| Literature DB >> 34747564 |
Wen-Feng Xiao1,2, Yun-Tao Yang1, Wen-Qing Xie1, Miao He1, Di Liu1, Zi-Jun Cai1, Deng-Jie Yu1, Yu-Sheng Li1,2, Li-Cheng Wei3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the repair of meniscal white-white zone injury through promoting the proliferation of canine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs).Entities:
Keywords: Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Osteoarthritis; Osteopontin; Platelet-Rich Plasma; Tibial Meniscus Injury
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34747564 PMCID: PMC8654644 DOI: 10.1111/os.13089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop Surg ISSN: 1757-7853 Impact factor: 2.071
Fig. 1Preparation of dog platelet‐rich plasma (A) and culture and identification of BMSCs (B) and BMSCs cultured in different concentrations of PRP (C).
Fig. 2Meniscal white‐white zone injury model establishment and grouping (A, B) and tissue selection and observation (C).
Fig. 3Expressions of BMSCs surface antigens were inspected using flow cytometry (A) and histogram that shows the effect of different PRP concentrations on the growth ability of BMSCs (B). Note: *, indicates P < 0.05 as compared with the 0% PRP group.
Fig. 4Comparisons of MRI images of beagle dogs among four groups (A) and histogram for the evaluation of meniscal white‐white zone healing by MRI (B). Note: Different lowercase letters indicate P < 0.05 as compared between the two groups.
Fig. 5General observation of meniscus in the beagle dogs of each group (A), HE staining observation of beagle dogs among four groups (B) and histogram evaluation of meniscal white‐white zone healing by HE staining (C) Note: Different lowercase letters indicate P < 0.05 as compared between the two groups.
Fig. 6Immunohistochemical staining results of type I and type II collagens in the meniscus of different groups (A, C) and histogram of protein quantitative analysis (B, D) Note: Different lowercase letters indicate P < 0.05 as compared between the two groups.
Comparisons of OPN contents in the synovial fluid of knee joint among four groups (Mean ± SD, pg./ml)
| Control group | BMSCs group | PRP group | BMSCs + PRP group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One week before modeling | 1998.61 ± 35.15 | 2003.23 ± 25.76 | 2026.00 ± 53.78 | 2012.90 ± 47.78 |
| Three months after modeling | 5024.95 ± 82.27 | 4002.18 ± 60.74 | 2221.77 ± 113.16 | 2140.63 ± 138.86 |
indicates P < 0.05 as compared with the control group.
indicates P < 0.05 as compared with that at 1 week before modeling.
Fig. 7HE and toluidine blue staining of cartilage of lateral femoral condyle in the healing and non‐healing groups (A) and histopathological grading histogram of numbers of cartilage damage between the healing and non‐healing groups (B). Note: *, indicates P < 0.05 as compared with the non‐healing group.