addition to imines derived from SIA (R)-3. The imines were made to react with Grignard
reagents at −78 °C for 6 h, and the reaction mixtures
were allowed to reach room temperature overnight. The reaction was
quenched and extracted, and the product yield was determined using 1H NMR with tert-butylmethyl ether as the
internal standard.Addition of aromatic Grignard regents (Table , entries 1–3)
to the imine derived
from pivaldehyde gave the addition product in high yields (86–98%)
and with high diastereomeric ratios (up to 96:4) which are comparable
to Grignard additions to tert-butyl sulfinyl imines.[73] Methyl magnesium bromide yielded the product
(86%) but with much lower selectivity compared to tert-butyl sulfinimines,[73] while aliphatic
isopropylmagnesium chloride gave only small amounts of the addition
product together with the reduced product derived from a hydride transfer
(Table , entries 4–5).
The addition of aromatic Grignard reagents to the SIA imine derived
from aromatic benzaldehyde provided products in high yields and diastereomeric
ratios (Table , entries
6–10) that are comparable with the selectivities obtained with
the tert-butyl sulfinyl imines.[74,75] Methyl magnesium bromide gave low selectivity in toluene, while
an improved selectivity (dr 84:16) was observed in CH2Cl2 (Table ,
entry 8).
Table 4
Scope of the Addition of Grignard
Reagents to Imines Derived from SIAsa
The yield was determined
by 1H NMR spectroscopy using tert-butyl
methyl
ether as the internal standard.
Determined by 1H NMR
spectroscopy or chiral HPLC.
Reaction performed in CH2Cl2.
Reaction conditions: imine (0.05
mmol, 1 equiv), Grignard reagent (2.5 equiv), toluene (0.5 mL), −78
to r.t.The yield was determined
by 1H NMR spectroscopy using tert-butyl
methyl
ether as the internal standard.Determined by 1H NMR
spectroscopy or chiral HPLC.Reaction performed in CH2Cl2.Finally, we performed the synthesis
between imine 16a and 3-methoxyphenylmagnesium bromide
in a 0.3 mmol scale which gave
product 17 in 95% yield and 95:5 diastereomeric ratio
(Scheme ).
Scheme 3
Larger
Scale Synthesis and Removal of Chiral Auxiliary
Reaction
conditions: 3-methoxyphenylmagnesium
bromide (0.75 mmol, 2.5 equiv), imine (0.3 mmol, 1.0 equiv), toluene
(2.5 mL, dry), N2-atmosphere −78 °C to r.t.
Compound 17 (0.09 mmol, 1 equiv), anisole (20 equiv),
TfOH (9 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 °C to r.t.
Larger
Scale Synthesis and Removal of Chiral Auxiliary
Reaction
conditions: 3-methoxyphenylmagnesium
bromide (0.75 mmol, 2.5 equiv), imine (0.3 mmol, 1.0 equiv), toluene
(2.5 mL, dry), N2-atmosphere −78 °C to r.t.
Compound 17 (0.09 mmol, 1 equiv), anisole (20 equiv),
TfOH (9 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 °C to r.t.The classical approach used to cleave the SA auxiliary
involves
acidic condition in protic solvents, typically HCl or trifluoroacetic
acid in methanol.[76,77] Unfortunately, those conditions
did not work and a complex reaction mixture was obtained. Finally,
the SIA chiral auxiliary was removed by treatment with triflic acid
and anisole in CH2Cl2[78] and the amine was obtained in 90% yield and 95:5 dr (Scheme ).
Conclusions
We
have developed a photopromoted reaction between perfluorinated
aromatic azides and SAs or SOs to obtain SIAs and SOIs, respectively.
The fluoro substituents on the aromatic ring of the azides were critical
for accessing synthetically useful nitrenes. The reaction proceeded
via in situ generated perfluorinated nitrenes and stereospecific addition,
enabling the formation of optically pure compounds. One of the chiral
SIAs, derived from the perfluorinated pyridine azide, was condensed
with aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes to yield enantiopure imine-derivatives
in good to excellent yields. The use of the synthesized SIA was evaluated
as a potential chiral auxiliary for the addition of Grignard reagents
to the chiral SIA-derived imines at −78 °C in toluene.
The investigation demonstrated that Grignard reagents were successfully
added to the imines in high to excellent yields (up to 98%) and good
to excellent diastereoselectivity (up to 96:4 dr). The use of SIA
as a chiral auxiliary is to the best of our knowledge unprecedented,
and we believe that these new types of SIAs find applications as novel
scaffolds in asymmetric synthesis.
