Literature DB >> 34754982

Analysis of SARS-COV2 spike protein variants among Iraqi isolates.

Dana Khdr Sabir1.   

Abstract

The ongoing pandemic of COVID-19 caused by the SARS-COV2 virus has triggered millions of deaths around the globe. Emerging several variants of the virus with increased transmissibility, the severity of disease, and the ability of the virus to escape from the immune system has a cause for concerns. Here, we compared the spike protein sequence of 91 human SARS CoV2 strains of Iraq to the first reported sequence of SARS-CoV2 isolate from Wuhan Hu-1/China. The strains were isolated between June 2020 and March 2021. Twenty-two distinct mutations were identified within the spike protein regions which were: L5F, L18F, T19R, S151T, G181A, A222V, A348S, L452 (Q or M), T478K, N501Y, A520S, A522V, A570D, S605A, D614G, Q675H, N679K, P681H, T716I, S982A, A1020S, D1118H. The most frequently mutations occurred at the D614G (87/91), followed by S982A (50/91), and A570D (48/91), respectively. In addition, a distinct shift was observed in the type of SARS-COV2 variants present in 2020 compared to 2021 isolates. In 2020, B.1.428.1 lineage was appeared to be a dominant variant (85%). However, the diversity of the variants increased in 2021, and the majority (73%) of the isolated were appeared to belong to B.1.1.7 lineage (VOC/alpha variants). To our knowledge, this is the first major genome analysis of SARS-CoV2 in Iraq. The data from this research could provide insights into SARS-CoV2 evolution, and can be potentially used to recognize the effective vaccine against the disease.
© 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACE2, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; CP, Cytoplasmic Peptide; Covid-19; FP, Fusion peptide; GISAID, Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data; HR1, Heptad Repeat 1; HR2, Heptad Repeat 2; Iraq; Mutation; NTD, N-terminal domain; PDB, Protein Data Bank; RBD, Receptor-Binding Domain; Receptor binding domain; SARS-COV2; SARS-CoV2, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SP, Signal Peptide; Spike protein; TM, Transmembrane Domain; VOC, Virus of Concern

Year:  2021        PMID: 34754982      PMCID: PMC8568320          DOI: 10.1016/j.genrep.2021.101420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene Rep        ISSN: 2452-0144


