Literature DB >> 34747572

Graphdiyne-Induced Iron Vacancy for Efficient Nitrogen Conversion.

Yan Fang1,2, Yurui Xue1,3, Lan Hui1,2, Huidi Yu1,2, Chao Zhang1,2, Bolong Huang4, Yuliang Li1,2.   

Abstract

An iron vacancy-rich ferroferric oxide/graphdiyne heterostructure (IVR-FO/GDY) is rationally designed and fabricated for high-efficiency electrocatalytic nitrogen fixation to ammonia (ENFA). Experimental and theoretical results show that the GDY-induced iron vacancies in IVR-FO/GDY promote the electrocatalysis, and activate the local O sites to transfer electrons towards GDY to boost ENFA, resulting in promising electrocatalytic performances with a highest ammonia yield (YNH3 ) of 134.02 µg h-1 mgcat. -1 and Faradaic efficiency (FE) of up to 60.88%, as well as the high long-term stability in neutral electrolytes. The cationic vacancy activation strategy proposed in this work has strong general and universal guiding significance to the design of new efficient electrocatalysts for various electrochemical energy conversion reactions. Such defect engineering may be used efficiently in electrocatalysis, leading to the development and progress of energy industry.
© 2021 The Authors. Advanced Science published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electrocatalytic nitrogen fixation to ammonia; graphdiyne; iron vacancy generation; structure optimization

Year:  2021        PMID: 34747572      PMCID: PMC8805558          DOI: 10.1002/advs.202102721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)        ISSN: 2198-3844            Impact factor:   16.806


Introduction

Ammonia, predominately as an important feedstock in agricultural and industrial production, is of great significance to the development of national economy, agriculture and energy as well as people's livelihood. Heavy pollution has become a major burden in modern society, however, Haber–Bosch process is the most common industrial method for industrial ammonia production from nitrogen and hydrogen. However, in order to break the inert N≡N bonds, it needs to be conducted at high pressures (200 atm) and temperatures (400–450 °C), which has caused energy waste and environmental pollution problems. Electrocatalytic nitrogen fixation to ammonia (ENFA) at ambient conditions has been emerging as a most promising alternative to Haber–Bosch process and has occupied a pivotal position in fundamental catalysis research over the years.[ , , ] Efficient ENFA process relies on electrocatalysts with high selectivity, efficiency, and stability, which can efficiently convert the thermostable and chemical inert N2 to NH3 at ambient conditions.[ , ] Construction of vacancy defects on the electrocatalysts has shown to be capable of initiating N≡N activation for ammonia synthesis.[ ] During past years, various electrocatalysts containing vacancy defects have been reported for the ENFA.[ , , , ] However, they focus on anion vacancy (for example, oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon vacancies) engineering on electrocatalysts. Until now, it is still rarely reported in controllable fabrication of cation vacancies for efficient ENFA. Graphdiyne (GDY), an emerging 2D carbon allotrope,[ , ] which features unevenly distributed surface charge, abundant porous structure, and high chemical stability, has been proven to be an ideal system for catalysis, energy conversion, and storage.[ , , , , ] Unlike conventional carbon‐based electrocatalysts, which are constructed by combining intrinsically inactive carbon materials with metals with finite active sites and low catalytic performances, GDY can effectively regulate morphology, coordination environment and valence states of the metal species, generating new active sites, enhancing electron transfer, and boosting the excellent catalytic activity.[ , , ] Therefore, rational and precise design and fabrication of novel GDY‐based heterogeneous catalysts can be realized by utilizing the advantageous properties of GDY and, consequently, breakthroughs in defect engineering research for high‐efficiency ENFA would be possible. Here, we report a facile and effective method to fabricate iron vacancy (V Fe)‐rich ferroferric oxide on GDY (IVR‐FO/GDY, mass loading: 0.246 mg cm−2) for high‐efficiency and ‐selectivity ENFA (Scheme  ). The crystalline structure and valence state of IVR‐FO/GDY were precisely characterized through scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X‐ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, Raman spectroscopy, in‐situ and ex‐situ X‐ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). It was experimentally determined that by incorporating GDY with Fe3O4, Fe vacancies could be generated in the crystalline structure. Moreover, the impressive activity of this catalyst was stimulated. The high YNH3 (127.92 ± 9.11 µg h−1 mgcat. −1) and FE (59.48 ± 2.57%) of IVR‐FO/GDY far exceeded that of all previously reported Fe‐based catalysts[ , , , ] as well as most other types of catalysts for the ENFA.[ , , , , , , , , , , , ] Therefore, the GDY‐incorporated catalyst was considered to be promising for practical applications. Furthermore, DFT calculations revealed the electronic structures in IVR‐FO/GDY, which determined its superior electrocatalytic performance for the ENFA. Distinct defect levels in the structure guarantee efficient electron transfer between Fe3O4 and GDY to facilitate the initial adsorption of N2 and the continuous hydrogenation to NH3.
Scheme 1

