A multiplex PCR method for rapid and sensitive diagnosis, differentiating three pathogenic Yersinia groups such as the highly pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, including serotype O8, low pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, and Y. pseudotuberculosis, was developed. Four primer pairs were chosen to detect the genes fyuA, ail, inv, and virF, responsible for the virulence in pathogenic Yersinia species. Under the multiplex PCR conditions, the unique band patterns for the highly pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, low pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, and Y. pseudotuberculosis were generated from Yersinia strains. The detection limit of this method was 101-103 CFU per reaction tube. This multiplex PCR method could detect highly pathogenic Y. enterocolitica O8 from the wild rodent fecal samples that were culture-positive. Therefore, the new multiplex PCR method developed in this study is a useful tool for rapid and sensitive diagnosis, distinguishing three pathogenic Yersinia groups.
A multiplex PCR method for rapid and sensitive diagnosis, differentiating three pathogenic Yersinia groups such as the highly pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, including serotype O8, low pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, and Y. pseudotuberculosis, was developed. Four primer pairs were chosen to detect the genes fyuA, ail, inv, and virF, responsible for the virulence in pathogenic Yersinia species. Under the multiplex PCR conditions, the unique band patterns for the highly pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, low pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, and Y. pseudotuberculosis were generated from Yersinia strains. The detection limit of this method was 101-103 CFU per reaction tube. This multiplex PCR method could detect highly pathogenic Y. enterocolitica O8 from the wild rodent fecal samples that were culture-positive. Therefore, the new multiplex PCR method developed in this study is a useful tool for rapid and sensitive diagnosis, distinguishing three pathogenic Yersinia groups.
Pathogenic bacteria of the Yersinia genus, including Yersinia
enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, are known to cause
yersiniosis [2, 4,
5]. From over 60 Y. enterocolitica
serotypes, only nine serotypes (O3, O4,32, O5,27, O8, O9, O13, O18, O20, and O21) are
pathogenic to humans [2, 5]. Among them, serotypes O3, O5,27, and O9 are called “European strains”, and show
low pathogenicity to humans. In contrast, the remaining six serotypes, which are called
“American strains”, are highly pathogenic to humans [3,
4]. Generally, human Yersinia
infection causes gastroenteritis with clinical symptoms including abdominal pain, diarrhea,
and fever, however, highly pathogenic Y. enterocolitica serotypes including
serotype O8 and Y. pseudotuberculosis sometimes cause septicemia [2, 4, 5]. In the highly pathogenic Y.
enterocolitica serotypes, recently serotype O8 has been increasing in Japan [9, 15, 23] and in some European countries such as Germany and
Poland [18, 19].
Therefore, a sensitive and rapid method for detecting these pathogens is required.The diagnostic methods for pathogenic Yersinia are mainly based on
conventional isolation and identification procedures [7,
13]; however, these methods are time-consuming and
laborious. Recently, some PCR methods have been developed to detect Y.
enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis, allowing rapid diagnosis
[6, 20]. A few
multiplex PCR methods have been developed to detect both pathogenic Y.
enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis [16, 21]. However, the multiplex PCR
method to detect highly pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, including serotype O8,
low pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, and Y. pseudotuberculosis,
has not been established.Therefore, the study aimed to develop a rapid multiplex PCR method for the detection and
identification of highly pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, low pathogenic
Y. enterocolitica, and Y. pseudotuberculosis, and evaluate
the performance of the method in the detection of highly pathogenic Y.
enterocolitica O8 from clinical samples.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains
A total of 25 strains of pathogenic Yersinia, including 6 strains of low
pathogenic Y. enterocolitica serotypes, 9 strains of highly pathogenic
serotypes, and 10 strains of pathogenic Y. pseudotuberculosis were used
in this study. Moreover, non-pathogenic Y. enterocolitica serotype O8,19,
Y. aldovae, Y. intermedia, Y. kristensenii, Y. rohdei,
Escherichia coli, and Salmonella enterica subsp.
enterica serovar Enteritidis were used to verify the specificity of the
multiplex PCR method (Table 1). These strains were stored in skim milk at −80°C until analysis.
Table 1.
Bacteria strains and band patterns of each bacteria by the polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) method
All bacterial strains were plated on trypticase soy agar (TSA, Becton, Dickinson and Co.,
Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and incubated for 24 hr at 25°C. After suspending the bacterial
cells of each strain in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA), genomic DNA was
extracted using the alkali-heat DNA extraction method described previously [8]. Briefly, 200 μl of the bacterial suspension was
centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min. The collected pellet was
resuspended in 85 μl of sterilized 50 mM NaOH, followed by heating at 100°C for 10 min.