Introduction

Highly contagious coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a human respiratory system infection which is caused by SARS-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2). The disease was firstly reported in the city of Wuhan, China in December 2019 (Wu et al., 2020) and it was declared to be pandemic by WHO on March 11, 2020 (World Health Organization, 2020a). Inhalation and/or direct contact with infected droplets is the main route of disease transmission (Mahmud et al., 2020). In Iraq, the first confirmed case of COVID-19 was reported on the 24th of February 2020 in Al-Najaf city in the south of Baghdad (Alsayed et al., 2020). As of 30 June 2021, more than 1.6 million people have contracted the disease in Iraq with more than 18,000 deaths (World Health Organization, 2020b). The etiology of COVID-19 is SARS-Cov-2; positive single-stranded RNA viruses belong to β-genus of the Coronaviridae family (Wu et al., 2020; Sabir et al., 2020). The size of the genome is about 29 kbp, having 14 open reading frames (ORFs) and 27 proteins, including four structural proteins which are spike (S), envelop protein (E), membrane protein (M), and nucleocapsid (N) (Sabir et al., 2020; Chan et al., 2020). Spike protein is a key target for diagnosis and developing vaccines (Wrapp et al., 2020) since it plays important role in the pathogenicity of the virus by interacting with cellular receptors such as the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) to enter the human body (Wu et al., 2020). It is made up of 1273 amino acid residues and the structure of the protein was first determined using cryo-electron microscopy (PDB: 6VSB) (Wrapp et al., 2020). The protein is composed of two S1 and S2 sub-domains. Residues from 1 to 685 were located in the S1 subdomain, whereas the rest were located in the S2 subdomain that is used to fuse and enter into the target cells (Tegally et al., 2021; Prevention ECfD, Control, 2021). The receptor-binding domain (RBD) (residue 319 to 541) is an important region of the S1 subdomain which facilitate the virus to interact with ACE2 of the human cells (Thomson et al., 2021; Wise, 2020). Several variants of SARS-COV2 have been reported around the world resulted possessing one or more mutations in the virus genome that can affect the transmissibility of the virus and also the immunological response of the host cells (Lauring and Hodcroft, 2021). A variant that carries D614G mutation in the spike protein of the virus, also known as G clade or B.1, was diagnosed during the early days of the pandemic in the north of America, and then reported in many European countries (Korber et al., 2021). Another variant possesses N439K mutation in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of spike protein has also been reported independently in many countries in Europe and the USA. The N439K variant has shown to have increased pathogenicity and can escape from neutralizing monoclonal antibodies and reducing the activities of some polyclonal responses (Thomson et al., 2021). B.1.1.7 lineage (Alpha variant, also known as VOC (Virus of Concern)) is a variant of the SARS-COV2 which was first identified in the January of 2020 in the UK (Wise, 2020). The variant is characterized by having a deletion in the amino acid position of 69/70 (nucleotide number: 21,765–21,770), and 17 mutations in the total viral genome including N501Y in the receptor-binding domain of spike protein (Wise, 2020). Beta variant (B.1.351) lineage is another variant of concern (VOC), which was first reported in South Africa in October 2020, and characterized by eight mutations in the spike protein region, including K417N, E484K, and N501Y (Tegally et al., 2021). Unlike B.1.1.7 lineage, B.1.351 variant does not have a deletion at the position of 69/70 (Tegally et al., 2021). Delta variant (B.1.617.2) lineage, a current dominant variant of the virus in many countries around the globe, was first identified in India in December 2020 (Prevention ECfD, Control, 2021; Planas et al., 2021). This variant is characterized by having several mutations in the spike proteins including L452R, T478K and P681R (Planas et al., 2021). A study has shown that this variant of SARS-COV2 is 60% more transmissible than the Alpha variant (B.1.1.7) (Planas et al., 2021). There are other variants, such as P.1 (Gamma) lineage (20J/501Y.V3) which is mainly spread in Brazil, carrying 17 mutations; three of them are located in the spike protein regions (K417T, E484K, and N501Y) (Faria et al., 2021). In this study, we describe the different variants of SARS-COV2 spread from June 2020 to March 2021 in Iraq based on a comprehensive analysis of 91 spike protein sequences of the virus. This study should give an insight into the evolution and the transmissibility of the virus in the region.

Materials and methods

Spike protein sequences of Iraqis' SARS CoV2 strains were obtained from the publicly accessible Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data (GISAID) databank on 18 June 2021. Multiple sequence alignments were created using online program Clustal-Omega at the European Bioinformatics Institute database (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/). The alignments were carefully inspected to recognize the mutations within the 91 Iraqi isolates relative to the Wuhan-Hu-1 (accession number: NC_045512.2) (Wu et al., 2020). The location of the amino acids within the structure of the spike protein was mapped based on the structural information of the S protein available in the Protein Data Bank (PDB: 6VXX). Visualization of the protein structure was carried out using UCSF Chimera software.

Results and discussion

Variants of SARS-COV2 of Iraq

At the time of writing, a total of 91 SARS-COV2 genome sequences of Iraq were available in the GISAID database. The strains GISAID accession numbers; collection dates, age and gender of the patients are shown in Table 1 .
Table 1

The accession numbers of the viral genome, and collection date, gender, and age of the patients who samples were taken.

