Sarah A Basindwah1, Basmah S Alzahrani2, Abdulrazag M Ajlan1, Hiasham Alkhalidi3. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 2. Department of Surgery, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Al-Khobar, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. 3. Department of Pathology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hydrocephalus is the most common presentation of choroid plexus tumors; it is thought to be caused either by mass effect obstructing the cerebrospinal fluid pathways or secretory properties of the tumor. In these case reports, we present two cases of choroid plexus tumors with persistence of communicating hydrocephalus postoperatively and review similar reports in the literature. CASE DESCRIPTION: Case 1: a 2-month-old baby girl presented with bulging fontanelle, sunsetting eyes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed large third ventricle mass with communicating hydrocephalus. She underwent complete excision of tumor through transcortical approach with perioperative intraventricular hemorrhage. Hydrocephalus persisted postoperatively and the patient required permanent ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. Case 2: a 16-year-old boy presented decreased visual acuity, papilledema, and morning headaches. MRI showed a tumor in the right ventricle and communicating hydrocephalus. He underwent transparietal resection of the tumor. In both cases, hydrocephalus persisted postoperatively and patients required permanent VP shunt. Review of similar cases showed the majority of cases required permanent shunting. CONCLUSION: Choroid plexus tumor patients can present with communicating hydrocephalus that may persist post tumor resection for different etiologies. Careful follow-up to determine the need for cerebrospinal fluid diversion through a permanent VP shunt is important. Copyright:
BACKGROUND: Hydrocephalus is the most common presentation of choroid plexus tumors; it is thought to be caused either by mass effect obstructing the cerebrospinal fluid pathways or secretory properties of the tumor. In these case reports, we present two cases of choroid plexus tumors with persistence of communicating hydrocephalus postoperatively and review similar reports in the literature. CASE DESCRIPTION: Case 1: a 2-month-old baby girl presented with bulging fontanelle, sunsetting eyes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed large third ventricle mass with communicating hydrocephalus. She underwent complete excision of tumor through transcortical approach with perioperative intraventricular hemorrhage. Hydrocephalus persisted postoperatively and the patient required permanent ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. Case 2: a 16-year-old boy presented decreased visual acuity, papilledema, and morning headaches. MRI showed a tumor in the right ventricle and communicating hydrocephalus. He underwent transparietal resection of the tumor. In both cases, hydrocephalus persisted postoperatively and patients required permanent VP shunt. Review of similar cases showed the majority of cases required permanent shunting. CONCLUSION: Choroid plexus tumor patients can present with communicating hydrocephalus that may persist post tumor resection for different etiologies. Careful follow-up to determine the need for cerebrospinal fluid diversion through a permanent VP shunt is important. Copyright:
Choroid plexus papilloma (CPP) is a rare tumor of neuroectodermal origin, accounting for less than 1% of all intracranial neoplasms[11,26] and 2–4% of brain tumors in children.[23] CPPs are benign tumors that are most detected during the first 2 years of life.[14,18,28] Based on the amount of choroidal tissue present, CPTs are generally found within the ventricular system, in which the most common location is lateral ventricle followed by the fourth ventricle.[34,43] Other locations are rather rare. Sporadic case reports have described third ventricular CPP. Choroid plexus tumors (CPTs) are classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as Grade 3 malignant choroid plexus carcinoma (CPC); Grade 2, intermediate atypical CPP (ACPP); and Grade 1 benign CPP.[17]About 70% of CPTs present with hydrocephalus along with symptoms of increased intracranial hypertension, macrocephaly, and developmental delay.[15] Hydrocephalus can be obstructive or communicating with numerous pathophysiologies.[7,19,42] In many cases reported in the literature, hydrocephalus persists even after removal of the tumor.[4,12]In this article, we report two cases of third ventricle CPP in an infant and an adolescent with communicating hydrocephalus and review the need for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion in similar population in literature reports.
CASE DESCRIPTION
Case 1
A 2-month-old girl presented with 1 week history of downward gaze, decreased feeding, and irritability. Her head circumference was above the 97th percentile, full fontanelle, and a positive sunset eye sign. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a large lobulated mass in the third ventricle, isointense in T2/FLAIR and T1 with avid postcontrast enhancement measuring 38 by 20 by 23 mm with severe communicating hydrocephalus [Figure 1]. The provisional diagnosis was a third ventricle choroid plexus mass, and the patient was taken to surgery.
