Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common comorbidity in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD), and can induce various changes in the right heart, such as right ventricular (RV) hypertrophy, dilatation, and dysfunction. We hypothesized that RV function, not only systolic function but also diastolic function, could be worsened with PH progression. We aimed to compare RV systolic and diastolic function in dogs with MMVD. Twenty healthy dogs and sixty-eight dogs with MMVD were enrolled. Dogs with MMVD were classified into the probability of PH. Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic indices for right heart and two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography indices were measured. The morphological indicators of the right heart were significantly higher only in the high probability of PH group. The RV strain, early-diastolic and systolic strain rates were significantly lower in the high probability of PH group than those in the low and intermediate probability of PH groups. Multivariate analysis showed that increased RV internal dimension normalized by body weight and RV myocardial performance index were significantly associated with the presence of right-sided congestive heart failure. Speckle tracking echocardiography-derived RV systolic and diastolic function were activated in the low and intermediate probability of PH groups. However, dogs with high probability of PH showed RV myocardial dysfunction and dilatation. Increased RV myocardial performance index and end-diastolic RV internal dimension normalized by body weight were significantly associated with the presence of right-sided congestive heart failure in dogs with MMVD.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common comorbidity in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD), and can induce various changes in the right heart, such as right ventricular (RV) hypertrophy, dilatation, and dysfunction. We hypothesized that RV function, not only systolic function but also diastolic function, could be worsened with PH progression. We aimed to compare RV systolic and diastolic function in dogs with MMVD. Twenty healthy dogs and sixty-eight dogs with MMVD were enrolled. Dogs with MMVD were classified into the probability of PH. Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic indices for right heart and two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography indices were measured. The morphological indicators of the right heart were significantly higher only in the high probability of PH group. The RV strain, early-diastolic and systolic strain rates were significantly lower in the high probability of PH group than those in the low and intermediate probability of PH groups. Multivariate analysis showed that increased RV internal dimension normalized by body weight and RV myocardial performance index were significantly associated with the presence of right-sided congestive heart failure. Speckle tracking echocardiography-derived RV systolic and diastolic function were activated in the low and intermediate probability of PH groups. However, dogs with high probability of PH showed RV myocardial dysfunction and dilatation. Increased RV myocardial performance index and end-diastolic RV internal dimension normalized by body weight were significantly associated with the presence of right-sided congestive heart failure in dogs with MMVD.
Entities:
Keywords:
canine; congestive heart failure; post-capillary pulmonary hypertension; right ventricular myocardial performance index
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common comorbidity in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve
disease (MMVD), characterized by an increase in the pulmonary artery pressure with or without
pulmonary vascular resistance. Particularly, PH secondary to elevated left atrial pressure is
hemodynamically classified into post-capillary PH [4,
14, 22]. It
can induce various changes in the right heart, such as right ventricular (RV) hypertrophy,
dilatation, and dysfunction, which might eventually lead to right-sided congestive heart
failure (R-CHF) [12, 46]. Recent study has reported that RV dilatation and systolic dysfunction were
associated with worse outcomes in dogs with PH [45].
Additionally, several human studies have reported that RV diastolic dysfunction was also
induced by PH through hypertrophy, fibrosis, and stiffening of RV cardiomyocytes [4,5,6, 27, 29, 41]. Therefore,
RV diastolic dysfunction might also be involved in the development of worse outcomes in PH
progression.A right heart catheterization is a gold standard for the assessment of RV function [15, 30]. However, it
has limited availability to perform catheterization in dogs due to the need for anesthesia.
Therefore, various echocardiographic variables have been tried to use for the disease state
evaluation of PH as alternatives to invasive indicators, but the ability of echocardiographic
indices to reliably evaluate RV function is limited [4,5,6,
30, 39, 41, 44]. Recently,
two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) could evaluate the regional and
entire RV myocardial function and may reflect the intrinsic RV function [2]. Especially, 2D-STE-derived RV strain rate (RV-SrL) could evaluate the RV
diastolic function as well as systolic function with the low dependency of angle and cardiac
translation, and various human studies have used as the indicators for RV systolic and
diastolic function [19, 31, 47].To the best of our knowledge, a few studies have assessed RV systolic function alone, and no
known study has assessed the diastolic function in dogs with PH, although PH could induce RV
diastolic dysfunction as well. Additionally, certain human study has reported that RV
diastolic function might precede systolic dysfunction in patients with PH [27]. We hypothesized that RV function, not only systolic
function but also diastolic function, could be worsened with PH progression and that RV
diastolic dysfunction might also be associated with the presence of R-CHF. Therefore, this
study aimed to assess the relationship between PH probability and echocardiographic indices
for right heart function in dogs with post-capillary PH secondary to MMVD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This was a prospective, observational study. Dogs that underwent cardiac screening at a
university veterinary medical hospital in Japan were recruited from October 2017 to May
2019. All procedures followed the Guidelines for Institutional Laboratory Animal Care and
Use of Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University in Japan, and it was approved by the
ethical committee for animal use of the Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University
Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, Japan (approval number: R2-5). Written informed
consent authorizing the participation of the dogs in this study was obtained from all the
dogs’ owners. All echocardiographic examinations were performed by a single investigator.
All echocardiographic and radiographic assessments, measurements, and calculations were
performed by a single observer who was well trained by a cardiologist and blinded to the
dogs’ identities.
Animals
Client-owned dogs who were clinically healthy or had MMVD were prospectively included in
our study. Dogs were described as clinically healthy based on their medical histories,
physical examinations, electrocardiography, radiography, non-invasive blood pressure
measurements using the oscillometric method, and transthoracic echocardiography. Dogs were
diagnosed as having MMVD based on the presence of mitral valve thickening, or prolapse and
mitral regurgitation, as determined by transthoracic echocardiography [34]. Exclusion criteria for this study were the
presence of (1) other cardiac diseases; (2) diseases that might increase the pulmonary
artery pressure, such as pulmonary disease, thromboembolic disease, and neoplastic
disease; (3) diseases that might affect cardiac function, such as endocrine disease and
systemic hypertension (systolic blood pressure≥160 mmHg [1]); and/or (4) missing data.