Schematic representation of the synthesis of the IVR‐FO/GDY iron vacancy‐rich catalyst.

Schematic representation of the synthesis of the IVR‐FO/GDY iron vacancy‐rich catalyst.

Results and Discussion

Morphological and Structural Characterizations

The crystalline structure of this catalyst was first characterized by XRD, Raman spectroscopy, SEM, and TEM. The powder XRD patterns (Figure  ) reveals the magnetite spinel phase (PDF: 19–0629) of IVR‐FO/GDY, which is similar to that of pristine Fe3O4 (p‐FO). The Raman spectra of IVR‐FO/GDY (Figure 1b) and p‐FO (Figure S1, Supporting Information) both exhibit three characteristic peaks corresponding to magnetite.[ ] Specifically, IVR‐FO/GDY shows two distinct peaks located at 1942 and 2167 cm−1, which can be attributed to the vibrations of conjugated diyne links in GDY.[ ] SEM, TEM, and high‐resolution TEM (HRTEM) were conducted to explore the morphologies and structures of the samples. Figure 1c shows the morphology of the pure Fe3O4, which exhibits a nanorod structure with irregular width. In contrast, thinner uniform Fe3O4 nanoneedles (average width: 19.48 nm) form when GDY is introduced as the growing substrate (Figure 1d–f). The lattice fringes of the GDY‐incorporated Fe3O4 (Figure 1g,h) exhibit visible lattice distortion, which might be due to the defects in catalyst and the strain effect caused by the interaction between Fe3O4 and GDY. The 0.241, 0.253, and 0.257 nm d‐spacings observed in Figure 1g,h can be attributed to the (222) and (311) planes of spinel magnetite. The interplanar distances of 0.335 and 0.348 nm in the outer space in Figure 1g,h can be attributed to the presence of the GDY substrate. Energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDX) elemental mapping results (Figure 1i) of IVR‐FO/GDY suggest the uniform distribution of Fe, O, and C in the catalyst.
Figure 1

Morphological characterizations. a) Powder XRD patterns of IVR‐FO/GDY and p‐FO. b) Raman spectroscopy of IVR‐FO/GDY. SEM images of c) p‐FO and d–f) IVR‐FO/GDY at different magnifications. g,h) HRTEM images of IVR‐FO/GDY. i) Elemental mapping images of IVR‐FO/GDY.

Morphological characterizations. a) Powder XRD patterns of IVR‐FO/GDY and p‐FO. b) Raman spectroscopy of IVR‐FO/GDY. SEM images of c) p‐FO and d–f) IVR‐FO/GDY at different magnifications. g,h) HRTEM images of IVR‐FO/GDY. i) Elemental mapping images of IVR‐FO/GDY. Extended X‐ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) analysis was performed to investigate the finer crystalline structure of IVR‐FO/GDY. The EXAFS spectra (Figure  ) contain three peaks located at ≈1.47, ≈2.63, and ≈3.08 Å, which can be assigned to oxygen‐bonded Fe atoms (Fe—O), octahedral Fe atoms (B‐site), and tetrahedral Fe atoms (A‐site), respectively.[ ] The visibly weaker amplitudes of the peaks attributed to the Fe—Fe shell suggest an increase of V Fe for both the octahedral and tetrahedral sites in IVR‐FO/GDY, with a substantial reduction of 18.8% in the coordination number of the Fe—Fe shell in IVR‐FO/GDY compared with p‐FO (Table S1, Supporting Information). Furthermore, the richer V Fe for IVR‐FO/GDY was indicated by its higher Debye–Waller factor, implying an increased degree of disorder and the existence of structural distortion and dangling bonds around the Fe atoms.[ , ]
Figure 2

