Literature DB >> 34731608

Epithelial-myeloid exchange of MHC class II constrains immunity and microbiota composition.

W Zac Stephens1, Jason L Kubinak2, Arevik Ghazaryan1, Kaylyn M Bauer1, Rickesha Bell1, Kate Buhrke1, Tyson R Chiaro1, Allison M Weis1, William W Tang1, Josh K Monts3, Ray Soto1, H Atakan Ekiz4, Ryan M O'Connell5, June L Round6.   

Abstract

Intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) have long been understood to express high levels of major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC class II) molecules but are not considered canonical antigen-presenting cells, and the impact of IEC-MHC class II signaling on gut homeostasis remains enigmatic. As IECs serve as the primary barrier between underlying host immune cells, we reasoned that IEC-intrinsic antigen presentation may play a role in responses toward the microbiota. Mice with an IEC-intrinsic deletion of MHC class II (IECΔMHC class II) are healthy but have fewer microbial-bound IgA, regulatory T cells (Tregs), and immune repertoire selection. This was associated with increased interindividual microbiota variation and altered proportions of two taxa in the ileum where MHC class II on IECs is highest. Intestinal mononuclear phagocytes (MNPs) have similar MHC class II transcription but less surface MHC class II and are capable of acquiring MHC class II from IECs. Thus, epithelial-myeloid interactions mediate development of adaptive responses to microbial antigens within the gastrointestinal tract.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  H2-Ab1; MHC class II; antigen processing; dendritic cell; immunity; intestinal epithelia; macrophage; microbiome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34731608      PMCID: PMC9012449          DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Rep            Impact factor:   9.995


INTRODUCTION

Classic major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC class II) molecules play a fundamental role in adaptive immunity by binding and presenting extracellularly derived peptide antigens on the cell surface. These peptide:MHC class II complexes (pMHC class II) then serve as ligands for T cell receptors expressed by CD4+ T cells, and cognate interactions are the first and key step in ensuing effector and memory cell responses. pMHC class II complexes are conventionally expressed by professional antigen-presenting cells (pro-APCs) such as dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages, and B cells, by loading of peptides onto heterodimeric MHC class II proteins (H2-A/E in mice, HLA-DR/DQ/DP in humans) in endolysosomes. H2 proteins present antigens to T cells, inducing effector and memory responses, and thus are integral to the development of adaptive immunity. While the role of MHC class II proteins in adaptive immunity to pathogens has been well studied, the role of MHC class II in coordinating host interactions with the numerous microbes that normally colonize the body (the microbiota) is less understood (Wosen et al., 2018). Most studies have focused on canonical roles of abundant pro-APCs in the lamina propria (LP) and intestinal lymphoid tissue such as mesenteric lymph nodes (mLNs) and Peyer’s patches (PPs). However, innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) in the intestine have also been found to express MHC class II molecules and participate in maintaining gut barrier integrity and responses to the gut microbiota (Hepworth et al., 2013). Supporting the role of the MHC class II in shaping the murine microbiota, we have shown that polymorphisms among MHC congenic mice result in distinct gut microbial communities and differential abundance of microbiota-reactive antibodies that impact enteric pathogen susceptibility (Kubinak et al., 2015b). Different MHC alleles in humans have also been demonstrated to impact gut microbiota composition and protect from type 1 diabetes (Silverman et al., 2017). Thus, intestinal MHC class II may play an important role in responding to gut microbial antigens and shaping the microbiota. In addition to pro-APCs and ILCs, MHC class II surface expression and antigen-presenting capabilities have been reported on other, non-professional APCs from human, mouse, and rat including endothelial cells, mast cells, basophils, eosinophils, and lung and intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) (Bland and Warren, 1986; Hughes et al., 1991; Hershberg et al., 1998; Kambayashi and Laufer, 2014; Dimitriadou et al., 1998; Sokol et al., 2009; Shi et al., 2000; Cunningham et al., 1997). IECs, in particular, express MHC class II proteins with varying reports on expression levels, inducibility, and costimulatory molecule presence from different intestinal locations in mouse and human. In general, small intestinal IECs are reported to express more MHC class II than colonic IECs in the absence of inflammation (Hershberg and Mayer, 2000; Chiba et al., 1988). The currently available data on the functional importance of IEC intrinsic MHC class II expression are scarce, and the results from these limited studies do not always agree. For instance, epithelial-derived MHC class II has been hypothesized to play a role in maintaining intestinal health, as patients with Crohn disease (CD) exhibit differential cellular and tissue distribution of MHC class II proteins (Hundorfean et al., 2007; Bär et al., 2013; Büning et al., 2006). IECs isolated from individuals with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) stimulated greater CD4+ T cell proliferation and interferon (IFN)-γ secretion when compared to IECs from healthy patients, indicating that IECs can directly stimulate pathogenic T cell responses (Dotan et al., 2007). However, reduced expression of MHC class II on IECs by deletion of the pIV promoter of the CIITA gene that drives MHC class II expression in IECs was correlated with worsened colitis and increased Th1 cells in a mouse model of colitis with Helicobacter hepaticus (Thelemann et al., 2014). A recent publication also deleted MHC class II on mouse IECs and found a slight protection from DSS-induced and T cell transfer colitis but increased susceptibility to Citrobacter rodentium infection (Jamwal et al., 2020). In another study, using mice where MHC class II expression was restricted to DCs or IECs, IEC-expressed MHC class II was not required for the development of Helicobacter bilis-induced colitis, but rather DC MHC class II was the key mediator of this hyper-inflamed state (Maggio-Price et al., 2013). Furthermore, while the presence of the microbiota or segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB) monoassociation has been reported to induce ileal IEC MHC class II specifically, IEC MHC class II is not required to induce Th17 cell responses against SFB that attach directly to IECs (Koyama et al., 2019; Umesaki et al., 1995; Goto et al., 2014). Thus, while both the microbiota and MHC class II are important contributors to intestinal homeostasis and inflammation, it remains unclear how MHC class II on IECs impacts intestinal homeostasis and microbial composition. As IECs may interact with many immune cell types in the LP, multiple processes are likely to underlie the role of IECs in the development of mucosal immune responses. IEC-derived MHC class II might influence mucosal immunity through canonical direct interaction with T cells. While in vivo evidence is sparse, studies with lung epithelia and many in vitro studies using T cells and gut-derived cell lines or organoids provide support for this potential mechanism (Framson et al., 1999; Dotan et al., 2007; Koyama et al., 2019; Rogoz et al., 2015; Westendorf et al., 2009; Biton et al., 2018). While the degree of direct contact of lamina propria T cells with IECs in vivo may limit this mechanism, it has been suggested that T cell interaction with Lgr5+ IECs can feed back and shape the differentiation of epithelial cells, thereby further impacting mucosal homeostasis (Biton et al., 2018). Besides direct interaction with T cells, intercellular communication of pMHC class II complexes on IECs with mononuclear phagocytic (MNP) cells such as macrophages and DCs might also occur by exosome transfer, trogocytosis, or phagocytosis of dying IECs (efferocytosis) (Cummings et al., 2016). Exosomes are produced in large amounts from IECs, and the IEC-specific glycoprotein A33 has been used to track the appearance of epithelial-derived proteins in DCs in mLNs (Büning et al., 2008; Van Niel et al., 2003). Furthermore, IFN-γ-stimulated IEC cell lines produce more MHC class II+ exosomes that are capable of stimulating antigen-specific humoral immune responses (Van Niel et al., 2003). Intercellular communication may also occur through trogocytosis of cell membranes by MNPs known to intimately interact with IECs. Gut-resident tolerogenic DCs, as well as macrophages, can induce or maintain Tregs through retinoic acid or interleukin (IL)-10-dependent signaling mechanisms and can extend dendrites across epithelia to sample lumenal antigens and could potentially acquire portions of IEC cell membranes during this process (Sun et al., 2007; Bain and Schridde, 2018; Murai et al., 2009; Niess et al., 2005). Additionally, an intriguing report suggested that macrophages and DCs themselves exchange membrane proteins in a gap-junction-dependent manner, suggesting a potential mechanism by which resident macrophages may exchange antigens with more mobile DCs that can traffic to mLNs that are major sites of Treg induction (Mazzini et al., 2014). Thus, multiple mechanisms of intercellular communication may transfer microbial antigen-specific signals to underlying immune cells through pMHC class II and influence adaptive immunity to intestinal antigens. Herein we confirm that the presence of the microbiota induces small intestinal IEC MHC class II expression specifically and report that lack of IEC-derived MHC class II reduces the amount of MHC class II on the surface of intestinal MNPs and results in a reduction of Helios− microbial-responsive Tregs, suggesting that MNPs participate in a network of communication with IECs and Tregs. The loss of MHC class II on IECs results in reduced selection of B cell receptor (BCR) repertoires, increased fecal microbiota variability and ileal expansion, and increased susceptibility to DSS-induced colitis. These results thus demonstrate a role for IEC-derived MHC class II in constraining microbiota composition and inducing tolerogenic responses against it.

RESULTS

MHC class II is differentially expressed within intestinal epithelia and induced by the microbiota

Given its proximity to gut microbial antigens, as well as its established role in mucosal immunity, we hypothesized that epithelial cell-derived MHC class II expression may play a key role in the development of immune responses to the microbiota. To determine where epithelial MHC class II expression is likely to exert its greatest effect, we first characterized the expression of surface MHC class II using an antibody against the H2-A heterodimer on live, CD45−, EpCAM+ IECs by flow cytometry under homeostatic conditions in wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 mice. Cell-surface H2-A was found on the highest proportion of cells in the small intestine but consistently expressed throughout the small intestine and colon, and the highest per cell expression was within the ileum (Figures 1A, 1B, and S1). This is consistent with a recent publication and suggests that the pattern of MHC class II expression along the intestinal tract is not dependent on different microbiota between facilities (Koyama et al., 2019). Immunohistochemistry of ileal sections showed high levels of punctate H2-A in intracellular vesicles located apically but also showed less intense but diffuse surface staining of H2-A throughout the basolateral surface of IECs (Figure 1C). Previous reports have shown that germ-free C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice have reduced or absent MHC class II on IECs (Umesaki et al., 1995; Koyama et al., 2019). To determine whether the induction of MHC class II on IECs by the microbiota is a general feature of the murine intestine and not a strain-specific effect, we similarly characterized cell-surface H2-A on IECs from age-matched germ-free and SPF Swiss-Webster mice. Again, ileal IECs expressed much higher levels of H2-A than colonic cells in this experiment; however, ileal H2-A was greatly reduced in the absence of the microbiota while the low-level expression of colonic H2-A was unaffected (Figures 1D-1F). These data indicate that the microbiota influences expression of H2-A within IECs of the small but not large intestine.
Figure 1.

MHC class II is differentially expressed on epithelia along the murine intestinal tract and inducible by the microbiota

(A and B) The percentage positive (A) and expression level (B) (MFI, median fluorescent intensity) of the H2-A protein on IECs of SPF-raised C57BL/6 mice. n = 6 mice, a single experiment representative of three independent experiments is shown. Letters denote significance between groups. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison correction was used.

(C) Representative cryosection immunohistochemistry image of a WT ileal villus illustrating intense apical granular cytoplasmic staining (arrow) of H2-A on IECs, and diffuse basolateral surface H2-A on IECs (asterisk).

(D and E) The percentage positive (D) and MFI (E) of H2-A on GF and SPF male Swiss-Webster mice. n = 7–8 mice per group. An unpaired Student’s t test was used, ****p < 0.0001.

(F) A representative histogram of H2-A staining from the ileum shows very low H2-A on GF mice is present above the isotype control background signal.

