Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez1, Nicolas Wentzensen2, Matthew J Maurer3, Kieran M Hawthorne3, Jesse S Voss4, Trynda N Kroneman4, Abimbola O Famuyide5, Amy C Clayton4, Kevin C Halling6, Sarah E Kerr4, William A Cliby5, Sean C Dowdy5, Benjamin R Kipp4, Andrea Mariani5, Ann L Oberg3, Karl C Podratz5, Viji Shridhar7, Mark E Sherman2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: Bakkum.jamie@mayo.edu. 2. Hormonal and Reproductive Branch (HREB), Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute (NCI), USA. 3. Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 4. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 6. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 7. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We demonstrate the feasibility of detecting EC by combining minimally-invasive specimen collection techniques with sensitive molecular testing. METHODS: Prior to hysterectomy for EC or benign indications, women collected vaginal pool samples with intravaginal tampons and underwent endometrial brushing. Specimens underwent pyrosequencing for DNA methylation of genes reported to be hypermethylated in gynecologic cancers and recently identified markers discovered by profiling over 200 ECs. Methylation was evaluated individually across CpGs and averaged across genes. Differences between EC and benign endometrium (BE) were assessed using two-sample t-tests and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Thirty-eight ECs and 28 BEs were included. We evaluated 97 CpGs within 12 genes, including previously reported markers (RASSF1, HSP2A, HOXA9, CDH13, HAAO, and GTF2A1) and those identified in discovery work (ASCL2, HTR1B, NPY, HS3ST2, MME, ADCYAP1, and additional CDH13 CpG sites). Mean methylation was higher in tampon specimens from EC v. BE for 9 of 12 genes (ADCYAP1, ASCL2, CDH13, HS3ST2, HTR1B, MME, HAAO, HOXA9, and RASSF1) (all p<0.05). Among these genes, relative hypermethylation was observed in EC v. BE across CpGs. Endometrial brush and tampon results were similar. Within tampon specimens, AUC was highest for HTR1B (0.82), RASSF1 (0.75), and HOXA9 (0.74). This is the first report of HOXA9 hypermethylation in EC. CONCLUSION: DNA hypermethylation in EC tissues can also be identified in vaginal pool DNA collected via intravaginal tampon. Identification of additional EC biomarkers and refined collection methods are needed to develop an early detection tool for EC.
OBJECTIVE: We demonstrate the feasibility of detecting EC by combining minimally-invasive specimen collection techniques with sensitive molecular testing. METHODS: Prior to hysterectomy for EC or benign indications, women collected vaginal pool samples with intravaginal tampons and underwent endometrial brushing. Specimens underwent pyrosequencing for DNA methylation of genes reported to be hypermethylated in gynecologic cancers and recently identified markers discovered by profiling over 200 ECs. Methylation was evaluated individually across CpGs and averaged across genes. Differences between EC and benign endometrium (BE) were assessed using two-sample t-tests and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Thirty-eight ECs and 28 BEs were included. We evaluated 97 CpGs within 12 genes, including previously reported markers (RASSF1, HSP2A, HOXA9, CDH13, HAAO, and GTF2A1) and those identified in discovery work (ASCL2, HTR1B, NPY, HS3ST2, MME, ADCYAP1, and additional CDH13 CpG sites). Mean methylation was higher in tampon specimens from EC v. BE for 9 of 12 genes (ADCYAP1, ASCL2, CDH13, HS3ST2, HTR1B, MME, HAAO, HOXA9, and RASSF1) (all p<0.05). Among these genes, relative hypermethylation was observed in EC v. BE across CpGs. Endometrial brush and tampon results were similar. Within tampon specimens, AUC was highest for HTR1B (0.82), RASSF1 (0.75), and HOXA9 (0.74). This is the first report of HOXA9 hypermethylation in EC. CONCLUSION: DNA hypermethylation in EC tissues can also be identified in vaginal pool DNA collected via intravaginal tampon. Identification of additional EC biomarkers and refined collection methods are needed to develop an early detection tool for EC.
Authors: N Horowitz; K Pinto; D G Mutch; T J Herzog; J S Rader; R Gibb; T Bocker-Edmonston; P J Goodfellow Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: L G Koss; K Schreiber; S G Oberlander; M Moukhtar; H S Levine; H F Moussouris Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 1981 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Heidi Fiegl; Conny Gattringer; Andreas Widschwendter; Alois Schneitter; Angela Ramoni; Daniela Sarlay; Inge Gaugg; Georg Goebel; Hannes M Müller; Elisabeth Mueller-Holzner; Christian Marth; Martin Widschwendter Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Melissa M Galey; Alexandria N Young; Valentina Z Petukhova; Mingxun Wang; Jian Wang; Amrita Salvi; Angela Russo; Joanna E Burdette; Laura M Sanchez Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Simrit K Warring; Bijan Borah; James Moriarty; Rachel Gullerud; Maureen A Lemens; Christopher Destephano; Mark E Sherman; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2021-10-28 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: E Martín-Sánchez; E Pernaut-Leza; S Mendaza; A Cordoba; F Vicente-Garcia; I Monreal-Santesteban; J Pérez Vizcaino; M J Díaz De Cerio; N Perez-Janices; I Blanco-Luquin; D Escors; A Ulazia-Garmendia; D Guerrero-Setas Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Megan A Clarke; Beverly J Long; Arena Del Mar Morillo; Marc Arbyn; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Nicolas Wentzensen Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Ajleeta Sangtani; Chen Wang; Amy Weaver; Nicole L Hoppman; Sarah E Kerr; Alexej Abyzov; Viji Shridhar; Julie Staub; Jean-Pierre A Kocher; Jesse S Voss; Karl C Podratz; Nicolas Wentzensen; John B Kisiel; Mark E Sherman; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-11-28 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Madhu Bagaria; Nicolas Wentzensen; Megan Clarke; Matthew R Hopkins; Lisa J Ahlberg; Lois J Mc Guire; Maureen A Lemens; Amy L Weaver; Ann VanOosten; Emily Shields; Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Mark E Sherman; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 5.304