Structural analysis. a) EXAFS spectra of the samples at the Fe K‐edge. b) The normalized Fe K‐edge XANES spectra of different samples (inset at the bottom: the first‐derivative curves of Fe K‐edge XANES spectra of samples). c) Fe K‐edge extended XANES oscillation functions k3 χ(k). d) Fe 2p XPS spectra of IVR‐FO/GDY and p‐FO. e) O 1s XPS spectra of IVR‐FO /GDY and p‐FO. f) C 1s XPS spectrum of IVR‐FO/GDY.

Structural analysis. a) EXAFS spectra of the samples at the Fe K‐edge. b) The normalized Fe K‐edge XANES spectra of different samples (inset at the bottom: the first‐derivative curves of Fe K‐edge XANES spectra of samples). c) Fe K‐edge extended XANES oscillation functions k3 χ(k). d) Fe 2p XPS spectra of IVR‐FO/GDY and p‐FO. e) O 1s XPS spectra of IVR‐FO /GDY and p‐FO. f) C 1s XPS spectrum of IVR‐FO/GDY. Moreover, the chemical state of IVR‐FO/GDY was carefully investigated through the Fe K‐edge X‐ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES) and the corresponding oscillation curves as well as XPS. The different intensities of the XANES spectra for different samples (Figure 2b) primarily arise from the changes in the electronic structures. Furthermore, the greatest absorption edge of IVR‐FO/GDY, obtained from the maximum of its first‐derivative XANES curve, implies a reduction in the electron density of the Fe atoms and a larger proportion of higher‐valence‐state Fe atoms, compared with those of p‐FO and the Fe3O4 model. The corresponding oscillation curve of IVR‐FO/GDY exhibits a decreased oscillation amplitude relative to that of p‐FO, further verifying their different Fe coordination environments.[ , , ] The XPS survey spectra of the samples are shown in Figure S2a, Supporting Information. The Fe 2p XPS spectra (Figure 2d) of IVR‐FO/GDY and p‐FO demonstrate that more high‐valence Fe atoms exist in IVR‐FO/GDY and this is indicated by the higher binding energies of Fe 2p3/2 (711.00 eV) and Fe2p1/2 (724.70 eV). The high‐resolution O 1s XPS spectra displayed in Figure 2e show three sub‐peaks attributed to O2− ions bonded to the metals (OI), O atoms with dangling bonds (OII), and surface‐adsorbed O atoms (OIII).[ , , ] The higher content of O atoms with dangling bonds in IVR‐FO/GDY also demonstrates its richer V Fe, which agrees with the best EXAFS fitting results shown in Table S1, Supporting Information. The five sub‐peaks in the C 1s XPS spectrum of IVR‐FO/GDY were assigned to C—C (sp[ ]), C—C (sp), C—O, C═O, and π–π * transition[ ] (Figure 2f). The existence of a π–π * transition peak in the spectrum of IVR‐FO/GDY in comparison with that of pristine GDY (Figure S2b, Supporting Information), implies an interaction between the Fe3O4 and GDY.

