| Literature DB >> 34741236 |
Gilnei Bruno da Silva1, Milena Ayumi Yamauchi1, Daniela Zanini1, Margarete Dulce Bagatini2.
Abstract
Cancer cases have increased significantly in Brazil and worldwide, with cutaneous melanoma (CM) being responsible for nearly 57,000 deaths in the world. Thus, this review article aims at exploring and proposed hypotheses with respect to the possibility that RA can be a promising and alternative compound to be used as an adjuvant in melanoma treatment, acting on purinergic signaling. The scarcity of articles evidencing the action of this compound in this signaling pathway requires further studies. Considering diverse evidence found in the literature, we hypothesize that RA can be an effective candidate for the treatment of CM acting as a modulating molecule of purinergic cellular pathway through P2X7 blocking, mitigating the Warburg effect, and as antagonic molecule of the P2Y12 receptor, reducing the formation of adhesive molecules that prevent adherence in tumor cells. In this way, our proposals for CM treatment based on targeting purinergic signaling permeate the integral practice, going from intracell to extracell. Undoubtedly, much is still to be discovered and elucidated about this promising compound, this paper being an interesting work baseline to support more research studies.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer; Chemotherapy; Melanoma. Rosmarinic acid; Phenolic compound; Purinergic system
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34741236 PMCID: PMC8570242 DOI: 10.1007/s11302-021-09821-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Purinergic Signal ISSN: 1573-9538 Impact factor: 3.765
Melanoma TNM classification
| Tumor (T) | Breslow thickness (mm) | Ulceration/mitotic rate |
|---|---|---|
| Not applicable | Not applicable | |
| ≤ 1.0 mm | a: no ulceration/ < 1 mm2 | |
| b: ulceration/ ≥ 1 mm2 | ||
| 1.01–2.0 mm | a: no ulceration | |
| b: ulceration | ||
| 2.01–4.0 mm | a: no ulceration | |
| b: ulceration | ||
| > 4.0 mm | a: no ulceration | |
| b: ulceration | ||
| 0 | Not applicable | |
| 1 | a: micrometastasis | |
| b: macrometastasis | ||
| 2–3 | a: micrometastasis | |
| b: macrometastasis | ||
| c: in-transit metastasis/satellites and no nodes | ||
| ≥ 4 metastatic nodes or in-transit metastases/satellite(s) | ||
| with metastatic node(s) | ||
| No distant metastases | Not applicable | |
| Distant skin, subcutaneous or nodal metastases | Normal | |
| Lung metastases | Normal | |
| All other visceral metastases | Normal | |
| Any distant metastasis | Elevated |
Source: Adapted from Gershenwald and Scolyer [174]
Explanation of the ABCDE rule on CM diagnosis. Source: Adapted from Michielin et al. [23]
Fig. 1Structures and functioning of the purinergic system. Initially, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), a key molecule of the purinergic system, is mainly generated intracellularly via oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in the mitochondria and can be released to the extracellular microenvironment by P2X type receptors (P2XR), such as P2X7. Once outside, it is available to act as cell signaling in P2XR and P2YR or to be hydrolyzed by ectonucleotidases to other nucleotides, such as adenosine monophosphate (AMP), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and nucleosides, such as Adenosine (Ado). Only P1 type receptors (P1R) have affinity to Ado. Pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase (E-NPPS) has affinity to break down ATP straight to AMP, whereas ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase (E-NTPDase-CD39) can breakdown ATP to ADP or ADP to AMP. The only ectoenzyme capable of hydrolyzing AMP to Ado is ecto-5′-nucleotidase (E-5′-NT-CD73). Finally, adenosine deaminase (ADA), the finisher of the purinergic cascade, can break down Ado to inosine (Ino)
Fig. 2Structural formula of RA. Chemical structure of phenolic compound rosmarinic acid (C18H16O8)
Fig. 3Possible hypothesis of RA biosynthesis. Initially, RA biosynthesis occurs in double parallel vias which unite to effectively form the phenolic acid molecule. One of the vias begins with precursor amino acid L-phenylalanine transformation by phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAT) to T-cinammic acid. Afterwards, T-cinnamic acid is converted to 4-coumaric acid by cinnamic acid 4-hydroxylase (C4H) with addition of one OH-group in position 4 of the aromatic ring and subsequently transformed to 4-coumaryl-CoA by 4-coumarate-CoA ligase (4CL). Another via from amino acid L-tyrosine transformation, involving the tyrosine aminotransferase (TAT) enzyme, to 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid and then, converted to 4-hydroxyphenyllactic acid by hydroxyphenylpyruvate reductase (HPPR). In the pre-final step, both vias are united; that is, the 4-coumaryl-CoA arising from the L-phenylalanine via and 4-hydroxyphenyllactic acid, from L-tyrosine, are incorporated by hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA hydroxyphenyllactate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase (RAS), and coenzyme A (CoA), present in 4-coumaryl-CoA, is released. Finally, RA via 3- and 3′-hydroxylase (3-H, 3′-H) is synthetized with introduction of OH-groups in positions 3′ and 3 of the aromatic rings