Classification
Dogs with MMVD were divided into three groups based on the American College of Veterinary
Internal Medicine (ACVIM) consensus: Stage B1 identified asymptomatic dogs with no or
minimal remodeling, Stage B2 identified asymptomatic dogs with significant left heart
remodeling based on radiography and echocardiography, and Stage C/D identified symptomatic
dogs with current or past clinical signs of heart failure caused by MMVD [21]. Additionally, dogs with MMVD were classified into
three PH probability groups according to the ACVIM consensus using echocardiographic
findings of the tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) velocity and anatomical abnormalities
of the right heart, pulmonary artery, and caudal vena cava: low, intermediate, and high
probability of PH (low, intermediate, and high groups, respectively) [30]. Even in asymptomatic dogs without substantial left
heart remodeling due to MMVD, cases with echocardiographic findings indicating increased
left atrial pressure were classified into the B1 group and the respective PH probability
groups. Increased left atrial pressure was estimated according to increased
early-diastolic transmitral flow velocity (>1.4 m/sec) and ratio of early-diastolic
transmitral flow velocity to early-diastolic myocardial velocity of the septal mitral
annulus (>13) [17, 32, 38]. Peak TR velocity was
obtained from the right parasternal long-axis view, short-axis view at the level of the
heart base, and/or the left parasternal apical four-chamber view [13, 31, 44]. The average value which was obtained from the highest quality of
TR signals in any echocardiographic view was used for the classification. The TR pressure
gradient was calculated using the simplified Bernoulli equation. Furthermore, the dogs
with TR were classified qualitatively according to severity using color Doppler and
continuous wave Doppler methods as previously described: mild TR identified as a small TR
jet and a faint parabolic TR jet signal, moderate TR identified as an intermediate TR jet
and a dense parabolic TR jet signal, and severe TR identified as a very large central jet
or eccentric wall impinging jet and a dense triangular, early peaking TR jet signal [23, 41]. Dogs
were diagnosed as having left-sided congestive heart failure, if they showed the
radiographic evidence of cardiogenic pulmonary edema characterized by an interstitial
and/or alveolar pulmonary pattern in the lung fields [21]. The R-CHF was diagnosed if dogs had radiographic and/or ultrasonographic
evidence of ascites, pleural effusion, or pericardial effusion without any other
abnormalities than PH that may have been responsible.
Clinical examinations
All dogs underwent a complete physical examination and blood pressure measurement using
the oscillometric method on the same day as echocardiographic evaluation. When necessary,
they underwent blood, coagulation, and/or neurological examinations to aid in the
differential diagnosis of the diseases listed in the exclusion criteria. When dogs had
echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac thrombus and smoke-like echo, dogs underwent a
coagulation examination. If dogs showed abnormally high values of fibrin/fibrinogen
degradation products (>4.0 µg/ml) or D-dimer (>2.0 µg/ml) or both, these dogs were
suspected of having thromboembolic disease and were excluded from this study. The
differential diagnosis of endocrine disease was performed based on the blood examination
(blood chemistry examination and hormone concentration measurement) and abdominal
ultrasonography. Especially, dogs with clinical findings associated with hypothyroidism,
such as bradycardia, lethargy, weakness, and depression, were measured serum T4
and free T4 concentrations, and those with abnormally low T4 and
free T4 values (<1.1 µg/dl and <0.5 ng/dl, respectively) were excluded
from this study. If dogs had clinical findings associated with hyperadrenocorticism, such
as polydipsia, polyuria, hepatomegaly, and abdominal enlargement, they underwent
adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation test and abdominal ultrasonography, and those with
abnormally high cortisol value (post-stimulation: >25 µg/dl) were excluded from this
study. Thoracic radiography was performed to evaluate the presence of respiratory
abnormalities, CHF, and cardiomegaly. Abdominal ultrasonography was performed to assess
the presence of ascites and congestion of the caudal vena cava and hepatic vein using the
caudal vena cava subxiphoid point-of-care ultrasound view [25, 42].
Echocardiographic evaluation of right heart
Conventional 2D, M-mode, and Doppler examinations were performed using an
echocardiographic system (Vivid E95, GE Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan) and a 3.5–6.9 MHz
transducer. Lead II electrocardiography was performed simultaneously and the results were
displayed on the images. All data were obtained from at least five consecutive cardiac
cycles in the sinus rhythm from non-sedated dogs that were manually restrained in right
and left lateral recumbency. All images were analyzed by a single observer who was well
trained by a cardiologist using an offline workstation (EchoPAC PC, Version 203, GE
Healthcare).To reduce the effect of respiratory variation, the means of five consecutive cardiac
cycles in the sinus rhythm from high-quality images were used for all analyses of the
echocardiographic indices of the right heart. The end-diastolic RV internal dimension
(RVIDd), end-diastolic and end-systolic RV area (RVEDA and RVESA), right atrial area
(RAA), end-diastolic right ventricular wall thickness (RVWTd), and pulmonary artery to
aortic diameter ratio (PA/Ao) were measured as the morphological indicators of the right
heart. These indices except for PA/Ao were obtained from the left parasternal apical
four-chamber view optimized for the right heart (RV focus view) [13, 31, 44]. The RVIDd was measured as the largest diameter at the middle right
ventricle parallel to the tricuspid annulus using the B-mode method. The RVEDA and RVESA
were measured by tracing the endocardial border of the RV inflow region at end-diastole
and end-systole excluding the papillary muscles (Fig.
1A and 1B) [41, 44]. The RAA was also measured by tracing the endocardial border of the right
atrium at the end-systole (Fig. 1B) [40]. To eliminate the effect of body sizes, the RVIDd,
RVEDA, RVESA, and RAA indices were normalized using the following formulae [13]:
Fig. 1.
Echocardiographic indices for right heart measured in this study: end-diastolic
right ventricular internal dimension (RVIDd), end-diastolic right ventricular area
(RVEDA), end-diastolic right ventricular wall thickness (RVWTd) (A),
end-systolic right ventricular area (RVESA), right atrial area (RAA)
(B), ratio of pulmonary artery dimension to aortic annulus dimension
(PA/Ao) (C), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)
(D), peak velocity of systolic tricuspid annular motion as determined by
tissue Doppler (RV S’) and right ventricular myocardial performance index
(E).