IEC-intrinsic MHC class II controls variability of the microbiota

We, and others, have previously shown that MHC class II haplotype can influence the composition of the microbiota (Kubinak et al., 2015b; Bolnick et al., 2014; Silverman et al., 2017; Khan et al., 2019; Melo-Gonzalez et al., 2019). Given this, and the proximity of abundant MHC class II expression by IECs to the microbiota, we hypothesized that knocking out MHC class II on IECs specifically would result in significant shifts to the structure and composition of the gut microbiota. We therefore crossed H2-Ab1 floxed mice with an IEC-specific Cre driver (Villin:Cre)(Hashimoto et al., 2002; Madison et al., 2002). These mice had near-complete loss of surface H2-A on their IECs, and we refer to these mice hereafter as IECΔMHCII and used Cre-negative H2-Ab1 floxed littermates as WT controls for all comparisons (Figures 2A and S2A). To understand whether a lack of IEC MHC class II expression altered their transcriptional profile, we performed bulk RNA-seq of sort-purified IECs from the ileums of WT and IECΔMHCII mice. This analysis confirmed the knockout of H2-Ab1 but detected no other significantly differentially expressed genes, indicating that loss of MHC class II within IECs had little effect on the function of these cells (Figure 2B). We next sought to address the potential of an IEC-intrinsic defect not observed from sorted IEC transcriptomes. Intestinal barrier function was assessed by gavaging mice with FITC-dextran and assaying the amount in the blood. No difference in the intestinal permeability of IECΔMHCII mice was detected among 3 independent experiments (Figure S2B). Additionally, we assessed the transcription of 5 genes involved in tight junction formation (Tjp1, Tjp2, Tjp3, Cldn7, and Cldn2) by qRT-PCR of intact ileal tissue. We found no difference between WT and IECΔMHCII mice of Tjp2, Tjp3, Cldn7, and Cldn2 and just a 2-fold increase in the transcription of Tjp 1 (Figure S2C). We also examined the number of Caspase3+ cells per villi or Ki67+ cells per crypt in immunohistochemical-stained intestinal sections to determine whether apoptosis or cell-cycle were impacted by deletion of IEC MHC class II. Again, we found no significant differences in the number of Ki67+ or Caspase3+ (Figures S2D and S2E). Taken together, our data suggest that loss of H2-Ab1 within IECs does not alter their intrinsic function.
Figure 2.

Lack of IEC-intrinsic MHC class II has no effect on the epithelial transcriptome but controls the variability of microbial communities

(A) Ileum-derived IECs stained for H2-A show knockout of H2-A on IECs in IECΔMHCII mice. n = 11 WT and n = 8 IECΔMHCII. A Student’s t test was used.

(B) Volcano plot of RNA expression levels from sorted ileal IECs shows that only the targeted gene (H2-Ab1) is significantly changed (after FDR correction; 13,481 genes tested) in IECΔMHCII mice. The increased Mt1 is an artifact that reflects Cre expression, due to a small fragment of this gene left on the Villin:Cre expression construct.

(C and D) Principal coordinates plots from Bray-Curtis (C) or weighted-UniFrac (D) metrics of fecal microbiota from mice housed by genotype (2 cages per genotype, 3–4 mice per cage). Permanova p values are shown with 9,999 permutations.

(E) Weighted-UniFrac distances from fecal microbiota of male mice individually housed post-weaning. n = 6WT and 5 IECΔMHCII, except at week 5 when only 3WT samples had enough quality sequences for analysis. Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak multiple testing correction was used.

(F) Principal coordinates plot of ileal microbiota from Bray-Curtis distances along with Anosim results with cage and genotype factors as the independent variables.

(G) Relative abundance of 2 taxa significantly different between genotypes in the ileum when separately housed. Both taxa initially identified with ANCOM (see main text) at the level of ASVs (2 each) were plotted as means of the ASVs summarized to their best taxonomic classification with significance between groups on plots shown with two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction for multiple testing.

(H) Ileal microbiota alpha-diversity metrics. A Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s correction was used.

We next assessed microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing of feces from WT and IECΔMHCII siblings separately housed by genotype since weaning. We detected few differences in these animals, with no significant differences in alpha diversity metrics and 2 ASVs (Amplicon Sequence Variants) from the abundant S24-7 family of Bacteroidales reduced in the feces (ANCOM, W = 264 and 253 among 267 ASVs) (Figure S3A). The IECΔMHCII microbiota clustered significantly different from WT by the non-phylogenetic abundance-weighted Bray-Curtis distance and both unweighted metrics but not by the phylogenetic weighted-UniFrac distance, and the distance between IECΔMHCII mice was greater than the distances between WT mice, suggesting these small differences are mainly driven by variability in the microbiota of IECΔMHCII mice at the level of ASVs (Figures 2C and 2D; Table S1; Figure S3B). Differences between groups when mice are housed together can be driven by changes in one or a few animals due to coprophagy, in addition to ecological drift between cages. Therefore, we also assessed the fecal microbiota each week after weaning for 4 weeks in WT and IECΔMHCII offspring individually housed after weaning at 3 weeks of age. We did not detect any significantly different taxa between genotypes, although we again found significantly increased dissimilarity among IECΔMHCII animals’ microbiota at 4 and 7 weeks of age (Figure 2E). MHC class II is induced in the ileum by the presence of the microbiota (Figures 1D and 1E). Therefore, we next examined the composition of the ileal microbiota in animals separated by genotype since weaning or continuously cohoused. In separately housed animals, genotype significantly separated the microbiota of IECΔMHCII with both phylogenetic and non-phylogenetic beta diversity metrics but was not significant when animals were cohoused (Table S1; Figure 2F). In separately housed animals, 4 ASVs were detected as different in the ileum between genotypes by ANCOM analysis, including 2 belonging to the S24-7 family (ANCOM, W = 113 and 112 among 121 ASVs) that were increased this time in IECΔMHCII ileal microbiota and 2 ASVs classified as Bifidobacterium pseudolongum (ANCOM, W = 119 for both) that were decreased. These differences were again not detected in cohoused animals (Figure 2G). Adonis analysis of Bray-Curtis dissimilarities showed that both cage and genotype accounted for a significant proportion of the microbiota variation (Figure 2F). Interestingly, despite no differences observed in the fecal microbiota, the ileal microbiota of IECΔMHCII animals exhibited an increase in the Shannon diversity index driven by a significant increase in the number of observed ASVs detected in the ileum (Figure 2H). Overall, while drastic changes in the fecal microbiota were not present within animals that lack IEC-intrinsic MHC class II, the ileal microbiota composition is affected IEC MHC class II. Our data suggest that IEC-intrinsic MHC class II is responsible for reducing variation in the composition of the fecal microbiota between individuals and controls expansion of the ileal microbiota.

Lack of IEC-derived MHC class II results in reduced microbiota-induced Tregs and increased susceptibility to colitis

Given that MHC class II is central to the generation of CD4+ T cell responses, we profiled the immune state within the intestine of IECΔMHCII mice. As MHC class II expression is highest on IECs of the small intestine, we focused on immune responses associated with this site, including mLN, PP, and siLP (small intestinal lamina propria). No differences were detected in the proportion of inflammatory Th17 or Th1 cells (Figures S3C and S3D). Because germinal center reactions are known to be important for constraining microbiota composition, we additionally assessed follicular T cell (Tfh), T follicular regulatory (Tfr), and germinal center B (GCB) cells but found no differences in the proportions or abundances of these cells in PP or mLNs (Figures S3E-S3G) (Kawamoto et al., 2014). We further assessed the recruitment of antigen-specific T cells into germinal centers by adoptively transferring CD45.1 marked OT-II T cells into sublethally irradiated WT and IECΔMHCII mice and then provided OVA antigen in drinking water ad libitum for 3 weeks. Again, we could not detect a difference in the amount of Tfh or Tfr OT-II cells in either PP or mLNs (Figure S3H). Tregs in the gut have been categorized by the expression of multiple surface markers. In addition to Foxp3 marking Tregs, the lack of expression of the transcription factor, Helios, has been suggested to identify a distinct population of Tregs within the gut and lack of Helios is associated with microbiota-induced Tregs (Thornton et al., 2010; Lathrop et al., 2011). We detected a consistently decreased proportion of Helios− Tregs among 3 experiments in the siLP, PP, and mLN of IECΔMHCII mice with the most significant decrease being present within the PP (Figures 3A and 3B; Table S2). Thus, MHC class II on IECs appears to be particularly important for maintaining microbiota-induced Tregs.
Figure 3.

Lack of IEC-derived MHC class II results in reduced microbiota-responsive Tregs and increased susceptibility to colitis

(A) The proportion of Helios− Tregs (CD3+, CD4+, Foxp3+) in 9- to 12-week-old female mice under homeostatic conditions. Data are represented as SuperPlots showing three experimental replicates. Bars are mean and SD among experimental replicates. Stars indicate genotype significance using a 2-way ANOVA with experiment and genotype as main effects (see Table S2 for a full ANOVA table).

(B) Absolute numbers of Helios− Tregs from one experiment. An unpaired t test was used. A representative flow plot of Helios gating from mLN Tregs was used.

(C) Histology scores from DSS-treated mice. Combined data from two experiments, indicated by shape, are shown. n = 10 WT and n = 10 IECΔMHCII. An unpaired t test with Welch’s correction was used. Untreated WT slide scores were included as control but not statistically tested.

(D) Representative images of H&E-stained sections from DSS experiments.

(E and F) Weight loss (E) and colon lengths (F) from 2 DSS experiments.

(G) RORγt+ Tregs in Peyer’s patches and mLN. Data are representative of 4 experiments, among which decreases in PP RORγt+ Tregs are sometimes observed. A Student’s t test with Holm-Sidak’s multiple testing correction was used.

Tregs are critical for maintaining tolerance to the microbiota and loss of Treg function results in colitis (Atarashi et al., 2013; Furusawa et al., 2013; Boehm et al., 2012). We therefore hypothesized that IECΔMHCII with reduced Tregs would have an increased susceptibility to develop colitis. We treated mice for 6 days with an acute model of DSS-induced colitis and found that, while IECΔMHCII mice did not differ in weight loss or colon length, these animals presented with significantly enhanced pathology in the colon (Figures 3C-3F). Although DSS-colitis is a model of colonic inflammation and IEC-MHC class II is mainly expressed in small intestinal IECs, low-level colon IEC MHC class II was observed under homeostatic conditions (Figures 1A and 1B), and mouse colonocytes can induce MHC class II expression in a T cell transfer model of colitis (Jamwal et al., 2020). Additionally, Tregs can traffic between LP and mLNs that connect both tissues and are a major site of Treg induction (Pabst, 2013). RORγt+Helios− Tregs have been demonstrated to be important for the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis (Britton et al., 2019). These Tregs are particularly abundant within the colon but are also present in mLNs, PPs, and the siLP (Sefik et al., 2015). While we did not see differences within RORγt+Helios− Tregs (CD3+CD4+Foxp3+) during the steady state, RORγt+Helios− Tregs were significantly reduced in the mLNs during DSS colitis (Figure 3G). RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) on ileal tissue from DSS-treated mice again showed modest changes to the overall transcriptome, despite including IECs as well as all underlying LP cells in this experiment, with no significantly differentially expressed genes after controlling for multiple hypothesis testing (Figure S4A). Additionally, we could not detect any difference in the ileal microbiota composition by any diversity metrics or taxonomic composition analysis in DSS-treated animals (Table S1). These data suggest that a lack of induction of Helios− Tregs may result in hyperresponsiveness to microbial antigens leading to increased intestinal damage in IECΔMHCII mice during colitis.

IEC intrinsic MHC class II expression influences surface MHC class II levels on macrophages and monocytes

A few studies have demonstrated that IECs can directly stimulate T cell responses in vitro, and these interactions may drive expansion of Tregs preferentially (Westendorf et al., 2009; Framson et al., 1999; Dotan et al., 2007). However, a recent study utilizing intra-vital microscopy to map the location of intra-epithelial CD4+ T cells and Tregs demonstrated that the vast majority of Foxp3+ Tregs within the intestine are restricted to the lamina propria and not found closely associated with the epithelia (Sujino et al., 2016). Additionally, DCs conditioned in the presence of IECs then co-cultured with T cells can induce Tregs (Iliev et al., 2009). These studies suggest that direct IEC MHC class II-mediated antigen presentation to Tregs is not the only pathway by which IEC MHC class II can impact Tregs. We identify reductions in Treg populations in areas of follicle formation such as PP and mLN, where proAPCs reside to stimulate T cell responses. Mononuclear phagocyte (MNP) populations, including macrophages and DCs, have well-established roles in maintaining gut homeostasis particularly by inducing microbiota-responsive Tregs in the LP as well as in the mLNs and also play important roles in maintaining epithelial barrier integrity (Bain and Schridde, 2018; Joeris et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2007). Moreover, these cell types are known to be in contact with intestinal epithelial cells (Niess et al., 2005). Given the reduced Helios− Tregs in IECΔMHCII mice, we compared MNP populations between mutant and WT mice under steady-state conditions. Initially, we used a broad gating strategy (CD45+CD11b+CD11c+MHC class II+CD103−) along the length of the intestine to determine whether loss of IEC intrinsic MHC class II affected MNPs. While there was no difference in the proportion of these cells in the colon or mLN, there was a decrease of these cells in the PP and a particularly striking reduction in the siLP of mice that lacked MHC class II within epithelia (Figure 4A), suggesting that IEC intrinsic MHC class II can influence surface MHC class II levels on MNPs.
Figure 4.

