Amgad Mentias1, Milind Y Desai1, Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin2,3, Shreya Rao4, Alanna A Morris5, Jennifer L Hall6, Venu Menon1, Jason Hockenberry7, Mario Sims8, Gregg C Fonarow9, Saket Girotra2,3,10, Ambarish Pandey4. 1. Heart, Thoracic, and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH (A.M., M.Y.D., V.M.). 2. Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center (M.S.V.-S., S.G.). 3. Department of Internal Medicine (M.S.V.-S., S.G.), Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City. 4. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (S.R., A.P.). 5. Division of Cardiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (A.A.M.). 6. Institute for Precision Cardiovascular Medicine, American Heart Association, Dallas, TX (J.L.H.). 7. Department of Public Health (Health Policy), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT (J.H.). 8. Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson (M.S.). 9. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Ronald Reagan University of California, Los Angeles, Medical Center (G.C.F.). 10. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine (S.G.), Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic disadvantage is a strong determinant of adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure. However, the contribution of community-level economic distress to adverse outcomes in heart failure may differ across races and ethnicities. METHODS: Patients of self-reported Black, White, and Hispanic race and ethnicity hospitalized with heart failure between 2014 and 2019 were identified from the Medicare MedPAR Part A 100% Files. We used patient-level residential ZIP code to quantify community-level economic distress on the basis of the Distressed Community Index (quintile 5: economically distressed versus quintiles 1-4: nondistressed). The association of continuous and categorical measures (distressed versus nondistressed) of Distressed Community Index with 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year risk-adjusted mortality, readmission burden, and home time were assessed separately by race and ethnicity groups. RESULTS: The study included 1 611 586 White (13.2% economically distressed), 205 840 Black (50.6% economically distressed), and 89 199 Hispanic (27.3% economically distressed) patients. Among White patients, living in economically distressed (versus nondistressed) communities was significantly associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes at 30-day and 1-year follow-up. Among Black and Hispanic patients, the risk of adverse outcomes associated with living in distressed versus nondistressed communities was not meaningfully different at 30 days and became more prominent by 1-year follow-up. Similarly, in the restricted cubic spline analysis, a stronger and more graded association was observed between Distressed Community Index score and risk of adverse outcomes in White patients (versus Black and Hispanic patients). Furthermore, the association between community-level economic distress and risk of adverse outcomes for Black patients differed in rural versus urban areas. Living in economically distressed communities was significantly associated with a higher risk of mortality and lower home time at 1-year follow-up in rural areas but not urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: The association between community-level economic distress and risk of adverse outcomes differs across race and ethnic groups, with a stronger association noted in White patients at short- and long-term follow-up. Among Black patients, the association of community-level economic distress with a higher risk of adverse outcomes is less evident in the short term and is more robust and significant in the long-term follow-up and rural areas.
BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic disadvantage is a strong determinant of adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure. However, the contribution of community-level economic distress to adverse outcomes in heart failure may differ across races and ethnicities. METHODS: Patients of self-reported Black, White, and Hispanic race and ethnicity hospitalized with heart failure between 2014 and 2019 were identified from the Medicare MedPAR Part A 100% Files. We used patient-level residential ZIP code to quantify community-level economic distress on the basis of the Distressed Community Index (quintile 5: economically distressed versus quintiles 1-4: nondistressed). The association of continuous and categorical measures (distressed versus nondistressed) of Distressed Community Index with 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year risk-adjusted mortality, readmission burden, and home time were assessed separately by race and ethnicity groups. RESULTS: The study included 1 611 586 White (13.2% economically distressed), 205 840 Black (50.6% economically distressed), and 89 199 Hispanic (27.3% economically distressed) patients. Among White patients, living in economically distressed (versus nondistressed) communities was significantly associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes at 30-day and 1-year follow-up. Among Black and Hispanic patients, the risk of adverse outcomes associated with living in distressed versus nondistressed communities was not meaningfully different at 30 days and became more prominent by 1-year follow-up. Similarly, in the restricted cubic spline analysis, a stronger and more graded association was observed between Distressed Community Index score and risk of adverse outcomes in White patients (versus Black and Hispanic patients). Furthermore, the association between community-level economic distress and risk of adverse outcomes for Black patients differed in rural versus urban areas. Living in economically distressed communities was significantly associated with a higher risk of mortality and lower home time at 1-year follow-up in rural areas but not urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: The association between community-level economic distress and risk of adverse outcomes differs across race and ethnic groups, with a stronger association noted in White patients at short- and long-term follow-up. Among Black patients, the association of community-level economic distress with a higher risk of adverse outcomes is less evident in the short term and is more robust and significant in the long-term follow-up and rural areas.
Authors: Kevin L Thomas; Adrian F Hernandez; David Dai; Paul Heidenreich; Gregg C Fonarow; Eric D Peterson; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Robert B Hawkins; Eric J Charles; J Hunter Mehaffey; Carlin A Williams; William P Robinson; Gilbert R Upchurch; John A Kern; Margaret C Tracci Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Jens Ludwig; Greg J Duncan; Lisa A Gennetian; Lawrence F Katz; Ronald C Kessler; Jeffrey R Kling; Lisa Sanbonmatsu Journal: Science Date: 2012-09-21 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Terence J Quinn; Jesse Dawson; Jennifer S Lees; Tou-Pin Chang; Matthew R Walters; Kennedy R Lees Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-11-21 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Keith Churchwell; Mitchell S V Elkind; Regina M Benjamin; April P Carson; Edward K Chang; Willie Lawrence; Andrew Mills; Tanya M Odom; Carlos J Rodriguez; Fatima Rodriguez; Eduardo Sanchez; Anjail Z Sharrief; Mario Sims; Olajide Williams Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Salim S Virani; Alvaro Alonso; Hugo J Aparicio; Emelia J Benjamin; Marcio S Bittencourt; Clifton W Callaway; April P Carson; Alanna M Chamberlain; Susan Cheng; Francesca N Delling; Mitchell S V Elkind; Kelly R Evenson; Jane F Ferguson; Deepak K Gupta; Sadiya S Khan; Brett M Kissela; Kristen L Knutson; Chong D Lee; Tené T Lewis; Junxiu Liu; Matthew Shane Loop; Pamela L Lutsey; Jun Ma; Jason Mackey; Seth S Martin; David B Matchar; Michael E Mussolino; Sankar D Navaneethan; Amanda Marma Perak; Gregory A Roth; Zainab Samad; Gary M Satou; Emily B Schroeder; Svati H Shah; Christina M Shay; Andrew Stokes; Lisa B VanWagner; Nae-Yuh Wang; Connie W Tsao Journal: Circulation Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rey P Vivo; Selim R Krim; Li Liang; Megan Neely; Adrian F Hernandez; Zubin J Eapen; Eric D Peterson; Deepak L Bhatt; Paul A Heidenreich; Clyde W Yancy; Gregg C Fonarow Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 5.501