Ziwei Xie1, Jinbo Xu1. 1. Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Inter-protein (interfacial) contact prediction is very useful for in silico structural characterization of protein-protein interactions. Although deep learning has been applied to this problem, its accuracy is not as good as intra-protein contact prediction. RESULTS: We propose a new deep learning method GLINTER (Graph Learning of INTER-protein contacts) for interfacial contact prediction of dimers, leveraging a rotational invariant representation of protein tertiary structures and a pretrained language model of multiple sequence alignments (MSAs). Tested on the 13th and 14th CASP-CAPRI datasets, the average top L/10 precision achieved by GLINTER is 54% on the homodimers and 52% on all the dimers, much higher than 30% obtained by the latest deep learning method DeepHomo on the homodimers and 15% obtained by BIPSPI on all the dimers. Our experiments show that GLINTER-predicted contacts help improve selection of docking decoys. AVAILABILITY: The software is available at https://github.com/zw2x/glinter. The data sets are available at https://github.com/zw2x/glinter/data.
MOTIVATION: Inter-protein (interfacial) contact prediction is very useful for in silico structural characterization of protein-protein interactions. Although deep learning has been applied to this problem, its accuracy is not as good as intra-protein contact prediction. RESULTS: We propose a new deep learning method GLINTER (Graph Learning of INTER-protein contacts) for interfacial contact prediction of dimers, leveraging a rotational invariant representation of protein tertiary structures and a pretrained language model of multiple sequence alignments (MSAs). Tested on the 13th and 14th CASP-CAPRI datasets, the average top L/10 precision achieved by GLINTER is 54% on the homodimers and 52% on all the dimers, much higher than 30% obtained by the latest deep learning method DeepHomo on the homodimers and 15% obtained by BIPSPI on all the dimers. Our experiments show that GLINTER-predicted contacts help improve selection of docking decoys. AVAILABILITY: The software is available at https://github.com/zw2x/glinter. The data sets are available at https://github.com/zw2x/glinter/data.
Authors: Guido Uguzzoni; Shalini John Lovis; Francesco Oteri; Alexander Schug; Hendrik Szurmant; Martin Weigt Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Andrew W Senior; Richard Evans; John Jumper; James Kirkpatrick; Laurent Sifre; Tim Green; Chongli Qin; Augustin Žídek; Alexander W R Nelson; Alex Bridgland; Hugo Penedones; Stig Petersen; Karen Simonyan; Steve Crossan; Pushmeet Kohli; David T Jones; David Silver; Koray Kavukcuoglu; Demis Hassabis Journal: Nature Date: 2020-01-15 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Martin Steinegger; Markus Meier; Milot Mirdita; Harald Vöhringer; Stephan J Haunsberger; Johannes Söding Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2019-09-14 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: John Jumper; Richard Evans; Alexander Pritzel; Tim Green; Michael Figurnov; Olaf Ronneberger; Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool; Russ Bates; Augustin Žídek; Anna Potapenko; Alex Bridgland; Clemens Meyer; Simon A A Kohl; Andrew J Ballard; Andrew Cowie; Bernardino Romera-Paredes; Stanislav Nikolov; Rishub Jain; Demis Hassabis; Jonas Adler; Trevor Back; Stig Petersen; David Reiman; Ellen Clancy; Michal Zielinski; Martin Steinegger; Michalina Pacholska; Tamas Berghammer; Sebastian Bodenstein; David Silver; Oriol Vinyals; Andrew W Senior; Koray Kavukcuoglu; Pushmeet Kohli Journal: Nature Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Bas Stringer; Hans de Ferrante; Sanne Abeln; Jaap Heringa; K Anton Feenstra; Reza Haydarlou Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2022-02-12 Impact factor: 6.937