Literature DB >> 34761322

Evaluation of Apparent Noise on CT Images Using Moving Average Filters.

Keisuke Fujii1,2, Keiichi Nomura3, Kuniharu Imai4, Yoshihisa Muramatsu3, So Tsushima5, Hiroyuki Ota3.   

Abstract

This study aims to devise a simple method for evaluating the magnitude of texture noise (apparent noise) observed on computed tomography (CT) images scanned at a low radiation dose and reconstructed using iterative reconstruction (IR) and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithms, and to evaluate the apparent noise in CT images reconstructed using the filtered back projection (FBP), IR, and two types of DLR (AiCE Body and AiCE Body Sharp) algorithms. We set a square region of interest (ROI) on CT images of standard- and obese-sized low-contrast phantoms, slid different-sized moving average filters in the ROI vertically and horizontally in steps of 1 pixel, and calculated the standard deviation (SD) of the mean CT values for each filter size. The SD of the mean CT values was fitted with a curve inversely proportional to the filter size, and an apparent noise index was determined from the curve-fitting formula. The apparent noise index of AiCE Body Sharp images for a given mAs value was approximately 58, 23, and 18% lower than that of the FBP, AIDR 3D, and AiCE Body images, respectively. The apparent noise index was considered to reflect noise power spectrum values at lower spatial frequency. Moreover, the apparent noise index was inversely proportional to the square roots of the mAs values. Thus, the apparent noise index could be a useful indicator to quantify and compare texture noise on CT images obtained with different scan parameters and reconstruction algorithms.
© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apparent noise; CT; Deep learning reconstruction; Iterative reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34761322      PMCID: PMC8854541          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-021-00531-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  27 in total

1.  Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.

Authors:  Mitsuru Matsuki; Takamichi Murakami; Hiroshi Juri; Shushi Yoshikawa; Yoshifumi Narumi
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Evaluation of Low-Contrast Detectability of Iterative Reconstruction across Multiple Institutions, CT Scanner Manufacturers, and Radiation Exposure Levels.

Authors:  Ganesh Saiprasad; James Filliben; Adele Peskin; Eliot Siegel; Joseph Chen; Christopher Trimble; Zhitong Yang; Olav Christianson; Ehsan Samei; Elizabeth Krupinski; Alden Dima
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Deep learning reconstruction improves image quality of abdominal ultra-high-resolution CT.

Authors:  Motonori Akagi; Yuko Nakamura; Toru Higaki; Keigo Narita; Yukiko Honda; Jian Zhou; Zhou Yu; Naruomi Akino; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Methods for clinical evaluation of noise reduction techniques in abdominopelvic CT.

Authors:  Eric C Ehman; Lifeng Yu; Armando Manduca; Amy K Hara; Maria M Shiung; Dayna Jondal; David S Lake; Robert G Paden; Daniel J Blezek; Michael R Bruesewitz; Cynthia H McCollough; David M Hough; Joel G Fletcher
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality of Abdominopelvic CT Using Iterative (AIDR 3D) and Conventional Reconstructions.

Authors:  Caroline Duarte de Mello-Amoedo; Aparecido Nakano Martins; Adriano Tachibana; Daniella Ferraro Pinho; Ronaldo Hueb Baroni
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Effects of various generations of iterative CT reconstruction algorithms on low-contrast detectability as a function of the effective abdominal diameter: A quantitative task-based phantom study.

Authors:  Anais Viry; Christoph Aberle; Damien Racine; Jean-François Knebel; Sebastian T Schindera; Sabine Schmidt; Fabio Becce; Francis R Verdun
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  The noise power spectrum in computed X-ray tomography.

Authors:  S J Riederer; N J Pelc; D A Chesler
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Effect of Radiation Dose Reduction and Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Noise, Contrast, Resolution, and Detectability of Subtle Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions at Multidetector CT: Filtered Back Projection versus a Commercial Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm.

Authors:  Justin Solomon; Daniele Marin; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Bhavik Patel; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Image Quality and Lesion Detection on Deep Learning Reconstruction and Iterative Reconstruction of Submillisievert Chest and Abdominal CT.

Authors:  Ramandeep Singh; Subba R Digumarthy; Victorine V Muse; Avinash R Kambadakone; Michael A Blake; Azadeh Tabari; Yiemeng Hoi; Naruomi Akino; Erin Angel; Rachna Madan; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Improving image quality with model-based iterative reconstruction at quarter of nominal dose in upper abdominal CT.

Authors:  Xirong Zhang; Jing Chen; Nan Yu; Zhanli Ren; Qian Tian; Xin Tian; Taiping He; Changyi Guo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.