Echocardiographic indices for right heart measured in this study: end-diastolic
right ventricular internal dimension (RVIDd), end-diastolic right ventricular area
(RVEDA), end-diastolic right ventricular wall thickness (RVWTd) (A),
end-systolic right ventricular area (RVESA), right atrial area (RAA)
(B), ratio of pulmonary artery dimension to aortic annulus dimension
(PA/Ao) (C), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)
(D), peak velocity of systolic tricuspid annular motion as determined by
tissue Doppler (RV S’) and right ventricular myocardial performance index
(E).RVIDd index=(RVIDd [mm])/(body weight [kg])0.327RVEDA index=(RVEDA [cm2])/(body weight [kg])0.624RVESA index=(RVESA [cm2])/(body weight [kg])0.628RAA index=(RAA [cm2])/(body weight [kg])0.714The RVWTd was measured as the largest diameter of RV free wall at end-diastole using
B-mode method (Fig. 1A). The PA/Ao was obtained
from the right parasternal short-axis view at the level of pulmonary artery, as previously
described (Fig. 1C) [43].For the assessment of RV function, the following indices were measured: tricuspid annular
plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), RV fractional area change (RV FAC), peak velocity of
systolic tricuspid annular motion as determined by tissue Doppler (RV S’), and tissue
Doppler-derived RV myocardial performance index (RV MPI). These indices were obtained from
the RV focus view [13, 31, 44]. The TAPSE was measured
using the M-mode image constructed by B-mode cine loops offline as the total displacement
of the tricuspid annulus from end-diastole to end-systole (Fig. 1D). The RV FAC was calculated using the RVEDA and RVESA
[44]:RV FAC (%)=([RVEDA−RVESA]/RVEDA) × 100.The TAPSE and RV FAC normalized by body weight (TAPSEn and RV FACn, respectively) were
calculated using the following formulae [7, 44]:TAPSEn=(TAPSE)/(body weight [kg])0.33RV FACn=(RV FAC)/(body weight [kg])-0.097.The RV S’ and RV MPI were obtained from the tissue Doppler imaging-derived lateral
tricuspid annular motion wave. The RV S’ was measured as the peak systolic velocity of the
lateral tricuspid annulus (Fig. 1E) [44]. The RV MPI was measured using the following
formula:RV MPI=(d−c)/ cIn this formula, c is the duration of the systolic tricuspid annular motion wave, and d
is the interval from the end of the late diastolic tricuspid annular motion wave to the
onset of the early diastolic tricuspid annular motion wave (Fig. 1E) [31].
Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography
All 2D-STE analyses were performed by the same investigator using the same ultrasound and
offline workstation as those for standard echocardiography. The strain and strain rate
were obtained from the RV focus view using the left ventricular four-chamber algorithms
[48]. The region of interest for 2D-STE was
defined by manually tracing the RV endocardial border. Only RV free wall analysis (3seg)
was performed by tracing from the level of the lateral tricuspid annulus to the RV apex
for the longitudinal strain (RV-SL3seg), as well as strain rate
(RV-SrL3seg). Right ventricular global analysis (6seg) was also performed by
tracing from the lateral tricuspid annulus to the septal tricuspid annulus (including the
interventricular septum) via the RV apex for the 6seg longitudinal strain
(RV-SL6seg), and strain rate (RV-SrL6seg) (Fig. 2). Manual adjustments were performed to include and track the entire myocardial
thickness over the cardiac cycle when necessary. When the automated software could not
track the myocardial regions, the regions of interest were retraced and recalculated. The
RV-SL was defined as the absolute value of the negative peak value obtained from the
global strain wave calculated automatically. The RV-SrL at systole, early-diastole, and
late-diastole (S, E, A, respectively) were obtained from the global strain rate wave
calculated automatically. The RV-SrL S was defined as the absolute value of the negative
peak value during systole, and the RV-SrL E and A were defined as the peak values obtained
from the early- and late-diastolic strain rate waves, respectively [35, 36].
Fig. 2.
Right ventricular strain (RV-SL) and strain rate (RV-SrL) obtained by
two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: RV-SL and RV-SrL of 3-segmental
analysis (A), and those of 6-segmental analysis (B).
Right ventricular strain (RV-SL) and strain rate (RV-SrL) obtained by
two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: RV-SL and RV-SrL of 3-segmental
analysis (A), and those of 6-segmental analysis (B).
Intra- and inter-observer measurement variability
Intra-observer measurement variability was performed by the same observer who performed
all echocardiographic and radiographic analyses. All echocardiographic indices of the
right heart except for the normalized indices from ten dogs, comprising two dogs randomly
selected from the normal group and each PH probability group, were measured on different
days using the same echocardiogram and heart cycles. A second blinded observer used the
same echocardiographic indices to obtain interobserver measurement variability using the
same echocardiogram and heart cycles. Two mean values calculated from the same cardiac
cycles were used to evaluate the intra- and interobserver measurement variability.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using EZR software version 1.41 [20]. Categorical data were reported as absolute
(number) and frequency (percentage). Continuous variables were reported as the mean value
± standard deviation.The normality of data was tested using a Shapiro-Wilk test. Depending on the expected
cell counts of the contingency tables, Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical
variables between the probability of PH group. Continuous variables were compared among
the normal group and each probability of PH group using a one way analysis of variance
with subsequent pairwise comparisons using the Tukey test for normally distributed data or
Kruskal-Wallis test with subsequent pairwise comparisons using the Steel-Dwass test for
non-normally distributed data. To identify the relationship between echocardiographic
indices and the presence of R-CHF, univariate and multivariate logistic regression
analyses were performed. Indices that had P<0.10 in the univariate
analysis were entered into the multivariate analysis, and those that had coefficients of
correlation |r| >0.7 were not enrolled owing to multicollinearity.
Indices entered into the logistic regression analysis were recorded as odds ratios and
their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). Additionally, receiver operating
characteristic curves were created to determine the optimal cutoff values required for the
evaluate the association with the presence of R-CHF in the indices that were significant
in the multivariate analysis. The cut-off value was defined as that which minimized the
distance between the curve and the upper left corner in the receiver operating
characteristic curve. Statistical significance for all analyses was set at
P<0.05.Intra- and inter-observer measurement variability was quantified by the coefficient of
variation (CV) using a root mean square method, as previously described [3]. Low measurement variability was defined as a CV
<10.0 [24].
