Literature DB >> 34757675

Retrospective study of acne telemedicine and in-person visits at an academic center during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Lilly Gu1, Susana Martinez Diaz1, Shari R Lipner2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; acne; teledermatology; telehealth; telemedicine

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34757675      PMCID: PMC8661784          DOI: 10.1111/jocd.14606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol        ISSN: 1473-2130            Impact factor:   2.189


× No keyword cloud information.
clinical laboratory improvement amendments Coronavirus disease 2019 food and drug administration international classification of diseases human chorionic gonadotropin

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors report no conflict of interest related to the content of the manuscript. To the Editor, The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has resulted in significant changes in dermatologic patient care. Studies on acne visits during this time are limited. , Our objectives were to analyze characteristics of acne visits during the pandemic. After Institutional Review Board approval, patients with an acne diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases (ICD‐10) codes L70.9, 70.0, 70.3), from March 16, 2020 to May 20, 2020, were queried from electronic health records. Characteristics of first dermatology visits, from March 16, 2020 to May 20, 2020, and follow‐ups, from March 16, 2020 to December 31, 2020, were analyzed using standard difference of proportions and difference of means t‐tests for continuous variables and categorical variables, respectively (significance p < 0.05). Five hundred and five acne patients were seen, from March 16, 2020 to May 20, 2020, with mean age 27.7 years, 69.5% females, and 95.0% of visits conducted by telemedicine. Video visits comprised 52.4% of follow‐ups, June 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. On average, patients with in‐person vs video visits lived significantly closer (4.5 vs. 9.3 miles, respectively) (p < 0.05) (Table 1).
TABLE 1

Patient demographics and clinical characteristics of acne visits 3/16/20‐5/20/20

TotalIn‐person visit (Percentage)Video visit (Percentage)
Number of patients50525 (5.0%)480 (95.0%)
Mean age27.7 (SD 12.2; range 1–72)32.5 (SD 18.3; range 13–72)27.5 (SD 11.7; range 1–70)
Gender
Male154 (30.5%)10 (40.0%)144 (30.0%)
Female351 (69.5%)15 (60.0%)336 (70.0%)
Race
White234 (46.3%)15 (60.0%)219 (45.6%)
Black or African American37 (7.3%)2 (8.0%)35 (7.3%)
Asian39 (7.7%)1 (4.0%)38 (7.9%)
Other51 (10.1%)1 (4.0%)50 (10.4%)
Declined144 (28.5%)6 (24.0%)138 (28.8%)
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino or Spanish47 (9.3%)0 (0.0%)47 (9.8%)
Not Hispanic or Latino or Spanish278 (55.0%)19 (76.0%)259 (54.0%)
Other17 (3.4%)1 (4.0%)16 (3.3%)
Declined163 (32.3%)5 (20.0%)157 (32.7%)
Mean distance from clinic (miles)*9.1 (SD 20.2)4.5 (SD 4.4)9.3 (SD 20.6)
Follow‐up Appointment Type
3/16/2020–5/30/202013212 (9.1%)120 (90.9%)
6/1/2020–12/31/20519247 (47.6%)272 (52.4%)
Mean time until follow‐up (days)*83.4 (SD 64.0)62.4 (SD 41.0)84.9 (SD 65.1)

Mean distance from clinic was calculated as the distance in miles between the zip code of the patient's home address and the zip code of the clinic, 10021. Outliers were excluded from analysis. Mean number of days until follow‐up included only patients who had a follow‐up appointment. A total of 213 patients did not have follow‐up appointments yet. *Indicates significant differences between in‐person vs video visits (p < 0.05).

Patient demographics and clinical characteristics of acne visits 3/16/20‐5/20/20 Mean distance from clinic was calculated as the distance in miles between the zip code of the patient's home address and the zip code of the clinic, 10021. Outliers were excluded from analysis. Mean number of days until follow‐up included only patients who had a follow‐up appointment. A total of 213 patients did not have follow‐up appointments yet. *Indicates significant differences between in‐person vs video visits (p < 0.05). Topical medications were most frequently prescribed compared to systemics (72.5% vs 27.5% total, respectively), with significantly higher percentage new vs established patients initiated on topicals (81.1% vs 69.5%, respectively) (p < 0.05) (Supplemental Table). One hundred and fourteen patients were treated with isotretinoin, with mean age 23.8 years and 47.4% females. Urine pregnancy tests were ordered for 90.7% of females. One hundred and one patients were treated with spironolactone, with mean age 30.4 years. Baseline potassium levels were ordered for 21.8% of patients (22.7% ≤ 45, 0% > 45 years) (Table 2). Follow‐up visits were virtual for 70.6% and 60.2% of patients on isotretinoin and spironolactone, respectively.
TABLE 2

Patient demographics and clinical characteristics of acne patients on isotretinoin or spironolactone 3/16/20‐5/20/20

Isotretinoin patientsSpironolactone patients
Number of patients114Number of patients101
Mean age23.8 (SD 7.5)Mean age30.4 (SD 7.2)
GenderPatients with baseline K check22 (21.8%)
Male60 (52.6%)≤45 years old22/97 (22.7%)
Female54 (47.4%)>45 years old0/4 (0.0%)
Mean time between follow‐up appointments (days)36.4 (SD 8.9)Mean age28.3 (SD 7.1)
Type of pregnancy test orderedPatients that never had K checked41 (40.6%)
Urine39 (72.2%)Average time between K checks (days)238 (SD 184.5)
Blood5 (9.3%)
Both10 (18.5%)
Mean time between lab checks (days)55.4 (SD 25.2)

Baseline potassium (K) serum checks also include patients who started spironolactone at an earlier visit (n = 65).

