Luciano Augusto Cano Martins1, Eduarda Helena Leandro Nascimento2, Hugo Gaêta-Araujo3, Matheus L Oliveira1, Deborah Queiroz Freitas1. 1. Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. 2. Department of Dentistry, Division of Oral Radiology, Odontomed Imagem - Medical and Dental Services, Recife, PE, Brazil. 3. Oral Radiology Area, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Alfenas (UNIFAL-MG), Alfenas, MG, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To map the shape, location, and thickness of the focal trough of a panoramic radiography device with a multilayer imaging program. METHODS: An acrylic plate (148 × 148 × 3 mm) containing 1156 holes distributed in a matrix of 34 × 34 rows was placed in the OP300 Maxio at the levels of the maxilla and mandible. 20 metal spheres (3.5 mm in diameter) were placed on the holes of the plate under 15 different arrangements and panoramic images were acquired for each arrangement at 66 kV, 8 mA, and an exposure time of 16 s. The resulting panoramic radiographs from the five image layers were exported, the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the metal spheres were measured in all images using the Image J software, and the magnification and distortion rates of the spheres were calculated. All metal spheres presenting a magnification rate lower than 30% in both vertical and horizontal dimensions and a distortion rate lower than 10% were considered to map the focal troughs of each of the five image layers. RESULTS: All panoramic image layers had a curved shape ranging from 39° to 51° for both dental arches and varied in position and thickness. The anterior region of maxilla was anteriorly displaced when compared to the anterior region of the mandible for all layers. Image layers are thicker at the level of the mandible than those at the level of the maxilla; also, inner layers were thinner and outer layers were thicker. CONCLUSION: All image layers in the studied panoramic radiography device had a curved shape and varied in position and thickness. The anterior region of maxilla was anteriorly displaced when compared to that of the mandible for all layers.
OBJECTIVE: To map the shape, location, and thickness of the focal trough of a panoramic radiography device with a multilayer imaging program. METHODS: An acrylic plate (148 × 148 × 3 mm) containing 1156 holes distributed in a matrix of 34 × 34 rows was placed in the OP300 Maxio at the levels of the maxilla and mandible. 20 metal spheres (3.5 mm in diameter) were placed on the holes of the plate under 15 different arrangements and panoramic images were acquired for each arrangement at 66 kV, 8 mA, and an exposure time of 16 s. The resulting panoramic radiographs from the five image layers were exported, the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the metal spheres were measured in all images using the Image J software, and the magnification and distortion rates of the spheres were calculated. All metal spheres presenting a magnification rate lower than 30% in both vertical and horizontal dimensions and a distortion rate lower than 10% were considered to map the focal troughs of each of the five image layers. RESULTS: All panoramic image layers had a curved shape ranging from 39° to 51° for both dental arches and varied in position and thickness. The anterior region of maxilla was anteriorly displaced when compared to the anterior region of the mandible for all layers. Image layers are thicker at the level of the mandible than those at the level of the maxilla; also, inner layers were thinner and outer layers were thicker. CONCLUSION: All image layers in the studied panoramic radiography device had a curved shape and varied in position and thickness. The anterior region of maxilla was anteriorly displaced when compared to that of the mandible for all layers.
Entities:
Keywords:
Digital Dental Radiography; Panoramic Radiography; Tomosynthesis
Authors: M Noujeim; T Prihoda; W D McDavid; K Ogawa; T Yamakawa; K Seki; T Okano; T Sue; R P Langlais Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Sally M Mauriello; Angela M Broome; Enrique Platin; André Mol; Christina Inscoe; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou; Kevin Moss Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 2.419