| Literature DB >> 34741714 |
Ela Patel1, Anya Mascarenhas2, Subuhee Ahmed3, Daniel Stirt4, Isabella Brady5, Roshane Perera6, Jonathan Noël7.
Abstract
Novice users of telesurgery could be limited by their experience and technical ability. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care systems is unprecedented, and telehealth allowed care providers and patients a safety margin. An indirect impact of redeployment of hospital staff during COVID-19 management has been on the reduced educational opportunities for residents. Proximie can be considered as a virtual teaching platform or classroom for any user. Twenty-one students voluntarily participated in utilizing a da Vinci® skills simulator (dVSS) to carry out surgical training simulation tasks. Our study focuses on digital native's adaptation to utilizing Proximie's augmented reality platform to direct task performance, to gauge its feasibility by this unique cohort.Entities:
Keywords: Robotic surgery; Simulation; Telementoring; Telepresence; Virtual reality
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34741714 PMCID: PMC8571977 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01330-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Robot Surg ISSN: 1863-2483
Fig. 1Mentor (J.N.) explaining the use of dVSS on site
Fig. 2Floor Plans of Nicholson Center (AdventHealth website). Red squares indicate Mentors and Mentees locations
Robotic telementorship questionnaire
| Response rate | Median | Range | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardware setup was easily understood | 4 | 3–5 | 0.9979 |
| Proximie technology took up little space | 4 | 1–5 | 1.1161 |
| Storing was manageable | 5 | 3–5 | 0.7123 |
| Video feed (augmented reality) was crisp. | 4 | 3–5 | 0.8536 |
| Audio and visual matched well | 5 | 4–5 | 0.6016 |
| Audio feedback was minimal or minimized efficiently | 4 | 3–5 | 0.6882 |
| I would use Proximie again if the opportunity arose | 5 | 2–5 | 0.7464 |
| I felt able to ask/answer questions during the case | 5 | 3–5 | 0.5390 |
| Proximie could be useful for me to build or foster independence safely | 4.5 | 3–5 | 0.8013 |
| The annotations available on Proximie were useful | 5 | 3–5 | 0.6806 |
| Teaching/Learning with Proximie was a beneficial alternative | 5 | 2–5 | 0.8106 |
| The experience using Proximie was easier the second time compared to the first | 5 | 5a | 0.2425 |
KEY: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree and 5 = strongly agree
aNo range
Fig. 3Participant at dVSS. Proximie captures a simulator view (top left) and an external view of the user at console (top right and bottom left)
Fig. 4Two mentors (left) telementoring a participant (right) on the dVSS in a separate floor of the building, by verbal instruction and telestration
Fig. 5Endoscopic camera view of live surgery (above) and single screen of Proximie for telementoring (below)
| Statements | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | N/A | Mean (range) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Hardware setup was easily understood | |||||||
| 2. Proximie technology took up little space | |||||||
| 3. Storing was manageable | |||||||
| 4. Video feed (augmented reality) was crisp. | |||||||
| 5. Audio and visual matched well | |||||||
| 6. Audio feedback was minimal or minimized efficiently | |||||||
| 7. I would use Proximie again if the opportunity arose | |||||||
| 8. I felt able to ask/answer questions during the case | |||||||
| 9. Proximie could be useful for me to build or foster independence safely | |||||||
| 10. The annotations available on Proximie were useful | |||||||
| 11. Teaching/Learning with Proximie was a beneficial alternative | |||||||
| 12. The experience using Proximie was easier the second time I used it compared to the first |