Electrocatalytic Nitrogen Fixation to Ammonia Performance

Furthermore, the ENFA performance of the as‐prepared samples was investigated under neutral conditions (Figures S3 and S4, Supporting Information). We equipped a gas purification set‐up to for the electrochemical nitrogen reduction reaction, which has been schematically displayed in Figure S5, Supporting Information. Before each measurement, the feeding gas (including 14N2, 15N2, and Ar) was carefully purified through the Cu‐trap to remove the possible impurities such as NO and other labile nitrogen compounds. Details regarding the measurements can be found in the Supporting Information. Figure  shows the YNH3 and FEs of IVR‐FO/GDY, p‐FO, GDY, and CC at various applied potentials. The corresponding UV–vis curves and chronoamperometry curves are shown in Figure S6, Supporting Information. IVR‐FO/GDY performs remarkably in the ammonia synthesis at a low applied potential of 0.255 V (versus RHE), resulting in an ammonia yield and FE of 127.92 ± 9.11 µg h−1 mgcat.−1 and 59.48 ± 2.57%, respectively; these are much higher than that achieved by the other samples tested at all potentials (Figure 3a and Figure S6c and Table S2, Supporting Information), outperforming most reported ENFA electrocatalysts (Figure 3b and Table S3, Supporting Information).[ , , , , , , , , , , , ] To verify that the detected ammonia originated from nitrogen reduction rather than any contamination, the electrochemical measurements were performed under Ar atmosphere and 15N‐isotopic labelling experiments were conducted. Ammonia was not formed at any of the applied potentials under an Ar atmosphere (Figure 3c and Figure S7, Supporting Information). Furthermore, the 1H NMR spectrum of the electrolyte after the ENFA using 15N2 as the feeding gas shows only two split doublets in the range of 6.85–7.15 ppm, which correspond to the characteristic peaks of 15NH4 +.[ , , , ] In contrast, the emerging of the typical triplets assigned to 14NH4 + were observed when the reaction was conducted in the presence of 14N2 gas (Figure 3d). Besides, quantitative comparison of concentrations of 14NH4 + and 15NH4 + using NMR spectroscopy was conducted and the calculated yields were 127.92 and 121.48 µg h−1 mgcat.−1, suggesting the consistent ammonia yields when 14N2 and 15N2 were applied as the feeding gas, respectively (Figure S8, Supporting Information). These results confirm that the detected NH3 was generated through electrochemical N2 reduction but not due to any possible contamination. Figure 3e shows that no by‐product (N2H4) was detected at any of the applied potentials, indicating that the as‐prepared IVR‐FO/GDY exhibits 100% selectivity towards the reduction of nitrogen to ammonia. The YNH3 and FE values of IVR‐FO/GDY remained almost constant after a 65‐hour stability test (Figure 3g and Figure S9, Supporting Information). Moreover, IVR‐FO/GDY could well retain its morphology during an 11‐cycle durability test (Figure 3f and Figure S10, Supporting Information), demonstrating the high stability of IVR‐FO/GDY toward ENFA. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and electrochemical active surface area (ECSA) analysis (Figure S11, Supporting Information) were conducted to determine the origin of the catalytic activity. The fitted electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) parameters (Table S4, Supporting Information) suggest that IVR‐FO/GDY exhibits the lowest electrochemical impedance among all tested samples, indicating its optimal charge transfer kinetics. Moreover, as shown in Figure 3i, IVR‐FO/GDY shows the highest capacitance of 15.95 mF cm−2, which implies that IVR‐FO/GDY has the largest electrochemical active surface area (ECSA) during the electrochemical reaction and, thus, the most available active sites during the ENFA process.
Figure 3

ENFA performances. a) YNH3 and FEs of the samples at different potentials in N2‐saturated 0.1 m Na2SO4 (bars present standard deviation). b) Comparison of YNH3 and FEs of IVR‐FO/GDY with reported ones in neutral condition. c) YNH3 and FEs of IVR‐FO/GDY obtained at different potentials in Ar‐ and N2‐saturated 0.1 m Na2SO4, respectively (bars present standard deviation). d) 1H NMR analysis of the electrolytes after ENFA fed by 15N2 and 14N2 in 0.1 m Na2SO4. e) Detection of N2H4 for IVR‐FO/GDY at applied potentials in N2‐saturated 0.1 m Na2SO4. f) YNH3 and FEs of IVR‐FO/GDY obtained after cycling test at 0.255 V versus RHE in 0.1 m Na2SO4. g) YNH3 and FEs of IVR‐FO/GDY at 0.255 V versus RHE in 0.1 m Na2SO4 before and after long‐time stability test. h) Nyquist plots of samples in 0.1 m Na2SO4 (Inset: corresponding fitted Nyquist plots.). i) Estimated C dl values of the samples.