No.Accession numbersCollection dateGenderAge
1EPI_ISL_81225806 June 2020Female33
2EPI_ISL_81228107 June 2020Male47
3EPI_ISL_81228007 June 2020Male32
4EPI_ISL_81227607 June 2020Male43
5EPI_ISL_81227507 June 2020Male48
6EPI_ISL_81227407 June 2020Male33
7EPI_ISL_81227207 June 2020Male37
8EPI_ISL_81227007 June 2020Male33
9EPI_ISL_81226707 June 2020Male40
10EPI_ISL_81226207 June 2020Male40
11EPI_ISL_81226011 June 2020Male20
12EPI_ISL_81228216 June 2020Male24
13EPI_ISL_81227916 June 2020Female36
14EPI_ISL_81227816 June 2020Male34
15EPI_ISL_81227716 June 2020Male41
16EPI_ISL_81227316 June 2020Male30
17EPI_ISL_81227116 June 2020Male26
18EPI_ISL_81226916 June 2020Male29
19EPI_ISL_81226816 June 2020Female24
20EPI_ISL_81226616 June 2020Male36
21EPI_ISL_81226516 June 2020Male41
22EPI_ISL_81226416 June 2020Male38
23EPI_ISL_81226316 June 2020Male30
24EPI_ISL_81226116 June 2020Male37
25EPI_ISL_81225916 June 2020Male31
26EPI_ISL_81228517 June 2020Male33
27EPI_ISL_81228417 June 2020Male27
28EPI_ISL_58203030 June 2020Female26
29EPI_ISL_90707501 October 2020UnknownUnknown
30EPI_ISL_95633201 October 2020UnknownUnknown
31EPI_ISL_238331714 December 2020Male37
32EPI_ISL_152433227 December 2020Male38
33EPI_ISL_152434429 December 2020Male38
34EPI_ISL_152433020 January 2021Female72
35EPI_ISL_88514320 January 2021FemaleUnknown
36EPI_ISL_152434723 January 2021Female65
37EPI_ISL_238320607 February 2021Female52
38EPI_ISL_246791908 February 2021Female65
39EPI_ISL_152433810 February 2021Male33
40EPI_ISL_152435910 February 2021Male50
41EPI_ISL_152434910 February 2021Male54
42EPI_ISL_152434510 February 2021Male36
43EPI_ISL_246792411 February 2021Female23
44EPI_ISL_152436911 February 2021Female24
90EPI_ISL_246792911 February 2021Male30
91EPI_ISL_246790911 February 2021Male23
45EPI_ISL_152435115 February 2021Female49
46EPI_ISL_152434615 February 2021Male45
47EPI_ISL_152437416 February 2021Male30
48EPI_ISL_152437216 February 2021Female30
49EPI_ISL_152433316 February 2021Male35
50EPI_ISL_152436416 February 2021Male42
51EPI_ISL_152436216 February 2021Male31
52EPI_ISL_246791117 February 2021Male86
53EPI_ISL_152436118 February 2021Male29
54EPI_ISL_152435619 February 2021Female25
55EPI_ISL_152435319 February 2021Male45
56EPI_ISL_152434319 February 2021Female70
57EPI_ISL_152434019 February 2021Male42
58EPI_ISL_152433720 February 2021Male50
59EPI_ISL_152433620 February 2021Male42
60EPI_ISL_246791520 February 2021Male25
61EPI_ISL_246791420 February 2021Female26
62EPI_ISL_152433520 February 2021Male40
63EPI_ISL_152433420 February 2021Male85
64EPI_ISL_152437820 February 2021Male60
65EPI_ISL_152437720 February 2021Male33
66EPI_ISL_152437520 February 2021Male31
67EPI_ISL_152437120 February 2021Female39
68EPI_ISL_152437020 February 2021Female56
69EPI_ISL_152436820 February 2021Female30
70EPI_ISL_152436720 February 2021Male43
71EPI_ISL_152436620 February 2021Female65
72EPI_ISL_152436520 February 2021Male15
73EPI_ISL_152436320 February 2021Male48
74EPI_ISL_152435820 February 2021Male63
75EPI_ISL_152435720 February 2021Female35
76EPI_ISL_152435420 February 2021Male52
77EPI_ISL_152435220 February 2021Male13
78EPI_ISL_152435020 February 2021Male57
79EPI_ISL_152433120 February 2021Male31
80EPI_ISL_152434220 February 2021Male48
81EPI_ISL_152434120 February 2021Female22
82EPI_ISL_152433920 February 2021Female42
83EPI_ISL_246791621 February 2021Female53
84EPI_ISL_152438022 February 2021Female42
85EPI_ISL_152437922 February 2021Female51
86EPI_ISL_152435522 February 2021Female42
87EPI_ISL_152436025 February 2021male40
88EPI_ISL_152434825 February 2021male27
89EPI_ISL_237989326 February 2021male72
The accession numbers of the viral genome, and collection date, gender, and age of the patients who samples were taken. Overall, an increase in the genome diversity and different viral lineages was observed in the SARS-COV2 isolates in 2021 compared to 2020. Such an increase in viral genome diversity is derived from the mutations which occur as the result of viral replication (Wise, 2020). Despite coronaviruses have a genetic proofreading mechanism to maintain their genome (Smith et al., 2013) and SARS-COV2 has low genetic diversity (Fauver et al., 2020), still, several variants of the virus have been recorded around the world since the first identification of the virus in December 2019 (Morais et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020). Knowing the viral variant that circulating in the region is important to develop effective use of the vaccines and therapeutic agents. Among the 33 genome sequences from 2020, B.1.428.1 appeared to be a dominant lineage (85%, 28 strains). This is followed by 6% (2 strains) of B.1.1.7 lineages (Alpha/VOC), and 3% (1 strain) of each B.1 (clade GH), and B.4 (O clade), and B.1.177.80 lineages (Fig. 1 ).
Fig. 1