RESULTS
Clinical profiles and standard echocardiography
A total of 83 dogs—20 healthy dogs and 63 dogs with MMVD—were enrolled in this study
comprising the following breeds: Chihuahua (n=21; 25%), mixed breed (n=10; 12%), Toy
Poodle (n=6; 7%), Shih Tzu (n=6; 7%), Miniature Dachshund (n=6; 7%), Maltese (n=5; 6%),
Papillon (n=4; 5%), Miniature Schnauzer (n=4; 5%), Pomeranian (n=3; 3%), Cavalier King
Charles spaniel (n=2; 2%), Chinese Crested dog (n=2; 2%), Norfolk terrier (n=2; 2%),
Pekingese (n=2; 2%), Miniature Pinscher (n=2; 2%), and a dog each from eight other breeds.
Seventy-four percent of dogs with MMVD were receiving some medical treatment from the
referral hospital at the time of examination; angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors
(low: n=12; intermediate: n=13; high: n=20), pimobendan (low: n=4; intermediate: n=10;
high: n=14), pulmonary vasodilators (sildenafil) (low: n=0; intermediate: n=3; high: n=5),
loop diuretics (low: n=0; intermediate: n=1; high: n=4), or some combination of those.All data on the clinical and selected echocardiographic indices, as classified by the
probability of PH, are summarized in Table
1. The age, sex, body weight, and heart rate were not
significantly different across the normal and the probability of PH groups. The population
of severe MMVD (C/D group) and tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) was significantly higher
in the high group (both were P<0.001). Nine dogs in the high group
(41%) had at least one sign of R-CHF at the time of examination: ascites (n=5), pleural
effusion (n=3), pericardial effusion (n=2), or some combination of these. A significantly
higher percentage of dogs with R-CHF was treated with angiotensin converting enzyme
inhibitors (R-CHF [%]: n=9 [100%]; non-R-CHF [%]; n=41 [52%], P=0.009),
pimobendan (R-CHF [%]: n=8 [89%]; non-R-CHF [%]; n=22 [28%], P<0.001),
and sildenafil (R-CHF [%]: n=4 [44%]; non-R-CHF [%]; n=4 [5%], P=0.003)
compared with that of dogs without R-CHF. There was no significant difference in the
percentage of dogs medicated by loop diuretics between the presence or absence of R-CHF
(R-CHF [%]: n=2 [29%]; non-R-CHF [%]; n=3 [4%], P=0.080).
Table 1.
Clinical and selected echocardiographic variables obtained from normal dogs
and dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease
Variable
Group
P*
Normal
Low
Intermediate
High
n
20
25
16
22
Age (year)
11.2 ± 2.2
11.6 ± 2.7
11.4 ± 2.4
13.0 ± 1.8
0.052
Sex (Male, Female)
8, 12
14, 10
9, 7
11, 12
0.616
Body weight (kg)
6.2 ± 4.0
5.6 ± 3.5
4.8 ± 1.9
5.7 ± 4.6
0.769
Heart rate (bpm)
124 ± 30
118 ± 32
122 ± 30
137 ± 35
0.350
ACVIM (B1, B2, C/D)
12, 9, 4
4, 9, 3
0, 7, 15
<0.001
TR severity (mild, moderate, severe)
0, 0, 0
15, 2, 0
1, 13, 2
6, 6, 10
<0.001
R-CHF (present, absent)
0, 20
0, 25
0, 16
9, 13
<0.001
High: high probability of PH; Intermediate: intermediate probability of PH; Low:
low probability of PH; PH: pulmonary hypertension; R-CHF: right-sided congestive
heart failure; TR: tricuspid valve regurgitation. Continuous variables are
displayed as mean ± standard deviation. *: P value of one way
analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and Fisher’s
exact tests for categorical variables.
High: high probability of PH; Intermediate: intermediate probability of PH; Low:
low probability of PH; PH: pulmonary hypertension; R-CHF: right-sided congestive
heart failure; TR: tricuspid valve regurgitation. Continuous variables are
displayed as mean ± standard deviation. *: P value of one way
analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and Fisher’s
exact tests for categorical variables.
Echocardiographic indices for right heart
All echocardiographic data of the right heart, as classified by the probability of PH, is
summarized in Table 2 and Fig. 3. All morphological indicators of the right heart, including RVIDd index, RVEDA
index, RVESA index, and RAA index, were significantly higher only in the high group (Fig. 3A). The TAPSEn was significantly higher in the
intermediate and high groups compared with that in the normal group
(P=0.005 [vs. intermediate group], P=0.006 [vs. high
group]), and was significantly higher in the intermediate group than that in the low group
(P=0.040) (Fig. 3B). The RV
FACn and RV S’ showed no significant differences among the normal and each PH probability
group. The RV MPI showed a significant increase in the high group compared with the
normal, low, and intermediate groups (P=0.005, P=0.029,
P=0.033, respectively) (Fig.
3C).
Table 2.
Echocardiographic variables for the right heart in normal dogs and dogs with
myxomatous mitral valve disease
Variable
Group
P
Normal
Low
Intermediate
High
RVEDA index
0.80 ± 0.21
0.76 ± 0.19
0.83 ± 0.14
1.18 ± 0.37a,b,c
<0.001
RVESA index
0.41 ± 0.15
0.39 ± 0.10
0.41 ± 0.10
0.62 ± 0.23a,b,c
<0.001
RAA index
0.46 ± 0.1
0.45 ± 0.15
0.56 ± 0.18
0.94 ± 0.49a,b,c
<0.001
RVWTd (mm)
3.6 ± 0.4
3.5 ± 0.7
3.7 ± 0.8
4.4 ± 0.9a,b,c
<0.001
PA/Ao
0.81 ± 0.2
0.8 ± 0.1
0.91 ± 0.1b
1.00 ± 0.2a,b
0.004
RV FACn
58.7 ± 11.1
55.5 ± 10.2
58.2 ± 7.6
54.6 ± 11.5
0.605
RV S’ (cm/sec)
10.4 ± 2.7
10.7 ± 2.8
11.8 ± 2.0
12.5 ± 4.6
0.165
RV MPI
0.44 ± 0.2
0.45 ± 0.2
0.43 ± 0.1
0.61 ± 0.2a,b,c
0.002
High: high probability of PH; Intermediate: intermediate probability of PH; Low:
low probability of PH; PA/Ao: pulmonary artery to aortic diameter ratio; RAA index:
right atrial area normalized by body weight; RV: right ventricular; RV FACn: RV
fractional area change normalized by body weight; RV S': peak systolic velocity of
lateral tricuspid annular motion; RVEDA index: end-diastolic RV area normalized by
body weight; RVESA index: end-systolic RV area normalized by body weight; RVWTd:
end-diastolic RV wall thickness. Continuous variables are displayed as mean ±
standard deviation. a; the value is significantly different from the normal, b; the
value is significantly different from the low probability of PH group, c; the value
is significantly different from the intermediate probability of PH group.