After cooling on ice, the suspension was neutralized with 15 μl of sterilized 1 M Tris-HCl
(pH 7.0) and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min. The supernatant
containing the DNA template was collected and used for the multiplex PCR.
Primer selection
The target genes were selected based on their ability to identify all pathogenic
Yersinia, including highly pathogenic Y.
enterocolitica, low pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, and
Y. pseudotuberculosis. These genes included fyuA
(ferric yersiniabactin uptake receptor A), present on chromosomal DNA of highly pathogenic
Y. enterocolitica [17];
ail (attachment invasion locus), found uniquely on the chromosome of
pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains [14, 20]; inv (invasin),
present on the chromosome of pathogenic Y. pseudotuberculosis [20]; and virF (virulence regulon
transcriptional activator), which is encoded on a 70 kilobase plasmid (pYV) of pathogenic
Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis [4]. PCR primers targeting the fyuA gene
were designed for this study. A region of the fyuA gene sequence of
Y. enterocolitica serotype O8 (GenBank accession no. Z35486.1), which
lacks homology with the fyuA gene sequence of Y.
pseudotuberculosis was chosen to design fyuA gene-specific
primers using the Primer-BLAST software [22]. The
primer pairs for inv, ail, and virF were designed by
Thoerner et al. [20]. The details
of primers to each target genes are shown in Table
2.
Table 2.
Oligonucleotide primers used in this study
Target genes
Sequences (5′-3′)
Product length (bp)
Target pathogens
References
inv
F
CGGTACGGCTCAAGTTAATCTG
183
Pathogenic Yersinia
pseudotuberculosis
[20]
R
CCGTTCTCCAATGTACGTATCC
fyuA
F
GGCCGTAAGCTCTCACTT
253
Highly pathogenic Y.
enterocolitica (American strains)
This study
R
ACACCATATCAACGGTACGC
ail
F
TAATGTGTACGCTGCGAG
351
Pathogenic Y. enterocolitica
[20]
R
GACGTCTTACTTGCACTG
virF
F
GGCAGAACAGCAGTCAGACATA
561
Pathogenic Y. enterocolitica and
Y. pseudotuberculosis
[20]
R
GGTGAGCATAGAGAATACGTCG
F, forward primer; R, reverse primer.
F, forward primer; R, reverse primer.
Multiplex PCR method
Initially, monoplex PCR using each primer pair was performed to observe the distribution
of target genes among pathogenic Yersinia species. After validation of
each pair, these four primer pairs were combined to confirm that each PCR product was the
correct size. Subsequently, the multiplex PCR conditions were optimized. Each reaction
mixture (15 μl) contained 0.1 μM of each primer, 1X Green buffer of Gotaq Flexi DNA
polymerase kit (Promega Corp., Madison, WI, USA), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM dNTP,
0.05 U Gotaq DNA polymerase (Promega), and 5 μl of template DNA. The reaction was
performed in a T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) under
the following conditions: initial denaturation step for 2 min at 95°C, followed by 30
cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 56°C for 30 sec, 72°C for 30 sec, and a final extension at 72°C
for 5 min. The PCR products were then subjected to electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose ME
(Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corp., Osaka, Japan) gel in 1X Tris-acetic acid EDTA buffer
(Fujifilm Wako Pure Chemical Corp.) at 100 V for 30 min and stained with AtlasSight DNA
Stain (Bioatlas, Tartu, Estonia).
Sensitivity test of developed multiplex PCR
The sensitivity of the developed multiplex PCR was examined using Y.
enterocolitica O3 (strain S3-3), Y. enterocolitica O8 (strain
YE16-58), Y. pseudotuberculosis 1b (strain SP-20), and Y.
pseudotuberculosis 4b (strain SP-2067). The bacterial cells of each strain from
colonies on TSA were suspended in TE buffer to achieve a final concentration of
109 CFU/ml. To examine the detection limits for the developed multiplex PCR,
a serial 10-fold dilution of these strains with TE buffer was performed. Genomic DNA from
each dilution was obtained using the alkaline-heat DNA extraction method described above
and was used for multiplex PCR amplification. Aliquots of the serial dilutions were plated
in duplicates onto TSA and grown at 25°C for 24 hr to determine the number of
colony-forming units (CFU).
Detection of pathogenic Yersinia from fecal samples
To evaluate the performance of the multiplex PCR developed in this study to detect
pathogenic Yersinia in clinical samples, a total of 45 wild rodent feces
contaminated with Y. enterocolitica O8 were used. The
fecal samples (0.5 g) were suspended in 4.5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.6),
and 200 μl of the PBS suspension was subjected to DNA extraction. Genomic DNA was
extracted immediately after the fecal samples were homogenized in PBS without enrichment.