Percentage of the different lineages of the SARS-COV2 that appears in Iraq during late 2020.

Percentage of the different lineages of the SARS-COV2 that appears in Iraq during late 2020. B.1.428.1 lineage, which is designated as Iraqi lineage, is a subtype of B.1.428 (known as Danish lineage according to Pango lineages database:https://cov-lineages.org/) (Rambaut et al., 2020). The sub-lineage of B.1.428.1 was first reported on 27 April of 2020 in Qatar (Benslimane et al., 2021). This lineage is suggested to be highly transmissible and highly contributed towards the first pandemic waves in Qatar (Benslimane et al., 2021). Also, B.1.428 is categorized as an Epsilon (Variants of Interest or VOI) by WHO (2021). In terms of genome diversity, B.1.428.1 lineage is characterized by possessing several mutations in the genome including two mutations in the spike protein region which are A522V, D614G (https://www.gisaid.org/). These mutations can increase transmissibility and infectivity of the virus compared to the wild type (Korber et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2020) (this variant is 10 times more infectious than the original SARS-COV2 (Li et al., 2020)). In addition, these mutations in the spike protein might affect the correct diagnosis of the virus, and also the severity of the disease (Control CfD, 2021). However, it does not increase the affinity of the protein to the ACE2, nor affects the neutralization action of the antibodies (Zhang et al., 2020). Thus, a vaccine produced based on the wild type spike protein should equally be effective against this variant (Zhang et al., 2020). Only one of the 2020's isolates was classified as a B.4 lineage. The strain was isolated in October 2020 and has an accession number of EPI_ISL_907075. Finding B.4 lineage among Iraqi strains is not surprising since this lineage has shown to be originated from Iran (Organization WH, 2020; Eden et al., 2020), and is mainly distributed in Asian countries between March to mid-May of 2020 (https://cov-lineages.org/). Additionally, people returning from Iran was thought to be the main factor to initiate spreading the SARS-COV2 virus in Iraq (Alsayed et al., 2020). Moreover, since the mutations of this lineage are located in the non-structural proteins (NPs), which are either enzymes or functional proteins involves in viral replication and methylation, it is less likely the variants can affect the pathogenicity of the virus or the host immune responses (Khateeb et al., 2021). Feghali et al. (2021) (Feghali et al., 2021) was also reported that the predominant lineage of SARS-COV2 strains isolated between 2 February 2020 and 15 March 2020 in Lebanon was B.1, and then B.4. Moreover, another one of the 2020 isolates was found to belong to B.1 lineage (or 20 clade). This lineage is characterized by having a mutation in NPS and D614G mutation in the spike protein region (Hodcroft et al., 2020). It has increased transmissibility and it first appeared in early 2020 in Europe then it became a predominant variant in many countries around the world (Hodcroft et al., 2020). There were three genome sequences of SARS-CoV2 isolated in December of 2020. These strains showed an increase in the genome diversity compared to other strains isolated earlier in the same year. The two strains which were belonging to B.1.1.7 variants had accession numbers of EPI_ISL_1524332 and EPI_ISL_1524344, and the third strain was belonging to B.1.177.80 variant with an accession number of EPI_ISL_2383317. B.1.1.7 variant (Alpha variant/VOC (Wise, 2020; Frampton et al., 2021)) was first identified in the UK. The variant was also reported among Karnataka/India isolates in December 2020 (Pattabiraman et al., 2021). This variant is characterized by higher transmissibility compared to most other variants (Frampton et al., 2021). However, there was no indication that the B.1.1.7 variation was linked to the severity of the illness or mortality (Frampton et al., 2021). On the other hand, B.1.177.80 lineage, which was identified among 2020's strain, is also called (Scandinavian lineage) has been reported in several countries around the world mainly in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, but also in Iraq and Switzerland (https://www.isitzen.com/). The variant possesses several mutations including A222V, D614G, and L18F mutations in the spike proteins. To our knowledge, there is no information about transmissibility and severity of the disease caused by this variant; however, it is expected to spread faster than the wild type since it is having D614G mutation. In early 2021, 58 SARS-COV2 genome sequences from Iraq belonging to 9 different lineages were submitted to the GISAID databank. The lineage of B.1.1.7 (Alpha variant or VOC) was appeared to be dominant with 73%, followed by B.1.1.337 (7%), B.1.438 (5%), and B.1.36.1 (5%). One variant (2%) of each B.1.1, B.1.1.374, B.1.177.7, B.1.36, and B.1.441 were also recorded among 2021's of Iraqi's SARS-COV2 variants (Fig. 2 ).
Fig. 2

