| Literature DB >> 34758207 |
K Amande M Pauls1,2, Jussi Toppila3, Maija Koivu1, Johanna Eerola-Rautio1, Marianne Udd4, Eero Pekkonen1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Levodopa-carbidopa-intestinal-gel (LCIG) infusion is an effective treatment for advanced PD with motor fluctuations. Polyneuropathy occurs as a complication in 10-15% of patients. We wanted to assess the frequency of polyneuropathy in Finnish advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with continuous LCIG infusion, and the value of different clinical monitoring parameters during follow-up.Entities:
Keywords: LCIG; Parkinson's disease; levodopa infusion; polyneuropathy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34758207 PMCID: PMC8671764 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Behav Impact factor: 2.708
Patient demographics
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 | 41 | f | 10 | 20 | 73 | 37 + 4 | n.a. | 800 | 1083 | 35% | 800 | 1083 | 35% |
| 2 | 58 | m | 12 | 20 | 53 | n.a. | 33 | 1200 | 1571 | 31% | 1380 | 1751 | 27% |
| 3 | 81 | m | 18 | 30 | 38 | 22 + 3 | 18 + 2 | 1564 | 1787 | 14% | 1564 | 1787 | 14% |
| 4 | 70 | f | 9 | 24 | 26 | 15 + 3 | n.a. | 574 | 1199 | 109% | 754 | 1199 | 59% |
| 5 | 55 | f | 7 | 18 | 48 | 22 + 3 | 28 + 2 | 982 | 1158 | 18% | 1102 | 1278 | 16% |
| 8 | 80 | m | 13 | 24 | 49 | 27 + 2 | 24 | 1397 | 2280 | 63% | 1520 | 2403 | 58% |
| 9 | 67 | f | 16 | 27 | 42 | 12 + 1 | 18 | 848 | 1431 | 69% | 1163 | 1746 | 50% |
| 10 | 68 | f | 18 | 26 | 50 | 13 | 18 | 1081 | 1433 | 33% | 1396 | 1748 | 25% |
| 14 | 69 | m | 8 | 27 | 58 | 54 | n.a. | 973 | 1212 | 25% | 973 | 1212 | 25% |
| 16 | 73 | m | 12 | 28 | 34 | 19 | 27 | 665 | 1238 | 86% | 845 | 1418 | 68% |
| 17 | 73 | f | 16 | 29 | 58 | 15 + 2 | 19 + 2 | 973 | 1205 | 24% | 1213 | 1445 | 19% |
| 18 | 75 | f | 14 | n.a. | 63 | 39 + 2 | 39 | 1000 | 932 | −7% | 1052 | 984 | −6% |
| 19 | 70 | m | 8 | 24 | 38 | 33 | 31 | 915 | 1502 | 64% | 1072 | 1554 | 45% |
| 6 | 64 | f | 7 | 27 | 35 | 20 + 3 | 30 + 1 | 1200 | 1805 | 50% | 1352 | 1805 | 34% |
| 7 | 76 | f | 11 | 23 | 55 | 33 | 33 | 1463 | 2337 | 60% | 1463 | 2337 | 60% |
| 11 | 75 | m | 10 | 30 | 35 | 21 | 24 | 950 | 2136 | 125% | 950 | 2136 | 125% |
| 12 | 75 | f | 6 | 29 | 64 | 27 | 31 | 1650 | 2123 | 29% | 2110 | 2123 | 1% |
| 13 | 66 | m | 11 | 30 | 39 | 15 + 2 | 7 + 1 | 1746 | 1584 | −9% | 1746 | 1584 | −9% |
| 15 | 64 | m | 25 | 22 | 61 | 29 + 3 | 37 + 2 | 1248 | 1606 | 29% | 1248 | 1606 | 29% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light shading indicates patients that were substituted with vitamin B6, B12, and folate at baseline (others were not). Dark shading indicates patients who developed a polyneuropathy after treatment initiation. LD – Levodopa dose, LED – Levodopa equivalent dose, MMSE – Mini mental state examination, UPDRS III – Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale part III (motor assessment).
Global dyskinesia score, range 0 (no dyskinesia) to 4 (severe dyskinesia), given if available.
Levodopa monotherapy.
**Change to levodopa monotherapy during observation period.
Patient clinical details
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 19.4 | 21.0 | 7.8 | 11 | 16 | 45.5 | n | n | n | n | n | red. | |
| 2 | 26.2 | 24.7 | −5.9 | 13 | 22 | 69.2 | n | n | n | n | n | red. | Axonal |
| 3 | 22.6 | 23.2 | 2.5 | 11 | 22 | 100.0 | n | n | elev. | n | n | n | |
| 4 | 22.0 | 21.4 | −2.8 | 13 | 34 | 161.5 | n | n | n | n | n | red. | |
| 5 | 22.7 | 23.4 | 3.4 | 11 | 11 | 0.0 | n | n | n | n | n | n | |
| 8 | 23.6 | 24.1 | 2.1 | 18 | 25 | 38.9 | n | n | n | elev. | n | n | |
| 9 | 17.3 | 16.7 | −3.2 | 12 | 18 | 50.0 | n | n | n | n | n | red. | |
| 10 | 24.3 | 23.1 | −4.8 | 22 | 20 | −9.1 | n | n | elev. | elev. | n | n | |
| 14 | 18.3 | 18.6 | 1.6 | 8 | 13 | 62.5 | n | n | elev. | elev. | n | n | |
| 16 | 22.8 | 21.1 | −7.6 | 19 | 22 | 15.8 | n | n | n | n | elev. | n | Demyel. |
| 17 | 23.6 | 24.4 | 3.4 | 12 | 13 | 8.3 | n | n | n | elev. | elev. | red. | |
| 18 | 18.4 | 18.4 | 0.2 | 14 | 10 | −28.6 | n | n | n | elev. | red. | n | |
| 19 | 29.1 | 28.9 | −0.5 | 21 | 30 | 42.9 | n | n | n | n | n | n | |
| 6* | 17.6 | 20.8 | 17.6 | 27 | 14 | −48.1 | n | elev. | n | n | red. | elev. | |
| 7* | 19.8 | 20.6 | 4.0 | 22 | 14 | −36.4 | n | elev. | elev. | elev. | red. | elev. | |
| 11* | 29.9 | 30.3 | 1.5 | 8 | 9 | 12.5 | n | elev. | n | n | elev. | n | |
| 12* | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 18 | 14 | −22.2 | n | elev. | n | elev. | elev. | elev. | |
| 13* | 23.8 | 24.0 | 0.7 | 16 | 15 | −6.3 | n | n | n | elev. | n | elev. | |
| 15* | 20.8 | 22.1 | 6.1 | 42 | 16 | −61.9 | n | elev. | n | n | red. | n | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rows in light grey highlight patients with B‐vitamin substitution from baseline onward (marked with *), dark grey highlighting marks patients who developed polyneuropathy.
BMI, body mass index; PNP, polyneuropathy; n, normal; elev., elevated; red., reduced.
FIGURE 1Homocysteine level change is influenced by B‐vitamin substitution. Homocysteine level increased in the no‐substitution group (14.2 to 19.7 umol/L, paired samples t‐test, p = 0.010), whereas homocysteine levels tend to decrease in patients with B‐vitamin substitution (22.2 to 13.7 umol/L, Wilcoxon signed‐rank test for paired samples, p = 0.058, n.s.)
FIGURE 2Increased homocysteine plasma correlated with daily LD increase in patients without vitamin B substitution (Pearson correlation, r = 0.64, p = 0.018), whereas there was no correlation in substituted patients (Spearman correlation, rho = 0.26, p = 0.62)