Linda Wu1, Ana Ferreira1, Gordon N Stevenson1,2, Jennifer Sanderson1,2, Aditi Mahajan1, Neama Meriki3,4, Alec W Welsh1,2. 1. School of Women's & Children's Health UNSW Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia. 2. Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Royal Hospital for Women Sydney New South Wales Australia. 3. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology College of Medicine King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia. 4. Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine King Khalid University Hospital Riyadh Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: 4D (3D + time) indices of tissue impedance using power Doppler (PD) ultrasound (US) can be measured with spatial-temporal image correlation (STIC) imaging. We wished to evaluate their repeatability and their influence under changes to US machine settings and regional differences within the placenta. METHODS: A total of 46 healthy women were recruited at 20-34 weeks of gestation. A total of 9940 3D frames from 644 4D data sets were analysed providing both 3D and 4D indices of vascularity. 4D vs. 3D indices were compared with different machine settings, across the cardiac cycle and in the different placenta regions to assess regional variability. RESULTS: 3D and 4D indices significantly decreased as wall motion filter (WMF) was increased (P < 0.001). Repeatability decreased as WMF increased (ICC; low1 = 0.80; high1 = 0.60). Indices were significantly lower at the maternal aspect (P = 0.002-0.009) of the placenta and showed less repeatability (ICC; 0.42-0.79) than the fetal aspect (ICC 0.49-0.88). 4D repeatability was good in the central region (ICC 0.80-0.81) but poor in the periphery (ICC 0.45-0.59), while 3D indices were good and comparable between regions (ICC; 0.80 central; 0.81 peripheral). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the future use of WMF 'low1' and PD to generate more reliable 4D indices values. For 3D indices, HD Flow may improve Doppler signal sensitivity. Regarding placental regional variability, the fetal plate and the central region demonstrated more repeatable 4D indices. 4D PD indices have potential to overcome the limitations of VOCAL™ indices and provide an internally standardised measure of localised impedance in vascular beds.
OBJECTIVES: 4D (3D + time) indices of tissue impedance using power Doppler (PD) ultrasound (US) can be measured with spatial-temporal image correlation (STIC) imaging. We wished to evaluate their repeatability and their influence under changes to US machine settings and regional differences within the placenta. METHODS: A total of 46 healthy women were recruited at 20-34 weeks of gestation. A total of 9940 3D frames from 644 4D data sets were analysed providing both 3D and 4D indices of vascularity. 4D vs. 3D indices were compared with different machine settings, across the cardiac cycle and in the different placenta regions to assess regional variability. RESULTS: 3D and 4D indices significantly decreased as wall motion filter (WMF) was increased (P < 0.001). Repeatability decreased as WMF increased (ICC; low1 = 0.80; high1 = 0.60). Indices were significantly lower at the maternal aspect (P = 0.002-0.009) of the placenta and showed less repeatability (ICC; 0.42-0.79) than the fetal aspect (ICC 0.49-0.88). 4D repeatability was good in the central region (ICC 0.80-0.81) but poor in the periphery (ICC 0.45-0.59), while 3D indices were good and comparable between regions (ICC; 0.80 central; 0.81 peripheral). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the future use of WMF 'low1' and PD to generate more reliable 4D indices values. For 3D indices, HD Flow may improve Doppler signal sensitivity. Regarding placental regional variability, the fetal plate and the central region demonstrated more repeatable 4D indices. 4D PD indices have potential to overcome the limitations of VOCAL™ indices and provide an internally standardised measure of localised impedance in vascular beds.
Authors: N J Raine-Fenning; N M Nordin; K V Ramnarine; B K Campbell; J S Clewes; A Perkins; I R Johnson Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: A H Miyague; N J Raine-Fenning; L Polanski; L H Martinez; E Araujo Júnior; T Z Pavan; W P Martins Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-09-22 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: E Hernandez-Andrade; T Jansson; D Ley; M Bellander; M Persson; G Lingman; K Marsál Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 7.299