Percentage of the different lineages of the SARS-COV2 appears in Iraq during the early of 2021.

Percentage of the different lineages of the SARS-COV2 appears in Iraq during the early of 2021. An increase in the B.1.1.7 (Alpha, VOC) lineage can be observed among the early 2021's strains (73%) compared to the late 2020's strains (6%). However, the lineage B.1.428.1 which appeared to be dominant in 2020, was not detected among the sequenced samples of 2021. Considering that B.1.1.7 has an increased transmissibility (Frampton et al., 2021), perhaps this could explain the reason for increasing COVID-19 cases in early of 2021 in Iraq compared to 2020 (Fig. 3 ). Other factors like stopping lockdown and back people to routine social life practice such as shaking hands, gathering during funeral and wedding ceremonies (Alsayed et al., 2020) might also play a role in increasing COVD-19 cases in Iraq.
Fig. 3

Weekly confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Iraq from the beginning of the pandemic. An increase in COVID-19 cases can be observed from the data of early 2021 compared to the second half of 2020. Data extracted from World Health Organization (WHO).

Weekly confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Iraq from the beginning of the pandemic. An increase in COVID-19 cases can be observed from the data of early 2021 compared to the second half of 2020. Data extracted from World Health Organization (WHO). Another variant was B.1.36 and its sublineages B.1.36.1 appeared among 2021 strains. The B.1.36 lineage was first reported in Saudi Arabia in February 2020 (Pattabiraman et al., 2021) and it was characterized by possessing D614G and L452M mutations, whereas, sublineage B.1.36.1 has an additional mutation of N679K in the spike protein region. Overall, several new lineages can be detected among 2021 strains of SARS-COV2 from Iraq, with higher genome diversity and might be pathogenicity.

