| Literature DB >> 34764592 |
Adwitiya Sinha1, Megha Rathi1.
Abstract
The severe spread of the COVID-19 pandemic has created a situation of public health emergency and global awareness. In our research, we analyzed the demographical factors affecting the global pandemic spread along with the features that lead to death due to the infection. Modeling results stipulate that the mortality rate increase as the age increase and it is found that most of the death cases belong to the age group 60-80. Cluster-based analysis of age groups is also conducted to analyze the maximum targeted age-groups. An association between positive COVID-19 cases and deceased cases are also presented, with the impact on male and female death cases due to corona. Additionally, we have also presented an artificial intelligence-based statistical approach to predict the survival chances of corona infected people in South Korea with the analysis of the impact on the exploratory factors, including age-groups, gender, temporal evolution, etc. To analyze the coronavirus cases, we applied machine learning with hyperparameters tuning and deep learning models with an autoencoder-based approach for estimating the influence of the disparate features on the spread of the disease and predict the survival possibilities of the quarantined patients in isolation. The model calibrated in the study is based on positive corona infection cases and presents the analysis over different aspects that proven to be impactful to analyze the temporal trends in the current situation along with the exploration of deceased cases due to coronavirus. Analysis delineates key points in the outbreak spreading, indicating that the models driven by machine intelligence and deep learning can be effective in providing a quantitative view of the epidemical outbreak.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Autoencoders; COVID-19; Coronavirus pandemic; Deep learning; Logistic regression; Machine learning; South Korea; Survival prediction
Year: 2021 PMID: 34764592 PMCID: PMC8027716 DOI: 10.1007/s10489-021-02352-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Intell (Dordr) ISSN: 0924-669X Impact factor: 5.086
Drugs for treating COVID-19
| S.No. | Authors | Target Drug/Therapy |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Elfiky 2020 [ | IDX-184, Remidisvir, Sofosbuvir, and Ribavirin |
| 2. | Gao et al. 2020 [ | Chloroquine phosphate |
| 3. | Touret & de Lamballerie 2020 [ | Chloroquine |
| 4. | Cortegiani et al. 2020 [ | Chloroquine |
| 5. | Kalil 2020 [ | Favipiravir, chloroquine, brincidofovir, hydroxychloroquine, monoclonal antibodies, antisense RNA, and convalescent plasma |
| 6. | Gautret et al. 2020 [ | Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine |
| 7. | Baron et al. 2020 [ | Teicoplanin |
| 8. | Colson et al. 2020 [ | Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine |
| 9. | Cai et al. 2020 [ | Favipiravir (Antiviral therapy) |
| 10. | Wu et al. 2020 [ | TH17 responses in patients with SARS-CoV-2 and JAK2 inhibitor Fedratinib for reducing mortality of patients with TH17 type immune profiles |
Fig. 1Search trend analysis of related diseases in Korea
Fig. 2Analysis of confirmed & death cases of Corona outbreak
Fig. 3Analysis of confirmed cases over different age groups
Fig. 4Analysis of deceased cases over different age groups
Fig. 6Temporal evolution of deceased cases for (a) 2-days (b) 4-days (c) 8-days (d) 16-days (e) Overall
Fig. 7a Cluster map of detected corona cases congregated over of age-groups. b Map of age-groups clustered over age and time (in days)
Fig. 5Temporal evolution of confirmed cases for (a) 2-days (b) 4-days (c) 8-days (d) 16-days (e) Overall
Fig. 9Density distribution of death cases of COVID-19
Fig. 10Gender-based analysis of confirmed cases detected over corona deaths
Fig. 11Province-based analysis of corona infected cases in Korea
Fig. 12A working prototype of AI-based approaches with model parameters
Fig. 13Log-transformed intercept of patient age
Fig. 14Log-transformed intercept of days under coronavirus treatment
Fig. 15Number of days under treatment for recovered cases
Fig. 16Number of days under treatment for deceased cases
Fig. 17ANN model validation & training loss with (a) Adam optimizer in 70 epochs, and (b) Adagrad optimizer in 80 epochs while deep learning simulation
Fig. 18Survival prediction for isolated cases in South Korea with (a) ANN with binary cross-entropy & Adam optimizer, and (b) SVM with parameter optimization (c) Auto-encoder LR (d) Auto-encoder SVM
Fig. 19t-SNE plots for evaluating deceased & released cases while model training with auto-encoder. The graphs show (a) original divergence, and outcomes for (b) 10 epochs (c) 50 epochs (d) 100 epochs
Comparative Analysis of our proposed approach with other recent studies
| S.No. | Description | Approach | Results (Accuracy) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | We have implemented machine learning techniques along with ensemble deep learning techniques for achieving improved predictive performance. | Proposed Approach (1) LR (2) SVM (3) ANN with Adam Optimizer (4) ANN with Adagrad Optimizer (5) ANN with Autoencoder based SVM (6) ANN with Autoencoder based LR | (1) 91 % (2) 97 % (3) 99 % (4) 99 % (5) 99.16 % (6) 97.07 % |
| 2. | An ensemble approach using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Support Vector Machine is developed [ | Support Vector Machine + Convolution Neural Network (CNN) | 97 % |
| 3. | Research predicting the cumulative number of daily cases, deaths, and recovered cases using SVM [ | Support Vector Regression | 97 % in death prediction, and 87 % in forecasting daily new cases |
| 4. | A comparative analysis of various traditional prediction techniques [ | (1) SVM (2) Neural Network (3) Naïve Bayes (4) K-Nearest Neighbor (5) Decision Table (6) Decision Stump (7) OneR (8) ZeroR | (1) 92.95 % (2) 92.89 % (3) 90.58 % (4) 92.89 % (5) 92.95 % (6) 70.73 % (7) 68.36 % (8) 57.86 % |
| 5. | An Embedded approach was developed for prediction purposes. It is the amalgamation of Boosting and Random Forest [ | Boosted Random Forest | 94 % |
| 6. | Several machine learning techniques analyzed on COVID-19 data for analyzing the prediction performance [ | (1) IPCRidge (2) CoxPH (3) Coxnet (4) Stagewise GB (5) Componentwise GB (6) Fast SVM (7) Fast Kernel SVM | (1) 49.05 % (2) 70.63 % (3) 70.72 % (4) 71.47 % (5) 70.60 % (6) 70.65 % (7) 61.05 % |
| 7. | A stacked autoencoder detector model is proposed to improve overall statistical parameter of prediction models like accuracy, precision rate, and recall rate [ | Stacked autoencoder | 94.70 % |
| 8. | A convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures along with transfer learning are proposed for medical classification [ | Transfer learning with convolutional neural networks | 96.78 % |
| 9. | A forecasting model for COVID-19 spread is created using a neural network [ | Neural Network | Average accuracy approx. 97 % |
| 10. | An artificial neural network approach is developed to detect COVID-19 disease using capsule networks [ | Artificial Neural Network | 97.24 % for binary class, and 84.22 % for multi-class |