Fig. 3.
Box and Whisker plots of selected echocardiographic indices with statistically
significant differences among various pulmonary hypertension probability groups:
end-diastolic right ventricular internal dimension normalized by body weight (RVIDd
index) (A), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion normalized by
body weight (TAPSEn) (B), right ventricular myocardial performance
index (C), early-diastolic right ventricular strain rate (RV-SrL E)
(D), and right ventricular strain (RV-SL) (E). The
Whiskers indicate the range of values obtained, the box extends from the 25th to the
75th percentile, and the horizontal bar in the box represents the median. For the
RV-SrL E and RV-SL, blue box plots represent 3seg, and orange box plots represent
6seg. *; Values differed significantly between pulmonary hypertension probability
groups. The sign in blue and orange indicate significant differences in 3seg and
6seg, respectively.
High: high probability of PH; Intermediate: intermediate probability of PH; Low:
low probability of PH; PA/Ao: pulmonary artery to aortic diameter ratio; RAA index:
right atrial area normalized by body weight; RV: right ventricular; RV FACn: RV
fractional area change normalized by body weight; RV S': peak systolic velocity of
lateral tricuspid annular motion; RVEDA index: end-diastolic RV area normalized by
body weight; RVESA index: end-systolic RV area normalized by body weight; RVWTd:
end-diastolic RV wall thickness. Continuous variables are displayed as mean ±
standard deviation. a; the value is significantly different from the normal, b; the
value is significantly different from the low probability of PH group, c; the value
is significantly different from the intermediate probability of PH group.Box and Whisker plots of selected echocardiographic indices with statistically
significant differences among various pulmonary hypertension probability groups:
end-diastolic right ventricular internal dimension normalized by body weight (RVIDd
index) (A), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion normalized by
body weight (TAPSEn) (B), right ventricular myocardial performance
index (C), early-diastolic right ventricular strain rate (RV-SrL E)
(D), and right ventricular strain (RV-SL) (E). The
Whiskers indicate the range of values obtained, the box extends from the 25th to the
75th percentile, and the horizontal bar in the box represents the median. For the
RV-SrL E and RV-SL, blue box plots represent 3seg, and orange box plots represent
6seg. *; Values differed significantly between pulmonary hypertension probability
groups. The sign in blue and orange indicate significant differences in 3seg and
6seg, respectively.For the 2D-STE indices, all myocardial segments were included in the statistical analyses
(Table 3 and Fig. 3D and 3E). The RV-SrL E
of each segment analysis showed significantly lower values in the high group compared with
that in the intermediate group (RV-SrL E3seg: P=0.047; RV-SrL
E6seg: P=0.010). Additionally, RV-SrL E6seg was
higher in the intermediate group than that in the normal group (P=0.041)
(Fig. 3D). The RV-SrL A of each segment
analysis showed no significant difference among each PH probability group. The RV-SL of
each segment analysis was significantly lower in the high group than that in the low and
intermediate groups (RV-SL3seg: P=0.049,
P=0.008, respectively; RV-SL6seg: P=0.027,
P=0.001, respectively) (Fig.
3E). The RV-SrL S3seg was significantly higher in the intermediate
group than that in the normal and high groups (P=0.048,
P=0.020, respectively) Whereas, RV-SrL S6seg was
significantly lower in the high group than that in the low and intermediate groups
(P=0.021, P=0.005, respectively).
Table 3.
Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography-derived indices in normal
dogs and dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease
Variable
Group
P
Normal
Low
Intermediate
High
RV-SrL S3seg (1/sec)
4.2 ± 1.5
5.1 ± 2.1
5.9 ± 2.3
3.7 ± 1.4b,c
0.002
RV-SrL E3seg (1/sec)
2.6 ± 1.3
3.6 ± 2.3
4.0 ± 2.1
3.0 ± 1.7c
0.038
RV-SrL A3seg (1/sec)
3.5 ± 1.5
4.1 ± 2.4
3.9 ± 1.0
3.7 ± 1.7
0.622
RV-SrL E/A3seg
0.8 ± 0.3
1.1 ± 0.5
1.1 ± 0.8
1.1 ± 0.5
0.269
RV-SL3seg (%)
26.9 ± 7.8
29.4 ± 7.8
30.7 ± 7.3
24.8 ± 6.7b,c
0.011
RV-SrL S6seg (1/sec)
3.2 ± 1.0
3.6 ± 1.1
4.1 ± 1.4
2.8 ± 1.0b,c
0.004
RV-SrL E6seg (1/sec)
2.3 ± 1.0
2.7 ± 1.3
3.4 ± 1.2a
2.2 ± 1.0c
0.012
RV-SrL A6seg (1/sec)
2.5 ± 1.0
3.1 ± 1.5
3.3 ± 0.8
2.6 ± 1.2
0.072
RV-SrL E/A6seg
1.0 ± 0.5
1.2 ± 0.6
1.1 ± 0.6
1.2 ± 0.5
0.472
RV-SL6seg (%)
23.2 ± 6.1
25.3 ± 5.7
27.8 ± 5.3
20.2 ± 6.1b,c
0.004
3seg: right ventricular free wall analysis; 6seg: right ventricular global
analysis; High: high probability of PH; Intermediate: intermediate probability of
PH; Low: low probability of PH; PH: pulmonary hypertension; RV: right ventricular;
RV-SL: RV longitudinal strain; RV-SrL A: late-diastolic RV strain rate; RV-SrL E:
early-diastolic RV strain rate; RV-SrL S: systolic RV strain rate. Continuous
variables are displayed as mean ± standard deviation. a; the value is significantly
different from the normal, b; the value is significantly different from the low
probability of PH group, c; the value is significantly different from the
intermediate probability of PH group.