IEC intrinsic H2-A influences H2-A levels on MNP cells

(A) The initial observation of the proportion of H2-A+ cells among immune cells with broad myeloid markers. One experiment; a Student’s t test with Holm-Sidak’s multiple testing correction was used.

(B) Representative flow plots illustrate the gating strategy used to identify P1–4 monocyte/macrophage cells. CD45+, Lin− (CD3, NK1.1, Siglec-F, CD19), CD11b+, CD11c+ cells are input.

(C–E) Proportion (C and E) and MFI (D) of P1, P2, and P3/4 monocyte/macrophages (C and D) and DCs (D and E) under homeostatic SPF conditions in 9-week-old male and female mice. P3/4 are not shown for PP because they are not CD64+. n = 6 WT and 5 IECΔMHCII. Data are representative of 2 experiments. A Student’s t test with Holm-Sidak’s multiple testing correction was used.

(F) As in (C)–(E) but showing the CD11c-negative subset of P3/4 macrophages.

Next, to better define the various myeloid populations, we defined CD45+,Lin−,CD11b+CD11c+CX3CR1+ monocyte-macrophages similar to the “P1–P4 waterfall” model of differentiation, and we defined DCs as CX3CR1−CD103+ from within the CD11b+CD11c+ subsets (Joeris et al., 2017; De Calisto et al., 2012) (Figure 4B). We observed a differential representation of the proportion of MNPs, including an increase in P1 monocytes in the siLP and mLN of IECΔMHCII mice along with reduced proportions of P2 transitioning monocytes in the mLN and reduced P3/4 macrophages in the siLP and mLN (Figure 4C). Surface MHC class II is frequently used as a primary marker of MNP populations, while in the waterfall model the amount of surface MHC class II (H2-A here) defines differentiating (P2) or differentiated macrophages (P3/4). We consistently observed small reductions in the amount of surface H2-A on these H2-A+ P2 and P3/4 cell subsets, with significant decreases in the mLNs where these cell types are rarer (Figure 4D). While we observed no difference in the proportion of DCs with these markers, we did find a decrease in the proportion of DCs that were H2-A+ at all sites, and a decreased abundance of surface H2-A on DCs in the siLP and mLN (Figures 4E and 4D). Because levels of the integrins that comprise CD11c can vary among these cell populations, we also examined the P1–4 populations within the Lin-, CD11b+CD11c−CX3CR1+ cells (Joeris et al., 2017) (Figures S5A and S5D). These CD11c− cells’ H2-A patterns were generally in agreement with the CD11c+ populations (though we did not detect sufficient CD11c− P3/P4 macrophage subsets in the PP), with strong decreases in the proportion of P3/P4 macrophages and H2-A MFI on siLP macrophages (Figures 4F, S4B, and S4C). These data suggest that an absence of MHC class II on IECs can impact the differentiation, activation, and/or function of underlying myeloid cells. To determine whether MNPs from IECΔMHCII were less activated than WT MNPs, we assessed intracellular versus surface H2-A among H2-A+ DCs and P3/4 macrophages, and the abundance of the CD80 costimulatory molecule. We could not detect differences in the percentage of CD80+ cells or the MFI of CD80 in the siLP or mLNs of IECΔMHCII mice (Figures S4D and S4E). While the percentage of surface H2-A+ cells was again reduced in IECΔMHCII mice, among H2-A+ cells we generally did not detect a difference in the ratio of surface and intracellular H2-A indicating there was no difference in the activation state of these cells, except for CD11c+ macrophages in the mLNs that exhibited a significant reduction (Figure S4F). The reduced H2-A on MNPs may reflect reduced extracellular acquisition of H2-A in IEC−ΔMHCII mice.

MHC class II on IECs constrains immune responses to intestinal microbes

Since these results suggest that loss of IEC MHC class II was able to impact cellular phenotypes beyond just CD4+ T cells, single-cell sequencing (scRNA-seq) was used to better assess the potential global immune effects of loss of IEC MHC class II. scRNA-seq libraries were prepared with the 10X genomics platform from MACS-sorted CD45+ cells of the siLP and PP and repertoires of B cell receptors (BCRs) were obtained from the same cells. There were no dramatic differences in the representation of various cell types based on their transcriptional profile between the WT and IECΔMHCII strains (Figures S5A and S5B). However, we did observe a difference in the BCR repertoires in the PPs. IECΔMHCII mice had a more even distribution of Ig clonotypes than WT mice, which were dominated by a single clone and had fewer clones present at an even sampling depth (Figures 5A and 5B). These data are reflective of stronger clonal selection in WT mice, while loss of IEC MHC class II leads to more permissive expansion of B cell clones. We could not detect a significant difference in the number of mutations per clonotype in IgA, IgG1, and IgG2b antibody isotypes in PP, consistent with a report of sorted IgA plasma cells from these animals (Figure S5C) (Jamwal et al., 2020). In addition to having more Ig clonotypes, IECΔMHCII BCR isotype frequencies were also skewed, with a decreased proportion of clonotypes carrying IGHA chains and increased proportion of IGHD and IGHM (Figure 5C), suggesting fewer distinct class-switched IgA producing B cells are present in the absence of IEC MHC class II. Quantification of IgA and IgG levels by ELISA from fecal supernatants revealed an increased total amount of both isotypes from mutant mice, however, less IgA-bound gut bacteria in IECΔMHCII mice (Figures 5D-5F and S6). Consistent with a previously shown role for Tregs in IgA selection, the difference in IgA production between WT and mutant mice is lost when IECΔMHCII were crossed onto a genetic background that results in the loss of conventional CD4+ T cells (TCRβ−/−) (Kawamoto et al., 2014; Cong et al., 2009) (Figure 5G). Taken together these data show that MHC class II on IECs influences T cell-dependent antibody responses and suggest the more evenly distributed immune repertoires in IECΔMHCII mice have less high-affinity IgA toward intestinal microbes.
Figure 5.

MHC class II constrains immune responses toward intestinal microbes

(A and B) The distribution (A) and total number (B) of Ig clonotypes detected in PP scRNA-seq data. The rank-abundance curve (A) shows only the top 20 clonotypes along with the Shannon diversity indices for each genotype, which takes into account the total number and distribution of clonotypes. Clonotype analysis was performed after subsampling without replacement to 3,215 observations in each group. Data are from one scRNA-seq experiment with an equivalent number of cells pooled from 4 WT or 4 IECΔMHCII mice.

(C) Ig heavy-chain isotype frequency in PP from scRNA-seq data.

(D and E) Total fecal IgA and IgG quantified by ELISA, normalized to fecal weight. n = 11–12 mice. Data are representative of 2 experiments. A t test with Welch’s correction was used.

(F) The proportion of bacterial cells (SYBR+) from feces that are bound by immunoglobulins. Data are representative of 2 experiments. t tests with Holm-Sidak’s multiple testing correction were used.

(G) Total fecal IgA and IgG are not different in T cell-deficient mice. n = 8 in both groups. A t test with Welch’s correction was used.

MNPs can acquire MHC class II from IECs

From the scRNA-seq profiling, differences within the transcriptional profiles of MNPs between WT and IECΔMHCII mice were not detected, including differences in the transcription of H2-Ab1. This observation indicates that leaky Cre expression in MNPs was not inadvertently impacting endogenous MHC class II function in these cells, thus validating that the observed decrease in protein expression of H2-A on MNPs is not an artifact of the genetic manipulation (Figures 6A and S5E). Since decreases of MHC class II on MNPs are seen at the protein but not the transcript level, and siLP MNPs do not appear to be differentially activated, these data support the possibility that MNPs acquire H2-A protein from IECs.
Figure 6.

MNPs can acquire H2-A from IECs to induce T cell responses

(A) Violin plots of H2-Ab1 transcripts from scRNA-seq data in the siLP show knockout of H2-Ab1 in IECs but normal expression in other known MHC class II+ cells types.

(B) Results from in vitro association of MODEK (H2k haplotype) cells and H2-Ab1 C57BL/6 bone-marrow-derived MNPs. Data are expressed as a fold change of H2-Ak signal over the background from the average of MNPs incubated without MODEK cells. Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparison test within cell type to no MODEK control was used.

(C) As in (B) (quantifying H2-Ak) but using MNPs sorted directly from the tissue of H2-Ab1 C57BL/6 mice. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test was used.

(D) The proportion of CFSE-labeled OT-II cells that underwent 1 or more divisions and were Foxp3+ after incubating with OVA-pulsed macrophages sorted directly from the tissue of WT or IECΔMHCII mice. Representative flow plots illustrate the gating strategy for assessing proliferating OT-II cells. Data are representative of 2 experiments; a Student’s t test was used.

To test the possibility that MNPs acquire MHC class II proteins from IECs, we devised an experimental in vitro association setup using MHC class II-expressing IECs and bone-marrow cells isolated from H2-Ab1 mice either skewed toward macrophages or DCs. MODEK cells (mouse duodenum derived) were used as IECs and express a distinct MHC haplotype (H2-Ak, recognizable by an antibody that does not cross-react with the H2-Ab from C57BL/6 mice), thus ensuring we could confidently distinguish IEC-derived H2-Ak. In addition, we either placed these bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) or DCs (BMDCs) in direct contact with MODEK cells or a transwell system to determine whether the transfer of H2-A was cell-contact dependent. MODEK cells were stimulated to induce MHC class II expression with IFN-γ and Pam3CSK4, and then MNPs were added and assayed for H2-Ak. IEC-derived H2-Ak was detected on the H2-Ab1 BMMs and somewhat on BMDCs; however, H2-Ak was detected more frequently on BMMs than BMDCs when cells were both in contact or in a transwell setup (Figure 6B). The total amount of MHC class II delivered, as indicated by the MFI of MHC class II, was much higher in BMMs that were in contact with IECs than in transwells, although because we normalized MODEK cells to the surface area in these different conditions, fewer MODEK cells are present in the transwell system (Figure 6B). These data suggest that both cell-contact-dependent mechanisms, such as trogocytosis, and secreted molecules, such as exosomes, are capable of delivering MHC class II molecules from IECs to myeloid cells. As bone-marrow-derived cells are functionally distinct from MNPs within the gut, MNPs were also directly isolated from the siLP and incubated with MODEK cells. Fluorescence-activated cell-sorted (FACS) monocytes (Dump−CD45+Ly6Chi) and macrophages (Dump−CD45+Ly6C−CX3CR1+ CD64+) from siLP or mLNs of H2Ab1 mice were incubated with MODEK cells (which had been stimulated for 2 days under MHC class II stimulating conditions as above) for 1 day. A significant amount of IEC-derived H2-Ak was detected on both H2Ab1 monocyte and macrophages isolated from siLP, with siLP Ly6Chi monocytes exhibiting the greatest apparent acquisition of H2-A from MODEK cells (Figure 6C). Together these data demonstrate that intestinal MNPs can acquire surface MHC class II from IECs. To test whether MNPs with reduced IEC-derived MHC class II had different Treg inducing activity, we sorted MNPs from PPs of WT and IECΔMHCII mice with CD45+CD3−CD19−CD11b+CD11c+CD103− markers, pulsed them with OVA peptide, and incubated them with CFSE-labeled splenic OT-II CD4+ T cells. These MNPs could contain macrophages and some cDC subsets based on this sort strategy but was necessary to acquire enough cells to coculture with OT-II T cells (Cerovic et al., 2013). MNPs isolated from IECΔMHCII mice stimulated more T cell proliferation than WT MNPs, but fewer of the proliferated cells were Foxp3+ compared to MNPs isolated from WT mice (Figure 6D). Thus, MNPs with reduced surface MHC class II isolated from animals that lack IEC-derived MHC class II have a decreased capacity to suppress proliferation and support Treg induction or maintenance. We next sought to test the ability of MNPs to interact with and acquire H2-A from IECs in vivo. First, we used the mT/mG genetic mouse model to determine whether we could detect labeled MNPs that had acquired membrane fragments from labeled IECs. In this model, membrane targeted tandem dimer tomato fluorescent protein (mT) is constitutively expressed by all cells, and when a Cre-mediated excision event occurs the cells begin to express membrane targeted GFP (mG) (Muzumdar et al., 2007). We therefore crossed these mT/mG mice to mice carrying the same Villin:Cre driver we used to knockout H2-Ab1 from the intestinal epithelium, such that GFP signal would be expected to only be present on IEC membranes and then assayed siLP macrophages and DCs for GFP. A small but significant fraction of both CD11c+ and CD11c− macrophages appeared to acquire membrane fragments from IECs as seen by the proportion of mT+mG+ cells. A considerably higher proportion of DCs were mT+mG+ (Figure 7a). imaging flow cytometry of the mT+mG+ MHC class II+ cells from the siLP showed that the GFP was typically found in a punctate pattern on these cells, further supporting that this was likely extracellularly acquired membrane GFP (Figure 7B). These assays support that MNPs are capable of acquiring IEC membrane fragments.
Figure 7.

