| Literature DB >> 34748992 |
Adam Bess1, Frej Berglind2, Supratik Mukhopadhyay3, Michal Brylinski4, Nicholas Griggs5, Tiffany Cho5, Chris Galliano6, Kishor M Wasan7.
Abstract
The search for effective drugs to treat new and existing diseases is a laborious one requiring a large investment of capital, resources, and time. The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a painful reminder of the lack of development of new antimicrobial agents to treat emerging infectious diseases. Artificial intelligence (AI) and other in silico techniques can drive a more efficient, cost-friendly approach to drug discovery by helping move potential candidates with better clinical tolerance forward in the pipeline. Several research teams have developed successful AI platforms for hit identification, lead generation, and lead optimization. In this review, we investigate the technologies at the forefront of spearheading an AI revolution in drug discovery and pharmaceutical sciences.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial agents; Artificial intelligence; COVID-19; Infectious diseases
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34748992 PMCID: PMC8570449 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.10.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Discov Today ISSN: 1359-6446 Impact factor: 7.851
Figure 1Visualization of protein–protein and protein–chemical graphs. The blue dots represent protein nodes, the green dots represent chemical nodes, the gray dot represents a virus protein, and the lines represent edges in the graph (protein–protein or chemical–protein interactions).
Figure 2Visualization of node embeddings in two dimensions using t-SNE. The red clusters show how the drugs are clustered, whereas the blue clusters show the clustering of the proteins. Overlap of the blue clusters with the red clusters represent drug–protein interactions.
Figure 4Composition of nontoxic and toxic compounds. The scatter plot shows the frequencies of eMolFrag-extracted chemical fragments from US FDA-approved (nontoxic) and TOXNET (toxic) molecules. The dotted black line is the line of regression, and the gray area represents the corresponding confidence intervals. Examples of three commonly found FDA-approved fragments (piperidine, piperazine, and fluorophenyl) are in green, whereas fragments of more commonly toxic fragments from the TOXNET data set (chlorophenyl, n-butyl, and acetic acid) are in red. Adapted from Figure 8 in Pu et al.
Comparison of emerging AI teams and their respective technologies.
| BenevolentAI | Knowledge graphs and protein pocket analysis | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Atomwise | Molecular docking prediction; GAN | ✓ | ||
| Insilico Medicine, ComboNet | GCN | ✓ | ||
| DeepDrug | eMolFrag, eSynth, eToxPred, eDrugRes, eVir, eComb | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ (Approved May 2021) |