ENFA performances. a) YNH3 and FEs of the samples at different potentials in N2‐saturated 0.1 m Na2SO4 (bars present standard deviation). b) Comparison of YNH3 and FEs of IVR‐FO/GDY with reported ones in neutral condition. c) YNH3 and FEs of IVR‐FO/GDY obtained at different potentials in Ar‐ and N2‐saturated 0.1 m Na2SO4, respectively (bars present standard deviation). d) 1H NMR analysis of the electrolytes after ENFA fed by 15N2 and 14N2 in 0.1 m Na2SO4. e) Detection of N2H4 for IVR‐FO/GDY at applied potentials in N2‐saturated 0.1 m Na2SO4. f) YNH3 and FEs of IVR‐FO/GDY obtained after cycling test at 0.255 V versus RHE in 0.1 m Na2SO4. g) YNH3 and FEs of IVR‐FO/GDY at 0.255 V versus RHE in 0.1 m Na2SO4 before and after long‐time stability test. h) Nyquist plots of samples in 0.1 m Na2SO4 (Inset: corresponding fitted Nyquist plots.). i) Estimated C dl values of the samples. Furthermore, in‐situ XPS and XAS measurements were conducted to clarify the ENFA reaction mechanism of IVR‐FO/GDY and investigate the structural and valence state changes during the electrocatalytic process. The EXAFS spectra and fitting results (Figure  and Table S1, Supporting Information) as well as the Fe K‐edge extended in‐situ XANES oscillation functions k3 χ(k) (Figure 4c) show that the coordination number of the Fe atoms in the Fe—Fe shell slightly increases after electrocatalysis, indicating a slight reduction in V Fe of IVR‐FO/GDY. This corresponds to a shift to the left for the absorption edge of IVR‐FO/GDY, which was revealed by its in‐situ XANES spectra and first‐derivative curves (Figure 4b). This finding agrees with the XPS results (Figure 4d and Figure S10, Supporting Information), wherein slight negative shifts are observed in the Fe 2p XPS spectra (Figure 4d), suggesting that more low‐valence‐state Fe atoms were generated during the ENFA. In addition, as shown in Figure 4e, the proportion of low‐coordination O atoms decreased as the ENFA proceeded, revealing a slight reduction in the low‐coordination‐number Fe atoms in the nearest Fe—O shell of IVR‐FO/GDY. Moreover, as the reaction time increased, the binding energy of C element (Figure 4f) shifted to lower values, indicating the electron‐rich state of GDY and the strong electron transfer capability of the electrocatalyst during the ENFA.
Figure 4

a) In‐situ Fe K‐edge EXAFS spectra of the freshly prepared IVR‐FO/GDY and that obtained after electrocatalysis. b) In‐situ Fe K‐edge XANES spectra of IVR‐FO/GDY before and after electrocatalysis (inset: the first‐derivative curves of Fe K‐edge XANES spectra of samples). c) Fe K‐edge extended in‐situ XANES oscillation functions k3 χ(k). d) Fe 2p, e) O 1s, and f) C 1s in‐situ XPS spectra of IVR‐FO/GDY along with electrocatalysis time.

