Literature DB >> 29406045

Comparing Changes in Carotid Flow Time and Stroke Volume Induced by Passive Leg Raising.

Bilal Jalil1, Patton Thompson2, Rodrigo Cavallazzi2, Paul Marik3, Jason Mann2, Karim El-Kersh2, Juan Guardiola2, Mohamed Saad2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Determining volume responsiveness in critically ill patients is challenging. We sought to determine if passive leg raise (PLR) induced changes in pulsed wave Doppler of the carotid artery flow time could predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical intensive care unit patients ≥18 years old with a radial arterial line and FloTrac/Vigileo monitor in place were enrolled. Pulsed wave Doppler of the carotid artery was performed to measure the change in carotid flow time (CFTC) in response to a PLR. Patients were categorized as fluid responders if stroke volume increased by ≥15% on a Vigileo monitor. The main outcome measure was the accuracy of CFTC to detect a change in response to a PLR. We also calculated the percentage increase in CFTC that could predict fluid responsiveness.
RESULTS: We enrolled 22 patients. Using an increase of ≥24.6% in the CFTC in response to PLR to predict fluid responsiveness there was a sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 92%, positive likelihood ratio of 7.2, negative likelihood ratio of 0.4, positive predictive value of 86%, negative predictive value of 73% and receiver operating characteristic of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.54-0.96).
CONCLUSIONS: CFTC performs well compared to stroke volume measurements on a Vigileo monitor. The use of CFTC is highlighted in resource-limited environments and when time limits the use of other methods. CFTc should be validated in a larger study with more operators against a variety of hemodynamic monitors.
Copyright © 2018 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid artery; Flow time; Fluid responsiveness; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29406045     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2017.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Sci        ISSN: 0002-9629            Impact factor:   2.378


  10 in total

1.  Ultrasound Assessment of the Change in Carotid Corrected Flow Time in Fluid Responsiveness in Undifferentiated Shock.

Authors:  Igor Barjaktarevic; William E Toppen; Scott Hu; Elizabeth Aquije Montoya; Stephanie Ong; Russell Buhr; Ian J David; Tisha Wang; Talayeh Rezayat; Steven Y Chang; David Elashoff; Daniela Markovic; David Berlin; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Evaluating corrected carotid flow time as a non-invasive parameter for trending cardiac output and stroke volume in cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  Joris van Houte; Anniek E Raaijmaakers; Frederik J Mooi; Loek P B Meijs; Esmée C de Boer; Irene Suriani; Saskia Houterman; Leon J Montenij; Arthur R Bouwman
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2022-04-09

3.  In training emergency physicians the carotid artery Doppler with passive leg raise, does previous sonographic experience influence scan time and competency?

Authors:  Robert Osgood; Sangeeth Mohan; Lisa John; Erin Stirling; Scott Stirling
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-04-16

4.  Change in Carotid Blood Flow and Carotid Corrected Flow Time Assessed by Novice Sonologists Fails to Determine Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Authors:  Adeel Abbasi; Nader Azab; Mohammed Nayeemuddin; Alexandra Schick; Thomas Lopardo; Gary S Phillips; Roland C Merchant; Mitchell M Levy; Michael Blaivas; Keith A Corl
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Diagnostic characteristics of 11 formulae for calculating corrected flow time as measured by a wearable Doppler patch.

Authors:  Jon-Émile S Kenny; Igor Barjaktarevic; David C Mackenzie; Andrew M Eibl; Matthew Parrotta; Bradley F Long; Joseph K Eibl
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2020-09-17

6.  A Carotid Doppler Patch Accurately Tracks Stroke Volume Changes During a Preload-Modifying Maneuver in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Jon-Émile S Kenny; Igor Barjaktarevic; Andrew M Eibl; Matthew Parrotta; Bradley F Long; Joseph K Eibl; Frederic Michard
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2020-01-29

7.  Emergency department non-invasive cardiac output study (EDNICO): an accuracy study.

Authors:  David McGregor; Shrey Sharma; Saksham Gupta; Shanaz Ahmed; Tim Harris
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  USER Protocol as a Guide to Resuscitation of the Patient with Septic Shock in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  German Devia Jaramillo; Salvador Menendez Ramirez
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2021-02-12

9.  VALUE OF CORRECTED FLOW TIME IN COMMON CAROTID ARTERY IN PREDICTING VOLUME RESPONSIVENESS UNDER MECHANICAL VENTILATION.

Authors:  Hongzhi Wang; Wei Chen; Hao Cheng; Can Liu; WeiDong Yao; Fang Ding; YuLong Wang; Yongquan Chen
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Comparison of accuracy of two uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output monitors in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients using pulmonary artery catheter-thermodilution as a reference.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Mukkamala; Benjamin A Kohl; Aman Mahajan
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.217

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.