3seg: right ventricular free wall analysis; 6seg: right ventricular global
analysis; High: high probability of PH; Intermediate: intermediate probability of
PH; Low: low probability of PH; PH: pulmonary hypertension; RV: right ventricular;
RV-SL: RV longitudinal strain; RV-SrL A: late-diastolic RV strain rate; RV-SrL E:
early-diastolic RV strain rate; RV-SrL S: systolic RV strain rate. Continuous
variables are displayed as mean ± standard deviation. a; the value is significantly
different from the normal, b; the value is significantly different from the low
probability of PH group, c; the value is significantly different from the
intermediate probability of PH group.Table 4 shows the results comparing echocardiographic indices according to the
presence or absence of R-CHF. All RV morphological indices, including RVIDd index, RVEDA
index, RVESA index, RAA index, RVWTd, and PA/Ao, were significantly higher in dogs with
R-CHF. The RV FACn, RV-SrL S, RV-SrL E6seg, and RV-SL6seg were
significantly lower in dogs with R-CHF. The RV MPI was significantly higher in dogs with
R-CHF. There was no significant difference in TAPSEn, RV S’, RV-SrL E3seg,
RV-SrL A, RV-SrL E/A, and RV-SL3seg between dogs with and without R-CHF.
Table 4.
Echocardiographic variables for the right heart in dogs with and without
right-sided congestive heart failure
Variables
Group
P
R-CHF (+)
R-CHF (-)
RVIDd index
10.2 ± 2.3
6.2 ± 1.3
<0.001
RVEDA index
1.40 ± 0.4
0.83 ± 0.2
0.001
RVESA index
0.77 ± 0.2
0.42 ± 0.1
<0.001
RAA index
1.24 ± 0.6
0.52 ± 0.2
<0.001
RVWTd (mm)
4.8 ± 0.9
3.6 ± 0.7
<0.001
PA/Ao
1.1 ± 0.2
0.86 ± 0.2
0.002
TAPSEn
7.2 ± 1.5
7.2 ± 1.8
0.823
RV FACn
49.8 ± 13.3
57.5 ± 9.7
0.027
RV S’ (cm/sec)
12.9 ± 4.7
11.1 ± 3.1
0.378
RV MPI
0.67 ± 0.2
0.46 ± 0.2
0.009
RV-SrL S3seg (1/sec)
3.4 ± 1.3
4.7 ± 2.1
0.027
RV-SrL E3seg (1/sec)
2.9 ± 1.1
3.4 ± 2.1
0.319
RV-SrL A3seg (1/sec)
3.9 ± 1.8
3.8 ± 1.8
0.694
RV-SrL E/A3seg
1.0 ± 0.4
1.0 ± 0.8
0.818
RV-SL3seg (%)
25.9 ± 5.6
28.1 ± 7.9
0.444
RV-SrL S6seg (1/sec)
2.4 ± 0.9
3.5 ± 1.2
0.010
RV-SrL E6seg (1/sec)
1.9 ± 0.8
2.7 ± 1.2
0.044
RV-SrL A6seg (1/sec)
2.8 ± 1.3
2.9 ± 1.2
0.694
RV-SrL E/A6seg
1.0 ± 0.5
1.1 ± 0.8
0.860
RV-SL6seg (%)
18.8 ± 5.9
24.7 ± 6.2
0.007
3seg: right ventricular free wall analysis; 6seg: right ventricular global
analysis; PA/Ao: pulmonary artery to aortic diameter ratio; RAA: right atrial area;
R-CHF: right-sided congestive heart failure; RV FAC: right ventricular fractional
area change; RV MPI: right ventricular myocardial performance index; RV S': peak
systolic velocity of lateral tricuspid annular motion; RVEDA: end-diastolic right
ventricular area; RVESA: end-systolic right ventricular area; RVIDd: end-diastolic
right ventricular internal dimension; RV-SL: right ventricular strain; RV-SrL A:
late-diastolic right ventricular strain rate; RV-SrL E: early-diastolic right
ventricular strain rate; RV-SrL S: systolic right ventricular strain rate; RVWTd:
end-diastolic right ventricular wall thickness; TAPSE: tricuspid annular plane
systolic excursion. Continuous variables are displayed as mean ± standard
deviation.
3seg: right ventricular free wall analysis; 6seg: right ventricular global
analysis; PA/Ao: pulmonary artery to aortic diameter ratio; RAA: right atrial area;
R-CHF: right-sided congestive heart failure; RV FAC: right ventricular fractional
area change; RV MPI: right ventricular myocardial performance index; RV S': peak
systolic velocity of lateral tricuspid annular motion; RVEDA: end-diastolic right
ventricular area; RVESA: end-systolic right ventricular area; RVIDd: end-diastolic
right ventricular internal dimension; RV-SL: right ventricular strain; RV-SrL A:
late-diastolic right ventricular strain rate; RV-SrL E: early-diastolic right
ventricular strain rate; RV-SrL S: systolic right ventricular strain rate; RVWTd:
end-diastolic right ventricular wall thickness; TAPSE: tricuspid annular plane
systolic excursion. Continuous variables are displayed as mean ± standard
deviation.The measurement variability-related results are summarized in Table 5. In terms of the intra-observer measurement variability, all of the indices
except for RV-SrL E3seg had low measurement variabilities [24]. However, RVEDA, RVESA, TAPSE, RV FAC, RV-SrL
E3seg, RV-SrL A3seg, and RV-SrL A6seg did not meet the
definition of low measurement variability for inter-observer measurement variability
[24].
Table 5.
Intra- and inter-observer measurement variability for echocardiographic
variables
Variables
Intra-observer
Inter-observer
CV (%)
CV (%)
RVIDd (mm)
5.1
9.0
RVEDA (cm2)
4.8
13.9
RVESA (cm2)
7.2
26.0
RAA (cm2)
6.9
8.9
RVWTd (mm)
5.4
7.8
PA/Ao
7.2
8.9
TAPSE (mm)
8.3
9.3
RV FAC (%)
7.2
13.8
RV S’ (cm/sec)
4.0
4.3
RV MPI
8.5
9.2
RV-SrL S3seg (1/sec)
7.2
11.3
RV-SrL E3seg (1/sec)
10.3
9.2
RV-SrL A3seg (1/sec)
5.5
13.0
RV-SL3seg (%)
4.8
5.7
RV-SrL S6seg (1/sec)
6.9
9.2
RV-SrL E6seg (1/sec)
9.1
9.8
RV-SrL A6seg (1/sec)
7.7
12.5
RV-SL6seg (%)
6.9
6.9
3seg: right ventricular free wall analysis; 6seg: right ventricular global
analysis; CV: coefficient of variation; PA/Ao: pulmonary artery to aortic diameter
ratio; RAA: right atrial area; RV FAC: right ventricular fractional area change; RV
MPI: right ventricular myocardial performance index; RV S': peak systolic velocity
of lateral tricuspid annular motion; RVEDA: end-diastolic right ventricular area;
RVESA: end-systolic right ventricular area; RVIDd: end-diastolic right ventricular
internal dimension; RV-SL: right ventricular strain; RV-SrL A: late-diastolic right
ventricular strain rate; RV-SrL E: early-diastolic right ventricular strain rate;
RV-SrL S: systolic right ventricular strain rate; RVWTd: end-diastolic right
ventricular wall thickness; TAPSE: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.