a) In‐situ Fe K‐edge EXAFS spectra of the freshly prepared IVR‐FO/GDY and that obtained after electrocatalysis. b) In‐situ Fe K‐edge XANES spectra of IVR‐FO/GDY before and after electrocatalysis (inset: the first‐derivative curves of Fe K‐edge XANES spectra of samples). c) Fe K‐edge extended in‐situ XANES oscillation functions k3 χ(k). d) Fe 2p, e) O 1s, and f) C 1s in‐situ XPS spectra of IVR‐FO/GDY along with electrocatalysis time. Further, we theoretically investigated the IVR‐FO/GDY as an efficient electrocatalyst for the above‐mentioned remarkable NRR performance. The model of IVR‐FO/GDY has been established based on the experimental characterizations, in which more Fe vacancies have been introduced in IVR‐FO/GDY. With the defect generation, electronic distributions have also been varied. Owing to the Fe vacancies, the neighboring O sites became more electron‐rich. From the side view, the strong interfacial charge transfer between Fe3O4 and GDY was noted, where GDY demonstrated the electron‐rich feature. Notably, the GDY preserved the electron‐rich feature as the electron depletion center for the efficient electron transfer towards adsorbates in IVR‐FO/GDY (Figure  ). Its projected partial density of states (PDOS) displayed the highly efficient electron transfer capability near the Fermi level (E F) due to the coupling between GDY and Fe3O4. We noticed the limited change of the s,p orbitals of GDY, supporting the maintenance of high electroactivity. Meanwhile, the defects still slightly perturbed the electronic structures of local Fe and O sites, which both preserved the high electron transfer capability in IVR‐FO/GDY (Figure 5b). Then, we further looked into the site‐to‐site electronic structures of IVR‐FO/GDY. Both the octahedral and tetrahedral Fe sites have displayed an evident t2g–eg splitting in Fe‐3d orbitals. Compared to the pristine Fe3O4, it was noted that the t2g–eg splitting has been alleviated to 2.59 and 2.91 eV for octahedral and tetrahedral Fe sites, respectively, indicating promotion of the electron transfer efficiency (Figure 5c). Meanwhile, with the formation of V Fe, more O sites became lower coordinated in the structure. From the interface to the surface O sites near the defects, the electron density near E F has been increased to facilitate the electron transfer (Figure 5d).
Figure 5

a) 3D real spatial orbital contour plots for bonding and anti‐bonding near the E F for IVR‐FO/GDY. b) The PDOSs of IVR‐FO/GDY. c) The site‐to‐site PDOSs of IVR‐FO/GDY. d) The site‐to‐site PDOSs of O‐2p orbitals in IVR‐FO/GDY. e) Energetic pathway of electrocatalysis NRR on IVR‐FO/GDY under U = 0 V. f) Energetic pathway of electrocatalysis NRR on IVR‐FO/GDY under U = −0.48 V.

a) 3D real spatial orbital contour plots for bonding and anti‐bonding near the E F for IVR‐FO/GDY. b) The PDOSs of IVR‐FO/GDY. c) The site‐to‐site PDOSs of IVR‐FO/GDY. d) The site‐to‐site PDOSs of O‐2p orbitals in IVR‐FO/GDY. e) Energetic pathway of electrocatalysis NRR on IVR‐FO/GDY under U = 0 V. f) Energetic pathway of electrocatalysis NRR on IVR‐FO/GDY under U = −0.48 V. Then, the energy pathways of NRR under electrocatalysis were illustrated. Under the equilibrium potential (U = 0 V), we noticed the largest energy barrier of 0.48 eV for the first hydrogenation step from N2* to *NNH, which was the rate determining step (RDS), supporting an applied potential similar to the experimental result. Another small energy barrier of 0.25 eV was identified for the transformation from *NH2NH to *NH2NH2. The subsequent hydrogenation and the final desorption of NH3 were energetically favorable, confirming the efficient production of NH3 (Figure 5e). With the applied potential of −0.48 eV, we noticed a continuous downhill trend for the NRR process without the applied potential. The NRR process released overall energy of 2.86 eV. It was noted that the initial adsorption of N2 and the final desorption of NH3 were both energetically favorable, which guaranteed the efficient process of NRR (Figure 5f).

