Literature DB >> 34748888

Materials, surfaces, and interfacial phenomena in nanoplastics toxicology research.

Leisha M A Martin1, Nin Gan1, Erica Wang2, Mackenzie Merrill1, Wei Xu3.   

Abstract

In response to the growing worldwide plastic pollution problem, the field of nanoplastics research is attempting to determine the risk of exposure to nanoparticles amidst their ever-increasing presence in the environment. Since little is known about the attributes of environmental nanoplastics (concentration, composition, morphology, and size) due to fundamental limitations in detection and quantification of smaller plastic particles, researchers often improvise by engineering nanoplastic particles with various surface modifications as models for laboratory toxicological testing. Polystyrene and other commercially available or easily synthesized polymer materials functionalized with surfactants or fluorophores are typically used for these studies. How surfactants, additives, fluorophores, the addition of surface functional groups for conjugation, or other changes to surface attributes alter toxicological profiles remains unclear. Additionally, the limited polymers used in laboratory models do not mimic the vast range of polymer types comprising environmental pollutants. Nanomaterials are tricky materials to investigate due to their high surface area, high surface energies, and their propensity to interact with molecules, proteins, and biological probes. These unique properties can often invalidate common laboratory assays. Extreme care must be taken to ensure that results are not artefactual. We have gathered zeta potential values for various polystyrene nanoparticles with different functionalization, in different solvents, from the reported literature. We also discuss the effects of surface engineering and solvent properties on interparticle interactions, agglomeration, particle-protein interactions, corona formation, nano-bio interfaces, and contemplate how these parameters might confound results. Various toxicological exemplars are critically reviewed, and the relevance and shortfalls of the most popular models used in nanoplastics toxicity studies published in the current literature are considered.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nanoplastics; Pollution; Polymeric nanoparticles; Polystyrene; Protein corona; Toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34748888      PMCID: PMC8823333          DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  149 in total

1.  Comparative ecotoxicity of polystyrene nanoparticles in natural seawater and reconstituted seawater using the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis.

Authors:  L Manfra; A Rotini; E Bergami; G Grassi; C Faleri; I Corsi
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 6.291

2.  Impacts of polystyrene microplastic on the gut barrier, microbiota and metabolism of mice.

Authors:  Yuanxiang Jin; Liang Lu; Wenqing Tu; Ting Luo; Zhengwei Fu
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Surface properties of beached plastic pellets.

Authors:  Kalliopi N Fotopoulou; Hrissi K Karapanagioti
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.130

4.  Identification of signaling cascade in the insulin signaling pathway in response to nanopolystyrene particles.

Authors:  Huimin Shao; Zhongyu Han; Natalia Krasteva; Dayong Wang
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 5.913

5.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in plastic pellets: variability in the concentration and composition at different sediment depths in a sandy beach.

Authors:  Mara Fisner; Satie Taniguchi; Fabiana Moreira; Márcia C Bícego; Alexander Turra
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 5.553

Review 6.  The role of surface charge in cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of medical nanoparticles.

Authors:  Eleonore Fröhlich
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-11-02

7.  Assessment on interactive prospectives of nanoplastics with plasma proteins and the toxicological impacts of virgin, coronated and environmentally released-nanoplastics.

Authors:  Ponnusamy Manogaran Gopinath; Vinayagam Saranya; Shanmugam Vijayakumar; Mohan Mythili Meera; Sharma Ruprekha; Reshamwala Kunal; Agarwal Pranay; John Thomas; Amitava Mukherjee; Natarajan Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Uptake, distribution, clearance, and toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles with different sizes and coatings.

Authors:  Qiyi Feng; Yanping Liu; Jian Huang; Ke Chen; Jinxing Huang; Kai Xiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Tissue accumulation of microplastics in mice and biomarker responses suggest widespread health risks of exposure.

Authors:  Yongfeng Deng; Yan Zhang; Bernardo Lemos; Hongqiang Ren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A Meta-analysis of Ecotoxicological Hazard Data for Nanoplastics in Marine and Freshwater Systems.

Authors:  Tong Yang; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.742

View more
  3 in total

1.  Development of Photoluminescent ZnO Nanoparticles for Biological Tracking.

Authors:  Leisha Martin; Jian Sheng; Nattamai Bhuvanesh; Maryam Jalali-Mousavi; Wei Xu
Journal:  MRS Adv       Date:  2022-04-15

2.  Amino-Functionalized Polystyrene Nano-Plastics Induce Mitochondria Damage in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells.

Authors:  Yiqi Fu; Mengqi Fan; Liwang Xu; Hui Wang; Qinglian Hu; Yuanxiang Jin
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-04-25

3.  Co-Exposure of Nanopolystyrene and Other Environmental Contaminants-Their Toxic Effects on the Survival and Reproduction of Enchytraeus crypticus.

Authors:  Luís A Mendes; Angela Barreto; Joana Santos; Mónica J B Amorim; Vera L Maria
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-04-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.