Peter James Snelling1,2. 1. Emergency Department Lady Cilento Children's Hospital South Brisbane Queensland Australia. 2. School of Medicine The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Forearm injuries are a common presentation to the emergency department. Point-of-care ultrasound has been demonstrated to be an accurate and well-tolerated tool in the diagnosis of non-angulated paediatric distal forearm fractures. Ultrasound model simulation is a practical alternative for ultrasound education. AIMS: To describe the construction and validation of a low-cost ultrasound model for the simulation of non-angulated paediatric buckle and greenstick distal forearm fractures, for the educational instruction of healthcare providers. MATERIALS & METHODS: The materials for the basic paediatric fracture model include turkey or chicken bones soaked in white vinegar to make them pliable, food-grade gelatine and plastic containers. The fidelity can be improved by using synthetic gelatine set in a cylindrical mould, which can be placed within a manikin forearm. RESULTS: The models were validated by five paediatric emergency nurse practitioners and five paediatric emergency physicians. All participants were able to correctly identify the fracture types. All participants rated the models highly for both realism and educational value, with a preference for the turkey bone model as a better representation of buckle fractures. DISCUSSION: The ultrasound model described in this article can be made from low-cost materials that can be easily sourced, which facilitates the identification of the different paediatric fracture subtypes, with the additional advantage of not causing discomfort to a child. A limitation of this model includes its inability to simulate the radiolucent epiphysis and represent Salter-Harris fracture subtypes. CONCLUSION: This low-cost, high-fidelity ultrasound model presents both an accurate and practical educational model for training healthcare providers, with a preference towards the turkey bone model.
BACKGROUND: Forearm injuries are a common presentation to the emergency department. Point-of-care ultrasound has been demonstrated to be an accurate and well-tolerated tool in the diagnosis of non-angulated paediatric distal forearm fractures. Ultrasound model simulation is a practical alternative for ultrasound education. AIMS: To describe the construction and validation of a low-cost ultrasound model for the simulation of non-angulated paediatric buckle and greenstick distal forearm fractures, for the educational instruction of healthcare providers. MATERIALS & METHODS: The materials for the basic paediatric fracture model include turkey or chicken bones soaked in white vinegar to make them pliable, food-grade gelatine and plastic containers. The fidelity can be improved by using synthetic gelatine set in a cylindrical mould, which can be placed within a manikin forearm. RESULTS: The models were validated by five paediatric emergency nurse practitioners and five paediatric emergency physicians. All participants were able to correctly identify the fracture types. All participants rated the models highly for both realism and educational value, with a preference for the turkey bone model as a better representation of buckle fractures. DISCUSSION: The ultrasound model described in this article can be made from low-cost materials that can be easily sourced, which facilitates the identification of the different paediatric fracture subtypes, with the additional advantage of not causing discomfort to a child. A limitation of this model includes its inability to simulate the radiolucent epiphysis and represent Salter-Harris fracture subtypes. CONCLUSION: This low-cost, high-fidelity ultrasound model presents both an accurate and practical educational model for training healthcare providers, with a preference towards the turkey bone model.
Authors: Leigh V Evans; Kelly L Dodge; Tanya D Shah; Lewis J Kaplan; Mark D Siegel; Christopher L Moore; Cara J Hamann; Zhenqiu Lin; Gail D'Onofrio Journal: Acad Med Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Ole Ackermann; Peter Liedgens; Kolja Eckert; Emmanuel Chelangattucherry; Christian Ruelander; Ioannis Emmanouilidis; Steffen Ruchholtz Journal: J Med Ultrason (2001) Date: 2010-04-23 Impact factor: 1.314
Authors: Naveen Poonai; Frank Myslik; Gary Joubert; Josiah Fan; Amita Misir; Victor Istasy; Melanie Columbus; Robert Soegtrop; Alex Goldfarb; Drew Thompson; Alexander Sasha Dubrovsky Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Djoke Douma-den Hamer; Marco H Blanker; Mireille A Edens; Lonneke N Buijteweg; Martijn F Boomsma; Sven H van Helden; Gert-Jan Mauritz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Peter J Snelling; Philip Jones; Mark Moore; Peta Gimpel; Rosemary Rogers; Kong Liew; Robert S Ware; Gerben Keijzers Journal: Australas J Ultrasound Med Date: 2022-03-07