Literature DB >> 28800530

Comparative ecotoxicity of polystyrene nanoparticles in natural seawater and reconstituted seawater using the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis.

L Manfra1, A Rotini2, E Bergami3, G Grassi4, C Faleri5, I Corsi6.   

Abstract

The impact of nanoplastics using model polystyrene nanoparticles (PS NPs), anionic (PS-COOH) and cationic (PS-NH2), has been investigated on the marine rotifer Brachionus plicatilis, a major component of marine zooplanktonic species. The role of different surface charges in affecting PS NP behaviour and toxicity has been considered in high ionic strength media. To this aim, the selected media were standardized reconstituted seawater (RSW) and natural sea water (NSW), the latter resembling more natural exposure scenarios. Hatched rotifer larvae were exposed for 24h and 48h to both PS NPs in the range of 0.5-50μg/ml using PS NP suspensions made in RSW and NSW. No effects on lethality upon exposure to anionic NPs were observed despite a clear gut retention was evident in all exposed rotifers. On the contrary, cationic NPs caused lethality to rotifer larvae but LC50 values resulted lower in rotifers exposed in RSW (LC50=2.75±0.67µg/ml) compared to those exposed in NSW (LC50=6.62±0.87µg/ml). PS NPs showed similar pattern of aggregation in both high ionic strength media (RSW and NSW) but while anionic NPs resulted in large microscale aggregates (Z-average 1109 ± 128nm and 998±67nm respectively), cationic NP aggregates were still in nano-size forms (93.99 ± 11.22nm and 108.3 ± 12.79nm). Both PDI and Z-potential of PS NPs slightly differed in the two media suggesting a role of their different surface charges in affecting their behaviour and stability. Our findings confirm the role of surface charges in nanoplastic behaviour in salt water media and provide a first evidence of a different toxicity in rotifers using artificial media (RSW) compared to natural one (NSW). Such evidence poses the question on how to select the best medium in standardized ecotoxicity assays in order to properly assess their hazard to marine life in natural environmental scenarios.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecotoxicity; Nanoplastics; PS NP surface charge; Polystyrene; Rotifer; Suitable testing medium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28800530     DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.07.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  6 in total

Review 1.  Materials, surfaces, and interfacial phenomena in nanoplastics toxicology research.

Authors:  Leisha M A Martin; Nin Gan; Erica Wang; Mackenzie Merrill; Wei Xu
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 2.  Nanoplastics: Status and Knowledge Gaps in the Finalization of Environmental Risk Assessments.

Authors:  Andrea Masseroni; Cristiana Rizzi; Chiara Urani; Sara Villa
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-05-23

3.  Shift in Immune Parameters After Repeated Exposure to Nanoplastics in the Marine Bivalve Mytilus.

Authors:  Manon Auguste; Teresa Balbi; Caterina Ciacci; Barbara Canonico; Stefano Papa; Alessio Borello; Luigi Vezzulli; Laura Canesi
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Molecular Impacts of Dietary Exposure to Nanoplastics Combined or Not with Arsenic in the Caribbean Mangrove Oysters (Isognomon alatus).

Authors:  Marc Lebordais; Zélie Venel; Julien Gigault; Valerie S Langlois; Magalie Baudrimont
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 5.  Metals and Metal-Nanoparticles in Human Pathologies: From Exposure to Therapy.

Authors:  Joanna Izabela Lachowicz; Luigi Isaia Lecca; Federico Meloni; Marcello Campagna
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  Environmental fate, toxicity and risk management strategies of nanoplastics in the environment: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Liuwei Wang; Wei-Min Wu; Nanthi S Bolan; Daniel C W Tsang; Yang Li; Muhan Qin; Deyi Hou
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 10.588

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.