MNPs can acquire MHC class II from IECs in vivo

(A) The proportion of mT+mG+ MNP subsets in the siLP. Cells subsets are pregated on Live, Dump− (CD3, CD19, NK1.1, Ly6G), CD45+, and MHC class II+. Representative flow plots are shown for CD11c+ macrophages and DCs. Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction was used.

(B) Representative image panel of cells from imaging flow cytometry analysis of mT+mG+ MNPs. Cells are Live, Dump− (CD3, IgM), CD45+, and MHC class II+. No CD11c or CD11b subsetting due to reduced channel availability on imaging cytometry platform was used.

(C) A cartoon schematic of mixed MHC class II bone-marrow transfer experiments.

(D) The percentage of host MHC class II (H2-Ab) positive donor cells (HLA-DR) in the siLP. Cells are CD11c− P3/P4 macrophages gated as in previous figures. A representative plot (pregated on CD45+, Dump-, CD11b+/CD11c+, and CX3CR1+/CD64+ cells) is shown, along with an overlay of the H2-Ab isotype control demonstrating the MHC class II-haplotype specificity of the staining.

We next sought to specifically determine whether underlying MNPs in the siLP acquired MHC class II molecules from the iECs in vivo by transferring bone-marrow cells with a distinct MHC class II from the MHC class II allele on C57BL/6 mice. We used our WT and IECΔMHCII mice in the TCRβ−/− background (H2-Ab allele) as recipient mice and NSG-Ab DR4 mice as donors. These humanized donor mice were developed to study graft-versus-host disease and, in addition to being T cell deficient due to the SCID mutation and IL2rγ−/−, carry a transgenic human MHC class II allele (HLA-DR4) and are mouse H2-Ab1 (Covassin et al., 2011). This allowed us to accurately distinguish 2 different MHC class II proteins (endogenous, donor cell derived, and host derived) on the same cells (Figure 7C). Following lethal irradiation, we transferred 3.8 × 106 bone-marrow cells into host mice and allowed the cells to engraft for 8 weeks before assessing the amount of host-derived H2-Ab on siLP resident MNPs. After this time frame post-transfer, we could not detect sufficient engraftment of HLA-DR+ donor cells in the spleen or mLN but found abundant CD11c− macrophages in the siLP. Interestingly, donor CD11c+ macrophages and donor DCs in the siLP were not abundant enough to accurately assay (Figure S7). However, we detected a significant decrease in the percentage of HLA-DR+, CD11c− donor macrophages in the siLP that also carried host H2-Ab (Figure 7D). While this does not exclude the possibility of transfer to other cell types, these in vivo data demonstrate that, at least, CD11c− ileal macrophages can specifically acquire IEC-derived MHC class II.

DISCUSSION

Abundant IEC-expressed MHC class II has been reported for decades, yet the exact roles of this non-canonical expression for immunity have been difficult to determine. Indeed, lack of MHC class II on IECs results in healthy mice under homeostatic conditions despite the high expression level on these cells. Here, we reported an unexpected transfer of MHC class II molecules between IECs and MNPs. Lack of IEC MHC class II resulted in decreased microbiota-induced Tregs, increased microbiota variability and altered ileal composition, and we have validated that ileal IEC MHC class II is inducible by the microbiota. These data implicate a role for IEC-derived MHC class II in a network of MHC class II molecule exchange among intestinal immune sites that serve to constrain intestinal immune responses and gut microbiota composition. Intestinal lamina propria MNPs can reside adjacent to IECs and may extend processes in between IECs (Niess et al., 2005). Among MNPs, DCs and macrophages participate in an exchange of pMHC class II that is gap junction dependent and facilitates the development of oral tolerance (Mazzini et al., 2014). Both cell types can play a role in Treg induction, although more mobile DCs are particularly effective Treg inducers at more distal sites such as mLNs and can be conditioned by small intestinal IEC-derived factors (Iliev et al., 2009). The data presented here cannot exclude the possibility that direct IEC-T cell interaction also contributes to inducing peripheral Tregs, and the lack of transcriptomic differences suggests that DCs are not differentially conditioned by IECs from IECΔMHCII mice. Here, we extend the network of MHC class II molecule intercellular exchange to include IECs and the abundant MHC class II found on them. While we cannot exclude the possibility that all MNPs are capable of acquiring IEC MHC class II, our data point to the importance of macrophages, in particular, in acquiring MHC class II from IECs. These APCs have endogenous MHC class II expression of their own and how, or whether, extracellularly acquired pMHC class II might be differentiated is an interesting future question. However, as the transition from monocyte to macrophage is well established to involve the upregulation of surface MHC class II and our data pointed to Ly6C+ monocytes as particularly effective at acquiring IEC-derived H2-A, while no differences were found in the activation status of macrophages, it raises the intriguing possibility that extracellular acquisition of MHC class II in the small intestine may play a role in monocyte-derived macrophage development at this site. Until recently, it was believed that all intestinal macrophages were derived of bone-marrow monocytes, but recent studies have shown that intestinal tissue resident macrophages are also generated from gut-resident embryonic precursors found in all layers of the ileum (De Schepper et al., 2018; Shaw et al.,2018). While we did not distinguish between these and monocyte-derived macrophages, it will be of immediate interest to determine whether these or other macrophages subsets are most efficient at acquiring IEC-derived MHC class II. Several potential mechanisms may facilitate exchange of MHC class II among cells, but how long antigens loaded onto MHC class II remain intact among this network, and whether these are differentiated from cell intrinsic pMHC class II, is unknown. Exosome uptake, efferocytosis, and trogocytosis have all been postulated as mechanisms of intercellular exchange of membrane and proteins from IECs. All mechanisms likely occur in some context. Our data support that both cell-contact-dependent and contact-independent mechanisms are relevant. Exosomes are produced abundantly from IECs, can contain surface MHC class II, and are capable of inducing peripheral tolerance earning them the moniker “tolerosomes” (Van Niel et al., 2003; Östman et al., 2005; Karlsson et al., 2001). It may be that IEC-produced exosomes are taken up by a specific subset of MNPs and induce tolerance by direct TCR interaction in the absence of costimulatory molecules. Efferocytosis is a dynamic process that may have inflammatory or anti-inflammatory effects and under normal circumstances results in production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, so is an attractive potential mechanism by which the rapidly proliferating MHC-class-II-containing IECs could impact development of tolerance dependent on macrophages. However, efferocytosis likely results in more general tolerance due to IL-10, IL-13, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β from M2-like macrophages, rather than antigen-specific tolerance as phagocytosed cells are degraded en masse and differential recognition of extracellular-acquired pMHC class II would seemingly be required to prevent its degradation in the lysosome. During trogocytosis, membrane patches and proteins are transferred between cells potentially allowing the recycling of extracellular pMHC class II to be regulated by ubiquitination as for endogenous pMHC class II in APCs (Cho et al., 2015). Interestingly, basophils have already been shown to acquire pMHC class II from DCs through trogocytosis, which explained the presence of surface MHC class II on basophils and their Th2-stimulating capabilities despite little corresponding transcription of MHC class II genes (Miyake et al., 2017). Similarly, ILC2s express MHC class II genes but also have been reported to acquire surface MHC class II from proAPCs through trogocytosis (Oliphant et al., 2014). It is through the mechanism of trogocytosis that closely interacting monocytes or macrophages appear most likely to acquire pMHC class II from IECs and participate in the development of adaptive immune responses to intestinal antigens. Tregs and secreted IgA play important roles in shaping gut microbial communities, which normally exhibit high interpersonal variation reflective of individualized adaptive immune responses as well as stochastic assembly factors. Due to the stochasticity inherent in the encounter of commensal microbial antigens, perturbations to adaptive immune responses alone, which respond only to antigens encountered, may not necessarily be predicted to result in distinct taxonomic groups being differentially represented consistently among individuals given the normal intra- and inter-individual variation in microbiomes. Rather, adaptive immune defects should be predicted to primarily reflect a lack of shaping or constraint of communities due to reduced immune repertoire selection. Indeed, we observe reduced constraining of the immune repertoire and microbiota when MHC class II is removed from IECs and, in accordance, previously reported that microbiota variance was one of the most distinguishing characteristics between microbiota of mice with different MHC class II haplotypes (Kubinak et al., 2015b). Because there is considerable strain-level variation within microbiomes which reflects antigenic variation, it is perhaps not surprising that we could not detect significant differences among taxonomic groups but could detect a few significantly different ASVs. The reduced microbiota-responsive immune constraint that is exhibited without MHC class II on IECs resulted in increased intestinal pathology in a DSS-induced colitis model, highlighting how reduced immune constraint can lead to hyperresponsiveness to microbiome antigens. Thus, MHC class II on IECs is important for constraining adaptive responses to gut microbial antigens and maintaining intestinal homeostasis.

Limitations of study

Challenges in examining origins of H2-A on MNPs and its role in colitis

Experiments to examine the cellular origins of proteins that are exchanged between cell types and endogenously transcribed in these cells require differential identification. These experiments are especially challenging when these proteins are involved in histocompatibility such as those in the MHC class II. While we detected transfer of different H2-A haplotypes in the siLP of a T cell-deficient mouse background (Figures 7C and 7D), T cells are involved in inducing IEC H2-A via IFN-γ so this T cell-deficient model may not faithfully recapitulate the natural location and signals in the LP but was useful in avoiding GVHD (Koyama et al., 2019). Future studies could build upon this model by carefully determining the timing after donor cell engraftment needed to detect transfer and not induce disease, removing only donor alloreactive T cells, and by microscopically examining the location of host and donor MNPs relative to IECs in intact tissue. The use of MNP lineage markers that are independent of activation state would help delineate intercellular exchange of commonly used MNP cell markers such as H2-A. While H2-A (MHC class II) is typically used as an early-gate marker of these cell types, throughout this report we assess its cell-surface abundance after using other markers of MNPs, which may limit the direct comparability of the cells we describe to most MNP studies that define them first by their presence of surface H2-A. In vitro experiments with bone-marrow-derived MNPs offer a useful alternative to in vivo experiments that may not be feasible, but given the importance of local tissue signals for MNPs and expected differences of in vitro skewed cells, results from in vitro assays are not expected to always reflect in vivo states. BMDCs from GM-CSF skewed bone marrow did not appear to acquire H2-A from MODEK cells in vitro (Figure 6B), yet in vivo DCs frequently acquired membrane from IECs (Figure 7A) and exhibited less surface H2-A in IECΔMHCII mice (Figure 4D). This could be attributed to differences between BMDCs and primary siLP DCs, differences between immortalized MODEK cells and ileum IECs, or lack of other cell types present in the siLP. Future in vitro studies with enteroid-derived gut monolayers and more specific subsets of primary DCs will help dissect the role of MNP subsets in transferring IEC-derived proteins and their functional differences. The lack of IEC MHC class II resulted in increased colon pathology as assessed by histological scoring but not by colon length or weight loss in a DSS-induced model of colitis (Figures 3C-3F). Another group using this IECΔMHCII mouse has now reported the opposite colon histology pattern in a DSS-recovery model but also did not see a weight change and found increased histological inflammation scores and decreased sIgA bacterial opsonization in a C. rodentium model of colitis (Jamwal et al., 2020). DSS colitis mainly effects the colon but highest MHC class II expression at steady state is in the ileum (Figures 1A and 1B). However, if MHC class II molecules are transferred to migratory MNPs that also interact with migratory T cells, colonic involvement is not unexpected, although the exact mechanism is unclear. Additionally, if H2-A transfer constrains the microbiota, which is intimately involved in colitis and varies between animal facilities, differences in colitis severity are also not unexpected. Future studies should use gnotobiotic mice with defined communities, assess colonic MHC class II levels during disease models, and further assess immune cell trafficking and immune repertoire development in these models. We provide correlative evidence that B cell repertoires are less selected without IEC MHC class II, yet determining the exact mechanistic point where IEC-transferred MHC class II impinges on BCR selection requires further investigation.

STAR★METHODS

RESOURCE AVAILABILITY

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources, reagents and additional information should be directed to the lead contact, June L. Round (june.round@path.utah.edu)

Materials availability

This study did not generate new unique reagents. Raw and processed RNA-seq and single-cell RNA-seq (scRNaseq) have been deposited at GEO and are publicly available as of the date of publication. Raw and processed 16S rRNA gene sequencing data have been deposited at SRA and Zenodo, respectively, and are publicly available as of the date of publication. Accession numbers are listed in the key resources table. Microscopy data reported in this paper will be shared by the lead contact upon request.

