Literature DB >> 3474854

Occlusal perception and bite force in young subjects with and without dental fillings.

T Kampe, T Haraldson, H Hannerz, G E Carlsson.   

Abstract

Interocclusal thickness discrimination (occlusal perception) and bite force was investigated in 29 young adults (16-18 years old). Thirteen individuals had intact dentitions (group I), whereas 16 individuals had minor restorations in posterior teeth (group C). Bite force was tested during 'gentle biting', 'biting as when chewing', and 'maximal clenching'. Endurance tests and bite force discrimination tests were also performed. The best occlusal perception was found in the incisor region in both groups, whereas the occlusal perception was somewhat smaller in the canine and premolar regions. Fifty-four per cent of the subjects in group I and 81% in group C reached certain perceptiveness at the 9-micron level. There were no statistically significant differences between test locations or groups, however. Group I had a significantly greater bite force in the incisor region during gentle biting than group C. The maximal bite force was on an average 532 N in group I and 516 N in group C. In the endurance tests, group I could withstand the muscle fatigue longer than group C, but the difference was not statistically significant. In the bite force discrimination test both groups showed a similar pattern. Group I showed a closer correlation than group C between recordings in a test of stepwise increase of force and a randomized test of five force levels. Both groups appeared functionally normal in the masticatory system and reacted similarly in the physiologic experiments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3474854     DOI: 10.3109/00016358709098364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6357            Impact factor:   2.331


  8 in total

1.  Time-dependent analysis and representation of force distribution and occlusion contact in the masticatory cycle.

Authors:  Bernd Koos; Johanna Höller; Christine Schille; Arnim Godt
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 2.  Effect of various malocclusion on maximal bite force- a systematic review.

Authors:  Harneet Kaur; Neelam Singh; Harshita Gupta; Ankita Chakarvarty; Pushpjot Sadana; Natasha Gupta; Anuraj Kochhar; Ritasha Bhasin
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-08-24

3.  Comparative evaluation of bite force in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Rohit Singh; Supriya Singh; Anju Jha; Sovendu Jha; Ajit Kumar Singh; Shashi Kumar
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-04-30

4.  Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: a literature review.

Authors:  Duygu Koc; Arife Dogan; Bulent Bek
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2010-04

5.  Biomechanical In Vitro Study on the Stability of Patient-Specific CAD/CAM Mandibular Reconstruction Plates: A Comparison Between Selective Laser Melted, Milled, and Hand-Bent Plates.

Authors:  Robin Kasper; Karsten Winter; Sebastian Pietzka; Alexander Schramm; Frank Wilde
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-08-28

Review 6.  History of materials used for recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks: a literature review.

Authors:  Ashu Sharma; G R Rahul; Soorya T Poduval; Karunakar Shetty; Bhawna Gupta; Varun Rajora
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2013-02-01

7.  Correlation of Bite Force Interpretation in Maximal Intercuspal Position among Patient, Clinician, and T-Scan III System.

Authors:  Nitikarn Ruttitivapanich; Ratchawan Tansalarak; Jadesada Palasuk; Jittima Pumklin
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-09-20

Review 8.  Patient-specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set-ups.

Authors:  Bram Barteld Jan Merema; Joep Kraeima; Haye H Glas; Fred K L Spijkervet; Max J H Witjes
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.511

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.