Literature DB >> 3474882

Relative wire stiffness due to lingual versus labial interbracket distance.

K I Moran.   

Abstract

Orthodontic treatment of patients with lingual appliances necessitates modifications of the conventional mechanotherapy used with labial appliances. When the brackets are placed on the lingual instead of the labial surface, the interbracket distances in the anterior region of the arches are decreased significantly. The purpose of this study was to determine by how much these interbracket distances are decreased, and to quantitate what effect this has on relative wire stiffness. Lingual and labial brackets were placed on models of 30 orthodontically treated patients and a ratio comparing the lingual to labial interbracket distances was calculated to be 1:1.47. Twenty-five orthodontic wires at lengths of 1 inch and 1.47 inches were then evaluated for their stiffness in first-, second-, and third-order bending. The results showed that the decreased interbracket distance associated with lingual appliances makes a wire seem approximately 3 times as stiff as when used with labial appliances for first- and second-order bends, and approximately 1 1/2 times as stiff for third-order bends. Wire equivalence charts were developed to help orthodontists make direct comparisons between labial and lingual arch wires in regard to stiffness. These charts should prove useful to the clinician during initial alignment and final detailing when adequate arch wire flexibility is essential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3474882     DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90292-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  9 in total

1.  Precision of indirect bonding of lingual brackets using the Quick Modul System (QMS)®.

Authors:  Katharina Schubert; Thomas Halbich; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; Ralf Müller-Hartwich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  External apical root resorption after nonextraction orthodontic treatment with labial vs. lingual fixed appliances.

Authors:  Hande Pamukçu; Ömür Polat-Özsoy; Ayşe Gülşahi; Mehmet Özgür Özemre
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  [A FEM study for the biomechanical comparison of labial and palatal force application on the upper incisors. Finite element method].

Authors:  P G Jost-Brinkmann; K Tanne; M Sakuda; R R Miethke
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1993-04

4.  Outcome assessment of lingual and labial appliances compared with cephalometric analysis, peer assessment rating, and objective grading system in Angle Class II extraction cases.

Authors:  Toru Deguchi; Fumie Terao; Tomo Aonuma; Tomoki Kataoka; Yasuyo Sugawara; Takashi Yamashiro; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Analysis of the torque capacity of a completely customized lingual appliance of the next generation.

Authors:  Stefan Lossdörfer; Carsten Bieber; Rainer Schwestka-Polly; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Frictional property comparisons of conventional and self-ligating lingual brackets according to tooth displacement during initial leveling and alignment: an in vitro mechanical study.

Authors:  Do-Yoon Kim; Bum-Soon Lim; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Stiffness comparison of mushroom and straight SS and TMA lingual archwires.

Authors:  Luca Lombardo; Antonella Carlucci; Mario Palone; Francesco Mollica; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 2.750

8.  In-vitro investigation of the mechanical friction properties of a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing lingual bracket system under diverse tooth displacement condition.

Authors:  Do-Yoon Kim; Sang-Woon Ha; Il-Sik Cho; Il-Hyung Yang; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 1.372

9.  Frictional resistance exerted by different lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Luca Lombardo; Weronika Wierusz; Dominique Toscano; Roberto Lapenta; Andrea Kaplan; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.750

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.