Literature DB >> 34760536

Comparing the effectiveness of training course formats for point-of-care ultrasound in the third trimester of pregnancy.

Susan Campbell Westerway1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The availability of obstetric point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) services has been shown to improve pregnancy outcomes in regional and remote areas both in Australia and around the world. There is an increasing demand for efficient, cost-effective PoCUS courses for monitoring the fetus in the third trimester of pregnancy. AIM: To compare the effectiveness of targeted PoCUS courses provided for health professionals that assess the fetus during the third trimester of pregnancy.
METHOD: The skill-teaching curriculum and competency outcomes of six obstetric PoCUS courses were compared. There were 55 learners with no prior ultrasound experience including 23 with English as a second language. Course duration ranged from 4 to 18 h, didactic lecture time up to 6 h and practical scanning sessions of 3-12 h. Learner/tutor ratio varied from 1:1 to 6:1. All courses included the teaching of knobology, image optimisation and probe manipulation. Practical sessions included supervised scanning of ultrasound phantoms and scanning women in the third trimester of pregnancy. The teaching outcomes that were assessed included image optimisation, determination of fetal lie, fetal heart rate, measuring the single deepest pocket of amniotic fluid, identifying the placental position and basic fetal biometry. The same pre- and post-course multiple choice test and course evaluation forms were used for every programme.
RESULTS: All participants achieved the limited course objectives, regardless of the differences in the course formats.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms that obstetric PoCUS courses can provide the initial basic knowledge and scanning skills required to perform limited scope third-trimester scanning.
© 2019 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  obstetric; point‐of‐care; training; ultrasound

Year:  2019        PMID: 34760536      PMCID: PMC8411680          DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 1836-6864


  14 in total

1.  Focused maternal ultrasound by midwives in rural Zambia.

Authors:  Heidi Harbison Kimberly; Alice Murray; Maria Mennicke; Andrew Liteplo; Jason Lew; J Stephen Bohan; Lynda Tyer-Viola; Roy Ahn; Thomas Burke; Vicki E Noble
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Evaluation of an Obstetric Ultrasound Curriculum for Midwives in Liberia.

Authors:  Suzanne Bentley; Braden Hexom; Bret P Nelson
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Huge poor-rich inequalities in maternity care: an international comparative study of maternity and child care in developing countries.

Authors:  Tanja A J Houweling; Carine Ronsmans; Oona M R Campbell; Anton E Kunst
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 4.  Psychomotor skills in medical ultrasound imaging: an analysis of the core skill set.

Authors:  Delwyn Nicholls; Linda Sweet; Jon Hyett
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Physicians' experiences and views on the role of obstetric ultrasound in rural and urban Rwanda: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Joseph Ntaganira; Annika Åhman; Jean Paul Semasaka Sengoma; Rhonda Small; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Review article: Use of ultrasound in the developing world.

Authors:  Stephanie Sippel; Krithika Muruganandan; Adam Levine; Sachita Shah
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-12-07

7.  Perceived barriers in the use of ultrasound in developing countries.

Authors:  Sachita Shah; Blaise A Bellows; Adeyinka A Adedipe; Jodie E Totten; Brandon H Backlund; Dana Sajed
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2015-06-19

8.  A low-cost ultrasound program leads to increased antenatal clinic visits and attended deliveries at a health care clinic in rural Uganda.

Authors:  Andrew B Ross; Kristen K DeStigter; Matthew Rielly; Sonia Souza; Gabriel Eli Morey; Melissa Nelson; Eric Z Silfen; Brian Garra; Alphonsus Matovu; Michael Grace Kawooya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparing Kirkpatrick's original and new model with CIPP evaluation model.

Authors:  Roghayeh Gandomkar
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2018-04

10.  Improved maternity care if midwives learn to perform ultrasound: a qualitative study of Rwandan midwives' experiences and views of obstetric ultrasound.

Authors:  Sophia Holmlund; Joseph Ntaganira; Kristina Edvardsson; Pham Thi Lan; Jean Paul Semasaka Sengoma; Annika Åhman; Rhonda Small; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.640

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of antenatal Point-of-Care Ultrasound (PoCUS) training: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amber Bidner; Eva Bezak; Nayana Parange
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2022-12

2.  Experiences of midwives on Vscan limited obstetric ultrasound use: a qualitative exploratory study.

Authors:  Mesele Damte Argaw; Hailemariam Segni Abawollo; Zergu Taffesse Tsegaye; Ismael Ali Beshir; Heran Demissie Damte; Birhan Tenaw Mengesha; Zenawork Kassa Gebremedhin; Atrie Fekadu Heyi; Asfaw Adugna Guteta; Tsega Teferi Mamo; Amare Assefa Anara; Zelalem Yilma Emiru; Feyisa Serbessa Yadeta; Almaz Bekele Wami; Mengistu Asnake Kibret; Binyam Fekadu Desta
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.