Maj Roselyn W Clemente Fuentes1. 1. is a Flight Surgeon, Medical Director at Flight and Operational Medicine Clinic, Eglin Air Force Base in Florida.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The current operational tempo and transitions in the structure of the military health system demands a renewed commitment to operational medicine readiness. There is an official mandate as well as the practical necessity to increase operational readiness within the medical corps. There is also a need to continue the scholarly evaluation of military medicine through research to ensure the progression of evidence-based medical care for the war fighter. Military graduate medical education (GME) has been threatened by budget cuts and lack of understanding of its value. This article reviews the literature on operational medicine curriculums and makes recommendations to restructure current military medicine training to produce operationally prepared clinicians who are informed in operationally focused research principles. OBSERVATIONS: During early medical training operational curriculum cements military identity, fosters military leadership skills, provides practice of scenarios unique to military medicine, and connects learners to experienced mentors. There have been several versions of curriculum development in various GME programs observed from a literature search; however, the curriculum overall is fragmented and there is no universal implementation. Studies have shown that deliberately mapped longitudinal curriculums can be well integrated into a existing medical curriculum. Multiple studies also suggest that military GME is a large component of the production of operational-themed medical research and is vital for continued advancements. Value-based analysis performed by multiple sources have found that the initial increased cost of a military medical school education and GME becomes cost-effective based on increased retention, deployments, and filling of leadership billets. CONCLUSIONS: Access to existing operational training structures that have well-established programs should be increased, and individual GME program curriculums should be modeled on those that have shown proven success with a focus on operational training, leadership, and research.
BACKGROUND: The current operational tempo and transitions in the structure of the military health system demands a renewed commitment to operational medicine readiness. There is an official mandate as well as the practical necessity to increase operational readiness within the medical corps. There is also a need to continue the scholarly evaluation of military medicine through research to ensure the progression of evidence-based medical care for the war fighter. Military graduate medical education (GME) has been threatened by budget cuts and lack of understanding of its value. This article reviews the literature on operational medicine curriculums and makes recommendations to restructure current military medicine training to produce operationally prepared clinicians who are informed in operationally focused research principles. OBSERVATIONS: During early medical training operational curriculum cements military identity, fosters military leadership skills, provides practice of scenarios unique to military medicine, and connects learners to experienced mentors. There have been several versions of curriculum development in various GME programs observed from a literature search; however, the curriculum overall is fragmented and there is no universal implementation. Studies have shown that deliberately mapped longitudinal curriculums can be well integrated into a existing medical curriculum. Multiple studies also suggest that military GME is a large component of the production of operational-themed medical research and is vital for continued advancements. Value-based analysis performed by multiple sources have found that the initial increased cost of a military medical school education and GME becomes cost-effective based on increased retention, deployments, and filling of leadership billets. CONCLUSIONS: Access to existing operational training structures that have well-established programs should be increased, and individual GME program curriculums should be modeled on those that have shown proven success with a focus on operational training, leadership, and research.
Authors: Steven J Durning; Ting Dong; Jeffrey L LaRochelle; Anthony R Artino; William R Gilliland; Kent J DeZee; Aaron Saguil; David F Cruess; Katherine Picho; John E McManigle Journal: Mil Med Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Clinton K Murray; Joel C Reynolds; Douglas A Boyer; Maureen K Koops; David A Van de Car; Thomas B Zanders; Duane R Hospenthal Journal: Mil Med Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Katherine Picho; William R Gilliland; Anthony R Artino; Kent J DeZee; Ting Dong; John E McManigle; David F Cruess; Steven J Durning Journal: Mil Med Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 1.437