Variations of the spike protein

SARS-COV2 is an RNA virus and mutations can naturally occur during viral replications, which can lead to variation (Wise, 2020). These mutations, particularly if occurs in the spike protein region, can change the transmissibility, pathogenicity, and also the effect of the vaccine and therapeutic antibodies against the virus (Frampton et al., 2021; Plante et al., 2021). Non-synonymous mutations were analysed among the genome of 91 SARS-COV2 isolates in the spike protein region. At least one or more mutations were found in all strains, except in the genome sequence of the EPI_ISL_907075 strain which did not have a mutation in the spike protein region. However, mutations V198I in NSP2, L37F in SNP6, and T113I in NSP14 were recorded in the genome sequence of the strain. In total, 23 non-synonymous mutations were distributed in 22 distinct sites of the spike protein. D614G was found to be the most predominant mutation as 96% (87/91 strains) of the sequenced strains were carrying the mutation (Fig. 4 ).
Fig. 4

Structure and the frequency of the mutations in the spike protein region among SARS-COV2 strains from Iraq. (A) Trimer structure of SARS-COV2 protein (PDB: 6VXX), the RBD (residue 319–541) is coloured red. (B): The ribbon structure of RBD of the monomeric structure of the protein and the locations of 5 mutations in the region of the protein. (C) Schematic representation of the different regions of SARS-COV2 and approximate mutations in each of the regions. SP: signal peptide; NTD: N-terminal domain; RBD: Ribosomal binding domain; S1/ S2 protease cleavage site; FP: fusion peptide; HR1: heptad repeat 1; HR2: heptad repeat 2; TM: transmembrane domain; CP: cytoplasmic peptide. (D) Percentage of the mutations of each of the residues located in the Spike proteins among 91 Iraqi isolates. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Structure and the frequency of the mutations in the spike protein region among SARS-COV2 strains from Iraq. (A) Trimer structure of SARS-COV2 protein (PDB: 6VXX), the RBD (residue 319–541) is coloured red. (B): The ribbon structure of RBD of the monomeric structure of the protein and the locations of 5 mutations in the region of the protein. (C) Schematic representation of the different regions of SARS-COV2 and approximate mutations in each of the regions. SP: signal peptide; NTD: N-terminal domain; RBD: Ribosomal binding domain; S1/ S2 protease cleavage site; FP: fusion peptide; HR1: heptad repeat 1; HR2: heptad repeat 2; TM: transmembrane domain; CP: cytoplasmic peptide. (D) Percentage of the mutations of each of the residues located in the Spike proteins among 91 Iraqi isolates. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) D614G mutation was also reported to be the dominant (84.20%) among 2634 genome sequence data of SARS-COV2 from Qatar (Benslimane et al., 2021). SARS-COV2 variant carrying D614G mutation has been shown to alter the virus fitness and increased transmissibility of the virus compared to the wild type (Korber et al., 2021; Plante et al., 2021; Yurkovetskiy et al., 2020; Volz et al., 2021). However, such mutation is not affecting the severity of the disease caused by the variant (Korber et al., 2021; Plante et al., 2021; Yurkovetskiy et al., 2020; Volz et al., 2021). Other predominant mutations which appeared frequently among Iraq isolates were S982A (55%), A570D (53%), P681H (52%), D1118H (51%). Limited researches have been carried out to study the effects of each mutations separatly. However, P681H, which can be found in Alpha (20I, V1), Kappa (21A), and Delta (21B) variants, and the residue is located near to the furin cleavage; mutation of P618 to H can increase the transmissibility of the virus (Khateeb et al., 2021). Similarly, D1118H, which is found in Alpha (20I, V1, B.1.1.7) lineage, can increase the transmissibility of the virus (Khateeb et al., 2021). Within the spike protein region, six of the mutations were located in the ribosomal binding domain (RBD; 319–541). These mutations were L452 (Q, M), T478K, N501Y, A520S, A522V. Residue 452 in the RBD of the spike protein had two variants (L452Q in the sequence accession number of EPI_ISL_1524379) and (L452M in the sequence accession number of EPI_ISL_1524347). Mutations in the RBD region can alter the sensitivity of the variants towards neutralizing monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies. Previously, L452R variant was shown to become resistant to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) X593 and P2B-2F6 (Li et al., 2020; Khateeb et al., 2021), however, mutating leucine (L) to glutamine (Q) or methionine (M) among the Iraqi strains could affect differently on the sensitivity of the strain towards the host and/or vaccine-induced immunity. Particularly, in the case of mutating leucine to glutamine since these two amino acids have different biochemical properties (leucine has a hydrophobic side chain, whereas glutamine has a polar uncharged side chain). Mutation of T478K in the RBD can be found in both Delta and Kappa (B.1.617.2/1) variants of the virus, but not in Alpha (B.1.1.7), beta (B.1.351), or Gamma (P.1) (Khateeb et al., 2021). This mutation has been shown to increase the transmissibility and affinity to ACE2. In addition, it helps the virus to escape from the host immune response (Khateeb et al., 2021). Both N501Yand A522V were the most frequent mutations that occurred at the RBS of the Iraqi strains with 37% and 53%, respectively (Fig. 4). N501Y mutation can be found in Alpha, Beta, or Gamma, but not in Delta and Kappa variants. Such mutation, same as T478K, increases the transmissibility of the virus (Khateeb et al., 2021). However, N501T reduces the binding affinity of spike protein to the human ACE2 (Shang et al., 2020). In summary, our data emphasise the increased genome diversities of the SARS-COV2 in Iraq. B.1.428.1 variant was appeared to be prevalent linage in the second half of 2020, whereas B.1.1.7 was appeared to be the dominant lineage in early 2021. Twenty-three mutations were detected in 22 sides of the spike protein of the Iraqi strains.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of competing interest

