Literature DB >> 24803582

TP53 mutation spectrum in breast cancer is subtype specific and has distinct prognostic relevance.

Laxmi Silwal-Pandit1, Hans Kristian Moen Vollan2, Suet-Feung Chin3, Oscar M Rueda3, Steven McKinney4, Tomo Osako4, David A Quigley5, Vessela N Kristensen6, Samuel Aparicio4, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale7, Carlos Caldas8, Anita Langerød7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In breast cancer, the TP53 gene is frequently mutated and the mutations have been associated with poor prognosis. The prognostic impact of the different types of TP53 mutations across the different molecular subtypes is still poorly understood. Here, we characterize the spectrum and prognostic significance of TP53 mutations with respect to the PAM50 subtypes and integrative clusters (IC). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: TP53 mutation status was obtained for 1,420 tumor samples from the METABRIC cohort by sequencing all coding exons using the Sanger method.
RESULTS: TP53 mutations were found in 28.3% of the tumors, conferring a worse overall and breast cancer-specific survival [HR = 2.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.65-2.48, P < 0.001], and were also found to be an independent marker of poor prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive cases (HR = 1.86; 95% CI, 1.39-2.49, P < 0.001). The mutation spectrum of TP53 varied between the breast cancer subtypes, and individual alterations showed subtype-specific association. TP53 mutations were associated with increased mortality in patients with luminal B, HER2-enriched, and normal-like tumors, but not in patients with luminal A and basal-like tumors. Similar observations were made in ICs, where mutation associated with poorer outcome in IC1, IC4, and IC5. The combined effect of TP53 mutation, TP53 LOH, and MDM2 amplification on mortality was additive.
CONCLUSION: This study reveals that TP53 mutations have different clinical relevance in molecular subtypes of breast cancer, and suggests diverse roles for TP53 in the biology underlying breast cancer development. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24803582     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  119 in total

1.  Correlation between (18)F-FDG uptake on PET/CT and prognostic factors in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Hye Ryoung Koo; Jeong Seon Park; Keon Wook Kang; Wonshik Han; In Ae Park; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparative clinical utility of tumor genomic testing and cell-free DNA in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Kara N Maxwell; Danielle Soucier-Ernst; Emin Tahirovic; Andrea B Troxel; Candace Clark; Michael Feldman; Christopher Colameco; Bijal Kakrecha; Melissa Langer; David Lieberman; Jennifer J D Morrissette; Matt R Paul; Tien-Chi Pan; Stephanie Yee; Natalie Shih; Erica Carpenter; Lewis A Chodosh; Angela DeMichele
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Learning Moral Graphs in Construction of High-Dimensional Bayesian Networks for Mixed Data.

Authors:  Suwa Xu; Bochao Jia; Faming Liang
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  YAP enhances the pro-proliferative transcriptional activity of mutant p53 proteins.

Authors:  Silvia Di Agostino; Giovanni Sorrentino; Eleonora Ingallina; Fabio Valenti; Maria Ferraiuolo; Silvio Bicciato; Silvano Piazza; Sabrina Strano; Giannino Del Sal; Giovanni Blandino
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Systemic Inflammation After Radiation Predicts Locoregional Recurrence, Progression, and Mortality in Stage II-III Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander D Sherry; Rie von Eyben; Neil B Newman; Paulina Gutkin; Ingrid Mayer; Kathleen Horst; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Marjan Rafat
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Hypoxia-induced p53 modulates both apoptosis and radiosensitivity via AKT.

Authors:  Katarzyna B Leszczynska; Iosifina P Foskolou; Aswin G Abraham; Selvakumar Anbalagan; Céline Tellier; Syed Haider; Paul N Span; Eric E O'Neill; Francesca M Buffa; Ester M Hammond
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  Wip1 phosphatase in breast cancer.

Authors:  A Emelyanov; D V Bulavin
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  New insight on the biological role of p53 protein as a tumor suppressor: re-evaluation of its clinical significance in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Min-Sun Jin; In Ae Park; Ji Young Kim; Yul Ri Chung; Seock-Ah Im; Kyung-Hun Lee; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Wonshik Han; Dong-Young Noh; Han Suk Ryu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-02-19

Review 9.  TP53 Mutations and Outcomes in Breast Cancer: Reading beyond the Headlines.

Authors:  Ashkan Shahbandi; Hoang D Nguyen; James G Jackson
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2020-02-05

Review 10.  Somatic TP53 Mutations in the Era of Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Pierre Hainaut; Gerd P Pfeifer
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 6.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.