It was purified using the QIAamp DNA stool mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany)
following the manufacturer’s instructions, with 100 μl elution buffer added for DNA
collection and used for multiplex PCR amplification. Y.
enterocolitica O8 was isolated from wild rodent feces using the cold
enrichment culture method and was identified as described previously [10].
RESULTS
The specificity of the developed multiplex PCR
The results of the specificity test for the monoplex and multiplex PCR are shown in Table 1. Detection of the fyuA,
ail, inv, and virF genes correlated
well with the genotypic traits of highly pathogenic Y. enterocolitica,
low pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, and Y.
pseudotuberculosis. Typical examples of multiplex PCR assays for pathogenic
Yersinia species are shown in Fig.
1. Among the 25 different pathogenic Yersinia strains, only highly
pathogenic Y. enterocolitica showed an extra PCR product of 253 bp, which
corresponded to a part of the fyuA gene. The 351 bp fragment of the
ail gene was observed in all the pathogenic Y.
enterocolitica serotypes, and the 183 bp fragment of the inv
gene was detected in all the Y. pseudotuberculosis serotypes. The
amplicon of 561 bp, which corresponded to a part of the virF gene, was
observed in all the pathogenic Yersinia serotypes tested. The pattern
with two bands, 253 bp, and 351 bp, indicated the presence of a highly pathogenic
Y. enterocolitica strains. The single-band, 351 bp corresponded to low
pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains, and 183 bp corresponded to
Y. pseudotuberculosis strains. The 561 bp band indicated the presence
of a virulent plasmid of the Yersinia strains. Thus, the highly
pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, pathogenic Y.
enterocolitica, and Y. pseudotuberculosis can be
differentiated by three different band patterns. No targeted gene products were amplified
from the negative controls (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Agarose gel electrophoresis results for the developed multiplex PCR method with
representative isolates of pathogenic Yersinia serotypes. Lanes O3,
O5, O8, and O9, Y. enterocolitica serotype O3, O5,27, O8, and O9,
respectively; lanes 1b, 2b, 3, 4b, 5a, and 6, Y. pseudotuberculosis
serotype 1b, 2b, 3, 4b, 5a and 6, respectively; lane Y.int., Y.
intermedia; lane EC, Escherichia coli; lane SE,
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar
Enteritidis. Lane N, multiplex PCR in the absence of template DNA. Lane MIX, Mix DNA
of Y. enterocolitica O8 and Y. pseudotuberculosis
1b. Lane M, 100 bp DNA ladder (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Japan).
Agarose gel electrophoresis results for the developed multiplex PCR method with
representative isolates of pathogenic Yersinia serotypes. Lanes O3,
O5, O8, and O9, Y. enterocolitica serotype O3, O5,27, O8, and O9,
respectively; lanes 1b, 2b, 3, 4b, 5a, and 6, Y. pseudotuberculosis
serotype 1b, 2b, 3, 4b, 5a and 6, respectively; lane Y.int., Y.
intermedia; lane EC, Escherichia coli; lane SE,
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar
Enteritidis. Lane N, multiplex PCR in the absence of template DNA. Lane MIX, Mix DNA
of Y. enterocolitica O8 and Y. pseudotuberculosis
1b. Lane M, 100 bp DNA ladder (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Japan).
The sensitivity of the developed multiplex PCR
The results showed that multiplex PCR was able to detect pathogenic
Yersinia with 101–103 CFU per reaction tube.
Among the four strains tested, Y. enterocolitica O8 (strain YE16-58) and
two strains of Y. pseudotuberculosis 1b (strain SP-20) and 4b (strain
SP-2067) were detectable at 101 CFU per reaction tube. However, more than
103 CFU per reaction tube was required to detect Y.
enterocolitica O3 (strain S3-3) (Fig.
2).
Fig. 2.
Detection limits of the multiplex PCR developed in this study. The numbers above
each lane represent 106, 105, 104, 103,
102, 101, and 100 CFU per reaction tube of
template DNA of Yersinia enterocolitica O3 (strain S3-3)
(A); Y. enterocolitica O8 (strain YE16-58)
(B); Y. pseudotuberculosis 1b (strain SP-20)
(C); and Y. pseudotuberculosis 4b (strain SP-2067)
(D). Lane M, 100 bp DNA ladder (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Japan).
Detection limits of the multiplex PCR developed in this study. The numbers above
each lane represent 106, 105, 104, 103,
102, 101, and 100 CFU per reaction tube of
template DNA of Yersinia enterocolitica O3 (strain S3-3)
(A); Y. enterocolitica O8 (strain YE16-58)
(B); Y. pseudotuberculosis 1b (strain SP-20)
(C); and Y. pseudotuberculosis 4b (strain SP-2067)
(D). Lane M, 100 bp DNA ladder (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Japan).The multiplex PCR results were in agreement with those from the culture method (Table 3 and Fig. 3). Among the 45 naturally contaminated wild rodent fecal samples tested,
simultaneous amplification of the virF, ail, and
fyuA genes was observed in three (6.7%) samples, indicating the
presence of highly pathogenic Y. enterocolitica O8. These samples were
the same as those of the culture-positive samples. No PCR product was observed in the
culture-negative samples.