Conclusion

In summary, we proposed a cation‐vacancy‐enabled activation strategy for the electrochemical synthesis of ammonia, and successfully obtained a structure‐optimized Fe‐vacancy‐rich ferroferric oxide/graphdiyne heterostructure. Owing to the synergy between GDY and Fe3O4, abundant Fe vacancies were introduced into the crystalline structure and the Fe valence state was accurately regulated in IVR‐FO/GDY, therefore improving the efficiency, selectivity, and stability of IVR‐FO/GDY during the ENFA. DFT calculations indicated that the vacancies played a significant role in accelerating nitrogen reduction during the electrocatalytic process. The interfacial coupling and vacancies in the Fe3O4 promoted significant electron transfer in the composite catalyst, thus benefiting to the efficient adsorption/desorption for electrocatalysis, resulting in impressive ENFA performance. The strategy presented in this work provides a new insight into the design and fabrication of novel catalysts for ammonia synthesis under ambient conditions as well as other energy conversion reactions.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Supporting Information Click here for additional data file.
  25 in total

1.  Architecture of graphdiyne nanoscale films.

Authors:  Guoxing Li; Yuliang Li; Huibiao Liu; Yanbing Guo; Yongjun Li; Daoben Zhu
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Graphdiyne and graphyne: from theoretical predictions to practical construction.

Authors:  Yongjun Li; Liang Xu; Huibiao Liu; Yuliang Li
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 54.564

3.  Graphdiyne@Janus Magnetite for Photocatalytic Nitrogen Fixation.

Authors:  Yan Fang; Yurui Xue; Lan Hui; Huidi Yu; Yuliang Li
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Au Sub-Nanoclusters on TiO2 toward Highly Efficient and Selective Electrocatalyst for N2 Conversion to NH3 at Ambient Conditions.

Authors:  Miao-Miao Shi; Di Bao; Ba-Ri Wulan; Yong-He Li; Yue-Fei Zhang; Jun-Min Yan; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 30.849

5.  Generating Defect-Rich Bismuth for Enhancing the Rate of Nitrogen Electroreduction to Ammonia.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Miao-Miao Shi; Di Bao; Fan-Lu Meng; Qi Zhang; Yi-Tong Zhou; Kai-Hua Liu; Yan Zhang; Jia-Zhi Wang; Zhi-Wen Chen; Da-Peng Liu; Zheng Jiang; Mi Luo; Lin Gu; Qing-Hua Zhang; Xing-Zhong Cao; Yao Yao; Min-Hua Shao; Yu Zhang; Xin-Bo Zhang; Jingguang G Chen; Jun-Min Yan; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Graphdiyne Interface Engineering: Highly Active and Selective Ammonia Synthesis.

Authors:  Yan Fang; Yurui Xue; Yongjun Li; Huidi Yu; Lan Hui; Yuxin Liu; Chengyu Xing; Chao Zhang; Danyan Zhang; Zhongqiang Wang; Xi Chen; Yang Gao; Bolong Huang; Yuliang Li
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Vacancy Engineering of Fe-doped W18O49 Nanoreactors for Low-barrier Electrochemical Nitrogen Reduction.

Authors:  Yueyu Tong; Haipeng Guo; Daolan Liu; Xiao Yan; Ji Liang; Panpan Su; Si Zhou; Jian Liu; Gao Qing Max Lu; Shi Xue Dou
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  Anchoring zero valence single atoms of nickel and iron on graphdiyne for hydrogen evolution.

Authors:  Yurui Xue; Bolong Huang; Yuanping Yi; Yuan Guo; Zicheng Zuo; Yongjun Li; Zhiyu Jia; Huibiao Liu; Yuliang Li
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Regulating kinetics and thermodynamics of electrochemical nitrogen reduction with metal single-atom catalysts in a pressurized electrolyser.

Authors:  Haiyuan Zou; Weifeng Rong; Shuting Wei; Yongfei Ji; Lele Duan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Graphdiyne-Induced Iron Vacancy for Efficient Nitrogen Conversion.

Authors:  Yan Fang; Yurui Xue; Lan Hui; Huidi Yu; Chao Zhang; Bolong Huang; Yuliang Li
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 16.806

View more
  1 in total

1.  Graphdiyne-Induced Iron Vacancy for Efficient Nitrogen Conversion.

Authors:  Yan Fang; Yurui Xue; Lan Hui; Huidi Yu; Chao Zhang; Bolong Huang; Yuliang Li
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 16.806

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.