None.
  25 in total

1.  Genetic Variants of SARS-CoV-2-What Do They Mean?

Authors:  Adam S Lauring; Emma B Hodcroft
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Covid-19: New coronavirus variant is identified in UK.

Authors:  Jacqui Wise
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-12-16

3.  Genomics and epidemiology of the P.1 SARS-CoV-2 lineage in Manaus, Brazil.

Authors:  Nuno R Faria; Thomas A Mellan; Charles Whittaker; Ingra M Claro; Darlan da S Candido; Swapnil Mishra; Oliver G Pybus; Seth Flaxman; Samir Bhatt; Ester C Sabino; Myuki A E Crispim; Flavia C S Sales; Iwona Hawryluk; John T McCrone; Ruben J G Hulswit; Lucas A M Franco; Mariana S Ramundo; Jaqueline G de Jesus; Pamela S Andrade; Thais M Coletti; Giulia M Ferreira; Camila A M Silva; Erika R Manuli; Rafael H M Pereira; Pedro S Peixoto; Moritz U G Kraemer; Nelson Gaburo; Cecilia da C Camilo; Henrique Hoeltgebaum; William M Souza; Esmenia C Rocha; Leandro M de Souza; Mariana C de Pinho; Leonardo J T Araujo; Frederico S V Malta; Aline B de Lima; Joice do P Silva; Danielle A G Zauli; Alessandro C de S Ferreira; Ricardo P Schnekenberg; Daniel J Laydon; Patrick G T Walker; Hannah M Schlüter; Ana L P Dos Santos; Maria S Vidal; Valentina S Del Caro; Rosinaldo M F Filho; Helem M Dos Santos; Renato S Aguiar; José L Proença-Modena; Bruce Nelson; James A Hay; Mélodie Monod; Xenia Miscouridou; Helen Coupland; Raphael Sonabend; Michaela Vollmer; Axel Gandy; Carlos A Prete; Vitor H Nascimento; Marc A Suchard; Thomas A Bowden; Sergei L K Pond; Chieh-Hsi Wu; Oliver Ratmann; Neil M Ferguson; Christopher Dye; Nick J Loman; Philippe Lemey; Andrew Rambaut; Nelson A Fraiji; Maria do P S S Carvalho
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Coast-to-Coast Spread of SARS-CoV-2 during the Early Epidemic in the United States.

