Literature DB >> 34752132

Multiparametric ultrasound and micro-ultrasound in prostate cancer: a comprehensive review.

Adriano Basso Dias1, Ciara O'Brien1, Jean-Michel Correas2, Sangeet Ghai1.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-cutaneous cancer diagnosed in males. Traditional tools for screening and diagnosis, such as prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination and conventional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), present low accuracy for PCa detection. Multiparametric MRI has become a game changer in the PCa diagnosis pathway and MRI-targeted biopsies are currently recommended for males at risk of clinically significant PCa, even in biopsy-naïve patients. Recent advances in ultrasound have also emerged with the goal to provide a readily accessible and cost-effective tool for detection of PCa. These newer techniques include elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound, as well as improved B-mode and Doppler techniques. These modalities can be combined to define a novel ultrasound approach, multiparametric ultrasound. High frequency Micro-ultrasound has emerged as a promising imaging technology for PCa diagnosis. Initial results have shown high sensitivity of Micro-ultrasound in detecting PCa in addition to its potential in improving the accuracy of targeted biopsies, based on targeting under real-time visualization, rather than relying on cognitive/fusion software MRI-transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34752132      PMCID: PMC8978255          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.629


  61 in total

1.  Differentiation of prostate cancer from benign lesions using strain index of transrectal real-time tissue elastography.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Jie Tang; Yan-Mi Li; Xiang Fei; Fa-Qin Lv; En-Hui He; Qiu-Yang Li; Huai-Yin Shi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, with or Without Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Frank-Jan H Drost; Daniel Osses; Daan Nieboer; Chris H Bangma; Ewout W Steyerberg; Monique J Roobol; Ivo G Schoots
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: random sextant versus biopsies of sono-morphologically suspicious lesions.

Authors:  Tillmann Loch; Ursula Eppelmann; Jan Lehmann; Bernd Wullich; Annemie Loch; Michael Stöckle
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Current status of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography fusion software platforms for guidance of prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Jennifer K Logan; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Andrew Gomella; Hayet Amalou; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Prostate cancer detection with real-time elastography using a bi-plane transducer: comparison with step section radical prostatectomy pathology.

Authors:  Yunkai Zhu; Yaqing Chen; Tingyue Qi; Jun Jiang; Jun Qi; Yongjiang Yu; Xiaohong Yao; Wenbin Guan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  High-resolution transrectal ultrasound: pilot study of a novel technique for imaging clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian P Pavlovich; Toby C Cornish; Jeffrey K Mullins; Joel Fradin; Lynda Z Mettee; Jason T Connor; Adam C Reese; Frederic B Askin; Rachael Luck; Jonathan I Epstein; Harry B Burke
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Changes in prostate cancer detection rate of MRI-TRUS fusion vs systematic biopsy over time: evidence of a learning curve.

Authors:  B Calio; A Sidana; D Sugano; S Gaur; A Jain; M Maruf; S Xu; P Yan; J Kruecker; M Merino; P Choyke; B Turkbey; B Wood; P Pinto
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  Comparison of Initial Experience with Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Guided Micro-Ultrasound Biopsies versus Established Transperineal Robotic Ultrasound Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsies for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Oliver Rojas Claros; Rafael Rocha Tourinho-Barbosa; Aude Fregeville; Anna Colomer Gallardo; Fabio Muttin; Ariê Carneiro; Armando Stabile; Marco Moschini; Petr Macek; Nathalie Cathala; Annick Mombet; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Xavier Cathelineau
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Sungmin Woo; Sang Youn Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Seung Hyup Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Prostate Cancer Vascularity: Superb Microvascular Imaging Ultrasonography with Histopathology Correlation.

Authors:  Yi-Cheng Zhu; Jun Shan; Yuan Zhang; Quan Jiang; Yong-Bing Wang; Shu-Hao Deng; Qing-Hua Qu; Qing Li
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-11-14
View more
  3 in total

1.  Innovations in prostate cancer: introductory editorial.

Authors:  Jurgen J Fütterer; Chan Kyo Kim; Daniel J Margolis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Micro-ultrasound-guided biopsies versus systematic biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Charles Dariane; Guillaume Ploussard; Eric Barret; Jean-Baptiste Beauval; Laurent Brureau; Gilles Créhange; Gaëlle Fromont; Mathieu Gauthé; Romain Mathieu; Raphaële Renard-Penna; Guilhem Roubaud; Alain Ruffion; Paul Sargos; Morgan Rouprêt; Gaëlle Fiard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 3.  Alternatives for MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnostics-Review of Current Ultrasound-Based Techniques.

Authors:  Adam Gurwin; Kamil Kowalczyk; Klaudia Knecht-Gurwin; Paweł Stelmach; Łukasz Nowak; Wojciech Krajewski; Tomasz Szydełko; Bartosz Małkiewicz
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 6.575

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.