Figure 1:
(a-c) T1, T2, T1+C axial cut showing a large lobulated mass in the third ventricle with contrast enhancement. (d) Flair T2 axial cut with no transependymal edema. (e and f) T1+C sagittal and coronal views.
(a-c) T1, T2, T1+C axial cut showing a large lobulated mass in the third ventricle with contrast enhancement. (d) Flair T2 axial cut with no transependymal edema. (e and f) T1+C sagittal and coronal views.An EVD was placed in the ventricular system for draining the excessive CSF, and the tumor was found to be friable, vascular, lobulated mass floating within the CSF of the third ventricle, with its pedicle attached to the roof of the third ventricle. Histopathological examination of the tumor tissue revealed maintained papillary architecture that resembled normal choroid plexus. The papillae were lined by single layer of cuboidal to columnar epithelium, with mild nuclear pleomorphism. Mitosis was easily detectable (more than two mitotic figure per 10 high-power fields). There was no evidence of malignant features or necrosis. The lining epithelial nature was confirmed using Cytokeratin immunohistostaining. Ki-67 proliferative index was increased (up to 8% in scattered foci). The overall findings were in keeping with ACPP (WHO Grade II) [Figure 2].
Figure 2:
(a) In this CPP, the cells exhibit mild nuclear pleomorphism and the mitotic figures (arrows) are easily detectable (H and E, ×400). (b) Immunohistochemistry shows reactivity of the epithelial cells to Pan-cytokeratin (PanCK, ×200). (c) Ki-67 proliferative index is estimated up to 8% in some foci (Ki-67, ×200).
(a) In this CPP, the cells exhibit mild nuclear pleomorphism and the mitotic figures (arrows) are easily detectable (H and E, ×400). (b) Immunohistochemistry shows reactivity of the epithelial cells to Pan-cytokeratin (PanCK, ×200). (c) Ki-67 proliferative index is estimated up to 8% in some foci (Ki-67, ×200).The EVD was kept post operatively to try and challenge CSF drainage after recovery and assess the need for a permanent ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt.The patient developed a perioperative and postoperative ventricular hemorrhage, and eventually needed a permanent shunt to divert the excessive CSF and recovered with good function.
Case 2
A 16-year-old boy presented with 10 days history of decreased visual acuity and morning headaches. He had severe bilateral papilledema Grade IV, and visual acuity of counting fingers from the right eye and 20/400 from the left eye. MRI showed a complex solid cystic lesion in the right ventricle, that is, isointense in T2/FLAIR and T1 and intense contrast enhancement. The mass measured 36 by 29 by 30 mm, with communicating hydrocephalus [Figure 3]. The provisional diagnosis was choroid plexus lesion and the patient was taken for surgery.
Figure 3:
(a-c) T2, FLAIR T2, and T1+C showing right intraventricular complex solid, cystic mass with contrast enhancement. (d and e) T1, T1+C sagittal views. (f) T2 coronal view of solid cystic tumor.
(a-c) T2, FLAIR T2, and T1+C showing right intraventricular complex solid, cystic mass with contrast enhancement. (d and e) T1, T1+C sagittal views. (f) T2 coronal view of solid cystic tumor.An EVD was inserted to drain excessive CSF out of the ventricles, the tumor was reached through a transparietal approach to the right lateral ventricle. It was found to be firm and vascular. Near-total resection was achieved with a small highly vascular rim left on the temporal horn.Histopathological assessment of this tumor showed features of a CPP (WHO Grade I). It has the papillary architecture that resembled a normal choroid plexus, with minimal nuclear pleomorphism, very rare mitotic activity, and low Ki-67 proliferative index [Figure 4].
Figure 4:
(a) The tumor exhibits papillary-like architecture that has fibrovascular cores (arrow) and lining by a single layer of cuboid epithelium (H and E, ×100). (b) Trichrome stain shows a collagenous fibrous stroma (green), with overlying epithelial layer (Trichrome, ×200). (c) Ki-67 proliferative index is about 2% (Ki-67, ×200).