Authors:  Joseph R Fauver; Mary E Petrone; Emma B Hodcroft; Kayoko Shioda; Hanna Y Ehrlich; Alexander G Watts; Chantal B F Vogels; Anderson F Brito; Tara Alpert; Anthony Muyombwe; Jafar Razeq; Randy Downing; Nagarjuna R Cheemarla; Anne L Wyllie; Chaney C Kalinich; Isabel M Ott; Joshua Quick; Nicholas J Loman; Karla M Neugebauer; Alexander L Greninger; Keith R Jerome; Pavitra Roychoudhury; Hong Xie; Lasata Shrestha; Meei-Li Huang; Virginia E Pitzer; Akiko Iwasaki; Saad B Omer; Kamran Khan; Isaac I Bogoch; Richard A Martinello; Ellen F Foxman; Marie L Landry; Richard A Neher; Albert I Ko; Nathan D Grubaugh
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Evaluating the Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Mutation D614G on Transmissibility and Pathogenicity.

Authors:  Erik Volz; Verity Hill; John T McCrone; Anna Price; David Jorgensen; Áine O'Toole; Joel Southgate; Robert Johnson; Ben Jackson; Fabricia F Nascimento; Sara M Rey; Samuel M Nicholls; Rachel M Colquhoun; Ana da Silva Filipe; James Shepherd; David J Pascall; Rajiv Shah; Natasha Jesudason; Kathy Li; Ruth Jarrett; Nicole Pacchiarini; Matthew Bull; Lily Geidelberg; Igor Siveroni; Ian Goodfellow; Nicholas J Loman; Oliver G Pybus; David L Robertson; Emma C Thomson; Andrew Rambaut; Thomas R Connor
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Genomic characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the first SARS-CoV-2 variants introduced in Lebanon.

Authors:  Rita Feghali; Georgi Merhi; Aurelia Kwasiborski; Veronique Hourdel; Nada Ghosn; Sima Tokajian
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and potential intervention approaches.

Authors:  Jasmin Khateeb; Yuchong Li; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Coronaviruses lacking exoribonuclease activity are susceptible to lethal mutagenesis: evidence for proofreading and potential therapeutics.

Authors:  Everett Clinton Smith; Hervé Blanc; Matthew C Surdel; Marco Vignuzzi; Mark R Denison
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  The global population of SARS-CoV-2 is composed of six major subtypes.

Authors:  Ivair José Morais; Richard Costa Polveiro; Gabriel Medeiros Souza; Daniel Inserra Bortolin; Flávio Tetsuo Sassaki; Alison Talis Martins Lima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Structural and Functional Analysis of the D614G SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Variant.

Authors:  Leonid Yurkovetskiy; Xue Wang; Kristen E Pascal; Christopher Tomkins-Tinch; Thomas P Nyalile; Yetao Wang; Alina Baum; William E Diehl; Ann Dauphin; Claudia Carbone; Kristen Veinotte; Shawn B Egri; Stephen F Schaffner; Jacob E Lemieux; James B Munro; Ashique Rafique; Abhi Barve; Pardis C Sabeti; Christos A Kyratsous; Natalya V Dudkina; Kuang Shen; Jeremy Luban
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 66.850

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Delta variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2: Mutations, impact, challenges and possible solutions.

Authors:  Manish Dhawan; Abhilasha Sharma; Nanamika Thakur; Tridib Kumar Rajkhowa; Om Prakash Choudhary
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.526

2.  Protective antigenic epitopes revealed by immunosignatures after three doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Authors:  Mian Peng; Xiaowen Dou; Xiuming Zhang; Mingchen Yan; Dan Xiong; Ruiwei Jiang; Tong Ou; Aifa Tang; Xiqiu Yu; Feiqi Zhu; Weiqin Li
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 3.  The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron lineages, immune escape, and vaccine effectivity.

Authors:  Yongbing Zhou; Huilin Zhi; Yong Teng
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 20.693

Review 4.  The emergence and epidemic characteristics of the highly mutated SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant.

Authors:  Dandan Tian; Yanhong Sun; Huihong Xu; Qing Ye
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 20.693

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.