| Literature DB >> 34747301 |
Fengmei Shi1,2,3, Hongjiu Yu1,2,3, Nan Zhang1,2,3, Su Wang1,2,3, Pengfei Li1,2,3, Qiuyue Yu1,2,3, Jie Liu1,2,3, Zhanjiang Pei1,2,3.
Abstract
The discarding and burning of corn stalks in the fields after harvesting lead to environmental pollution and waste of resources. Composting is an effective way to disposal of the crop straws. Composting is a complex biochemical process and needs a detailed study in cold region. Hence, the succession process of bacteria and Actinomycetes in the process of corn stalk composting in cold region was studied by 16SrRNA. Alpha diversity analysis showed that the detection results could represent the real situation. The bacterial community diversity from high to low was F50 > F90 > F0 > F10 > F20. The results of beta analysis showed that F20 and F50 had the most similar microbial structure at the phylum level, and the difference between F0 and F20 was the largest. The dominant microbes changed from Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes in F0 in heating stage to Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Firmicutes in F10 during early high temperature stage, and Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes in cooling and post composting phases. Actinobacteria and Firmicutes were the dominant bacteria in the whole composting process. In the composting process, the microbial community was mainly involved in amino acid metabolism related to nitrogen transformation and carbohydrate metabolism related to lignocellulose degradation. Lignin and hemicellulose were mainly degraded in thermophilic stage. The conversion of nitrogen and degradation of cellulose occurred mainly in the early stages of composting. The research will be helpful to understand the biochemical process of composting in cold region.Entities:
Keywords: Biodiversity; bacteria; compost; corn stalk; lignocellulose
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34747301 PMCID: PMC8809999 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2021.2002622
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Physical and chemical properties of corn stalk during compost
| Period | Water content | pH | E4/E6 | EC | VS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d0 | 53.06 | 7.3 | 1.34 | 1372 | 91.08 |
| d10 | 60.48 | 9.29 | 2.34 | 403 | 81.83 |
| d20 | 58.60 | 8.95 | 1.73 | 2890 | 73.23 |
| d30 | 53.45 | 8.06 | 1.34 | 3130 | 67.93 |
| d40 | 66.50 | 8.85 | 1.26 | 744 | 65.81 |
| d50 | 51.31 | 8.72 | 1.93 | 684 | 53.47 |
| d60 | 50.72 | 8.80 | 0.88 | 619 | 47.32 |
| d70 | 47.60 | 8.92 | 1.64 | 551 | 42.27 |
| d80 | 46.15 | 7.83 | 1.49 | 507 | 37.19 |
| d90 | 44.40 | 7.05 | 1.35 | 448 | 32.36 |
Figure 1.Temperature changes during corn stalk composting process [19]
Figure 2.Rarefaction curve of the f corn stalk composting samples
Rarefaction measure indexes of corn stalk composting samples
| Sample Name | Chao1 | Shannon | Simpson | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F0 | 429.66 | 3.27 | 0.10 | 0.992 |
| F10 | 443.19 | 3.04 | 0.18 | 0.994 |
| F20 | 233.239 | 2.27 | 0.21 | 0.998 |
| F50 | 596.68 | 4.57 | 0.02 | 0.993 |
| F90 | 677.84 | 4.30 | 0.04 | 0.992 |
Figure 3.Principal components factoring analysis of corn stalk composting samples
Figure 4.Bacterial community in compositing samples at phylum (a) and genus (b) level
Figure 5.Function predict KO of composting samples