Experimental
Section
All reagents were obtained from commercial sources
and used without
further purification. The perfluorinated aromatic azides were synthesized
according to the literature.[79] All solvents
were purified and dried according to standard methods prior to use,
unless stated otherwise. Degassed solvents were obtained by bubbling
the solvent with inert gas through a needle. Anhydrous dichloromethane
was obtained by distillation over calcium hydride, and anhydrous diethyl
ether, THF, and toluene were obtained from a Glass Contour solvent
dispensing system. Heating of reaction mixtures was performed in oil
baths, and experiments at lower temperatures (−78 °C)
were carried out with dry ice/acetone baths. Thin-layer chromatography
(TLC) was performed using 60 mesh silica gel plates visualized with
short-wavelength UV light (254 nm). Silica gel 60 (200–300
mesh) was used for column chromatography. HPLC analyses were conducted
using a UV detector (Shimadzu SPD-20A) and a chiral column (Kromasil
5-CelluCoat RP, 0.46 × 25 cm) using a flow of 1.0 mL/min of the
eluent system hexane/iso-propanol. A Bruker Ascend
400 spectrometer (400 MHz) or Bruker Avance DMX 500 (500 MHz) spectrometer
was used for the recording of 1H NMR spectra, 13C{1H} NMR spectra, and 19F NMR spectra. Proton chemical
shifts are reported as δ values (ppm) relative to tetramethylsilane
with residual undeuterated CHCl3 (δ 7.26), DMSO-d6 (δ 2.50), and methanol-d4 (δ 3.31) as internal standards. 13C{1H}
chemical shifts are reported as δ values (ppm) relative to tetramethylsilane
with CDCl3 (δ 77.16 ppm), DMSO-d6 (δ 39.52 ppm), or methanol-d4 (δ 49.0 ppm) as internal standards. Data for 1H NMR are reported as follows: chemical shift (δ, ppm) and
multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet,
m = multiplet or unresolved, br = broad singlet, and J = coupling constants in Hz, integration). High-resolution mass spectrometry
(HRMS) measurements were performed on methanolic solutions of the
compounds using a Bruker maXis impact II micrOTOF spectrometer [direct
injection and electrospray ionization (ESI)]. The light-promoted reactions
were run using a 390 nm light source (40 W, Kessil PR160, set to maximum
intensity) at a distance of 3.0 cm from the reaction vessel. Experimental
details, such as spectroscopic characterizations (1H, 13C{1H}, and 19F NMR), HPLC chromatograms, and HRMS,
are given in the Supporting Information.
General Procedure A for the Synthesis of SIAs
To an
8 mL vial equipped with a magnetic stir bar, the perfluorinated aromatic
azido (PFAA) compound (1 equiv, 0.3 mmol, 0.05 M), SA (1.5 equiv,
0.45 mmol), and degassed α,α,α-trifluorotoluene
(PhCF3) (6 mL) were added. At this point, the vial was
evacuated and back filled with N2, and the vial was capped
with a rubber septum. The reaction mixture was irradiated at 390 nm
(40 W, Kessil PR160, set to maximum intensity, 3.0 cm from the reaction
vessel) while stirring. After the completion of the reaction, the
crude obtained upon solvent removal under reduced pressure was purified
by flash column chromatography using either petroleum ether and ethyl
acetate (PE/EtOAc) or petroleum ether, dichloromethane, and ethyl
acetate (PE/DCM/EtOAc) as the eluent system to afford the pure product.
All compounds were characterized via HRMS and 1H NMR, 13C{1H} NMR, and 19F NMR spectroscopies.
The compound was
obtained according
to general procedure A using azide 1e (68 mg, 0.3 mmol,
1 equiv) and (S)-tert-butylsulfinamide
(57 mg, 0.5 mmol, 1.5 equiv). The reaction was completed after 10
h of the reaction. The pure product was obtained after flash column
chromatography (eluent: 5% MeOH in CH2Cl2 +
0.5% formic acid) (rf: 0.19, eluent: 5% MeOH in CH2Cl2 + 0.5% formic acid) as a white precipitate (31 mg, 34%).
mp: 74 °C. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): δ 6.88 (br, 2H, NH2) and 1.43 (s, 9H, t-Bu); 13C{1H} NMR (DMSO-d6, 125 MHz): δ 161.0, 144.9 (dm, J = 249 Hz), 141.6 (dm, J = 243 Hz), 129.1, 103.8,
60.6, and 23.8; 19F NMR (DMSO-d6, 376 MHz): δ −143.5 (m, 2F) and −148.8 (m, 2F).
HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C11H12F4N2O3SNa, 351.0397; found, 351.0399. [α]D31 – 4 (c 0.4, methanol).
The compound was obtained according to general
procedure A using azide 1a (75 mg, 0.3 mmol, 1 equiv)
and 1-(phenylsulfinyl)piperidine (94 mg, 0.45 mmol, 1.5 equiv). The
reaction was completed after 6 h of the reaction. The pure product
was obtained after flash column chromatography (eluent: PE/DCM/EtOAc,
20:1:1 → 10:1:1) as a white precipitate (51 mg, 42%). mp: 85–86
°C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 7.94
(m, 2H), 7.62 (m, 1H), 7.56 (m, 2H), 3.93 (s, 3H), 3.05 (m, 4H), 1.54
(m, 4H), and 1.40 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz): δ 161.1, 145.9 (dm, J =
255 Hz), 142.5 (dm, J = 245 Hz), 136.3, 133.1, 129.3,
128.1, 127.4, 104.5, 52.9, 47.6, 25.5, and 23.6; 19F NMR
(CDCl3, 376 MHz): δ −141.2 (m, 2F) and −147.8
(m, 2F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M
+ H]+ calcd for C19H19F4N2O3S, 431,1047; found, 431.1049.
General
Procedure B for the Synthesis of SOIs
To an
8 mL vial equipped with a magnetic stir bar, PFAA compound (1 equiv,
0.3 mmol, 0.05 M), SO (1.5 equiv, 0.45 mmol), and degassed α,α,α-trifluorotoluene
(PhCF3) (6 mL) were added. At this point, the vial was
evacuated and back filled with N2, and the vial was capped
with a rubber septum. The reaction mixture was irradiated at 390 nm
(40 W, Kessil PR160, set to maximum intensity, 3.0 cm from the reaction
vessel) while stirring. After the completion of the reaction, the
crude obtained upon solvent removal under reduced pressure was purified
by flash column chromatography using either petroleum ether and ethyl
acetate (PE/EtOAc) or petroleum ether, dichloromethane, and ethyl
acetate (PE/DCM/EtOAc) as the eluent system to afford the pure product.
All compounds were characterized via HRMS and 1H NMR, 13C{1H} NMR, and 19F NMR spectroscopies.
The compound was obtained according to general
procedure B using azide 1a (75 mg, 0.3 mmol, 1 equiv)
and DMSO (32 μL, 0.45 mmol, 1.5 equiv). The reaction was completed
after 2 h of the reaction. The pure product was obtained after flash
column chromatography (eluent: PE/EtOAc, 2:1 → 1:1) (rf: 0.3,
eluent PE/EtOAc 1:1) as a white precipitate (70 mg, 78%). mp: 129–130
°C 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 3.94
(s, 3H, OCH3), and 3.29 (s, 6H, CH3); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz): δ 160.9,
146–0 (dm, J = 256 Hz), 142.1 (dm, J = 243 Hz), 127.6, 104.7, 53.0, and 44.8; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376 MHz): δ −140.8 (m, 2F)
and −149.5 (m, 2F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C10H10F4NO3S, 300.0312; found, 300.0312.
The compound was obtained according
to general procedure B using azide 1a (75 mg, 0.3 mmol,
1 equiv) and l-methionine SO N-Boc protected
(120 mg, 0.45 mmol, 1.5 equiv). The reaction was completed after 1
h of the reaction. The pure product was obtained after flash column
chromatography (eluent: 2.5% MeOH in DCM + 0.25% formic acid →
5.0% MeOH in DCM + 0.25% formic acid) (rf: 0.25, eluent: 5.0% MeOH
in DCM + 0.5% formic acid) as a pale-yellow precipitate (72 mg, 49%).
mp: 111–112 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500
MHz): δ 9.97 (br, 1H, CO2H), 7.05–5.52 (br,
1H, NH), 4.45–4.40 (s, 1H, CH), 3.92 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.57–3.66 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.21 (s, 3H, S-CH3), 2.56–2.33 (m, 2H, CH2), and 1.50–1.42 (s, 9H, t-Bu); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz): δ 174.1,
161.0, 156.9, 155.9, 145.9 (dm, J = 256 Hz), 142.0
(dm, J = 240 Hz), 127.5, 104.6, 83.21, 81.1, 53.3,
53.0, 52.0, 42.5, 28.3, and 25.9; 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376 MHz): δ −140.7 (m, 2F) and −149.2 (m, 2F).
HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C18H22F4N2O7SNa, 509.0976; found, 509.0973.
