| Literature DB >> 34733950 |
Jingjing Zhang1,2, Yingteng Wang3, Dongyan Cao2, Keng Shen2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cervical tumors usually have an irregular morphology. It is often difficult to estimate tumor size or volume based on a diameter measurement from a two-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging slice. This study aimed to explore the use of magnetic resonance imaging-based three-dimensional reconstruction in cervical cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical cancer; lymph node metastasis; magnetic resonance imaging; three-dimensional reconstruction; tumor volume
Year: 2021 PMID: 34733950 PMCID: PMC8506782 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-2246
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839
Figure 1MRIs of a patient with cervical cancer and 3D reconstructed cervical cancer image. The boundary of tumor is automatically outlined and tumor volume was automatically calculated by VitaWorks®, whose procedure based on signal intensity difference between the background and anatomical features. (A) Sagittal image, Arrow: cervical cancer lesion. (B) MRI-3D reconstructed image. MRI-3D, magnetic resonance image based three-dimensional.
Clinicopathological characteristics of the 54 patients in the study
| n (%) | |
|---|---|
| Characteristics | |
| Age (years) | |
| M ± SD | 49.0±11.5 |
| Range | 24–73 |
| Histology | |
| SCC | 41 (75.9) |
| AC or ASC | 13 (24.1) |
| FIGO stage (2018) | |
| IA1 | 2 (3.7) |
| IA2 | 2 (3.7) |
| IB1 | 19 (35.2) |
| IB2 | 14 (25.9) |
| IB3 | 3 (5.6) |
| IIA1 | 1 (1.9) |
| IIA2 | 2 (3.7) |
| IIB | 6 (11.1) |
| IIIB | 2 (3.7) |
| IIIC | 2 (3.7) |
| IVA | 1 (1.9) |
| Adverse pathological factors | n (%) |
| LNM | |
| Positive | 5 (13.9) |
| Negative | 31 (86.1) |
| Parametrial infiltration | |
| Positive | 0 |
| Negative | 35 (100.0) |
| Positive margins | |
| Positive | 0 |
| Negative | 35 (100.0) |
| Deep stromal infiltration | |
| Positive | 12 (34.3) |
| Negative | 23 (65.7) |
| Lymphovascular invasion | |
| Positive | 10 (28.6) |
| Negative | 25 (71.4) |
| Tumor size | |
| ≥4 cm | 1 (2.9) |
| <4 cm | 34 (97.1) |
M ± SD, mean ± standard deviation; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; AC, adenocarcinoma; ASC, adenosquamous cell carcinoma; LNM, lymph node metastasis.
FIGO stage (2018), reviewed stage according to MRI-3D reconstruction model and subsequent change of hysterectomy type
| FIGO stage (2018) | Reviewed stagea | Hysterectomy types upgrade | Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| IA1 | IB1 | Subradical hysterectomy instead of extrafascial hysterectomy (If stage IA1 without lymphovascular invasion) | 2 |
| IA2 | IB1 | No | 1 |
| IA2 | IB2 | Radical hysterectomy instead of subradical hysterectomy | 1 |
| IB1 | IB2 | Radical hysterectomy instead of subradical hysterectomy | 8 |
| IB1 | IB3 | Radical hysterectomy instead of subradical hysterectomy | 1 |
| IB2 | IB3 | No | 3 |
a, according to the MRI-3D reconstruction, the stages of the enrolled patients were reviewed. FIGO, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; MRI-3D, magnetic resonance image based three-dimensional.
Figure 2Tumor volume calculated by VitaWorks® in the groups with or without LNM and the groups of low- or intermediate-risk and high-risk patients and ROC curve of tumor volume in prediction of high-risk cervical cancer patients. (A) Tumor volume in the groups with or without LNM. (B) Tumor volume in the groups of low- or intermediate-risk and high-risk patients. (C) ROC curve of tumor volume in prediction of high-risk patients. LNM, lymph node metastasis; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.