3seg: right ventricular free wall analysis; 6seg: right ventricular global
analysis; CV: coefficient of variation; PA/Ao: pulmonary artery to aortic diameter
ratio; RAA: right atrial area; RV FAC: right ventricular fractional area change; RV
MPI: right ventricular myocardial performance index; RV S': peak systolic velocity
of lateral tricuspid annular motion; RVEDA: end-diastolic right ventricular area;
RVESA: end-systolic right ventricular area; RVIDd: end-diastolic right ventricular
internal dimension; RV-SL: right ventricular strain; RV-SrL A: late-diastolic right
ventricular strain rate; RV-SrL E: early-diastolic right ventricular strain rate;
RV-SrL S: systolic right ventricular strain rate; RVWTd: end-diastolic right
ventricular wall thickness; TAPSE: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.
Logistic regression analyses
For the results of the univariate models that evaluated the association between
echocardiographic indices and the presence of R-CHF, an association was observed between
the presence of R-CHF and increased RVIDd index, RVEDA index, RVESA, RAA index, RVWTd,
PA/Ao, and RV MPI, and decreased RV FACn, RV-SrL S3seg, RV-SL6seg,
RV-SrL S6seg, and RV-SrL E6seg (Table 6). After adjusting for confounding factors, four indices, including RVIDd
index, RVWTd, RV MPI, and RV-SL6seg, were included in the multivariate model,
and RVIDd index and RV MPI remained significant in the multivariate model. The optimal
cutoff of RVIDd index and RV MPI were 8.487 (area under the curve [95% confidence
interval], 0.98 [0.96−1.00]; sensitivity, 0.89; specificity, 0.99) and 0.4593 (area under
the curve [95% confidence interval], 0.73 [0.57−0.92]; sensitivity, 0.78; specificity,
0.67), respectively (Fig.
4).
Table 6.
Results of logistic regression analysis to evaluate the association between
echocardiographic indices and the presence of right-sided congestive heart
failure
Variables
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
non-adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
P
adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
P
RVIDd index
9.25 (1.92–44.61)
<0.001
12.5 (1.85–84.7)
0.01
RVEDA index (0.1)
3.71 (1.43–9.62)
<0.001
RVESA index (0.1)
8.40 (2.10–33.70)
<0.001
RAA index (0.1)
2.26 (1.36–3.77)
<0.001
RVWTd (0.1 mm)
4.53 (1.85–11.10)
<0.001
PA/Ao (0.1)
2.07 (1.34–3.20)
<0.001
RV FACn
1.08 (1.00–1.16)
0.032
RV MPI (0.1)
1.44 (1.09–1.91)
0.009
1.76 (1.02–3.39)
0.049
RV-SrL S3seg (0.1/sec)
1.05 (1.00–1.11)
0.036
RV-SL6seg (%)
1.15 (1.03–1.30)
0.012
RV-SrL S6seg (0.1/sec)
1.10 (1.01–1.20)
0.009
RV-SrL E6seg (0.1/sec)
1.06 (1.01–1.14)
0.041
6seg: right ventricular global analysis; CI: confidence interval; PA/Ao: pulmonary
artery to aortic diameter ratio; RAA index: right atrial area normalized by body
weight; RV: right ventricular; RV FACn: RV fractional area change normalized by body
weight; RV MPI: RV myocardial performance index; RVEDA index: end-diastolic RV area
normalized by body weight; RVESA index: end-systolic RV area normalized by body
weight; RVIDd index: end-diastolic RV internal dimension normalized by body weight;
RV-SrL E: early-diastolic RV strain rate; RV-SL: RV strain.
Fig. 4.
Receiver operating characteristic curves of end-diastolic right ventricular
internal dimension normalized by body weight (A) and right
ventricular myocardial performance index (B) to predict the presence
of right-sided congestive heart failure.
6seg: right ventricular global analysis; CI: confidence interval; PA/Ao: pulmonary
artery to aortic diameter ratio; RAA index: right atrial area normalized by body
weight; RV: right ventricular; RV FACn: RV fractional area change normalized by body
weight; RV MPI: RV myocardial performance index; RVEDA index: end-diastolic RV area
normalized by body weight; RVESA index: end-systolic RV area normalized by body
weight; RVIDd index: end-diastolic RV internal dimension normalized by body weight;
RV-SrL E: early-diastolic RV strain rate; RV-SL: RV strain.Receiver operating characteristic curves of end-diastolic right ventricular
internal dimension normalized by body weight (A) and right
ventricular myocardial performance index (B) to predict the presence
of right-sided congestive heart failure.
DISCUSSION
Our results of 2D-STE indices demonstrated that RV function, not only systolic function but
also diastolic function, was increased in the intermediate probability of PH group than the
normal group. Whereas, RV systolic and diastolic function were significantly impaired in
dogs with high probability of PH, which might reflect the substantial increase of pulmonary
artery pressure and RV myocardial dysfunction. Additionally, dogs with R-CHF showed
significantly increased RV MPI, which could detect both systolic and diastolic disorders in
the right ventricle. These non-invasive variables for RV function might provide additional
information to monitor the PH progression and detect the presence of R-CHF.In this study, conventional echocardiographic indices for RV systolic function, such as
TAPSEn and RV S’, were higher in the intermediate group compared with the normal group.
However, there was no significant decline in these conventional echocardiographic indices
for RV function in the high group, although the 2D-STE indices showed significant worsening.