General
Procedure C for the Condensation Reaction
To
a dry round-bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar, a reflux
condenser and 4 Å molecular sieves (MSs), SIA (1 equiv, 0.8 mmol,
0.1 M), aldehyde (2 equiv), pyrrolidine (0.08 mmol, 0.1 equiv), and
anhydrous CH2Cl2 (8 mL) were added. The reaction
was refluxed under an inert atmosphere (N2). After the
completion of the reaction, the crude obtained upon solvent removal
under reduced pressure was purified by flash column chromatography
using petroleum ether, dichloromethane, and ethyl acetate (PE/EtOAc)
as the eluent system to afford the pure product. All compounds were
characterized via HRMS and 1H NMR, 13C{1H} NMR,
and 19F NMR spectroscopies.
The compound was obtained
according to general procedure C using compound (R)-3 (1 equiv) and pivaldehyde (2.0 equiv). The reaction
was completed after 40 h of the reaction. The pure product was obtained
after flash column chromatography (eluent: PE/EtOAc 20:1) as a white
precipitate (125 mg, 90%). mp: 88 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 8.50 (s, 1H, imine), 1.54 (s, 9H, t-Bu), and 1.42 (s, 9H, t-Bu); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz): δ 189.4,
144.3 (dm, J = 240 Hz), 137.1 (dm, J = 252 Hz), 136.7, 62.0, 38.9, 26.1, and 23.8; 19F NMR
(CDCl3, 376 MHz): δ −93.8 (m, 2F) and −152.0
(m, 2F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M
+ Na]+ calcd for C14H19F4N3OSNa, 376.1077; found, 376.1078. [α]D31 – 64 (c 0.2, CHCl3).
The compound was obtained
according to general procedure C using compound (R)-3 (1 equiv) and 4-chloro benzaldehyde (2.0 equiv).
The reaction was completed after 40 h of the reaction. The pure product
was obtained after flash column chromatography (eluent: PE/EtOAc 20:1)
as white crystals (254 mg, 78%). mp: 99–100 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 9.02 (s, 1H, imine), 7.93
(d, J = 8.5, 2H), 7.54 (d, J = 8.5,
2H), and 1.60 (s, 9H, t-Bu); 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz): δ 173.1, 144.1 (dm, J = 241 Hz), 142.4, 137.1 (dm, J = 252
Hz), 136.5, 132.7, 130.7, 130.1, 62.6, and 24.0; 19F NMR
(CDCl3, 376 MHz): δ −93.77 (m, 2F) and −151.89
(m, 2F). HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M
+ Na]+ calcd for C16H14ClF4N3OSNa, 430.0375; found, 430.0376. [α]D31 – 194
(c 0.2, CHCl3).
General Procedure
D for the Solvent Screening of Grignard Addition
Reactions
To a dry Biotage microwave vial equipped with a
magnetic stir bar, a 0.5 mL solution of SIA-imine (1 equiv, 0.05 mmol,
0.1 M) was added. The solution was allowed to reach −78 °C
in an acetone/dry ice bath, and 47 μL of a solution (3.0 M in
Et2O) of phenyl magnesium bromine was added drop-wise.
The reaction mixture was stirred for 6 h. The crude reaction mixture
was sampled, quenched with sat. aq. sol. of NH4Cl, and
analyzed via 1H NMR to determine the conversion and the
dr.
General Procedure E for Grignard Addition Reactions
To a dry Biotage microwave vial equipped with a magnetic stir bar,
a 0.5 mL solution of SIA-imine (1 equiv, 0.05 mmol, 0.1 M) was added.
The solution was allowed to reach −78 °C in an acetone/dry
ice bath and the Grignard reagent (0.125 mmol, 2.5 equiv) was added
dropwise to the solution. The reaction mixture was stirred at −78
°C for 6 h and then let reach r.t. overnight. The crude reaction
mixture was quenched with sat. aq. sol. of NH4Cl (2 mL)
and extracted with EtOAc (4 × 1 mL). The organic phases were
combined, dried over Na2SO4, and filtered, and
the solvent was removed via rotary evaporation in vacuo. The yield
of the reaction was obtained via 1H NMR using tert-butyl methyl ether as the internal standard. The dr was obtained
via 1H NMR analysis.
