Chunling Liu1,2, Jie Ding2,3, Karl Spuhler3, Yi Gao4,5, Mario Serrano Sosa3, Meghan Moriarty6, Shahid Hussain2, Xiang He2, Changhong Liang1, Chuan Huang2,3,7,8,9. 1. Department of Radiology, Guangdong General Hospital/Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China. 2. Department of Radiology, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA. 4. School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China. 5. Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, Shenzhen, China. 6. Department of Radiology, Stony Brook Medicine, John T Mather Memorial Hospital, Port Jefferson, New York, USA. 7. Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, New York, USA. 8. Department of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA. 9. Stony Brook University Cancer Center, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is an important prognostic factor for patients with breast cancer, which is currently determined in clinical practice by invasive SLN biopsy. PURPOSE: To noninvasively predict SLN metastasis in breast cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) intra- and peritumoral radiomics features combined with or without clinicopathologic characteristics of the primary tumor. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: A total of 163 breast cancer patients (55 positive SLN and 108 negative SLN). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T, T1 -weighted DCE-MRI. ASSESSMENT: A total of 590 radiomic features were extracted for each patient from both intratumoral and peritumoral regions of interest. To avoid overfitting, the dataset was randomly separated into a training set (∼67%) and a validation set (∼33%). The prediction models were built with the training set using logistic regression on the most significant radiomic features in the training set combined with or without clinicopathologic characteristics. The prediction performance was further evaluated in the independent validation set. STATISTICAL TESTS: Mann-Whitney U-test, Spearman correlation, least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) regression, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed. RESULTS: Combining radiomic features with clinicopathologic characteristics, six features were automatically selected in the training set to establish the prediction model of SLN metastasis. In the independent validation set, the area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.869 (NPV = 0.886). Using radiomic features alone in the same procedure, 4 features were selected and the validation set AUC was 0.806 (NPV = 0.824). DATA CONCLUSION: This is the first attempt to demonstrate the feasibility of using DCE-MRI radiomics to predict SLN metastasis in breast cancer. Clinicopathologic characteristics improved the prediction performance. This study provides noninvasive methods to evaluate SLN status for guiding further treatment of breast cancer patients, and can potentially benefit those with negative SLN, by eliminating unnecessary invasive lymph node removal and the associated complications, which is a step further towards precision medicine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:131-140.
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is an important prognostic factor for patients with breast cancer, which is currently determined in clinical practice by invasive SLN biopsy. PURPOSE: To noninvasively predict SLN metastasis in breast cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) intra- and peritumoral radiomics features combined with or without clinicopathologic characteristics of the primary tumor. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: A total of 163 breast cancerpatients (55 positive SLN and 108 negative SLN). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T, T1 -weighted DCE-MRI. ASSESSMENT: A total of 590 radiomic features were extracted for each patient from both intratumoral and peritumoral regions of interest. To avoid overfitting, the dataset was randomly separated into a training set (∼67%) and a validation set (∼33%). The prediction models were built with the training set using logistic regression on the most significant radiomic features in the training set combined with or without clinicopathologic characteristics. The prediction performance was further evaluated in the independent validation set. STATISTICAL TESTS: Mann-Whitney U-test, Spearman correlation, least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) regression, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed. RESULTS: Combining radiomic features with clinicopathologic characteristics, six features were automatically selected in the training set to establish the prediction model of SLN metastasis. In the independent validation set, the area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.869 (NPV = 0.886). Using radiomic features alone in the same procedure, 4 features were selected and the validation set AUC was 0.806 (NPV = 0.824). DATA CONCLUSION: This is the first attempt to demonstrate the feasibility of using DCE-MRI radiomics to predict SLN metastasis in breast cancer. Clinicopathologic characteristics improved the prediction performance. This study provides noninvasive methods to evaluate SLN status for guiding further treatment of breast cancerpatients, and can potentially benefit those with negative SLN, by eliminating unnecessary invasive lymph node removal and the associated complications, which is a step further towards precision medicine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:131-140.
Authors: Philippe Lambin; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Ralph Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Patrick Granton; Catharina M L Zegers; Robert Gillies; Ronald Boellard; André Dekker; Hugo J W L Aerts Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2012-01-16 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Carol E DeSantis; Chun Chieh Lin; Angela B Mariotto; Rebecca L Siegel; Kevin D Stein; Joan L Kramer; Rick Alteri; Anthony S Robbins; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2014-06-01 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: C Ngô; D Mouttet; Y De Rycke; F Reyal; V Fourchotte; F Hugonnet; M C Falcou; F C Bidard; A Vincent-Salomon; A Fourquet; S Alran Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2012-09-03 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Gary H Lyman; Sarah Temin; Stephen B Edge; Lisa A Newman; Roderick R Turner; Donald L Weaver; Al B Benson; Linda D Bosserman; Harold J Burstein; Hiram Cody; James Hayman; Cheryl L Perkins; Donald A Podoloff; Armando E Giuliano Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Karen Drukker; Alexandra Edwards; Christopher Doyle; John Papaioannou; Kirti Kulkarni; Maryellen L Giger Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2019-09-30
Authors: Karl D Spuhler; Jie Ding; Chunling Liu; Junqi Sun; Mario Serrano-Sosa; Meghan Moriarty; Chuan Huang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 4.668