KEY RESOURCES TABLE

Reagent or resourceSourceIdentifier
Antibodies
CD4 FITC, clone RM4-5BiolegendCat#100510; RRID: AB_312713
Foxp3 APC, clone FJK-16SThermoFisher ScientificCat#17-5773-82; RRID: AB_469457
Helios PerCP-Cy5.5, clone 22F6BiolegendCat#137230; RRID: AB_2561640
RORγt eFluor610, clone B2DThermoFisher ScientificCat#61-6981-82; RRID: AB_2574650
CD3 violetFluor 450, clone 17A2Tonbo BiosciencesCat#75-0032; RRID: AB_2621923
CD3e APC Cy7, clone 145-2C11BiolegendCat#100330, RRID: AB_1877170
CD3e Pacific Blue, clone 145-2C11BiolegendCat#100334; RRID: AB_2028475
CD3e PerCP-Cy5.5, clone 145-2C11Tonbo BiosciencesCat#65-0031; RRID:AB_2621872
IFNγ PE, clone XMG1.2BiolegendCat#505808; RRID: AB_315402
IL-17A PE-Cy7, clone eBio17B7ThermoFisher ScientificCat#25-7177-82; RRID: AB_10732356
EpCAM APC, clone G8.8ThermoFisher ScientificCat#17-5791-82; RRID: AB_2716944
EpCAM eFluor450, clone G8.8ThermoFisher ScientificCat#48-5791-80; RRID: AB_10717391
CD45 violetFluor 450, clone 30-F11Tonbo BiosciencesCat#75-0451; RRID: AB_2621947
CD45 PE-Cy7, clone 30-F11Tonbo BiosciencesCat#60-0451; RRID: AB_2621848
CD45 PE, clone 30-F11Tonbo BiosciencesCat#50-0451; RRID: AB_2621763
CD103 PE, clone 2E7BiolegendCat#121406; RRID: AB_1133989
CD103 APC-Cy7, clone 2E7BiolegendCat#121432; RRID: AB_2566552
CD11c SuperBright 600, clone N418ThermoFisher ScientificCat#63-0114-82; RRID: AB_2722930
CD11c FITC, clone N418BiolegendCat#117306, RRID: AB_313775
Anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (Fc Shield)Tonbo BiosciencesCat#70-0161
I-Ak PE, clone 10-3.6BiolegendCat#109908; RRID: AB_313457
CX3CR1 PE/Dazzle 594, clone SA011F11BiolegendCat#149013; RRID: AB_2565697
CX3CR1 Brilliant Violet 510, clone SA011F11BiolegendCat#149025; RRID: AB_2565707
CD11b PE-Cy7, clone M1/70Tonbo BiosciencesCat#60-0112; RRID: AB_2621836
Ly-6C AlexaFluor 488, clone HK1.4BiolegendCat#128022; RRID: AB_10639728
CD64 Brilliant Violet 711, clone X54-5/7.1BiolegendCat#139311; RRID: AB_2563846
CD279 (PD-1) PE-Cy7, clone 29F.1A12BiolegendCat#135216; RRID: AB_10689635
CD185 (CXCR5) PE, clone SPRCL5ThermoFisher ScientificCat#12-7185-80; RRID: AB_11218887
CD45.1 FITC, clone A20BiolegendCat#110705; RRID: AB_313494
CD45.1 PE, clone A20Tonbo BiosciencesCat#50-0453; RRID: AB_2621765
CD4 violetFluor 450, clone GK1.5Tonbo BiosciencesCat#75-0041; RRID: AB_2621927
CD45.2 PE-Cy7, clone 104Tonbo BiosciencesCat#60-0454; RRID: AB_2621851
I-A/I-E (H2-A) PE, clone M5/114.15.2BiolegendCat#107608; RRID: AB_313323
I-A/I-E (H2-A) APC, clone M5/114.15.2BiolegendCat#107613; RRID: AB_313328
I-A/I-E (H2-A) AlexaFluor 647, clone M5/114.15.2BiolegendCat#107618; RRID: AB_493525
I-Ab (H2-Ab) APC, clone AF6-120.1BiolegendCat#116418; RRID: AB_10574160
HLA-DR PE, clone L243Tonbo BiosciencesCat#50-9952; RRID: AB_2621813
CD19 PerCP-Cy5.5, clone 1D3Tonbo BiosciencesCat#65-0193; RRID: AB_2621887
Ly-6G PerCP-Cy5.5, clone 1A8Tonbo BiosciencesCat#65-1276; RRID: AB_2621899
NK1.1 (CD161) PerCP-Cy5.5, clone PK136Tonbo BiosciencesCat#65-5941; RRID: AB_2621910
CD80 PE, clone 16-10A1BiolegendCat#104707; RRID: AB_313128
IgA PE, clone mA-6e1ThermoFisher ScientificCat#12-4204-83; RRID: AB_465918
IgG1 CruzFluor 555Santa Cruz BiotechnologyCat#sc-395765
IgG3 CruzFluor 555Santa Cruz BiotechnologyCat#sc-395780
IgM APC-Cy7, clone RMM-1BiolegendCat#406516; RRID: AB_10660305
IgD AlexaFluor647, clone 11-26c.2aBiolegendCat#405708; RRID: AB_893528
B220 PerCP-Cy5.5, clone RA3-6B2ThermoFisher ScientificCat#45-0452-82; RRID: AB_1107006
GL7 FITC, clone GL7BiolegendCat#144604; RRID: AB_2561697
FAS (CD95) PE-Cy7, clone Jo2BD BiosciencesCat#557653; RRID: AB_396768
Bacterial and virus strains
Biological samplesN/A
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins
Dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) salt, MW36000-50000MP BioCat#0216011090; CAS: 9011-18-1
Ghost Dye Red 780Tonbo BiosciencesCat#13-0865-T100
Ghost Dye Violet 510Tonbo BiosciencesCat#13-0870-T100
OVA peptide 329-337AnaspecCat#AS-64777
OvalbuminSigmaCat#A5503
CFSEThermoFisher ScientificCat#50-169-50
GM-CSFBiolegendCat#576304
CSFBiolegendCat#574802
Recombinant mouse IFNγ (carrier-free)BiolegendCat#575306
Sodium PyruvateCorningCat#10013CV
Penicillin-StreptomycinCorningCat#30-001-C1
Non-essential amino acidsCorningCat#25-025-C1
Pam3CSK4InvivogenCat#tlrl-pms
Dispase IIMillipore-SigmaCat#4942078001
DNase IWorthington BiochemicalCat#LS002139
Collagenase DMillipore-SigmaCat#11088866001
SYBR Green IThermoFisher ScientificCat#S7563
FITC-dextran (3000-5000 MW)Millipore-SigmaCat#FD4; CAS: 60842-46-8
TRIzol ReagentThermoFisher ScientificCat#15596026
LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master MixRocheCat#04707516001
Phalloidin Fluorescent Dye 555-IAbnovaCat#u0289
Formalin, buffered 10%Fisher ScientificCat#SF100-4
Critical commercial assays
CD45+ microbeads, mouseMiltenyiCat#130-052-301
CD4+ T cell isolation kit, mouseMiltenyiCat#130-104-454
Chromium Single Cell 5′ Library and Gel Bead Kit10X GenomicsCat#PN-1000006
Chromium Single Cell 5′ Library Construction Kit10X GenomicsCat#PN-1000020
Chromium Single Cell V(D)J Enrichment Kit, Mouse B Cell10X GenomicsCat#PN-1000072
Chromium Single Cell A Chip Kit10X GenomicsCat#PN-120236
Direct-zol RNA microprepZymo ResearchCat#R2061
PowerFecal DNA Isolation KitQIAGENCat#12830-50
qScript cDNA SuperMixQuantaBioCat#95048
TruSeq Stranded RNA kit with Ribo-Zero GoldIlluminaCat#RS-122-2301
NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep KitNEBCat#E7760
IgG (Total) Mouse ELISA KitThermoFisher ScientificCat#88-50400-88
IgA Mouse ELISA KitThermoFisher ScientificCat#88-50450-22
Deposited data
Raw 16S sequence dataThis paperSRA: SRP334816
Processed 16S sequence data and processing codeThis paper https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5485145
Raw and analyzed RNaseq, sorted IECsThis paperGEO: GSE183709
Raw and analyzed RNaseq, ileum tissue during DSS-colitisThis paperGEO: GSE183708
Raw and analyzed scRNaseq CD45+ cell 5′ expression dataThis paperGEO: GSE183710
Raw and analyzed scRNaseq V(D)J dataThis paperGEO: GSE183711
Experimental models: Cell lines
MODEK cells Vidal et al., 1993 N/A
Experimental models: Organisms/strains
Mouse: H2-Ab1loxP/loxPThe Jackson LaboratoryCat#013181
Mouse: Villin:CreThe Jackson LaboratoryCat#004586
Mouse: IECΔMHCII: H2-Ab1loxP/loxP; Villin:CreTg/−This paperN/A
Mouse: WT: H2-Ab1loxP/loxP;Villin:Cre−/−This paperN/A
Mouse: TCRβ−/−The Jackson LaboratoryCat#002118
Mouse: H2-Ab1−/−TaconicCat#ABBN12
Mouse: mT/mGThe Jackson LaboratoryCat#007676
Mouse: NSG-Ab DR4The Jackson LaboratoryCat#017637
Mouse: OT-IIThe Jackson LaboratoryCat#004194
Mouse: CD45.1The Jackson LaboratoryCat#002014
Mouse: OT-II;CD45.1This paperN/A
Oligonucleotides
ill_S-D-Bact-0346-a-S-17: AATGATAC GGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACXXX XXXXXACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACG CTCTTCCGATCTTAGGGRGGCWGC AGTRRGG Kubinak et al., 2015a N/A
ill_S-D-Bact-0781-b-A-23: CAA GCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGAT XXXXXXXXGTGACTGGAGTTC AGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCTT TCTACHVGGGTATCTAATCCTGTT Kubinak et al., 2015a N/A
Prok16SV34_For: AATGATACG GCGACCACCGAGATCTACAC XXXXXXXXACACTCTTTCCCTAC ACGACGCTCTTCCGATCTTGC CTACGGGNBGCASCAG Takahashi et al., 2014 N/A
Prok16SV34_Rev: CAAGC AGAAGACGGCATACGAGA TXXXXXXXXGTGACTGGAGT TCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCG ATCTGCGACTACNVGGGTA TCTAATCC Takahashi et al., 2014 N/A
Software and algorithms
Biojupies Torre et al., 2018 https://maayanlab.cloud/biojupies/
USeqRRID: SCR_004753; http://useq.sourceforge.net/
NovoalignRRID: SCR_014818; http://www.novocraft.com/
TopHat2 Kim et al., 2013 RRID: SCR_013035; https://ccb.jhu.edu/software/tophat/index.shtml
Limma Ritchie et al., 2015 RRID: SCR_010943; https://bioconductor.org/
GenomicAlignments Lawrence et al., 2013 https://bioconductor.org/
QIIME2 Bolyen et al., 2019 RRID: SCR_021258; https://qiime2.org
Cutadapt Martin, 2011 QIIME2 plugin
VSEARCH Rognes et al., 2016 QIIME2 plugin
Deblur Amir et al., 2017 QIIME2 plugin
q2-feature-classifier Bokulich et al., 2018 QIIME2 plugin
Scikit-learn Pedregosa et al., 2011 QIIME2 plugin
Seurat Butler et al., 2018 https://satijalab.org/seurat/
CIPR Ekiz et al., 2020 https://github.com/atakanekiz/CIPR-Shiny
CellRanger10X Genomics https://www.10xgenomics.com/
vegan Oksanen et al., 2019 RRID: SCR_011950; https://cran.r-project.org/
Change-O Gupta et al., 2015 https://bitbucket.org/kleinstein/changeo/downloads/
GraphPad PrismGraphPad SoftwareRRID: SCR_002798; https://www.graphpad.com:443/
IDEAS SoftwareLuminex https://www.luminexcorp.com/imagestreamx-mk-ii/#software
FlowJoBD Biosciences https://www.flowjo.com
Other
2.8 mm ceramic beadsOmni InternationalCat#19-646-3
Mini-Beadbeater-16Biospec ProductsCat#607
All original code has been deposited at Zenodo and is publicly available as of the date of the publication. DOIs are listed in the key resources table. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.