Patient demographics and clinical characteristics of acne patients on isotretinoin or spironolactone 3/16/20‐5/20/20 Baseline potassium (K) serum checks also include patients who started spironolactone at an earlier visit (n = 65). When New York State in‐person restrictions were lifted, telemedicine accounted for approximately half of acne follow‐ups and the majority of isotretinoin and spironolactone follow‐ups, suggesting that telemedicine will likely play a significant role in acne management beyond the pandemic. Since patients with in‐person vs video visits lived significantly closer, telemedicine may be the preferred option for acne patients living at a distance, decreasing barriers to healthcare access. Acne virtual visits may also be favored to theoretically limit transmission of COVID‐19, since demasking is required for in‐person visits. Prior to the pandemic, iPLEDGE, a computer‐based risk management program approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to decrease fetal exposure to isotretinoin, required use of Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)‐certified laboratories for human chorionic gonadotropin (β‐hCG) measurements for women taking isotretinoin,  so the majority of visits were in‐person. iPLEDGE recently allowed for telemedicine with home urine pregnancy tests, with a noticeable shift from in‐person to virtual visits and from use of laboratory testing to home urine pregnancy tests. Dermatologists should be cautioned that home urine pregnancy tests have variable sensitivity and require accurate user interpretation. Discrepancies may exist between manufacturer‐advertised accuracy and laboratory‐determined accuracy of home pregnancy tests, with one study reporting the agreement in accuracy ranging from less than 50% to greater than 90%, depending on the brand. Hyperkalemia is extremely uncommon in women ≤ 45 years old taking spironolactone, and serum potassium monitoring may not be necessary. Since 22.7% of patients ≤ 45 years old had potassium levels checked in this study, there is a need for education on this topic. Limitations of this study include single‐center institution and retrospective design. Outcomes and treatment efficacies were not analyzed. Our study demonstrated that about half of acne visits and a majority of systemic acne management were conducted virtually even when in‐person visits were permitted. Since video visits are likely to persist post‐pandemic, dermatologists should become proficient in managing acne patients via telemedicine. Dermatologists should be cautioned when using telemedicine to manage female patients taking isotretinoin due to the lack of studies assessing the efficacy and safety of using telemedicine to manage this population. Future studies should compare treatment efficacies for in‐person vs telemedicine visits.

IRB APPROVAL

Reviewed and approved by Weill Cornell Institutional Review Board; Protocol #20‐03021691–01. Table S1 Click here for additional data file.
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of analytical sensitivity and women's interpretation of home pregnancy tests.

Authors:  Sarah Johnson; Michael Cushion; Sharon Bond; Sonya Godbert; Joanna Pike
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Low Usefulness of Potassium Monitoring Among Healthy Young Women Taking Spironolactone for Acne.

Authors:  Molly Plovanich; Qing Yu Weng; Arash Mostaghimi
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  Retrospective analysis of adverse events with spironolactone in females reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Shari R Lipner
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2020-05-19

4.  Teledermatology for acne patients: How to reduce face-to-face visits during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Alessia Villani; Maria Carmela Annunziata; Luisa Abategiovanni; Gabriella Fabbrocini
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Retrospective study of acne telemedicine and in-person visits at an academic center during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Lilly Gu; Susana Martinez Diaz; Shari R Lipner
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 2.189

6.  Teledermatology for acne during COVID-19: high patients' satisfaction in spite of the emergency.

Authors:  A Ruggiero; M Megna; M C Annunziata; L Abategiovanni; M Scalvenzi; A Tajani; G Fabbrocini; A Villani
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  An opportunity for improvement: iPLEDGE policy changes during the coronavirus pandemic.

Authors:  James T Pathoulas; Ronda S Farah; Lori Fiessinger; Matthew Mansh
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.851

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Retrospective study of acne telemedicine and in-person visits at an academic center during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Lilly Gu; Susana Martinez Diaz; Shari R Lipner
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 2.189

2.  Long-term results of teledermatology for acne patients during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Alessia Villani; Maria Carmela Annunziata; Matteo Megna; Massimiliano Scalvenzi; Gabriella Fabbrocini
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 2.189

Review 3.  Teledermatology and Inflammatory Skin Conditions during COVID-19 Era: New Perspectives and Applications.

Authors:  Claudio Marasca; Maria Carmela Annunziata; Elisa Camela; Adriana Di Guida; Luigi Fornaro; Matteo Megna; Maddalena Napolitano; Cataldo Patruno; Luca Potestio; Gabriella Fabbrocini
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.