Table 3.
Comparison of multiplex PCR method with culture method in detecting pathogenic
Yersinia from wild rodent fecal samples
Methods
No. of samples
Y. enterocolitica
Y. pseudotuberculosis
Multiplex PCR
45
3 (6.7%)§
0
Culture
3 (6.7%)§
0
Yersinia enterocolitica O8.
Fig. 3.
Band pattern of the developed multiplex PCR for Yersinia from
fecal samples and Yersinia isolates from wild rodents. Lane M, 100
bp DNA ladder (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Japan). Lanes 7F, 23F, 44F, mice fecal
samples number 7, 23, and 44, respectively; 7B, 23B, 44B, Yersinia
isolates from mice fecal samples number 7, 23, and 44, respectively. Lane O8,
positive control Y. enterocolitica O8. Lane N, multiplex PCR in the
absence of template DNA.
Yersinia enterocolitica O8.Band pattern of the developed multiplex PCR for Yersinia from
fecal samples and Yersinia isolates from wild rodents. Lane M, 100
bp DNA ladder (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Japan). Lanes 7F, 23F, 44F, mice fecal
samples number 7, 23, and 44, respectively; 7B, 23B, 44B, Yersinia
isolates from mice fecal samples number 7, 23, and 44, respectively. Lane O8,
positive control Y. enterocolitica O8. Lane N, multiplex PCR in the
absence of template DNA.
DISCUSSION
A few multiplex PCR methods to detect Y. enterocolitica and Y.
pseudotuberculosis have been reported [16,
21]. However, no reports are available on the
multiplex PCR method for simultaneous detection and identification of low and high
pathogenic Y. enterocolitica at the same time. A rapid, specific, and
sensitive multiplex PCR method, which can detect and distinguish the three pathogenic
Yersinia groups consisting of highly pathogenic Y.
enterocolitica, including serotype O8, low pathogenic Y.
enterocolitica, and Y. pseudotuberculosis, was developed in this
study. A new primer pair targeting fyuA was designed to detect highly
pathogenic Y. enterocolitica. This fyuA primer pair was
combined with the ail, inv, and virF primer pairs
described previously by Thoerner et al. [20] to allow both detection and differentiation among the three pathogenic
Yersinia groups. The primer pairs, ail, inv, and
virF, were initially designed and used in conventional monoplex PCR
assays [20]. Under the multiplex PCR conditions, with
a mixture of these four pairs of primers (Fig. 1),
three groups of pathogenic Yersinia, were distinguished. Moreover, the
detection limit of the multiplex PCR method was 101–103 CFU per
reaction tube, which demonstrated a high sensitivity level [11, 16]. A spike experiment using
Yersinia-free pig fecal samples was performed, and the multiplex PCR
method developed in this study could detect pathogenic Yersinia at
101–103 CFU per reaction tube from spiked fecal samples (data not
shown). However, few reports [1, 12] have stated that some primer sets of PCR methods for detecting
pathogenic Yersinia showed high sensitivity in spiked fecal samples but not
in naturally contaminated samples. Therefore, the multiplex PCR method was applied to detect
pathogenic Yersinia from wild rodent feces contaminated with Y.
enterocolitica O8 to determine the feasibility of this method as a diagnostic
tool. The multiplex PCR method developed in this study could detect Y.
enterocolitica O8 from the same rodent fecal samples that were culture-positive
(Table 3, Fig. 3). While the conventional culture method is time-consuming and laborious
[7, 13], the
multiplex PCR method can be completed within one day. Therefore, the multiplex PCR developed
in this study seems to be a useful method for rapid and sensitive diagnosis, distinguishing
three pathogenic Yersinia groups such as highly pathogenic Y.
enterocolitica, including Y. enterocolitica O8, low pathogenic
Y. enterocolitica, and Y. pseudotuberculosis.
Authors: P Thoerner; C I Bin Kingombe; K Bögli-Stuber; B Bissig-Choisat; T M Wassenaar; J Frey; T Jemmi Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: H Hayashidani; Y Ohtomo; Y Toyokawa; M Saito; K Kaneko; J Kosuge; M Kato; M Ogawa; G Kapperud Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Jian Ye; George Coulouris; Irena Zaretskaya; Ioana Cutcutache; Steve Rozen; Thomas L Madden Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2012-06-18 Impact factor: 3.169