Literature DB >> 34756471

The cost of diagnosing endometrial cancer: Quantifying the healthcare cost of an abnormal uterine bleeding workup.

Simrit K Warring1, Bijan Borah2, James Moriarty2, Rachel Gullerud2, Maureen A Lemens1, Christopher Destephano3, Mark E Sherman4, Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The evaluation of women with perimenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) to detect endometrial cancer (EC) and its precursors is not standardized and can vary widely. Consequently, costs associated with the workup and management undoubtedly vary. This study aimed to quantify costs of AUB/PMB evaluation to understand the healthcare burden associated with securing a pathologic diagnosis.
METHODS: Women ≥45 years of age presenting to a single institution gynecology clinic with AUB/PMB for diagnostic workup were prospectively enrolled February 2013-October 2017 for a lower genital tract biospecimen research study. Clinical workup of AUB/PMB was determined by individual provider discretion. Costs of care were collected from administrative billing systems from enrollment to 90 days post enrollment. Costs were standardized and inflation-adjusted to 2017 US Dollars (USD).
RESULTS: In total, there were 1017 women enrolled with 5.6% diagnosed with atypical hyperplasia or endometrial cancer (EC). Within the full cohort, 90-day median cost for AUB/PMB workup and management was $2279 (IQR $512-4828). Among patients with a diagnostic biopsy, median 90-day costs ranged from $2203 (IQR $499-3604) for benign or disordered proliferative endometrium (DPE) diagnosis to $21,039 (IQR $19,084-24,536) for a diagnosis of EC.
CONCLUSIONS: The costs for diagnostic evaluation of perimenopausal AUB and PMB vary greatly according to ultimate tissue-based diagnosis. Even reassuring benign findings that do not require further intervention-the most common in this study's cohort-yield substantial costs. The development of sensitive, specific, and more cost-effective diagnostic strategies is warranted.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost; Endometrial cancer; Perimenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding; Postmenopausal bleeding

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34756471      PMCID: PMC8724459          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  15 in total

Review 1.  The distribution of health care costs and their statistical analysis for economic evaluation.

Authors:  A Briggs; A Gray
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1998-10

Review 2.  A systematic review evaluating health-related quality of life, work impairment, and health-care costs and utilization in abnormal uterine bleeding.

Authors:  Zhimei Liu; Quan V Doan; Paul Blumenthal; Robert W Dubois
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.725

3.  Nonparametric inference for median costs with censored data.

Authors:  Hongwei Zhao; Chen Zuo; Shuai Chen; Heejung Bang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Abnormal uterine bleeding, health status, and usual source of medical care: analyses using the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey.

Authors:  Kristen A Matteson; Christina A Raker; Melissa A Clark; Kevin D Frick
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 5.  Clinical pathway for the evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding with an emphasis on endometrial cancer detection.

Authors:  M Moodley; C Roberts
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Detection of endometrial cancer via molecular analysis of DNA collected with vaginal tampons.

Authors:  Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Nicolas Wentzensen; Matthew J Maurer; Kieran M Hawthorne; Jesse S Voss; Trynda N Kroneman; Abimbola O Famuyide; Amy C Clayton; Kevin C Halling; Sarah E Kerr; William A Cliby; Sean C Dowdy; Benjamin R Kipp; Andrea Mariani; Ann L Oberg; Karl C Podratz; Viji Shridhar; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Tao brush endometrial cytology is a sensitive diagnostic tool for cancer and hyperplasia among women presenting to clinic with abnormal uterine bleeding.

Authors:  Stephanie R DeJong; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Amy C Clayton; Michael R Henry; Gary L Keeney; Jun Zhang; Trynda N Kroneman; Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Lisa J Ahlberg; Ann L VanOosten; Amy L Weaver; Nicolas Wentzensen; Sarah E Kerr
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 4.711

8.  Combining copy number, methylation markers, and mutations as a panel for endometrial cancer detection via intravaginal tampon collection.

Authors:  Ajleeta Sangtani; Chen Wang; Amy Weaver; Nicole L Hoppman; Sarah E Kerr; Alexej Abyzov; Viji Shridhar; Julie Staub; Jean-Pierre A Kocher; Jesse S Voss; Karl C Podratz; Nicolas Wentzensen; John B Kisiel; Mark E Sherman; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Lateral decubitus position to facilitate pelvic examination of the patient with severe obesity.

Authors:  Daniel M Breitkopf
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  A risk-scoring model for the prediction of endometrial cancer among symptomatic postmenopausal women with endometrial thickness > 4 mm.

Authors:  Luca Giannella; Kabala Mfuta; Tiziano Setti; Lillo Bruno Cerami; Ezio Bergamini; Fausto Boselli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.