The conventional echocardiographic indices, such as TAPSEn, RV FACn, RV S’, were easily
affected by heart rate, volume overload, and/or ventricular interdependence in addition to
intrinsic RV function [16, 18]. These influences might prevent the detection of RV systolic
dysfunction in the high group using conventional echocardiographic indices, including
TAPSEn, RV FACn, and RV S’. Whereas 2D-STE-derived RV-SrL S and RV-SL were significantly
lower in the high group compared with the low and intermediate groups. The 2D-STE could
evaluate the precise myocardial function with low effects from the heart rate, volume
overload, and ventricular interdependence [2, 35]. Our results suggested that 2D-STE-derived RV-SL
might reflect the precise RV systolic dysfunction which could not be detected by
conventional echocardiographic indices.This is the first study to evaluate the diastolic function of the RV using RV-SrL E of
2D-STE in dogs with MMVD. The RV-SrL E6seg showed a significant increase in the
intermediate group compared with that in the normal group, and a significant decrease in the
high group compared with that in the intermediate group, which indicated a similar tendency
to RV systolic function assessed by RV-SrL S and RV-SL. Our results suggested that RV
diastolic function might also be increased compensatory in the intermediate group, but
impaired to the same degree as the normal group in the high group. However, unlike the
previous human study, RV diastolic dysfunction preceding systolic dysfunction was not
observed in this study [27]. The difference in the
degree of RV remodeling and RV compensation might affect the results. In this study, only
dogs in the high group had substantial RV remodeling, including hypertrophy and dilatation,
which might result in increased RV stiffness and hence RV diastolic dysfunction [10]. Consequently, our findings suggest that temporarily
activated RV diastolic function may also be worsened in association with PH progression as
well as RV systolic dysfunction. Further studies that evaluate the RV diastolic function
using a right heart catheterization in dogs with PH are expected in the future.Regarding the results of 2D-STE indices, the 6seg analyses showed more drastic changes in
cases with high probability of PH, although the 3seg analyses had the same tendency. There
has still been controversy surrounding whether 2D-STE analysis for RV function should
include interventricular septum [6, 26]. Several experimental studies have reported that the
interventricular septum plays an important role in the cardiac output of the right ventricle
[9, 33].
Naturally, the chronic pressure overload due to PH would induce entire RV remodeling, and
the low cardiac output from the left ventricle associated with MMVD could also damage the
myocardium extensively [11]. Therefore, our results
suggest that the 6seg analysis might be more useful to assess RV function in dogs with MMVD.
However, myocardial function in the interventricular septum might reflect the left
ventricular function. Further studies that include the assessment of left ventricular
function are warranted in the future.In this study, the various echocardiographic indices were significantly worsened in dogs
with R-CHF. In particular, increased RV MPI was significantly relevant to the presence of
R-CHF. The RV MPI reflects the global RV myocardial function, including systolic and
diastolic function, and that measured by pulsed-wave Doppler is considered to provide
prognostic information in dogs with MMVD [28, 37]. In this study, dogs in the high group showed a
significant worsening in RV-SrL S, E, and RV-SL. Our study indicated that the tissue
Doppler-derived RV MPI, which could detect both RV systolic and diastolic dysfunction, might
also be a clinically useful tool to predict the presence of R-CHF as well as that measured
by pulsed-wave Doppler. In addition to RV MPI, RVIDd index showed a significant association
in the multivariate analysis. As a previous human study described, RV dilatation would be
induced to maintain stroke volume in dogs with RV systolic dysfunction [8]. Therefore, RV dysfunction and associated RV dilatation
might provide important information about the presence of R-CHF in dogs with post-capillary
PH.This study had some limitations. First, since the right heart catheterization is the gold
standard to evaluate RV function, it was unclear whether 2D-STE derived RV-SL and RV-SrL
could detect the intrinsic RV function. Second, few cases of misdiagnosis may have occurred
in some dogs with R-CHF. Since all dogs did not undergo complete abdominal ultrasonography,
we may not have identified some dogs with mild ascites. Third, the effects of medication
could not be considered in dogs with MMVD. Some drugs, such as cardiotonic (pimobendan),
pulmonary vasodilators (sildenafil), and diuretics, might affect RV function indices by
changing the pressure and volume loads against the right heart. Fourth, the dogs were
diagnosed with PH based on the TR pressure gradient and echocardiographic findings of right
heart remodeling, although catheterization is the gold standard for PH diagnosis.
Substantially impaired RV function may lead to the underestimation of the peak TR velocity
and PH probability. Additionally, because not all dogs have undergone complete differential
diagnosis including pathological examination, we might not be able to completely rule out
the diseases that could elevate PAP other than MMVD [30]. Furthermore, because coagulation examination was not performed in all dogs,
pulmonary thromboembolism might potentially contribute to the increase of PAP. Finally, our
study enrolled a relatively small study population of dogs with R-CHF. Unfortunately, there
were only a few dogs with post-capillary PH that might progress to pulmonary vascular
remodeling secondary to MMVD. Although small sample size might affect the results especially
in the multivariate model, our study however could assess and compare precise right heart
morphology and function of dogs with post-capillary PH.In conclusion, 2D-STE indices could detect the change in precise RV function (both systolic
and diastolic function) with the progression of PH. Additionally, increased RV MPI, which
would reflect RV systolic and diastolic dysfunction, and RV dilatation would be associated
with the presence of R-CHF in dogs with post-capillary PH. Additional studies that include
more dogs with severe post-capillary PH are expected to further validate our findings.
Authors: Craig C Cornell; Mark D Kittleson; Paul Della Torre; Jens Häggström; Christophe W Lombard; Henrik D Pedersen; Andrea Vollmar; Aaron Wey Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2004 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Lawrence G Rudski; Wyman W Lai; Jonathan Afilalo; Lanqi Hua; Mark D Handschumacher; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Scott D Solomon; Eric K Louie; Nelson B Schiller Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Brage H Amundsen; Thomas Helle-Valle; Thor Edvardsen; Hans Torp; Jonas Crosby; Erik Lyseggen; Asbjørn Støylen; Halfdan Ihlen; João A C Lima; Otto A Smiseth; Stig A Slørdahl Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-01-26 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: M Borgarelli; J Abbott; L Braz-Ruivo; D Chiavegato; S Crosara; K Lamb; I Ljungvall; M Poggi; R A Santilli; J Haggstrom Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2015 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.333