Some studies with pure RA in different human cancer pathological contexts over the past three years. IC50 (half maximum inhibitory concentration), MARK4 (microtubule affinity regulating kinase 4), TNFRSF25 (TNF receptor superfamily 25), TNFSF10 (TNF superfamily member 10), TNFRSF11B (TNF receptor superfamily 11B), BNIP3 (BCL-2 interacting protein 3), BIRC5 (baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 5), GADD45A (growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible 45 alpha), H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide), EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), NOX (NAD(P)H oxidase), PI3K/AKT/mTOR (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/serine-threonine protein kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin), MG132 (carbobenzoxy-L-z-L-leucyl-L-leucinal), AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase), Bax (Bcl-2-associated X protein), HDAC2 (histone deacetylases 2), PARP-1 (poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase 1), and MALAT-1 (metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1)
| Study type | Pathological context | Dose/time | Main findings | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
In vitro A549 and MDA-MB-231 cells | Basal alveolar adenocarcinoma and breast cancer | IC50 and 2 × IC50 (72 h) IC50 = 6.204 µM | ↑apoptosis ↓MARK4 protein ↓cell proliferation | [ |
In vitro Hep-G2 cells | Liver carcinoma | 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160, and 320 µM to cell viability assay (12 h) 0, 7, 14, 28 μM to apoptosis assay (24 h) IC50 = 14 µM | ↑apoptosis (caspase-3 and caspase-9) ↓cell proliferation - cytotoxic effect against liver carcinoma cells | [ |
In vitro TNBC cell lines: MDA-MB-231 and MDAMB-468 | Triple-negative breast cancer | 0–500 µM (48–96 h) IC50 = 350 µM | ↑apoptosis (TNFRSF25, TNFSF10, TNFRSF11B, BNIP3, BIRC5 and GADD45A) ↓cell proliferation - cycle arrest MDAMB-468 (S phase) and MDA-MB-231 (G0/G1 phase) | [ |
In vitro HNSCC cell lines: UM-SCC-1, UM-SCC-6 and OSC2 | Head and neck carcinoma | 80 μg/mL single and combined with blue light (24–96 h) | ↑apoptosis ↓cell proliferation ↓H2O2 (EGFR increases NOX signaling) | [ |
In vitro SMMC 7721 cells | Liver carcinoma | 0, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 μg/mL (24 h, 48 h, and 72 h) | ↑apoptosis (PI3K/AKT/mTOR) ↓cell proliferation | [ |
In vitro Hep-G2 cells | Liver carcinoma | 0, 10, 100, and 1.000 µM (24 h) | ↑apoptosis - increased MG132-induced cytotoxicity, proteasome inhibition, autophagy, cellular stresses (1000 µM only) | [ |
In vitro HCT116 cells | Colorectal cancer | 0, 50, 100, and 200 µM (24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h) | ↑apoptosis ↓cell proliferation ↓metastatic (AMPK phosphorylation) | [ |
In vitro PC-3 and DU145 cells | Prostate cancer | 25, 50, 100, 200, 250, and 300 µM (48 h–2 weeks) | ↑apoptosis ↓cell proliferation ↓colony formation ↓HDAC2 (enzyme involved in tumor formation) - modulated Bax, caspase-3 and PARP-1 | [ |
In vitro OVCAR-3 cells | Ovarian cancer | 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 µM (48 h and 72 h) IC50 = 34.6 and 25.1 µM/time respectively | ↑apoptosis (MALAT-1) ↓cell proliferation - morphological alterations cells (shrinkage and rounding) | [ |
In vivo nude mice | Liver carcinoma | 0, 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg (for 5 days) | ↓colony formation ↓decreased volume and weight of tumor (inhibited growth of xenografts) | [ |
In vivo BALB/c female mice | Colorectal cancer | 100 mg/kg/day (14 days) | [ |
Fig. 4Possible mechanism to block the P2X7 receptor and inhibit the Warburg effect through RA action. Since ionotropic purine receptor P2X type 7 (P2X7) is prevented from ATP-ligand by RA blocking, uptake of calcium ion (Ca2+) is decreased and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in the mitochondria downregulates ATP generation and release. In addition, the blocked P2X7 inhibits the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K–AKT) pathway, which downregulates the expression of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) in the plasma membrane with a reduction of glucose intake and mitigates pH acidification in TME due to lactate release by monocarboxylate transporter 4 (MCT4) from the aerobic glycolysis cascade. With pH regulated, there is chemiotaxis of the immune cells as DCs and macrophages, and a reduction in the secretion of cytokine IL-10 with inhibition of tumor progression. At the same time, with PI3K–AKT inhibition, there is no stimulus of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) and, consequently, a reduction in mitogenic/angiogenic inductors
Fig. 5Hypothesis of RA antagonism in P2Y12 receptor acting against progression of tumoral events. The ADP-like antagonism effect of RA on metabotropic purine receptor P2Y type 12 (P2Y12) prevents ADP-ligand, thus avoiding the intracellular cascade linked to activation of adenylate cyclase (AC) and its second messenger, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), which does not promote activation of protein kinase A (PKA) to vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation. All that intracell signaling leads to downregulation of the adhesive proteins’ expression in the plasma membrane, reducing tumor mass formation in TME