EXPERIMENTAL MODELS AND SUBJECT DETAILS

Mice

All mice described in these studies were on the C57BL/6J genetic background with the exception of the GF mice data shown in Figures 1D-1F which used Swiss Webster (SW) mice. Mice were housed in animal facility at the University of Utah and all experiments were in adherence to federal regulations as well as the guidelines for animal use set forth by the University of Utah Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Mice were age- and sex-matched for all experiments and mice from both sexes are reported in the data, but analysis of sex-specific differences was not performed. We used 8-16 week old mice for all experiments except for individually housed animals assessed from 4-7 weeks old in Figure 2E. Animals were genotyped prior to weaning at 3 weeks of age and separated by sex and genotype at weaning except where we have noted they were cohoused by genotypes. H2-Ab1loxP/loxP mice (Jackson Laboratories, stock # 013181) were crossed with Villin:Cre mice (Jackson Laborartories, stock # 004586) to obtain IECΔMHCII mice. Due to known low-level testes expression of Cre recombinase in Villin:Cre mice, breeder pairs were always maintained as female H2-Ab1loxP/loxP;Villin:CreTg/− (i.e., IECΔMHCII) with male H2-Ab1loxP/loxP;Villin:Cre−/− (i.e., “WT”) to prevent germline knockouts from occurring, and to allow comparison of WT and IECΔMHCII among littermates. All mice were genotyped for the presence of the Villin:Cre construct, as well as the first H2-Ab1 exon that is flanked by loxP sites in these mice to ensure germline deletions were not present. Additionally, IEC H2A phenotype was confirmed by flow cytometry of epithelial cells for all experiments. We improved on the supplier-provided genotyping protocol for Villin:Cre by using primers that spanned the Villin gene promoter and Cre junction. The Villin:Cre targeting forward primer (5′-ACCCCCATAGGAAGCCAGTT-3′) and reverse primer (5′-GTTTTTACTGC CAGACCGCG-3′) were used in conjunction with internal positive control primers (Jackson lab primers oIMR7338/oIMR7339; 5′-CTAGGCCACAGAATTGAAAGATCT-3′ / 5′-GTAGGTGGAAATTCTAGCATCATCC-3′) to yield an approximately 450 base-pair fragment for Villin:Cre-positive mice with a 324 base-pair fragment for the internal positive control. The amplification program was as follows: 95°C for 2 minutes, 35 cycles of 95°C for 20 s, 62°C for 15 s, 72°C for 20 s, and a final 2 minute extension at 72°C. To obtain the T cell-deficient mice with IEC-conditional H2-Ab1 knockout (TCRβ−/−; IECΔMHCII or wT), we crossed the IECΔMHCII to Tcrb knockout mice (Jackson Laboratories, 002118) and interbred to obtain homozygous Tcrb knockouts and homozygous H2-Ab1 floxed mice, then maintained them with breeder pairings as described for IECΔMHCII animals with respect to the Villin:Cre. The Tcrb knockout was genotyped with the standard PCR genotyping protocol provided by Jackson Laboratories. H2-Ab1 total body knockout mice on the C57BL/6 background were purchased from Taconic (Taconic, cat # ABBN12). mT/mG mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (stock # 007676) and crossed to the same Villin:Cre mice used in all other experiments. 10-12 week old NSG-Ab DR4 mice carrying the human HLA-DR4 transgene were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (stock # 017637) and used immediately as bone marrow donors. OT-II transgenic mice (stock # 004194) and CD45.1 mice (stock # 002014) were purchase from Jackson Laboratories and crossed to create OT-II;CD45.1 donor-mice which were confirmed by genotyping according to Jackson lab’s protocol for the OT-II transgenes and blood phenotyping with anti-CD45.1 and anti-CD45.2 antibodies (Tonbo Biosciences, clone A20 and clone 104).

Cell lines and primary cell cultures

MODEK cells previously described were maintained, and associated with MNPs, in DMEM media with L-glutamine, 4.5g/L glucose and sodium pyruvate supplemented with 10% v/v FBS, 1X penicillin-streptomycin and 1X non-essential amino acids at 37°C (Vidal et al., 1993). Primary sorted, or bone-marrow derived, MNP cells obtained from female H2-Ab1 mice were added to stimulated MODEK cells (directly on MODEK cells or in lower well without MODEK cells for transwell assays) and further incubated under MHCII-stimulating conditions (with fresh media) for 24 hours before staining and assaying by flow-cytometry. Bone marrow-derived cells from female H2-Ab1 mice were skewed by adding GM-CSF for BMDCs or M-CSF for BMMs at a concentration of 20 ng/ml after 3 days in culture and then maintained under skewing conditions for 4 more days before being split and used in MODEK associations 2 days later. Additional details of the plating density and growth conditions during association with MNPs is found in the methods details section under in vitro cell associations.

METHOD DETAILS

Tissue dissection and cell isolation

Lamina propria cells, epithelial cells and lymphoid tissue cells were isolated as we have previously described, with minor modifications intended to increase viable epithelial cell recovery and avoid potential differential representation of cells due to the use of Percoll gradients that have now been shown to be unnecessary (Kubinak et al., 2015a; Goodyear et al., 2014). Briefly, after euthanization with CO2 and cervical dislocation, mLNs, whole small intestines and/or colons were first dissected. We defined the most distal 10 cm of small intestines as ileum and this was cut away from the rest of the small intestine after removing Peyer’s patches along the entire length of the SI. Visible mesentery was carefully removed from the intestines which were then cut open longitudinally and gently scraped with the back of forceps to remove loosely adherent mucus and intestinal contents. These opened intestines were first rinsed for 10 minutes at 4°C with shaking in 10 mL of 1X HBSS (without Ca2+ and Mg2+) containing 1.5 mM DTT and 10 mM HEPES. After rinse, tissue was removed and cut into small pieces then placed in dissociation solution (HBSS without Ca2+/Mg2+ containing 1.5 mM DTT, 10 mM HEPES and 30 mM EDTA), and shaken for 25 minutes at 37°C. Dissociated IECs were collected after incubation by first giving 10 horizontal shakes of the tissues and vortexing for 10 s, then passing the tissue over a 100 μM cell-strainer. The flow-through containing IECs was then passed over a 40 μM cell strainer, rinsed with 10 mL of 1X sterile PBS and the flow-through containing IECs collected. This flow-through was spun down for 5 minutes at 400 x g and rinsed 1X with column buffer then resuspended in column buffer (HBSS without Ca2+/Mg2+ containing 2 mM EDTA, 0.5% FBS, 10 mM HEPES) and cells counted. The tissue collected on the first 100 μM cell-strainer contained lamina propria and this was processed in parallel by first incubating tissue for 25 (SI) or 45 (colon) minutes at 37°C in 15 mL of LP digestion solution (HBSS plus Mg2+/Ca2+ and 2.5% v/v FBS with 50 U/ml Dispase II, 0.5 mg/ml DNase I and 0.5 mg/ml Collagenase D). After incubation, the tissue was vortexed and passed over a 40 μM cell strainer then rinsed with 10 mL 1X PBS to collect liberated LP cells in the flow-through. The flow-through was then spun down for 10 minutes at 500 x g, supernatant poured off and cells gently resuspended in 10 mL column buffer and moved to new tubes. The cells were then spun down as before and rinsed again with 10 mL column buffer and then finally resuspended in 0.5 mL column buffer before counting and staining. Notably, as opposed to our previously described method, no Percoll gradient was used. mLN and Peyer’s patches were placed in 40 μM cell strainers in complete RPMI following dissection. Subsequently, the tissues were broken up on the cell-strainers with plungers from sterile 1 mL syringes and cells that passed through the strainers were collected, spun down for 5 minute at 367 x g, resuspended in complete RPMI and counted before staining.

DSS treatment and pathology scoring

Acutes DSS-induced colitis was induced by providing 3% (w/v) DSS (MP Biomedicals) in drinking water for 6 days. Fresh DSS solution was provided twice during the 6 day administration. Animal weights were obtained before DSS treatment and mice were monitored for weight change daily throughout the experiments. For histology, entire colons were dissected from below the cecum to rectum, lumenal contents flushed out and the tissue fixed in formalin before being embedded, sectioned and H&E stained by the University of Utah Research Histology core. Slides were scored for crypt loss and inflammation as we have previously detailed and the aggregate pathology score was reported (Kubinak et al., 2015a).

Bone marrow and T cell transfer experiments

For MHC-mismatched adoptive transfer experiments, 5 female NSG-Ab DR4 donor mice were euthanized and bone marrow was harvested from the hind limb bones by centrifugation (30 s at 10,000 x g) after removing muscle and connective tissue as previously described (Amend et al., 2016). Bone marrow cells were resuspended in sterile HBSS (without Ca2+ / Mg2+) at a density of 1.9x107 cells per ml and 200 μL (3.8x106 cells) was tail-vein injected into host mice (TCRb−/−; IECΔMHCII or WT) immediately following their second dose of radiation. Host mice were irradiated twice with 450 rads separated by 4 hours. For adoptive transfer of OT-II T cells, donor CD4+ T cells were isolated from spleens of OT-II mice with a MACS CD4+ T cell isolation kit and 4.2x106 cells resuspended in 50 μL HBSS (without Ca2+ / Mg2+) was retro-orbitally injected into WT and IECΔMHCII host-mice following a single dose of irradiation with 400 rads. OVA (Ovalbumin) was then provided in drinking water at a concentration of 1 mg/ml and changed every 2-3 days for 3 weeks after transfer.

Fecal immunoglobulin assays

Fecal IgA and IgG were quantified using ELISA kits (ThermoFisher Scientific) from fecal supernatants prepared as previously described (Kubinak et al., 2015a). Bacteria bound by immunoglobulins were analyzed by flow cytometry of washed fecal pellets stained with SYBR green I and rat anti-mouse IgA (eBioscience clone mA-6E1, PE), anti-mouse IgG1 (Santa Cruz, CruzFluor 555) or anti-mouse IgG3 (Santa Cruz, CruzFlour 555) as previously described (Kubinak et al., 2015a).

Flow cytometry and antibody panels

All end-point flow cytometry analyses were performed on a BD LSR Fortessa instrument and all cell sorting was performed on a BD FACSAria instrument with a 100 μm nozzle. Positive cell populations were identified with the use of FMO (fluorescence minus one) or appropriate isotype controls and viable cells were identified with the use of Ghost Dye Violet 510 or Red 780 (Tonbo Biosciences). FCS files were analyzed with FlowJo (v10) software to identify populations and create count matrices. The I-A/I-E antibody (clone M5/114.15.2) was used for detecting H2-A (MHCII) on all experiments except when distinguishing different haplotypes. To detect MODEK cell-derived H2-A we used the H2k haplotype-reactive antibody I-Ak (BioLegend, clone 10-3.6). To distinguish mouse and human MHCII in bone marrow transfer studies we used a mouse H2b haplotype-specific antibody (Biolegend, clone AF6-120.1) and a human HLA-DR specific antibody (Tonbo, clone L243). All antibodies were used at 1:250 (v:v) dilution in column buffer for cell stains unless otherwise noted. For cell antibody staining, cells were plated at 0.25x106-2x106 cells per well of a 96 well plate, live/dead stained (if included) with 100 μL Ghost Dyes diluted 1:1000 (v:v) in PBS at room temperature for 20 minutes then rinsed once in column buffer. Fc receptors were blocked by adding 100 μL Fc Shield (diluted 1:250 (v:v) in column buffer; Tonbo Biosciences) and incubating for 20 minutes at 4°C. Antibody stains in 100 μL were added directly and cells incubated for another 20 minutes at 4°C, then rinsed twice in column buffer before fixing or running on flow cytometer. Antibody panels used for assays include: H2-Aon IECs (Figures 1 and 2A)(Ghost Violet 510, EpCAM APC, I-A/I-E PE (H2-A), CD45 PECy7), Tregs (Figures 3A, 3B, and 3G)(CD3 violet-Fluor450 or CD3e Pacific Blue, CD4 FITC, Foxp3 APC, Helios PerCP-Cy5.5, RORɣt eFluor610), MNPs (Figures 4C-4F)(Dump PerCP-Cy5.5[CD3, CD19, NK1.1, Ly-6G], CD45 violetFluor450, CD11b PE-Cy7, CD11c SuperBright600, CX3CR1 PE/Dazzle594, Ly-6C AlexaFluor488, I-A/I-E APC, CD64 BV711, CD103 PE), Primary H2-Ab1−/− MNPs after MODEK cells association (Figure 6C)(I-Ak PE, CD45 violetFluor450, Ly-6C AlexaFluor488, CD64 BV711, CX3CR1 BV510, CD103 APC-Cy7), H2-Ab1−/− BMM/BMDCs after MODEK cells association (Figure 6B)(I-Ak PE, CD45 violetFluor450, CD11c FITC, CX3CR1 BV510), OT-II associated with OVA-pulsed MNPs (Figure 6D)(CD45.1 PE, CD3 violetFluor450, Foxp3 APC, CFSE), mTmG mice assayed with Fortessa (Figure 7A)(Dump PerCP-Cy5.5[CD3, CD19, NK1.1, Ly6G], CD45 violetFluor450, CD11b PE-Cy7, CD11c SuperBright600, I-A/I-E APC, CD64 BV711, CD103 APC-Cy7), mTmG mice assayed with ImageStream (Figure 7B)(Ghost Violet 510, Dump APC-Cy7 [CD3e, IgM], CD45 violetFluor450, I/A-IE APC, GFP, tdTomato), MHCII chimeras (Figures 7C and 7D)(Dump PerCP-Cy5.5[CD3, CD19, NK1.1, Ly-6G], CD45 violetFluor450, CD11b PE-Cy7, CD11c SuperBright600, CX3CR1 PE/Dazzle594, CD64 BV711, Ly-6C AlexaFluor488, I-Ab APC, HLA-DR PE), Tfh and Tfr (CD3 PerCP-Cy5.5, CD4 violetFluor450, Foxp3 APC, CXCR5 PE, PD-1 PE-Cy7), OT-II Tfh and Tfr (CD4violetFluor450, CD45.1 FITC, PD-1 PE-Cy7, CXCR5 PE, Foxp3 APC, Helios PerCP-Cy5.5), germinal center B cells (IgD AlexaFluor647, GL-7 FITC, B220 PerCP-Cy5.5, FAS PE-Cy7).