(a) The tumor exhibits papillary-like architecture that has fibrovascular cores (arrow) and lining by a single layer of cuboid epithelium (H and E, ×100). (b) Trichrome stain shows a collagenous fibrous stroma (green), with overlying epithelial layer (Trichrome, ×200). (c) Ki-67 proliferative index is about 2% (Ki-67, ×200).The EVD was kept postoperatively to challenge CSF drainage and assess the need for a permanent shunt, and it was removed 5 days postoperatively.The patient kept having decreased visual acuity and persistent papilledema 2 weeks postoperatively and a VP shunt was inserted to relieve his persistent high intracranial pressure (ICP) symptoms.The patient needed a permanent VP shunt and continued to have decreased visual acuity with optic disc gliosis evidence on subsequent images. Five-year follow-up showed no tumor recurrence.
DISCUSSION
Epidemiology
CPPs are benign intraventricular tumors (WHO Grade I) of neuroectodermal origin.[3] They occur at the early stages of life (50% in the first 2 years of life),[23] but can also be seen in adults. In pediatric patients, CPPs are most frequently found in the lateral ventricles (64%),[11] with preference to the left trigone. This is contrary to CPP’s in adults, where they are usually found in the fourth ventricle, arising from the caudal roof.[36] CPPs in the third ventricle are relatively rare. Only two out of 18 pediatric patients had third ventricle CPP.[23]Hydrocephalus is seen at presentation in >70% of patients, other signs such as increased head circumference, developmental delay, and intracranial hypertension can be commonly seen.[15]
Clinical presentation
The presentation and clinical course differ between children and adults. CPPs usually present with symptoms headache, diplopia, and ataxia with a more rapid course in adults.[1] Children have a more indolent course of symptoms. It has been reported that more than 70% of pediatric CPP patients present with signs and symptoms of hydrocephalus.[23] This may be a caused by CSF overproduction from the tumor itself or by obstruction of CSF pathways by the tumor.[6,39] In such cases, hydrocephalus would be cured by removal of the tumor. It has been hypothesized that some of those tumors can have necrotic areas with repeated micro-hemorrhages that cause arachnoiditis resulting in hydrocephalus. In some cases, hydrocephalus persists after removal of the tumor, and the patient needs to divert the CSF with a shunt. In previously published case series about pediatric patients with choroid plexus tumors, the median percentage of those needing a shunt was 44.7%.[8,10]Massive hydrocephalus causing brain atrophy may be attributed to excessive CSF production of the tumor. Even in cases where those tumors are resected early and a shunt has been placed, hydrocephalus with parenchymal atrophy causing subsequent intellectual disabilities may persist.[6]Hydrocephalus causing ventriculomegaly can be surgically adventitious when trying to resect an intraventricular tumor in dilated ventricles. In most cases, hydrocephalus resolves after resection. Shunting is often postponed to postresection to assess the need for a shunt.Both our patients presented with hydrocephalus and symptoms of high ICP. In an infant, high ICP presents with bulging tense fontanelle and sunsetting eyes. In older children and teenagers, high ICP symptoms are visual changes, headaches, and bilateral papilledema.In our cases, both patients presented with communicating hydrocephalus that persisted to require a VP shunt after resection.[Table 1][4,9,13,20,21,22,24,27,29,31,32,35,39,40,42] shows reported cases with communicating hydrocephalus and the need for postoperative CSF diversion. A total of 31 cases of communicating hydrocephalus with choroid plexus tumors were reported in literature: 22 (71%) of those required a postoperative shunt, 9 (29%) showed no persistent hydrocephalus and were cured without a shunt. In about 62% of the reported cases, the tumor was located in the third ventricle, reported lateral ventricle tumors with persistent communicating hydrocephalus were only 38%. No CPT reported in the fourth ventricle presented with communicating hydrocephalus. This could be because of the size and the anatomy of the fourth ventricle compared to the lateral and third ventricles. About 80% of reported cases with third ventricle CPT and communicating hydrocephalus needed a permanent shunt, compared to 58% of cases with lateral ventricle CPT (P = 0.25). Histopathology in all cases was CPP except in two cases which showed ACPP.
Table 1:
Communicating hydrocephalus in choroid plexus tumors and the need for postoperative shunt.
Communicating hydrocephalus in choroid plexus tumors and the need for postoperative shunt.
