Literature DB >> 34760607

In training emergency physicians the carotid artery Doppler with passive leg raise, does previous sonographic experience influence scan time and competency?

Robert Osgood1,2, Sangeeth Mohan1,3, Lisa John1,4, Erin Stirling1, Scott Stirling1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Determination of fluid responsiveness (FR) associated with intravascular fluid resuscitation in hypotensive patients poses a challenge, with current best evidence methods fraught with poor retest reliability and difficulty in image acquisition (Osman, Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 64; Marik, Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2642). Doppler carotid blood flow with passive leg raise (PLR) is a recent modality for determining FR (Marik, Chest 2013; 143: 364).
PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine whether emergency physicians with limited ultrasound experience can reliably acquire this skill.
METHOD: This prospective study recruited 60 emergency physicians with varying experience, who underwent a 3-step learning programme. Participants performed carotid velocity time integral (VTi) Doppler on healthy subjects, followed by repeat measurements in the PLR position. A 16-point checklist and time recorded were assessed for each sonographer, with each participant completing a post-study questionnaire to evaluate perceived competence and ease of skill acquisition.
RESULTS: Of the 60 emergency physicians recruited, 37 (61.6%) were inexperienced and 23 (38.4%) were experienced. Against the 16-point assessment, 61% completed assessment without any errors. Fifty-six out of 60 (94.3%) completed the assessment to acceptable standard with errors recognised and corrected, and four participants (6.7%) made critical errors without correction (Figure 1). Average (±SEM) total scan time was 4:52 ± 0:19, with no significant difference found between inexperienced and experienced groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated feasibility to train emergency physicians, demonstrating that average FR assessment was obtained within 5 min, with no difference between prior experience in scan quality/time taken. 94% completed the scan to acceptable standards, demonstrating ease of carotid Doppler flow with PLR to provide critical information in management of the hypotensive patient.
© 2020 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and State of Queensland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  POCUS; carotid VTi; emergency medicine training; fluid responsiveness; fluid resuscitation; haemodynamics; shock; ultrasonography

Year:  2020        PMID: 34760607      PMCID: PMC8412025          DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 1836-6864


  16 in total

1.  Comparing Changes in Carotid Flow Time and Stroke Volume Induced by Passive Leg Raising.

Authors:  Bilal Jalil; Patton Thompson; Rodrigo Cavallazzi; Paul Marik; Jason Mann; Karim El-Kersh; Juan Guardiola; Mohamed Saad
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.378

2.  Measuring cardiac index with a focused cardiac ultrasound examination in the ED.

Authors:  Vi Am Dinh; H Samuel Ko; Rajiv Rao; Ramesh C Bansal; Dustin D Smith; Tae Eung Kim; H Bryant Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Initial accuracy of bedside ultrasound performed by emergency physicians for multiple indications after a short training period.

Authors:  Juan Torres-Macho; Juan M Antón-Santos; Isabel García-Gutierrez; María de Castro-García; Sergio Gámez-Díez; Pilar García de la Torre; Gonzalo Latorre-Barcenilla; Yolanda Majo-Carbajo; Juan C Reparaz-González; Gonzalo García de Casasola
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 2.469

Review 4.  Liberal versus restricted fluid resuscitation strategies in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies*.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Wang; Wen-Han Hsieh; Hao-Chang Chou; Yu-Sheng Huang; Jen-Hsiang Shen; Yee Hui Yeo; Huai-En Chang; Shyr-Chyr Chen; Chien-Chang Lee
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge.

Authors:  David Osman; Christophe Ridel; Patrick Ray; Xavier Monnet; Nadia Anguel; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 6.  Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Rodrigo Cavallazzi; Tajender Vasu; Amyn Hirani
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Rodrigo Cavallazzi
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  The use of bioreactance and carotid Doppler to determine volume responsiveness and blood flow redistribution following passive leg raising in hemodynamically unstable patients.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Alex Levitov; Alisha Young; Lois Andrews
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 9.  Iatrogenic salt water drowning and the hazards of a high central venous pressure.

Authors:  Paul E Marik
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 10.  Assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department.

Authors:  David C Mackenzie; Vicki E Noble
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2014-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.