FITC-dextran permeability assays

Assessment of intestinal barrier using FITC-dextran (3,000-5000 MW) was performed similarly to previously described, except mice were fasted overnight (with water provided) instead of only 4 hours before FITC-dextran gavage (Chiaro et al., 2017). 6 μL of FITC-dextran (100 mg/ml in PBS) per gram of body weight was gavaged the morning after fast and followed by 4 more hours of fasting before sacrifice and blood collection. PBS only gavages were given to 2-3 mice as controls to normalize to background signal. Blood was taken by cardiac puncture, allowed to sit 30 minutes at room temperature and then centrifuged at 1500 x g for 10 minutes and the serum supernatant was removed to a new tube. Serum was diluted 1:2 and 1:10 (v/v) with PBS (to ensure a reading within the dynamic range of the plate reader) and 100 μL was assayed in black flat-bottom 96 well plates on a microplate reader with 488 nm excitation and 519 nm emission (Biotek Synergy H1). Average values from duplicates of ten 2-fold dilutions of FITC-dextran diluted in PBS (1 mg/ml starting concentration) were used as standards to generate a standard curve and extrapolate values of FITC-dextran in the serum, and values were expressed as fold-change over serum from PBS-only gavaged mice.

Immunofluorescent histochemistry

10 cm of the distal small intestine was dissected and lumenal contents gently pushed out with the back of forceps before fixing the tissue in 5 mL of 10% buffered formalin solution for 4 hours at room temperature with rocking. Tissue was then rinsed 3 times for 5 minutes each in PBS at room temperature and then placed in 30% (w/v) sucrose overnight at 4 C with rocking. Samples were then embedded and cryosectioned in 9 μm thick sections by the University of Utah Research Histology core. Frozen sections were stored at −70 C until staining. An antigen retrieval step was performed to begin staining of sections for H2-A / MHCII. First, sections were warmed to room temperature, rinsed once in PBS for 10 minutes then transferred to prewarmed (95 C) containers with 10mM citric acid (pH 6.0) and incubated at 95 C for 20 minutes. Containers with slides were then cooled to room temperature and rinsed twice for 5 minutes each in PBS. Sections were blocked for 1 hour at room temperature using a blocking solution of 3% (v/v) goat serum, 5% (w/v) BSA, 0.01% Na-Azide (w/v) and 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 made in PBS (without Ca2+ and Mg2+). Primary labeled anti-mouse I-A/I-E (H2-A) AlexaFluor 647 was then added (diluted 1:250 in blocking solution) and slides incubated overnight at 4 C. Slides were then rinsed 5 times for 5 minutes each at room temperature with PBS. Counterstains with either DAPI alone or DAPI and Phalloidin-conjugated with fluorescent dye 555-I (Abnova) were added to slides and incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature followed by 2 more rinses in PBS before mounting with Vectashield hard set mounting reagent.

Imaging flow cytometry

Tissue samples from mT/mG and Villin:Cre; mT/mG mice were prepared as described for standard flow cytometry. Half of each sample was analyzed with an overlapping, but more extensive, antibody panel on a BD LSR Fortessa (Figures 7A and 7B) and the other half analyzed with the Amnis ImageStream Mk II platform (405, 488, 561,642 and 785 nm excitation lasers; 60X magnification) and ISX software (version 201.1.9.725) using the highest bin mode resolution. Data was then processed with IDEAS software (version 6.3). Cells were first gated based on their brightfield gradient RMS as a measure of focus, followed by their area and aspect ratio to exclude debris and aggregates. CD45+ MHCII+ cells were interrogated for tdTomato surface staining and GFP+ puncta. Fluorescent channel brightness was normalized to the brightest cell per fluorochrome within the CD45+ MHCII+ population.

Single cell RNaseq

Cells from PP and siLP of 4 female WT and 4 female IECΔMHCII were collected as described in tissue dissection and cell isolation section, except DNase was not included in the siLP digestion and the digestion time was increased to 45 minutes. After tissue digestion (for siLP) the cells were washed one more time with column buffer and the isolated cells (from both siLP and PP) were enriched for CD45+ cells using MACS columns with CD45+ microbeads. The collected CD45+ cells from each animal were counted and evenly mixed to provide a single sample of each genotype from each tissue. The University of Utah High-throughput Genomics core then prepared 5′ gene expression and VDJ profiling libraries (from the same cells) with the 10X genomics platform, and libraries were run on an Illumina NovaSeq instrument.

Bulk RNaseq

For RNaseq of sorted epithelial cells, the dissociation fraction of ileal lamina propria preps was used to sort Live, CD45−, EpCAM+ cells from WT and IECΔMHCII mice. After dissociation described in the tissue dissection section, cells were spun down at 367 x g, rinsed once with 5 mL of HBSS, counted and resuspended at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells per 100 μL Ghost Dye Red 780 (Tonbo Biosciences) diluted to 1 μL per ml in HBSS and incubated for 10 minutes in the dark at 4°C. Following incubation, 100 μL of labeled antibodies diluted 1:500 in column buffer (EpCAM eFluor450, CD45 PE) were added and cells were incubated for an additional 20 minutes in the dark at 4°C. Cells were then washed twice in column buffer and resuspended in complete RPMI and kept on ice until sorting. 400,000 epithelial cells from each animal were sorted into tubes with complete RPMI using a BD FACS Aria at the University of Utah Flow Cytometry core. Sorted cells were then spun down at 367 × g for 5 minutes and resuspended in 600 μL TRIzol. RNA was extracted with Direct-zol RNA Microprep kits (Zymo Research, cat # R2062) as per manufacturer’s instructions and eluted with 16.5 μL elution buffer. RNA was quantified with the nanodrop and ranged from 32 - 132 ng/μl. For RNaseq of ileal tissue during DSS colitis, the most distal 2 cm of ileum (without Peyer’s Patches) was dissected, cut open longitudinally and gently scraped with forceps to remove any lumenal contents, then placed in TRIzol and stored at −80°C until RNA extraction with Direct-zol RNA microprep kits after bead-beating with 2.8 mm ceramic beads for 2 minutes with a Mini-Bead-Beater 16 (BioSpec Products). For the sorted lECs RNA-seq, sequencing libraries were prepared from RNA by the University of Utah High-throughput genomics core using the Illumina TruSeq Stranded RNA kit with Ribo-Zero Gold. For RNA-seq of DSS-treated ileal tissue, libraries were prepared with NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep kit for Illumina. For each project, individual samples were multiplexed and sequenced on a single lane of an Illumina HiSeq 2500 instrument with 50 cycle single-end reads. All raw sequences have been deposited in the NCBI SRA under BioProject accession PRJNA758100 and GEO with accession listed in the Key Resources Table.

16S sequencing

Fecal pellets or ileal contents were collected individual mice and immediately frozen at −70°C in 2mL screw cap tubes containing 250 mg of 0.15 mm garnet beads (MoBio, cat# 13122-500). DNA was extracted using the Power Fecal DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio or QIAGEN), per kit instructions and included 2 cycles of 1 minute of bead beating at 4°C on a Mini-Bead-Beater 16 (BioSpec Products). 16S rRNA gene amplification of the V3 and V4 regions with the addition of dual indices described by Kozich, cleaning and multiplexing was done as we have previously described (Kubinaket al., 2015a; Kozich et al., 2013). This method used a single PCR (performed in triplicate for each sample) with primers that contained (described 3′ to 5′) the V3/4 region 16S rRNA gene targeting sequence, then a 2-nucelotide pad followed by the Illumina adaptor sequences and an 8-nucleotide index sequence. The V3/4 16S rRNA gene targeting sequences were those described by Kubinak for all experiments except for the ileal sequencing described in Figures 2F-2H, for which we used the V3/4 16S-targeting sequences described by Takahashi (Takahashi et al., 2014; Kubinak et al., 2015a). The full oligonucleotide sequences are reported in the Key Resources table with indices denoted by Xs. Individual sequencing libraries were multiplexed across 4 different runs and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument in paired-end 300 cycle mode.

qPCR

Ileal tissue (2 cm most distal) was dissected and stored in TRIzol in 2 mL screw-cap tubes prior to RNA isolation. Ceramic beads (2.8 mm, Omni International) were added to tubes and then the tissue was bead-beaten for 2 minutes with a Mini-Bead-Beater 16 (BioSpec Products). Total RNA was then isolated using Direct-zol RNA purification kits and cDNA was synthesized with qScript cDNASuperMix (QuantaBio). qPCR reactions were performed on a Roche LightCycler480 using LightCycler480 SYBR Green I master mix (Roche). All assays were normalized to expression level of Rpl32. The primer sequences used were: Rpl32_F(5′-AAGCGAAACTGGCGGAAAC-3′), Rpl32_R(5′-TAACCGATGTTGGGCATCAG-3′), Tjp1_F(5′-GCCGCTAAGAGCACAGCAA-3′), Tjp1_R(5′-TCCCCACTCTGAAAATGAGGA-3′), Tjp2_F(5′-ATGGGAGCAGTACACCGTGA-3’), Tjp2_R(5′-TGACCACCCTGTCATTTTCTTG-3′), Tjp3_F(5′-CTGTGGAGAACGTCACATCTG –3′), Tjp3_R(5′-TTGGCTGTTTTGGTGCAGGT –3′), Cldn7_F(5′-GGCCTGATAGCGAGCACTG –3′), Cldn7_R(5′-GTGACGCACTCCATCCAGA –3′), Cldn2_F(5′- CAACTGGTGGGCTACATCCTA-3′), Cldn2_R(5′-CCCTTGGAAAAGCCAACCG-3′). Primers were synthesized by the University of Utah DNA synthesis core.

