Joanna L Martin1, Desiree R Azizoddin1, Lauren Z Rynar1, Jane Weber1, Tyra Oliver1, Christine B Weldon1, Joshua M Hauser1. 1. and are Palliative Care Physicians; is a Palliative Care Nurse Practitioner; and is a Palliative Care and Hematology Oncology Clinical Social Worker; all at Jesse Brown VA Medical Center in Chicago, Illinois. is Adjunct Faculty in Hematology and Oncology; Joanna Martin is a Health System Clinician; and Joshua Hauser is a Palliative Care Physician; all at Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine in Illinois. Christine Weldon is Director at the Center for Business Models in Healthcare in Illinois. is a Research Scientist at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Affiliate Research Faculty, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, and Harvard Medical School, in Massachusetts. is an Assistant Professor, Supportive Oncology at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Veterans who live with cancer need comprehensive care. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer guidelines recommend evaluating distress and providing appropriate follow-up to all patients with cancer. METHODS: We created patient-centered, collaborative clinics to screen for and address cancer-related distress. Medical oncologists received education about available supportive services and instructions on how to make referrals. Participants completed the Coleman Supportive Oncology Collaborative screening questions. RESULTS: Patients in this outpatient US Department of Veterans Affairs medical oncology clinic were primarily older, African American men. Most veterans screened positive for ≥ 1 type of cancer-related distress. Patients screened for high levels of distress received in-person clinical follow-up for further evaluation and to make immediate referrals to supportive care services. CONCLUSIONS: We evaluated patients' needs, made referrals as needed, and helped bring care directly into the oncology clinic. Using a screening tool for cancer-related distress and managing distress with integrated psychosocial providers could improve care coordination and enhance patient-centered supportive oncology care, especially for high-risk patients. A full-time social worker was integrated into the medical oncology clinics based on our program's success.
OBJECTIVE: Veterans who live with cancer need comprehensive care. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer guidelines recommend evaluating distress and providing appropriate follow-up to all patients with cancer. METHODS: We created patient-centered, collaborative clinics to screen for and address cancer-related distress. Medical oncologists received education about available supportive services and instructions on how to make referrals. Participants completed the Coleman Supportive Oncology Collaborative screening questions. RESULTS: Patients in this outpatient US Department of Veterans Affairs medical oncology clinic were primarily older, African American men. Most veterans screened positive for ≥ 1 type of cancer-related distress. Patients screened for high levels of distress received in-person clinical follow-up for further evaluation and to make immediate referrals to supportive care services. CONCLUSIONS: We evaluated patients' needs, made referrals as needed, and helped bring care directly into the oncology clinic. Using a screening tool for cancer-related distress and managing distress with integrated psychosocial providers could improve care coordination and enhance patient-centered supportive oncology care, especially for high-risk patients. A full-time social worker was integrated into the medical oncology clinics based on our program's success.
Authors: Supriya G Mohile; William Dale; Mark R Somerfield; Mara A Schonberg; Cynthia M Boyd; Peggy S Burhenn; Beverly Canin; Harvey Jay Cohen; Holly M Holmes; Judith O Hopkins; Michelle C Janelsins; Alok A Khorana; Heidi D Klepin; Stuart M Lichtman; Karen M Mustian; William P Tew; Arti Hurria Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-05-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Pallavi Kumar; Alexi A Wright; Laura A Hatfield; Jennifer S Temel; Nancy L Keating Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: B I O'Toole; R P Marshall; D A Grayson; R J Schureck; M Dobson; M Ffrench; B Pulvertaft; L Meldrum; J Bolton; J Vennard Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 1996-04 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Somnath Saha; Michele Freeman; Joahd Toure; Kimberly M Tippens; Christine Weeks; Said Ibrahim Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-02-27 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Vincent Mor; Nina R Joyce; Danielle L Coté; Risha A Gidwani; Mary Ersek; Cari R Levy; Katherine E Faricy-Anderson; Susan C Miller; Todd H Wagner; Bruce P Kinosian; Karl A Lorenz; Scott T Shreve Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kassandra I Alcaraz; Tracy L Wiedt; Elvan C Daniels; K Robin Yabroff; Carmen E Guerra; Richard C Wender Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2019-10-29 Impact factor: 508.702