Literature DB >> 25850138

Assessing curriculum effectiveness: a survey of Uniformed Services University medical school graduates.

Katherine Picho1, William R Gilliland2, Anthony R Artino2, Kent J DeZee1, Ting Dong1, John E McManigle3, David F Cruess4, Steven J Durning1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study assessed alumni perceptions of their preparedness for clinical practice using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competencies. We hypothesized that our alumni's perception of preparedness would be highest for military-unique practice and professionalism and lowest for system-based practice and practice-based learning and improvement.
METHOD: 1,189 alumni who graduated from the Uniformed Services University (USU) between 1980 and 2001 completed a survey modeled to assess the ACGME competencies on a 5-point, Likert-type scale. Specifically, self-reports of competencies related to patient care, communication and interpersonal skills, medical knowledge, professionalism, systems-based practice, practice-based learning and improvement, and military-unique practice were evaluated.
RESULTS: Consistent with our expectations as the nation's military medical school, our graduates were most confident in their preparedness for military-unique practice, which included items assessing military leadership (M = 4.30, SD = 0.65). USU graduates also indicated being well prepared for the challenges of residency education in the domain of professionalism (M = 4.02, SD = 0.72). Self-reports were also high for competencies related to patient care (M = 3.86, SD = 0.68), communication and interpersonal skills (M = 3.88, SD = 0.66), and medical knowledge (M = 3.78, SD = 0.73). Consistent with expectations, systems-based practice (M = 3.50, SD = 0.70) and practice-based learning and improvement (M = 3.57, SD = 0.62) were the lowest rated competencies, although self-reported preparedness was still quite high. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that, from the perspective of our graduates, USU is providing both an effective military-unique curriculum and is preparing trainees for residency training. Further, these results support the notion that graduates are prepared to lead and to practice medicine in austere environments. Compared to other competencies that were assessed, self-ratings for systems-based practice and practice-based learning and improvement were the lowest, which suggests the need to continue to improve USU education in these areas. Reprint &
Copyright © 2015 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25850138     DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  2 in total

1.  Operational Curriculum and Research Initiatives: Shaping the Future of Military Medicine.

Authors:  Maj Roselyn W Clemente Fuentes
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2021-10

Review 2.  Assessing Professionalism in Medicine - A Scoping Review of Assessment Tools from 1990 to 2018.

Authors:  Kuang Teck Tay; Shea Ng; Jia Min Hee; Elisha Wan Ying Chia; Divya Vythilingam; Yun Ting Ong; Min Chiam; Annelissa Mien Chew Chin; Warren Fong; Limin Wijaya; Ying Pin Toh; Stephen Mason; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2020-10-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.