In vitro cell associations

For MNP-associations with MODEK cells, 48 hours before association the MODEK cells were resuspended, counted and then seeded at an initial density of 50,000 cell per ml into standard 24-well plate wells with 500 μL of cell suspension, or into transwell inserts with 90 μL cell-suspension (and 600 μL media only in the lower well), to maintain the same surface-area cellular density in both conditions. This seeding density was found to be optimal such that MODEK cells were not already confluent when the MNPs were added. To stimulate MHCII expression in MODEK cells, recombinant mouse IFNg was added at a final concentration of 100 ng/ml along with Pam3CSK4 at a concentration of 1 μg/ml at initial seeding, which we found to be an even more potent stimulator of MHCII on MODEK cells than IFNγ alone (data not shown). Primary sorted, or bone-marrow derived, cells obtained from female H2-Ab1−/− mice were added to stimulated MODEK cells (directly on MODEK cells or in lower well without MODEK cells for transwell assays) and further incubated under MHCII-stimulating conditions (with fresh media) for 24 hours before staining and assaying by flow-cytometry. Primary isolated, sorted cells pooled from 7 female 9-weekold H2-Ab1−/− mice were added at a density of 3,000 - 5,000 cells per well, while BMDCs/BMMs were added at a density of 20,000 cells per well. To collect cells for staining, the cells were scraped from wells and pipetted up and down with a wide-bore 1 mL pipette tip to avoid enzymatic degradation of surface proteins. Bone marrow-derived cells from H2-Ab1−/− mice were skewed by adding GM-CSF for BMDCs or M-CSF at a concentration of 20 ng/ml after 3 days in culture and then maintained under skewing conditions for 4 more days before being split and used in MODEK associations 2 days later. For association of OT-II T cells and MNPs, spleens from OT-II mice were first collected and CD4+ cells isolated with a MACS column and CD4+ T cell isolation kit. OT-II cells were then labeled with CFSE in DPBS + 0.05% (w/v) BSA for 10 minutes in a 37°C incubator, rinsed twice with complete RPMI culture media, then resuspended and plated in 96-well v-bottom plates at a density of 60,000 cells per well along with 6,000 OVA-pulsed MNPs. Primary isolated and sorted MNP cells were pulsed with OVA(329-337) peptide prior to association with OT-II cells by incubating them with 10 μM peptide for 45 minutes in a 37°C tissue incubator. Then, the OVA-pulsed cells were rinsed twice with complete RPMI and mixed with the CFSE-labeled OT-II cells in a separate plate and incubated together for 72 hours before assay. For MHC-mismatched adoptive transfer experiments, 5 female NSG-Ab DR4 donor mice were euthanized and bone marrow was harvested from the hind limb bones by centrifugation (30 s at 10,000 x g) after removing muscle and connective tissue as previously described (Amend et al., 2016). Bone marrow cells were resuspended in sterile HBSS (without Ca2+ / Mg2+) at a density of 1.9x107 cells per ml and 200 μL (3.8x106 cells) was tail-vein injected into host mice (TCRb−/−; IECΔMHCI1 or WT) immediately following their second dose of radiation. Host mice were irradiated twice with 450 rads separated by 4 hours prior to injection. For adoptive transfer of OT-II T cells, donor CD4+ T cells were isolated from spleens of OT-II mice with a MACS CD4+ T cell isolation kit and 4.2x106 cells were resuspended in 50 μL HBSS (without Ca2+/ Mg2+) then retro-orbitally injected into WT and IECΔMHCII host-mice following a single dose of irradiation with 400 rads. OVA (Ovalbumin) was then provided in drinking water at a concentration of 1 mg/ml and changed every 2-3 days for 3 weeks after transfer.

QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Bioinformatics processing of sequence data

16S rRNA gene raw reads were processed and analyzed within the QIIME2 framework (2019.4) (Bolyen et al., 2019). Demultiplexed and quality-filtered sequences were first trimmed of primer and linker sequences with the Cutadapt plugin, then joined with vsearch, trimmed to 392 nucleotides and denoised with Deblur (Martin, 2011; Rognes et al., 2016; Amir et al., 2017). Chimeras were filtered with uchime-denovo method in the vsearch plugin and taxonomies assigned with the classify-sklearn method in the feature-classifier plugin, against the Greengenes reference set (13_8) trimmed to the amplified region and trained with the fit-classifier-naive-bayes method (Pedregosaet al., 2011; Bokulich et al., 2018). Diversity metrics, distances and statistical significance of beta diversity groupings by permanova were calculated within QIIME2 (Anderson, 2001). All code used for processing of 16S data, as well as the processed ASV tables, taxonomies and phylogenies are available at Zenodo with the DOI shown in the Key Resources table. For bulk RNA-seq from ileal tissue treated with DSS, raw reads were aligned to the mouse assembly GRCm38.89 (mm10) using TopHat2 and per gene aligned read counts for each sample were collated and filtered of genes with less than 2 reads aligning using the R package GenomicAlignments (Lawrence et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2013). For bulk RNA-seq of sorted lECs, raw reads were aligned to the mm10 transcriptome using Novoalign and counts were generated using USeq’s DefinedRegionDifferentialSeq application. For both bulk RNA-seq projects, the resultant count matrices were uploaded and analyzed with the BioJupies framework for differential expression testing and term enrichment tests (Torre et al., 2018). Volcano plots were made in R from the differential expression table values generated by BioJupies which utilized Limma for differential expression analysis (Ritchie et al., 2015). scRNaseq Illumina reads were initially processed using the 10X Genomics Cell Ranger pipeline against the mouse GRCm38 reference assembly, then further analyzed with the Seurat package in R (Butler et al., 2018). We initially filtered out cells that had less than 200 genes detected and genes that were found in less than 5 cells, then filtered cells with higher than 8% mitochondrial reads to exclude low-quality dying cells. We then regressed out the effect of UMI (unique molecular identifier) and mitochondrial gene representation prior to further analysis. Differential expression signatures for cell clusters after combining samples were uploaded to the CIPR tool and used against the mouse ImmGen reference set to annotate cell types of each cluster (Ekiz et al., 2020). Some cell types, particularly in the siLP, had an ambiguous identity score and were manually annotated based on a combination of CIPR identification and direct examination of differentially expressed genes. Cell Ranger vdj was used to process VDJ sequences and the resulting clonotypes count tables were imported in to R. The vegan package in R was used to rarefy without replacement to an even number of observations and to calculate Shannon diversity (Oksanen et al., 2019). The Change-O package within the Immcantation framework was used to import 10X genomics data and assess mutation rates after collapsing cells into clonotypes for each of the detected antibody isotypes (Gupta et al., 2015).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Statistical analyses was performed using GraphPad Prism for all flow cytometry data, ELISA data and qPCR. RNAseq statistics were calculated within BioJupies. 16S sequencing statistics were calculated with QIIME2 plugins (permanova and ANCOM) or within R (anosim using the vegan package) (Mandal et al., 2015; Oksanen et al., 2019). Error bars indicate standard deviation in all graphs and mean or median as noted in figure legends. Error bars in SuperPlots of replicate data indicate SD of replicates (Lord et al., 2020). MFI for flow cytometry data is the median fluorescent intensity. For all figures significance was defined and denoted as * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001. Number of animals used or replicates (n), as well as the corresponding statistical tests used, are denoted in the methods or figure legends.
  85 in total

1.  Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells.

Authors:  Yukihiro Furusawa; Yuuki Obata; Shinji Fukuda; Takaho A Endo; Gaku Nakato; Daisuke Takahashi; Yumiko Nakanishi; Chikako Uetake; Keiko Kato; Tamotsu Kato; Masumi Takahashi; Noriko N Fukuda; Shinnosuke Murakami; Eiji Miyauchi; Shingo Hino; Koji Atarashi; Satoshi Onawa; Yumiko Fujimura; Trevor Lockett; Julie M Clarke; David L Topping; Masaru Tomita; Shohei Hori; Osamu Ohara; Tatsuya Morita; Haruhiko Koseki; Jun Kikuchi; Kenya Honda; Koji Hase; Hiroshi Ohno
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A comparison of the antigen-presenting capabilities of class II MHC-expressing human lung epithelial and endothelial cells.

Authors:  A C Cunningham; J G Zhang; J V Moy; S Ali; J A Kirby
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 7.397

3.  Ubiquitous expression of HLA-DR antigens on human small intestinal epithelium.

Authors:  M Chiba; M Iizuka; O Masamune
Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn       Date:  1988-04

4.  Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2.

Authors:  Evan Bolyen; Jai Ram Rideout; Matthew R Dillon; Nicholas A Bokulich; Christian C Abnet; Gabriel A Al-Ghalith; Harriet Alexander; Eric J Alm; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Francesco Asnicar; Yang Bai; Jordan E Bisanz; Kyle Bittinger; Asker Brejnrod; Colin J Brislawn; C Titus Brown; Benjamin J Callahan; Andrés Mauricio Caraballo-Rodríguez; John Chase; Emily K Cope; Ricardo Da Silva; Christian Diener; Pieter C Dorrestein; Gavin M Douglas; Daniel M Durall; Claire Duvallet; Christian F Edwardson; Madeleine Ernst; Mehrbod Estaki; Jennifer Fouquier; Julia M Gauglitz; Sean M Gibbons; Deanna L Gibson; Antonio Gonzalez; Kestrel Gorlick; Jiarong Guo; Benjamin Hillmann; Susan Holmes; Hannes Holste; Curtis Huttenhower; Gavin A Huttley; Stefan Janssen; Alan K Jarmusch; Lingjing Jiang; Benjamin D Kaehler; Kyo Bin Kang; Christopher R Keefe; Paul Keim; Scott T Kelley; Dan Knights; Irina Koester; Tomasz Kosciolek; Jorden Kreps; Morgan G I Langille; Joslynn Lee; Ruth Ley; Yong-Xin Liu; Erikka Loftfield; Catherine Lozupone; Massoud Maher; Clarisse Marotz; Bryan D Martin; Daniel McDonald; Lauren J McIver; Alexey V Melnik; Jessica L Metcalf; Sydney C Morgan; Jamie T Morton; Ahmad Turan Naimey; Jose A Navas-Molina; Louis Felix Nothias; Stephanie B Orchanian; Talima Pearson; Samuel L Peoples; Daniel Petras; Mary Lai Preuss; Elmar Pruesse; Lasse Buur Rasmussen; Adam Rivers; Michael S Robeson; Patrick Rosenthal; Nicola Segata; Michael Shaffer; Arron Shiffer; Rashmi Sinha; Se Jin Song; John R Spear; Austin D Swafford; Luke R Thompson; Pedro J Torres; Pauline Trinh; Anupriya Tripathi; Peter J Turnbaugh; Sabah Ul-Hasan; Justin J J van der Hooft; Fernando Vargas; Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza; Emily Vogtmann; Max von Hippel; William Walters; Yunhu Wan; Mingxun Wang; Jonathan Warren; Kyle C Weber; Charles H D Williamson; Amy D Willis; Zhenjiang Zech Xu; Jesse R Zaneveld; Yilong Zhang; Qiyun Zhu; Rob Knight; J Gregory Caporaso
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Multivesicular bodies in intestinal epithelial cells: responsible for MHC class II-restricted antigen processing and origin of exosomes.

Authors:  Jürgen Büning; Dorthe von Smolinski; Kianush Tafazzoli; Klaus-Peter Zimmer; Stephan Strobel; Maria Apostolaki; George Kollias; Joan K Heath; Diether Ludwig; Andreas Gebert
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.397

6.  Ubiquitination by March-I prevents MHC class II recycling and promotes MHC class II turnover in antigen-presenting cells.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Cho; Even Walseng; Satoshi Ishido; Paul A Roche
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Intestinal Epithelial Expression of MHCII Determines Severity of Chemical, T-Cell-Induced, and Infectious Colitis in Mice.

Authors:  Deepa R Jamwal; Daniel Laubitz; Christy A Harrison; Vanessa Figliuolo da Paz; Christopher M Cox; Rachel Wong; Monica Midura-Kiela; Michael A Gurney; David G Besselsen; Prashanth Setty; Lonnie Lybarger; Deepta Bhattacharya; Jean M Wilson; Fayez K Ghishan; Pawel R Kiela
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 33.883

8.  Deblur Rapidly Resolves Single-Nucleotide Community Sequence Patterns.

Authors:  Amnon Amir; Daniel McDonald; Jose A Navas-Molina; Evguenia Kopylova; James T Morton; Zhenjiang Zech Xu; Eric P Kightley; Luke R Thompson; Embriette R Hyde; Antonio Gonzalez; Rob Knight
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 6.496

Review 9.  Origin, Differentiation, and Function of Intestinal Macrophages.

Authors:  Calum C Bain; Anika Schridde
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  SuperPlots: Communicating reproducibility and variability in cell biology.

Authors:  Samuel J Lord; Katrina B Velle; R Dyche Mullins; Lillian K Fritz-Laylin
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Reciprocal Interactions Between Regulatory T Cells and Intestinal Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Jiang; Chuan Wu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 8.786

2.  Tofacitinib Downregulates TNF and Poly(I:C)-Dependent MHC-II Expression in the Colonic Epithelium.

Authors:  Shreya Gopalakrishnan; Marianne Doré Hansen; Helene Kolstad Skovdahl; Ingrid Aass Roseth; Atle van Beelen Granlund; Ann Elisabet Østvik; Ingunn Bakke; Arne Kristian Sandvik; Torunn Bruland
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 3.  TREGking From Gut to Brain: The Control of Regulatory T Cells Along the Gut-Brain Axis.

Authors:  Juli Choi; Bo-Ram Kim; Begum Akuzum; Leechung Chang; June-Yong Lee; Ho-Keun Kwon
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 4.  Host gene effects on gut microbiota in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Keyu Guo; Juan Huang; Zhiguang Zhou
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.919

Review 5.  Interactions between the gut microbiota-derived functional factors and intestinal epithelial cells - implication in the microbiota-host mutualism.

Authors:  Harpreet Kaur; Syed Azmal Ali; Fang Yan
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 8.786

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.