Jack K Phillips1, Sydney A Sherman1, Kristen Y Cotton1, John M Heddleston2, Aaron B Taylor2, John D Finan3. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA. 2. Advanced Imaging Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA. Electronic address: jfinan@northshore.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unbiased screening studies have repeatedly identified actin-related proteins as one of the families of proteins most influenced by neurotrauma. Nevertheless, the status quo model of cytoskeletal reorganization after neurotrauma excludes actin and incorporates only changes in microtubules and intermediate filaments. Actin is excluded in part because it is difficult to image with conventional techniques. However, recent innovations in fluorescent microscopy provide an opportunity to image the actin cytoskeleton at super-resolution resolution in living cells. This study applied these innovations to an in vitro model of neurotrauma. NEW METHOD: New methods are introduced for traumatizing neurons before imaging them with high speed structured illumination microscopy or lattice light sheet microscopy. Also, methods for analyzing structured illumination microscopy images to quantify post-traumatic neurite dystrophy are presented. RESULTS: Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons exhibited actin organization typical of immature neurons. Neurite dystrophy increased after trauma but was not influenced by jasplakinolide treatment. The F-actin content of dystrophies varied greatly from one dystrophy to another. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: In contrast to fixation dependent methods, these methods capture the evolution of the actin cytoskeleton over time in a living cell. In contrast to prior methods based on counting dystrophies, this quantification scheme parameterizes the severity of a given dystrophy as it evolves from a local swelling to an almost-perfect spheroid that threatens to transect the neurite. CONCLUSIONS: These methods can be used to investigate genetic factors and therapeutic interventions that modulate the course of neurite dystrophy after trauma.
BACKGROUND: Unbiased screening studies have repeatedly identified actin-related proteins as one of the families of proteins most influenced by neurotrauma. Nevertheless, the status quo model of cytoskeletal reorganization after neurotrauma excludes actin and incorporates only changes in microtubules and intermediate filaments. Actin is excluded in part because it is difficult to image with conventional techniques. However, recent innovations in fluorescent microscopy provide an opportunity to image the actin cytoskeleton at super-resolution resolution in living cells. This study applied these innovations to an in vitro model of neurotrauma. NEW METHOD: New methods are introduced for traumatizing neurons before imaging them with high speed structured illumination microscopy or lattice light sheet microscopy. Also, methods for analyzing structured illumination microscopy images to quantify post-traumatic neurite dystrophy are presented. RESULTS:Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons exhibited actin organization typical of immature neurons. Neurite dystrophy increased after trauma but was not influenced by jasplakinolide treatment. The F-actin content of dystrophies varied greatly from one dystrophy to another. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: In contrast to fixation dependent methods, these methods capture the evolution of the actin cytoskeleton over time in a living cell. In contrast to prior methods based on counting dystrophies, this quantification scheme parameterizes the severity of a given dystrophy as it evolves from a local swelling to an almost-perfect spheroid that threatens to transect the neurite. CONCLUSIONS: These methods can be used to investigate genetic factors and therapeutic interventions that modulate the course of neurite dystrophy after trauma.
Authors: Reto Fiolka; Lin Shao; E Hesper Rego; Michael W Davidson; Mats G L Gustafsson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Evangelos Kiskinis; Jackson Sandoe; Luis A Williams; Gabriella L Boulting; Rob Moccia; Brian J Wainger; Steve Han; Theodore Peng; Sebastian Thams; Shravani Mikkilineni; Cassidy Mellin; Florian T Merkle; Brandi N Davis-Dusenbery; Michael Ziller; Derek Oakley; Justin Ichida; Stefania Di Costanzo; Nick Atwater; Morgan L Maeder; Mathew J Goodwin; James Nemesh; Robert E Handsaker; Daniel Paull; Scott Noggle; Steven A McCarroll; J Keith Joung; Clifford J Woolf; Robert H Brown; Kevin Eggan Journal: Cell Stem Cell Date: 2014-04-03 Impact factor: 24.633
Authors: Aaron R Shoemaker; Ian E Jones; Kira D Jeffris; Gina Gabrielli; Alyssa G Togliatti; Rajeswari Pichika; Eric Martin; Evangelos Kiskinis; Colin K Franz; John D Finan Journal: Dis Model Mech Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 5.758