The compound was obtained according to general
procedure E using imine (R)-16a (1 equiv,
0.3 mmol, 100 mg) and a 1.0 M solution of 3-methoxyphenylmagnesium
bromide in THF (2.5 equiv). The crude reaction mixture was quenched
with sat. aq. sol. of NH4Cl (10 mL) and extracted with
EtOAc (4 × 8 mL). The organic phases were combined, washed with
H2O, dried over Na2SO4, and filtered,
and the solvent was removed via rotary evaporation in vacuo. The pure
product was obtained without further purification as colorless powder
(124 mg, 95% yield, 95:5 dr). HPLC (Kromasil 5-CelluCoat RP, 0.46
cm × 25 cm, n-hexane/isopropanol = 98/2, flow
rate = 1.0 mL/min, λ = 220 nm) tR = 14.5 min (major), 22.1 min (minor). mp: 152–153 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.06 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (m, 1H), 6.59 (m, 1H), 6.49 (m, 1H),
4.21 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H, NH), 4.13 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H, CH), 3.73 (s, 3Hm OCH3), 1.52 (s, 9H, t-Bu), and 0.94 (s, 9H, t-Bu); 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 159.1,
143.8 (dm, J = 243 Hz), 142.6, 137.9 (dm, J = 253 Hz), 136.1, 128.8, 120.2, 114.4, 111.5, 67.6, 64.1,
55.1, 35.8, 27.5, and 24.6. 19F NMR (CDCl3,
376 MHz): δ −93.6 (m, 2F) and −151.2 (m, 2F).
HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C21H27F4N3O2SNa, 484.1653; found, 484.1654. [α]D31 – 20 (c 0.2, CHCl3).
1-(3-Methoxyphenyl)-2,2-dimethylpropan-1-amine 18
Compound 17 (1 equiv, 0.09 mmol,
40 mg) and
anisole (20 equiv) were introduced into a round-bottom flask, equipped
with a magnetic stirrer, containing 8 mL of dichloromethane. The reaction
mixture was cooled down to 0–5 °C (ice bath), and a 4
mL solution of triflic acid in dichloromethane (0.2 M) was added dropwise.
After the addition, the reaction was let reach room temperature. After
the completion of the reaction (2 h), the crude mixture was quenched
with aqueous NaOH (2 M, 10 mL) and extracted with dichloromethane
(3 × 10 mL). The reunited organic phase was dried over Na2SO4 and filtered, and the solvent was removed via
rotary evaporation in vacuo. The pure product was obtained via preparative-TLC
(eluent: 5% MeOH in DCM) (rf: 0.2, eluent: 5% MeOH in DCM) as a colorless
liquid (15 mg, 90%, 95:5 dr). HPLC (ReproSil Chiral-NR, 0.46 cm ×
25 cm, n-hexane/isopropanol = 70/30, flow rate =
1.0 mL/min, λ = 220 nm) tR = 6.5
min (minor), 8.4 min (major). mp: 152–153 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.20 (m, 1H), 6.85 (m,
2H), 6.78 (m, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.94 (br, 2H, NH2), and 0.92 (s, 9H, t-Bu); 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 159.2, 144.8,
128.6, 121.0, 114.3, 112.2, 65.4, 55.3, 35.1, and 26.7. HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C12H20NO, 194.1539; found, 194.1541. [α]D30 – 2.4
(c 0.5, methanol).
Authors: Fernando Sehgelmeble; Juliette Janson; Colin Ray; Susanne Rosqvist; Susanne Gustavsson; Linda I Nilsson; Alexander Minidis; Jörg Holenz; Didier Rotticci; Johan Lundkvist; Per I Arvidsson Journal: ChemMedChem Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Nobuko Nishimura; Mark H Norman; Longbin Liu; Kevin C Yang; Kate S Ashton; Michael D Bartberger; Samer Chmait; Jie Chen; Rod Cupples; Christopher Fotsch; Joan Helmering; Steven R Jordan; Roxanne K Kunz; Lewis D Pennington; Steve F Poon; Aaron Siegmund; Glenn Sivits; David J Lloyd; Clarence Hale; David J St Jean Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Marina Zenzola; Robert Doran; Leonardo Degennaro; Renzo Luisi; James A Bull Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Ulrich Lücking; Arne Scholz; Philip Lienau; Gerhard Siemeister; Dirk Kosemund; Rolf Bohlmann; Hans Briem; Ildiko Terebesi; Kirstin Meyer; Katja Prelle; Karsten Denner; Ulf Bömer; Martina Schäfer; Knut Eis; Ray Valencia; Stuart Ince; Franz von Nussbaum; Dominik Mumberg; Karl Ziegelbauer; Bert Klebl; Axel Choidas; Peter Nussbaumer; Matthias Baumann; Carsten Schultz-Fademrecht; Gerd Rühter; Jan Eickhoff; Michael Brands Journal: ChemMedChem Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 3.466