Pathophysiology
Choroid plexus tumors are composed of cuboidal, columnar epithelium resembling that of a normal choroid plexus. The cause of hydrocephalus in CPPs is thought to be either obstructive, communicating, or a combination of both. Obstructive (noncommunicating) hydrocephalus could be caused by the tumor mass obstructing CSF pathways or obstruction of choroid villi due to microhemorrhages from the tumor or chronic arachnoiditis.[12,19] Communicating hydrocephalus can be caused by CSF overproduction.[33] CPP has been reported to secret CSF to exceed 1000 ml per day.[7,42] There are reports about villous hypertrophy being associated with overproduction of CSF.[7] Choroid plexus tumor epithelium was found to express aquaporin 1 (AQP1), a selective water channel that secretes CSF in the central nervous system in humans and animals. The more structured the tumor is (lower grade tumors) the stronger the expression of AQP1.[16] Embolization of CPP has been reported to successfully decrease CSF hypersecretion from the tumor.[42] Even with no radiological evidence of obstruction, hydrocephalus can persist after complete resection of the tumor.In both of our cases, hydrocephalus persisted even with postoperative gross total resection and both patients required a VP shunt. Intraoperative, intraventricular micro/ macrobleeding may have contributed to occlusion of choroid villi draining CSF.
Pathology
CPP has a nodular, pink cauliflower-like appearance. They can be large enough to fill the whole ventricle. Microscopically, they consist of finger-like papillary projections with a fibrovascular core covered by cuboidal and columnar epithelial cells. ACPP is formed by the same arborizing stems covered by cuboidal or columnar epithelium with higher features of atypia, mitotic figures, and irregular nuclei.[17]One variant of CPP is the CPP with villous hypertrophy where there is bilateral ventricular choroid plexus hypertrophy. Patients with this variant may develop shunt resistant hydrocephalus.[41]
Molecular profiling
To date, there is no evidence of molecular features leading to hydrocephalus formation in CPT patients. There is scant information about the molecular features in CPT’s in the literature. A case study on the molecular changes in CPT’s showed that a germline mutation leading to losses of tumor suppressor genes RB1 and BRCA2 may have led to malignant progression of CPP into atypical CPP.[44] The poorly understood association of CPC with Li- Fraumeni syndrome has led to molecular exploration study to help with the prognosis and treatment of CPTs. It was found that patients with no TP53 tumor suppressor dysfunction have a better prognosis than those who have the TP53 dysfunction.[37]
Management
Gross total resection is the treatment of choice. As those are highly vascular tumors, blood losses should be compensated early on in surgery, with tumor coagulation and en bloc piecemeal removal.[30] Small vessels feeding the tumor can be coagulated using a catheter. Management of hydrocephalus is an essential step in treating patients with CPP. It can be managed with a perioperative EVD, VP shunt, or third ventriculostomy.The most common complications of surgery include perioperative bleeding, pneumocephalus, subdural fluid collection, or persistence of hydrocephalus.[5]Management for ACPP may require postoperative chemotherapy. Long-term survival was seen with surgery and chemotherapy together in ACPP compared to surgery alone in four out of four patients.[25]
Prognosis
CPPs have a favorable prognosis. Most patients who undergo gross total resection as a primary treatment survive.[2] Since these are WHO Grade I lesions, no adjuvant therapy is required to achieve long-term survival. ACPP harbors a significantly worse recurrence-free survival than CPP. Increased number of mitotic figures is related with higher rates of recurrence in older children but not in children younger than 3 years.[38] Approximately half of pediatric CPP patients will need a VP shunt to manage persistent hydrocephalus.
CONCLUSION
CPPs can present with communicating hydrocephalus that may persist post tumor resection. Patients often need CSF diversion through a permanent VP shunt. Although different etiologies were investigated, the cause of persistence of communicating hydrocephalus is not yet known and is still managed by shunt placement.
Authors: Christian Thomas; Vincent Ruland; Uwe Kordes; Stefan Hartung; David Capper; Torsten Pietsch; Joachim Gerß; Johannes E A Wolff; Werner Paulus; Martin Hasselblatt Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2015-05-03 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Michael Safaee; Michael C Oh; Orin Bloch; Matthew Z Sun; Gurvinder Kaur; Kurtis I Auguste; Tarik Tihan; Andrew T Parsa Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 12.300