Wagahta Semere1, Anupama G Cemballi2, Dean Schillinger2, Alejandra Casillas3, Miya Lemberg4, Courtney R Lyles2. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: wagahta.semere@ucsf.edu. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore physician leaders' perspectives on processes and priorities for engaging with caregivers in their clinical practices as well as within their safety net health systems. METHODS: We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with primary care physicians in care management leadership at three California safety net health systems. Interviews explored physicians' experiences managing medically and socially complex patients with caregivers. Using thematic analysis, two qualitative researchers independently analyzed interview transcripts and established consensus with the broader research team through iterative input to derive major themes. RESULTS: Fifteen physicians completed interviews. Nine participants were women, 8 were White and 10 reported Spanish language proficiency. Participant interviews generated six major themes: challenges uncovering caregiver identities, recognizing variation in caregivers' roles, adapting visit communication strategies to include caregivers, engaging caregivers in patient care, and caring for the caregiver. CONCLUSIONS: Engaging caregivers is challenging given the limited recognition of caregiver involvement in patient care by health systems. Adapting visit communication to include caregivers requires bridging language and literacy barriers. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Developing mechanisms to enable the consistent identification of patients' caregivers, facilitate ongoing communication with caregivers, and extend support for them could improve outcomes for vulnerable patients and their families.
OBJECTIVE: To explore physician leaders' perspectives on processes and priorities for engaging with caregivers in their clinical practices as well as within their safety net health systems. METHODS: We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with primary care physicians in care management leadership at three California safety net health systems. Interviews explored physicians' experiences managing medically and socially complex patients with caregivers. Using thematic analysis, two qualitative researchers independently analyzed interview transcripts and established consensus with the broader research team through iterative input to derive major themes. RESULTS: Fifteen physicians completed interviews. Nine participants were women, 8 were White and 10 reported Spanish language proficiency. Participant interviews generated six major themes: challenges uncovering caregiver identities, recognizing variation in caregivers' roles, adapting visit communication strategies to include caregivers, engaging caregivers in patient care, and caring for the caregiver. CONCLUSIONS: Engaging caregivers is challenging given the limited recognition of caregiver involvement in patient care by health systems. Adapting visit communication to include caregivers requires bridging language and literacy barriers. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Developing mechanisms to enable the consistent identification of patients' caregivers, facilitate ongoing communication with caregivers, and extend support for them could improve outcomes for vulnerable patients and their families.
Authors: Rebecca T Brown; Edgar Pierluissi; David Guzman; Eric R Kessell; L Elizabeth Goldman; Urmimala Sarkar; Michelle Schneidermann; Jeffrey M Critchfield; Margot B Kushel Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Wagahta Semere; Anna María Nápoles; Steven Gregorich; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Leah Karliner Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: R C Laidsaar-Powell; P N Butow; S Bu; C Charles; A Gafni; W W T Lam; J Jansen; K J McCaffery; H L Shepherd; M H N Tattersall; I Juraskova Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2013-01-17
Authors: Juleen Rodakowski; Cassandra Leighton; Grant R Martsolf; A Everette James Journal: Qual Manag Health Care Date: 2021 Jan/Mar 01 Impact factor: 1.147